Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these are addressed by vetting through a multi-level review process, and through requirements for references to be provided to support the content. Appropriately referenced content is required of all authors and must conform to UpToDate standards of evidence.
INTRODUCTION — Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is an obstetric emergency with many potentially effective interventions for management (table 1). In patients with PPH who have had a vaginal birth or whose cesarean delivery has been completed, medical and minimally invasive approaches are the preferred treatment approaches; laparotomy is generally a last resort that is performed when less invasive interventions have failed. During cesarean delivery, uterotonic drugs and manual uterine massage and compression are still the initial treatments for bleeding due to atony, but uterine compression sutures and other operative interventions for control of hemorrhage are performed sooner since the abdomen is already open.
This topic will discuss treatment approaches to PPH that require laparotomy. Medical and minimally invasive management of patients with PPH is reviewed separately (see "Postpartum hemorrhage: Medical and minimally invasive management"). An overview of issues related to PPH: incidence, pathogenesis, risk factors, clinical presentation and diagnosis, general principles of planning and management, morbidity and mortality, and recurrence, is also available separately. (See "Overview of postpartum hemorrhage".)
EVALUATION OF THE ABDOMEN — Laparotomy to assess and treat suspected pelvic bleeding is, in the author's opinion, best performed through a vertical midline incision to provide exposure of both the pelvis and abdomen. In patients at or post cesarean delivery, the existing incision is used, and extended if needed to provide adequate exposure.
A self-retaining retractor, such as a Balfour or Bookwalter, provides adequate lateral exposure. A posterior rupture is not readily visualized upon entering the abdomen so the entire uterus needs to be inspected carefully.
At laparotomy, the abdominal cavity is irrigated to remove blood and clots and inspected for the source of bleeding. The source of bleeding is usually readily apparent if pelvic, but may not be immediately recognized when it is retroperitoneal (including vaginal and vulvar hematomas), confined to the uterine cavity after vaginal delivery or after closure of the uterine incision at cesarean, or under surgical drapes. These sites should be actively evaluated in patients with compensated shock (normal blood pressure with increasing heart rate).
Intra-abdominal blood without an obvious uterine rupture or bleeding vessel may be due to hepatic or splenic rupture. (See "HELLP syndrome", section on 'Hepatic hematoma and rupture' and "Approach to the adult with splenomegaly and other splenic disorders", section on 'Splenic rupture'.)
TEMPORARY MEASURES FOR STABILIZING HEMODYNAMICALLY UNSTABLE PATIENTS — Severe bleeding often continues while the surgeon is preparing to perform and performing surgical procedures for controlling hemorrhage. Temporizing maneuvers should be attempted prior to performing any surgical procedures, such as opening the retroperitoneum, which will take significant time before the source of bleeding is identified and/or controlled. Even the most simple-appearing hysterectomy in a patient with severe coagulopathy can be very difficult once the pelvis or retroperitoneum fills with blood and structures that were not bleeding start to bleed.
The following measures, in addition to fluid administration and transfusion of blood products, help to support the patient hemodynamically in preparation for and during surgical evaluation and treatment, and can be life-saving. The option chosen depends on the urgency to control bleeding, the source of bleeding (intrauterine versus extrauterine), and the surgeon's expertise and preference.
Highly urgent settings
Manual aortic compression — If there is an immediate threat of exsanguination within a few minutes, the surgeon should palpate the aorta a few centimeters superior to the sacral promontory and compress the aorta just proximal to the bifurcation. This will markedly slow the volume of bleeding and affords a better opportunity for finding and controlling the source of hemorrhage. However, to completely isolate the uterus from its blood supply via collaterals, aortic occlusion above the ovarian and inferior mesenteric arteries and below the renal arteries is required. (See 'Intermittent aortic occlusion' below.).
Manual pressure on the posterior pelvic side walls and the infrarenal aorta can also reduce bleeding while blood products, electrolytes, and volume are being given to stabilize the patient.
Uterine tourniquet — Tourniquets have been used to control bleeding at myomectomy, and for other types of pelvic hemorrhage, and may be useful as a temporizing measure in PPH [1-3]. A bladder catheter or Penrose drain is tied tightly around the uterus as low as possible to occlude the uterine vessels in the broad ligaments, and then secured with a clamp. A second or third tourniquet can also be applied, as needed. (See "Techniques to reduce blood loss during abdominal or laparoscopic myomectomy", section on 'Tourniquets and clamps'.)
