Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Pregnancy outcome after assisted reproductive technology

Richard Paulson, MD
Section Editors
Charles J Lockwood, MD, MHCM
Robert L Barbieri, MD
Deputy Editor
Kristen Eckler, MD, FACOG


The first pregnancy after in vitro fertilization (IVF) of a human egg and the first birth of an in vitro-fertilized baby were reported in 1976 and 1978, respectively [1,2]. Since then, an estimated seven million pregnancies have been achieved worldwide by IVF and its modifications [3]. These procedures are known generically as assisted reproductive technology (ART) and include gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT), and zygote intrafallopian transfer (ZIFT). In the United States, approximately 1.5 percent of all births [4] and 20 percent of all multiple births are the result of IVF [5]; the rate is higher when all types of medically-assisted conception are considered.

As experience has accumulated, ART success rates have increased and the indications for these procedures have expanded. Concerns about the outcome of these pregnancies have accompanied their increasing prevalence. Both short and long-term outcomes have been studied and the findings are generally reassuring [6,7]. However, research in this field is complicated by the need to distinguish between the effects of ART on outcomes in offspring versus multiple other confounding or mediating factors. Furthermore, these outcomes are influenced by technological changes in the performance of ART, as well as changes in obstetrical and neonatal care, over time [6].

The outcome of pregnancies conceived by ART will be discussed here. An in-depth discussion of IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) procedures themselves can be found separately. (See "In vitro fertilization" and "Intracytoplasmic sperm injection".)


Pregnancy rates after ART are influenced by a variety of factors, which are discussed in detail separately. (See "In vitro fertilization", section on 'Pre-cycle factors associated with success' and "In vitro fertilization", section on 'Pregnancy and live birth rate'.)


Conception by IVF is associated with an increased incidence of several obstetrical and perinatal complications. Most of these are related to the high incidence of multiple gestations [8]. Whereas multiple gestations achieved by IVF appear to have similar outcomes to those of multiple gestations conceived spontaneously, singleton pregnancies after IVF are associated with an increased incidence of complications [9]. The precise reasons for this increase in adverse outcomes are not clear, but potential candidates include: maternal and paternal characteristics, underlying medical conditions associated with subfertility and infertility, sperm factors, the use of fertility medications, laboratory conditions during embryo culture, culture medium, cryopreservation and thawing, prenatal genetic diagnosis (if performed), differences in obstetrical management, increased proportion of multiple gestations and vanishing twins, or a combination of these factors. The effects of advanced maternal age also need to be considered since many women who undergo IVF are older and older women are more likely to have pregnancy complications. (See "Effects of advanced maternal age on pregnancy".)

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information on subscription options, click below on the option that best describes you:

