QT interval of the ECG, heart rate and arterial pressure using propofol, methohexital or midazolam for induction of anaesthesia

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1990 May;34(4):276-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1990.tb03085.x.

Abstract

The effects of propofol 2 mg/kg, methohexital 2 mg/kg or midazolam 0.3 mg/kg were studied on the QT interval of the ECG corrected by the heart rate (QTc), heart rate and arterial pressure during induction of anaesthesia in 87 ASA class I-(II)-patients. The patients were randomly allocated to one of the three anaesthetic groups. The incidence of the patients with a prolonged QTc interval (= more than 440 ms) ranged from 29 to 41% between the groups. In each group these patients were treated separately. After all anaesthetics, the QTc interval was significantly prolonged in the patients with a normal control QTc interval, whereas in the patients with a prolonged control QTc interval, it tended to be shortened both after propofol and methohexital and it was significantly shortened after midazolam. After injection of suxamethonium, no significant QTc interval changes occurred in the patients with a normal control QTc interval in either the propofol or the methohexital groups, whereas in the patients with a prolonged control QTc interval treated with propofol the QTc interval decreased significantly 60 s after suxamethonium when compared with the corresponding preceding values. The mean values in the propofol group in the patients with a normal control QTc interval were always below the upper limit of the normal range.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anesthesia, Intravenous*
  • Blood Pressure / drug effects*
  • Electrocardiography / drug effects*
  • Heart Rate / drug effects*
  • Humans
  • Methohexital / pharmacology*
  • Midazolam / pharmacology*
  • Propofol / pharmacology*

Substances

  • Methohexital
  • Midazolam
  • Propofol