Intrauterine balloon tamponade — Commercially available and improvised devices have been used successfully to tamponade bleeding from the uterine cavity after vaginal or cesarean delivery. For each device, the intrauterine balloon is filled until bleeding is controlled; continued excessive bleeding indicates that tamponade is not effective. Intrauterine balloon tamponade has been used alone and in combination with uterine compression sutures ("uterine sandwich"). The technique is described separately. (See "Intrauterine balloon tamponade for control of postpartum hemorrhage", section on 'After cesarean delivery'.)
Ligation of uterine and utero-ovarian arteries — Ligation of the uterine and utero-ovarian arteries can decrease uterine bleeding by reducing perfusion pressure in the myometrium. It will not control bleeding from uterine atony or placenta accreta, but may decrease blood loss while other interventions are being attempted. It does not harm the uterus and does not appear to impact reproductive function . (See 'Laceration of the uterine artery or utero-ovarian artery branches' below.)
Pelvic pack — Packing the pelvis to control otherwise uncontrollable hemorrhage can be a lifesaving temporary option. (See 'Management of persistent bleeding after hysterectomy' below.)
Effective but morbid options
Clamp across utero-ovarian ligaments — Placing a large clamp across the utero-ovarian ligaments is a rapid and simple means of occluding uterine blood flow through ovarian artery collaterals; however, it also effectively ligates the fallopian tubes.
Procedures of last resort
Arterial embolization — If the facility has a hybrid operating room, or an operating room that allows simultaneous surgery and embolization (an appropriately sensitive portable C-arm and carbon fiber table), performing uterine or hypogastric artery embolization in an operating room with the full surgical team in attendance is an option for hemodynamically unstable patients when the above measures have failed.
Embolization after a failed uterine artery ligation is more difficult [5,6], although not impossible. In one study, arterial embolization was successful in 10 of 11 cases of failed surgical ligation therapy for PPH . Thus, uterine artery embolization can be considered an option even after failed surgical ligation due to incomplete/ineffective occlusion. (See "Postpartum hemorrhage: Medical and minimally invasive management", section on 'Consider uterine or hypogastric artery embolization'.)
Intermittent aortic occlusion — Intra-aortic balloon catheters have been used to stabilize patients with life-threatening PPH in extreme emergencies, but evidence of safety and efficacy is limited to case reports [8-10]. This procedure should only be done in life-saving situations where death is imminent and likely without such interventions.
In situations where the risk of massive hemorrhage is known (eg, ultrasound diagnosis of placenta percreta) the intra-aortic balloon catheter can be placed prior to surgery and positioned by an interventional radiologist using fluoroscopy. In an extreme unanticipated intraoperative emergency when no interventional radiologist or vascular surgeon is available, a balloon catheter can be placed directly into the aorta at the bifurcation using a Seldinger technique (initial needle followed by a guidewire over which the balloon catheter is inserted). The catheter is advanced up the aorta and the balloon is positioned under direct vision and palpation, and then inflated. Consultation with a vascular surgeon is recommended prior to removal of the catheter.
The balloon is placed below the renal arteries and above the ovarian and inferior mesenteric arteries to ensure substantial reduction in uterine blood flow (figure 1). Placing the intra-aortic balloon just above the aortic bifurcation may not substantially reduce uterine blood flow because of the extensive collateral blood supply to the uterus (figure 2). For example, the ovarian arteries supply the uterus via the utero-ovarian branches; therefore, if the ovarian arteries are not occluded, then uterine blood flow may not be substantially reduced despite uterine artery, and even internal iliac artery, ligation. Similarly, the inferior mesenteric artery is continuous with the uterine arterial collateral system via the superior rectal artery and its posterior collaterals (lumbar and median sacral arteries); therefore, uterine blood flow may not be substantially reduced if the inferior mesenteric artery is not occluded.
The occurrence of ischemic limb or colon complications from aortic occlusion is a concern. To prevent this complication, the balloon is deflated intermittently and distal pulses are monitored frequently.
Common iliac artery occlusion — Bilateral common iliac artery occlusion using balloon catheters can control catastrophic hemorrhage from placenta percreta during cesarean hysterectomy, but evidence of safety and efficacy is limited to case reports. The catheters are usually placed preoperatively by an interventional radiologist when the potential for massive hemorrhage is high. In situations where there is unanticipated intraoperative bleeding and sufficient time is available, common iliac catheters can be placed in the operating room via a femoral approach by an interventional radiologist.