Subscribers log in here

Literature review current through: Nov 2017. | This topic last updated: Aug 15, 2017.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2017 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Reimplantation of a human embryo with subsequent tubal pregnancy. Lancet 1976; 1:880.
  2. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet 1978; 2:366.
  3. http://www.eshre.eu/press-room/press-releases/press-releases-eshre-2012/5-million-babies.aspx (Accessed on May 06, 2014).
  4. Ory SJ. The national epidemic of multiple pregnancy and the contribution of assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 2013; 100:929.
  5. Kulkarni AD, Jamieson DJ, Jones HW Jr, et al. Fertility treatments and multiple births in the United States. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:2218.
  6. Wilson CL, Fisher JR, Hammarberg K, et al. Looking downstream: a review of the literature on physical and psychosocial health outcomes in adolescents and young adults who were conceived by ART. Hum Reprod 2011; 26:1209.
  7. Allen VM, Wilson RD, Cheung A, et al. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2006; 28:220.
  8. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Obstetric Practice, Committee on Genetics, U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Committee Opinion No 671: Perinatal Risks Associated With Assisted Reproductive Technology. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128:e61.
  9. Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, et al. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:731.
  10. La Sala GB, Nucera G, Gallinelli A, et al. Spontaneous embryonic loss following in vitro fertilization: incidence and effect on outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191:741.
  11. Dickey RP, Taylor SN, Lu PY, et al. Spontaneous reduction of multiple pregnancy: incidence and effect on outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186:77.
  12. Kovacs GT, Breheny S, Maclachlan V, et al. Outcome of pregnancies achieved by in vitro fertilisation techniques and diagnosed as twins at the 6 week ultrasound. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 44:510.
  13. Pinborg A, Lidegaard O, la Cour Freiesleben N, Andersen AN. Consequences of vanishing twins in IVF/ICSI pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2005; 20:2821.
  14. Chasen ST, Luo G, Perni SC, Kalish RB. Are in vitro fertilization pregnancies with early spontaneous reduction high risk? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195:814.
  15. Luke B, Brown MB, Grainger DA, et al. The effect of early fetal losses on singleton assisted-conception pregnancy outcomes. Fertil Steril 2009; 91:2578.
  16. Pinborg A, Lidegaard O, Freiesleben Nl, Andersen AN. Vanishing twins: a predictor of small-for-gestational age in IVF singletons. Hum Reprod 2007; 22:2707.
  17. Luke B, Brown MB, Grainger DA, et al. The effect of early fetal losses on twin assisted-conception pregnancy outcomes. Fertil Steril 2009; 91:2586.
  18. La Sala GB, Villani MT, Nicoli A, et al. Effect of the mode of assisted reproductive technology conception on obstetric outcomes for survivors of the vanishing twin syndrome. Fertil Steril 2006; 86:247.
  19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Assisted reproductive technology reports and resources. http://www.cdc.gov/art/ARTReports.htm (Accessed on August 24, 2015).
  20. Schieve LA, Tatham L, Peterson HB, et al. Spontaneous abortion among pregnancies conceived using assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101:959.
  21. Pezeshki K, Feldman J, Stein DE, et al. Bleeding and spontaneous abortion after therapy for infertility. Fertil Steril 2000; 74:504.
  22. Clayton HB, Schieve LA, Peterson HB, et al. Ectopic pregnancy risk with assisted reproductive technology procedures. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:595.
  23. Kupka MS, Ferraretti AP, de Mouzon J, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2010: results generated from European registers by ESHRE†. Hum Reprod 2014; 29:2099.
  24. Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford SB, et al. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2014. MMWR Surveill Summ 2017; 66:1.
  25. Derom C, Vlietinck R, Derom R, et al. Increased monozygotic twinning rate after ovulation induction. Lancet 1987; 1:1236.
  26. Knopman J, Krey LC, Lee J, et al. Monozygotic twinning: an eight-year experience at a large IVF center. Fertil Steril 2010; 94:502.