In one report, occlusion of the common iliac arteries for 53 minutes dramatically reduced blood loss and the patient tolerated the procedure without apparent lower limb damage . The oxygen saturation in the lower limbs remained between 85 and 92 percent during balloon occlusion. Other small case series also suggest benefit [12,13]. This procedure should only be done in life-saving situations where death is imminent and likely without such interventions.
Theoretically, occlusion of the common iliac arteries shuts down collateral flow between the internal and external iliac arteries, resulting in more effective reduction in uterine perfusion than with internal iliac occlusion alone. None of the published cases have described ischemic limb injury despite occlusion times up to 70 minutes, presumably because collateral supply to the leg maintains adequate flow during common iliac occlusion. However, more study of this technique is needed before it can be recommended as a safe and effective option.
Internal iliac artery ligation — Bilateral ligation of the internal iliac arteries (hypogastric arteries) has been used to control uterine hemorrhage by reducing the pulse pressure of blood flowing to the uterus . The utility of internal iliac artery ligation may be compromised when there are extensive collateral vessels (such as in placenta percreta). Reverse filling of the internal iliac arteries has been reported beyond the point of ligation via branches of the external iliac artery (inferior epigastric, obturator, deep circumflex iliac, and superior gluteal arteries) [15,16].
The technique is challenging even for an experienced pelvic surgeon, especially when there is a large uterus, a transverse lower abdominal incision, ongoing pelvic hemorrhage, or the patient has a high body mass index. Successful and safe bilateral hypogastric ligation becomes even more difficult when attempted by a surgeon who rarely operates deep in the pelvic retroperitoneal space . For these reasons, uterine compression sutures and, less commonly, uterine artery ligation, have largely replaced this procedure. The internal iliac ligation procedure is described separately. (See "Management of hemorrhage in gynecologic surgery".)
INTRAOPERATIVE BLOOD SALVAGE — Intraoperative blood salvage may be arranged before laparotomy or requested during laparotomy. Institutions should have designated personnel, which may include cross-trained operating room employee (eg, an anesthesia technician) or a member of a specialist service (eg, an extracorporeal technologist or perfusionist), who are called to manage this equipment and who follow written policies and procedures for proper collection, labeling, and storage of the collected blood.
Intraoperative blood salvage with a leukocyte filter and autotransfusion can reduce the use of allogeneic blood, but its use is investigational in the obstetrical setting [18-21]. Although there is a theoretical concern that reinfusing amniotic fluid may cause amniotic fluid embolism, this has been documented only once . Risk of maternal infection from infusion of bacterial contamination is also minimal. Salvaged blood may contain fetal erythrocytes, but this is not a major concern, as Rh(D) alloimmunization in an Rh(D)-negative mother can be prevented by administration of anti-D immunoglobulin. ABO incompatibility reactions cannot be prevented, but are unlikely to be serious because the volume of fetal blood contamination is small and A and B antigens/antibodies are not fully developed at birth. These risks are probably less than or similar to those from allogeneic transfusion. (See "Surgical blood conservation: Blood salvage".)
TREATMENT — A variety of surgical interventions are effective for controlling PPH. Clinicians should use their clinical judgment in deciding whether to expend time attempting one or more of these interventions in a patient with severe hemorrhage who may be better served by hysterectomy, such as women with diffuse placenta accreta/increta/percreta or uterine rupture. The following list is not intended to be progressive, and any, or many, of these procedures may be used simultaneously. The choice depends on patient-specific factors and surgical expertise.
Cessation of hemorrhage depends on reversal of any coagulopathy, so every effort should be made to reverse contributing factors such as hypothermia, acidosis, and lack of clotting factors. Even if bleeding cannot be completely controlled initially, as long as more blood and blood products are infused than lost, hemodynamic stability can be achieved and maintained. (See "Postpartum hemorrhage: Medical and minimally invasive management".)
Myometrial lacerations — Serious hemorrhage from the uterine incision is generally caused by lateral extension of the incision. Bleeding from a hysterotomy incision can generally be controlled by suture ligation. The angles of a transverse incision should be clearly visualized to ensure that they, and any retracted vessels, are completely ligated. This generally requires exteriorization of the uterus with gentle traction and adequate lateral retraction.
Given the proximity of the ureter to the vaginal angle and bladder reflection, placement of hemostatic sutures laterally to control bleeding from an extension of a hysterotomy laceration should be carried out with extreme caution. If possible, the ipsilateral ureter should be identified before the bleeding is controlled and, once the hemorrhage has been controlled, the integrity of the ureter should be ensured. (See 'Post-laparotomy inspection' below.)
Focal bleeding from the placental site — Focal bleeding from the placental implantation site, presumably due to a small area of morbidly adherent placenta, can be managed by local techniques, such as [23-26]:
●Placement of figure 8 sutures or other hemostatic sutures directly into the placental bed
●Placement of fibrin glues and patches over areas of oozing to promote clotting
●Application of ferric subsulfate (Monsel's solution) to oozing areas
●Excision, if the area is small and easily accessible, particularly in cases of placenta accreta with persistent bleeding
Laceration of the uterine artery or utero-ovarian artery branches — Bilateral ligation of the uterine vessels (O'Leary stitch) is the preferred approach for controlling PPH from laceration of the uterine artery or branches of the utero-ovarian artery [27,28]. It is preferable to internal iliac artery ligation because the uterine arteries are more readily accessible, the procedure is technically easier, and there is less risk to major adjacent vessels and the ureters. (See 'Internal iliac artery ligation' above.)
After identification of the ureter, a large curved needle with a #0 polyglycolic acid suture is passed through the lateral aspect of the lower uterine segment as close to the cervix as possible and then back through the broad ligament just lateral to the uterine vessels. If this does not control bleeding, the vessels of the utero-ovarian arcade are similarly ligated just distal to the cornua by passing a suture ligature through the myometrium just medial to the vessels, then back through the broad ligament just lateral to the vessels, and then tying to compress the vessels (figure 3).
Bilateral ligation of the arteries and veins (uterine and utero-ovarian) is successful in controlling hemorrhage in over 90 percent of patients [28,29] and does not appear affect future reproductive function . Uterine necrosis and placental insufficiency in a subsequent pregnancy have not been described as complications [29,30]. However, there is a single case report of ovarian failure and development of intrauterine synechiae after postpartum ligation of the uterine, utero-ovarian, and ovarian arteries for PPH related to atony .
Atony — The interventions for reduction and control of bleeding due to atony are applied in rapid sequence until bleeding is controlled, which may be the result of the cumulative combined effect of multiple interventions. If uterine atony persists despite uterine massage and administration of uterotonic drugs and tranexamic acid, we suggest rapidly moving on to placement of uterine compression sutures, which are an effective method for reducing uterine blood loss related to atony. Manual compression of the uterus, insertion of an intrauterine balloon for tamponade, placement of a uterine tourniquet, and/or ligation of the uterine and utero-ovarian arteries can reduce ongoing heavy blood loss before attempting the procedure, and may obviate the need for the compression sutures. (See "Postpartum hemorrhage: Medical and minimally invasive management", section on 'Manage atony' and "Postpartum hemorrhage: Medical and minimally invasive management", section on 'Administer tranexamic acid'.)
Uterine compression sutures — The B-Lynch suture is the most common technique for uterine compression; several variations of this technique have been described and no technique has been proven significantly more effective than another . Generally, longitudinal sutures are easier to place and safer than transverse sutures, but this may not always be the case.
Procedure-related complications, such as uterine necrosis, erosion, and pyometra, have been reported rarely [33-38]. Limited follow-up of women who have had a uterine compression suture suggests that there are no adverse effects on fertility or future pregnancy outcome [4,39]. Although uterine synechiae have been reported on postpartum hysteroscopy or hysterosalpingogram, some of these women may have also had curettage, which could account for the finding .
B-Lynch suture — The B-Lynch suture envelops and compresses the uterus, similar to the result achieved with manual uterine compression . In case reports and small series, it has been highly successful in controlling uterine bleeding from atony when other methods have failed [41-45]. The technique is relatively simple to learn, appears safe, preserves future reproductive potential, and does increase the risk of placentation-related adverse outcomes in a subsequent pregnancy [46,47]. It should only be used in cases of uterine atony; it will not control hemorrhage from placenta accreta. It will not prevent postpartum hemorrhage in future pregnancies .
A large Mayo needle with #1 or #2 chromic catgut (or any absorbable suture if catgut is unavailable) is used to enter and exit the uterine cavity laterally in the lower uterine segment (figure 4). A large suture is used to prevent breaking and a rapid absorption is important to prevent a herniation of bowel through a suture loop after the uterus has involuted.