  27. Luke B, Brown MB, Wantman E, Stern JE. Factors associated with monozygosity in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies and the risk of recurrence using linked cycles. Fertil Steril 2014; 101:683.
  28. Das S, Blake D, Farquhar C, Seif MM. Assisted hatching on assisted conception (IVF and ICSI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; :CD001894.
  29. Lambalk CB, van Hooff M. Natural versus induced twinning and pregnancy outcome: a Dutch nationwide survey of primiparous dizygotic twin deliveries. Fertil Steril 2001; 75:731.
  30. Olivennes F, Rufat P, André B, et al. The increased risk of complication observed in singleton pregnancies resulting from in-vitro fertilization (IVF) does not seem to be related to the IVF method itself. Hum Reprod 1993; 8:1297.
  31. Pregnancies and births resulting from in vitro fertilization: French national registry, analysis of data 1986 to 1990. FIVNAT (French In Vitro National). Fertil Steril 1995; 64:746.
  32. Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, Croughan MS. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103:551.
  33. Helmerhorst FM, Perquin DA, Donker D, Keirse MJ. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ 2004; 328:261.
  34. Pinborg A, Loft A, Schmidt L, et al. Maternal risks and perinatal outcome in a Danish national cohort of 1005 twin pregnancies: the role of in vitro fertilization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83:75.
  35. McGovern PG, Llorens AJ, Skurnick JH, et al. Increased risk of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer or gamete intrafallopian transfer: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2004; 82:1514.
  36. Wang YA, Sullivan EA, Black D, et al. Preterm birth and low birth weight after assisted reproductive technology-related pregnancy in Australia between 1996 and 2000. Fertil Steril 2005; 83:1650.
  37. Katalinic A, Rösch C, Ludwig M, German ICSI Follow-Up Study Group. Pregnancy course and outcome after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a controlled, prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 2004; 81:1604.
  38. Klemetti R, Sevón T, Gissler M, Hemminki E. Health of children born as a result of in vitro fertilization. Pediatrics 2006; 118:1819.
  39. Declercq E, Luke B, Belanoff C, et al. Perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART). Fertil Steril 2015; 103:888.
  40. Luke B, Gopal D, Cabral H, et al. Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017.
  41. Boulet SL, Schieve LA, Nannini A, et al. Perinatal outcomes of twin births conceived using assisted reproduction technology: a population-based study. Hum Reprod 2008; 23:1941.
  42. McDonald S, Murphy K, Beyene J, Ohlsson A. Perinatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization twins: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193:141.
  43. Verstraelen H, Goetgeluk S, Derom C, et al. Preterm birth in twins after subfertility treatment: population based cohort study. BMJ 2005; 331:1173.
  44. Schieve LA, Ferre C, Peterson HB, et al. Perinatal outcome among singleton infants conceived through assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103:1144.
  45. Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Shetty A, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2012; 98:368.
  46. Wennerholm UB, Henningsen AK, Romundstad LB, et al. Perinatal outcomes of children born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a Nordic cohort study from the CoNARTaS group. Hum Reprod 2013; 28:2545.
  47. Maas K, Galkina E, Thornton K, et al. No change in live birthweight of IVF singleton deliveries over an 18-year period despite significant clinical and laboratory changes. Hum Reprod 2016; 31:1987.
  48. Draper ES, Kurinczuk JJ, Abrams KR, Clarke M. Assessment of separate contributions to perinatal mortality of infertility history and treatment: a case-control analysis. Lancet 1999; 353:1746.
  49. McElrath TF, Wise PH. Fertility therapy and the risk of very low birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90:600.
  50. Wang JX, Norman RJ, Kristiansson P. The effect of various infertility treatments on the risk of preterm birth. Hum Reprod 2002; 17:945.
  51. Zhu JL, Obel C, Hammer Bech B, et al. Infertility, infertility treatment, and fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110:1326.
  52. Cooper AR, O'Neill KE, Allsworth JE, et al. Smaller fetal size in singletons after infertility therapies: the influence of technology and the underlying infertility. Fertil Steril 2011; 96:1100.