The suture is looped over the fundus and re-enters the lower uterine cavity through the posterior wall. The suture then crosses to the other side of the lower uterine segment, exits through the posterior wall, and is looped back over the fundus to enter the anterior lateral lower uterine segment opposite and parallel to the initial bites. The free ends are pulled tightly and tied down securely to compress the uterus, assisted by bimanual compression.
Proper patient positioning (legs apart, patient flat, or, if stable, in slight reverse Trendelenburg) will enhance the ability to assess the efficacy of these efforts by allowing for better visualization of persistent vaginal bleeding.
The technique has been used alone and in combination with balloon tamponade. This combination has been called the "uterine sandwich." (See "Intrauterine balloon tamponade for control of postpartum hemorrhage", section on 'External compression plus internal tamponade'.)
Other uterine compression suture techniques — Other techniques have been reported in small case series and represent modifications of the B-Lynch suture [43,48-55].
●Hayman described placement of two to four vertical compression sutures from the anterior to posterior uterine wall without hysterotomy (figure 5); thus, this is a good choice for surgical treatment of atony after a vaginal delivery [48,49,56]. A transverse cervicoisthmic suture can also be placed if needed to control bleeding from the lower uterine segment.
●Pereira described a technique in which a series of transverse and longitudinal sutures of a delayed absorbable multifilament suture are placed around the uterus via a series of bites into the subserosal myometrium, without entering the uterine cavity (figure 6) . Two or three rows of these sutures are placed in each direction to completely envelope and compress the uterus. The longitudinal sutures begin and end tied to the transverse suture nearest the cervix. When the transverse sutures are brought through the broad ligament, care should be taken to avoid damaging blood vessels, ureters, and fallopian tubes. The myometrium should be manually compressed prior to tying down the sutures to facilitate maximal compression.
Retroperitoneal bleeding — Identification of an isolated bleeding point in the retroperitoneum is often impossible. It is rarely advisable to open the retroperitoneum or attempt dissection of an expanding retroperitoneal hematoma in a coagulopathic, hemodynamically unstable patient. The temporizing procedures described above can be used to stabilize the patient before beginning retroperitoneal surgery. (See 'Temporary measures for stabilizing hemodynamically unstable patients' above.)
If a discrete retroperitoneal vessel is responsible for hemorrhage, it is clamped and ligated with appropriate suture material. Bleeding adjacent to the uterus without clear bleeding points can be managed by ligation of uterine vessels. If ineffective, ligation of the ipsilateral hypogastric artery usually stops the bleeding and avoids the delay associated with searching for the discrete source of bleeding. If bleeding does not respond to ipsilateral hypogastric artery ligation, then bilateral hypogastric artery ligation and/or pelvic packing may be necessary. Management of retroperitoneal bleeding is discussed in more detail separately. (See "Management of hematomas incurred as a result of obstetrical delivery", section on 'Retroperitoneal hematomas'.)
If time allows, when retroperitoneal bleeding is present and efforts at controlling retroperitoneal bleeding are necessary, ureteral stents may allow palpation of the ureters and placement of hemostatic sutures with more confidence.
ROLE OF HYSTERECTOMY — Hysterectomy is a definitive treatment of uterine bleeding. Regardless of the etiology of PPH, continued blood loss can lead to severe coagulopathy due to massive loss of coagulation factors. Severe hypovolemia, tissue hypoxia, hypothermia, electrolyte abnormalities, and acidosis can result, which further compromise the patient's status. If the patient is not already at laparotomy and has developed these additional complications, then correction of the severe physiological deficits before hysterectomy, if possible, could be life-saving [58,59]. (See "Peripartum hysterectomy for management of hemorrhage".)
In women with placenta accreta/increta/percreta or uterine rupture, early resort to hysterectomy may be the least morbid approach for controlling hemorrhage and may prevent deaths and morbidity caused by delays while ineffective fertility-preserving procedures are attempted. With improving prenatal diagnosis of placental attachment disorders, hysterectomy can often be anticipated and discussed with the patient before cesarean delivery. (See "Clinical features and diagnosis of the morbidly adherent placenta (placenta accreta, increta, and percreta)" and "Management of the morbidly adherent placenta (placenta accreta, increta, and percreta)".)