  53. Raatikainen K, Kuivasaari-Pirinen P, Hippeläinen M, Heinonen S. Comparison of the pregnancy outcomes of subfertile women after infertility treatment and in naturally conceived pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2012; 27:1162.
  54. Romundstad LB, Romundstad PR, Sunde A, et al. Effects of technology or maternal factors on perinatal outcome after assisted fertilisation: a population-based cohort study. Lancet 2008; 372:737.
  55. Seggers J, Pontesilli M, Ravelli AC, et al. Effects of in vitro fertilization and maternal characteristics on perinatal outcomes: a population-based study using siblings. Fertil Steril 2016; 105:590.
  56. Bay B, Mortensen EL, Golombok S, et al. Long-awaited pregnancy: intelligence and academic performance in offspring of infertile parents-a cohort study. Fertil Steril 2016; 106:1033.
  57. Balayla J, Sheehy O, Fraser WD, et al. Neurodevelopmental Outcomes After Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Obstet Gynecol 2017.
  58. Barbuscia A, Mills MC. Cognitive development in children up to age 11 years born after ART-a longitudinal cohort study. Hum Reprod 2017; 32:1482.
  59. Bay B, Mortensen EL, Kesmodel US. Assisted reproduction and child neurodevelopmental outcomes: a systematic review. Fertil Steril 2013; 100:844.
  60. Conti E, Mazzotti S, Calderoni S, et al. Are children born after assisted reproductive technology at increased risk of autism spectrum disorders? A systematic review. Hum Reprod 2013; 28:3316.
  61. Diop H, Gopal D, Cabral H, et al. Assisted Reproductive Technology and Early Intervention Program Enrollment. Pediatrics 2016; 137:e20152007.
  62. Yeung EH, Sundaram R, Bell EM, et al. Examining Infertility Treatment and Early Childhood Development in the Upstate KIDS Study. JAMA Pediatr 2016; 170:251.
  63. Yeung EH, Sundaram R, Bell EM, et al. Infertility treatment and children's longitudinal growth between birth and 3 years of age. Hum Reprod 2016; 31:1621.
  64. Rojas-Marcos PM, David R, Kohn B. Hormonal effects in infants conceived by assisted reproductive technology. Pediatrics 2005; 116:190.
  65. Belva F, Roelants M, Painter R, et al. Pubertal development in ICSI children. Hum Reprod 2012; 27:1156.
  66. Heisey AS, Bell EM, Herdt-Losavio ML, Druschel C. Surveillance of congenital malformations in infants conceived through assisted reproductive technology or other fertility treatments. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2015; 103:119.
  67. Boulet SL, Kirby RS, Reefhuis J, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects among liveborn infants in Florida, Massachusetts, and Michigan, 2000-2010. JAMA Pediatr 2016; :e1.
  68. Wen J, Jiang J, Ding C, et al. Birth defects in children conceived by in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2012; 97:1331.
  69. Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med 2012; 366:1803.
  70. Shevell T, Malone FD, Vidaver J, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106:1039.
  71. Conway DA, Patel SS, Liem J, et al. The risk of cytogenetic abnormalities in the late first trimester of pregnancies conceived through assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 2011; 95:503.
  72. Bonduelle M, Camus M, De Vos A, et al. Seven years of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and follow-up of 1987 subsequent children. Hum Reprod 1999; 14 Suppl 1:243.
  73. Batcheller A, Cardozo E, Maguire M, et al. Are there subtle genome-wide epigenetic alterations in normal offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technologies? Fertil Steril 2011; 96:1306.
  74. Vermeiden JP, Bernardus RE. Are imprinting disorders more prevalent after human in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection? Fertil Steril 2013; 99:642.
  75. Mussa A, Molinatto C, Cerrato F, et al. Assisted Reproductive Techniques and Risk of Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome. Pediatrics 2017; 140.
  76. Amor DJ, Halliday J. A review of known imprinting syndromes and their association with assisted reproduction technologies. Hum Reprod 2008; 23:2826.
  77. Doornbos ME, Maas SM, McDonnell J, et al. Infertility, assisted reproduction technologies and imprinting disturbances: a Dutch study. Hum Reprod 2007; 22:2476.
  78. De Rycke M, Liebaers I, Van Steirteghem A. Epigenetic risks related to assisted reproductive technologies: risk analysis and epigenetic inheritance. Hum Reprod 2002; 17:2487.
  79. Gosden R, Trasler J, Lucifero D, Faddy M. Rare congenital disorders, imprinted genes, and assisted reproductive technology. Lancet 2003; 361:1975.
  80. Bowdin S, Allen C, Kirby G, et al. A survey of assisted reproductive technology births and imprinting disorders. Hum Reprod 2007; 22:3237.
  81. Manipalviratn S, DeCherney A, Segars J. Imprinting disorders and assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 2009; 91:305.
  82. Hargreave M, Jensen A, Toender A, et al. Fertility treatment and childhood cancer risk: a systematic meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2013; 100:150.
  83. Romundstad LB, Romundstad PR, Sunde A, et al. Increased risk of placenta previa in pregnancies following IVF/ICSI; a comparison of ART and non-ART pregnancies in the same mother. Hum Reprod 2006; 21:2353.
  84. Sun LM, Walker MC, Cao HL, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and placenta-mediated adverse pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114:818.
  85. Healy DL, Breheny S, Halliday J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for obstetric haemorrhage in 6730 singleton births after assisted reproductive technology in Victoria Australia. Hum Reprod 2010; 25:265.
  86. Tandberg A, Klungsøyr K, Romundstad LB, Skjærven R. Pre-eclampsia and assisted reproductive technologies: consequences of advanced maternal age, interbirth intervals, new partner and smoking habits. BJOG 2015; 122:915.
  87. Martin AS, Monsour M, Kissin DM, et al. Trends in Severe Maternal Morbidity After Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States, 2008-2012. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127:59.
  88. Martin AS, Zhang Y, Crawford S, et al. Antenatal Hospitalizations Among Pregnancies Conceived With and Without Assisted Reproductive Technology. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127:941.
  89. Masoudian P, Nasr A, de Nanassy J, et al. Oocyte donation pregnancies and the risk of preeclampsia or gestational hypertension: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214:328.
  90. Jeve YB, Potdar N, Opoku A, Khare M. Donor oocyte conception and pregnancy complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2016; 123:1471.
  91. Luke B, Gopal D, Cabral H, et al. Adverse pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes in twins: Effects of maternal fertility status and infant gender combinations The Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017.
  92. Qin JB, Wang H, Sheng X, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and risk of adverse obstetric outcomes in dichorionic twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2016; 105:1180.
  93. Wisborg K, Ingerslev HJ, Henriksen TB. IVF and stillbirth: a prospective follow-up study. Hum Reprod 2010; 25:1312.
  94. Luke B, Brown MB, Grainger DA, et al. The sex ratio of singleton offspring in assisted-conception pregnancies. Fertil Steril 2009; 92:1579.
  95. Dean JH, Chapman MG, Sullivan EA. The effect on human sex ratio at birth by assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures--an assessment of babies born following single embryo transfers, Australia and New Zealand, 2002-2006. BJOG 2010; 117:1628.
  96. Maalouf WE, Mincheva MN, Campbell BK, Hardy IC. Effects of assisted reproductive technologies on human sex ratio at birth. Fertil Steril 2014; 101:1321.
  97. Chang HJ, Lee JR, Jee BC, et al. Impact of blastocyst transfer on offspring sex ratio and the monozygotic twinning rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2009; 91:2381.
  98. Fruchter E, Beck-Fruchter R, Hourvitz A, et al. Health and functioning of adolescents conceived by assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 2017; 107:774.
  99. Halliday J, Wilson C, Hammarberg K, et al. Comparing indicators of health and development of singleton young adults conceived with and without assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 2014; 101:1055.
  100. Scherrer U, Rimoldi SF, Rexhaj E, et al. Systemic and pulmonary vascular dysfunction in children conceived by assisted reproductive technologies. Circulation 2012; 125:1890.
  101. Ceelen M, van Weissenbruch MM, Vermeiden JP, et al. Cardiometabolic differences in children born after in vitro fertilization: follow-up study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93:1682.
  102. Valenzuela-Alcaraz B, Crispi F, Bijnens B, et al. Assisted reproductive technologies are associated with cardiovascular remodeling in utero that persists postnatally. Circulation 2013; 128:1442.
  103. Carson C, Sacker A, Kelly Y, et al. Asthma in children born after infertility treatment: findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Hum Reprod 2013; 28:471.
  104. Källén B, Finnström O, Nygren KG, Otterblad Olausson P. Asthma in Swedish children conceived by in vitro fertilisation. Arch Dis Child 2013; 98:92.