In contrast, uterine atony can usually be controlled by uterotonic drugs alone or in combination with fertility preserving procedures (uterine compression sutures, uterine artery/utero-ovarian artery ligation, arterial embolization, intrauterine balloon tamponade), as described above. Once the patient is resuscitated and the coagulopathy is reversed, hysterectomy may no longer be required to control hemorrhage. However, if fertility preserving procedures do not reduce the bleeding to a manageable level, then there is no choice but to proceed with hysterectomy.
POST-LAPAROTOMY INSPECTION — At the completion of the laparotomy and before closing the abdomen, the operative field should be inspected carefully for hemostasis. Microvascular bleeding usually can be controlled using topical hemostatic agents. (See "Management of hemorrhage in gynecologic surgery".)
The bladder and ureters should be identified and inspected. The ureter courses horizontally along the peritoneum 1 to 5 cm dorsal to the ovarian vessels and can be identified readily as it passes ventral to the bifurcation of the common iliac artery. Identification of bladder and/or ureteral injury is the same as during gynecologic surgery (visual inspection; possible cystoscopy, dye injection, stent placement to assess for obstruction, ureterography). (See "Urinary tract injury in gynecologic surgery: Identification and management".)
MANAGEMENT OF PERSISTENT BLEEDING AFTER HYSTERECTOMY — Patients with continued severe hemorrhage after hysterectomy can enter a lethal downward spiral characterized by hypothermia, coagulopathy, and metabolic acidosis [58,60]. Criteria proposed for this "in extremis" state include pH <7.30, temperature <35°C, combined resuscitation and procedural time >90 minutes, nonmechanical bleeding, and transfusion requirement >10 units packed red blood cells (RBCs) .
To abort the cycle, the bleeding area is tightly packed and the skin is closed to prevent heat and moisture loss (either with large sutures or with towel clamps). Under most circumstances, the patient should remain in the operating room with continuous monitoring, while replacement of appropriate blood products and correction of physiologic derangements ("damage control") occurs. Once stable and safe for transfer, the patient may be transferred to the intensive care unit for ongoing management until definitive surgery can be performed. This approach halts the downward spiral and lessens the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome. Compartment syndrome is more difficult to define postpartum since postcesarean intra-abdominal pressure appears to be higher than in the general surgical population, especially in women with elevated body mass index and hypertensive disorders . (See "Abdominal compartment syndrome in adults".)
One technique uses a sufficient number of gauze bandages (eg, Kerlix) tied end-to-end to pack the pelvis tightly and tamponade the hemorrhage. The free end of the gauze train is extracorporealized through the main incision. The peritoneum, muscle, and fascia are closed in the usual fashion, but with the gauze protruding from one end of the incision. The subcutaneous and cutaneous layers are left open and packed with additional gauze.
Different surgeons practice slight variations of this procedure ("umbrella pack") [62-70]. One variation is to fill a sterile plastic bag (eg, drawstring bag used to cover x-ray film) or cloth container with gauze and place it against the pelvic bleeders. The drawstrings are pulled through the vagina and attached to a weight, which provides traction so that the pack exerts pressure against the pelvic floor. A balloon tamponade device has also been used as a pelvic pressure pack after hysterectomy for PPH [71,72].
The need for ≥2 units packed RBCs per hour for three hours is a sign of significant ongoing bleeding and need for surgical intervention or arterial embolization by an interventional radiologist. Placement of a large bore drainage catheter (such as a large Jackson-Pratt drain or a chest tube) in the pelvis at the time of temporary closure will allow early recognition of the need for emergency re-laparotomy.
Otherwise, the patient is returned to the operating room to undergo definitive surgical care in 48 hours. Packing should not be removed until coagulation defects have been corrected. If the packing has controlled bleeding, it generally is removed at this time. If it is removed too soon, bleeding will resume, whereas if it is removed too late, pelvic infection or abscess may ensue.
Under general anesthesia, the wound is opened and the gauze is removed with gentle traction. The pelvis is irrigated with saline to clear loose clots and other debris, but aggressive exploration of the pelvis is not performed if no pooling of blood is noted. The wound is then reapproximated in the usual manner. In one study, bleeding did not stop in 20 of 53 women despite abdominal packing; 6 required a second surgical intervention, 6 underwent pelvic artery embolization, and 8 had further intensive resuscitation and pharmacologic treatments .
INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.
Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)
●Basics topic (see "Patient education: Postpartum hemorrhage (The Basics)")
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
●We suggest a vertical midline incision at laparotomy for treatment of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), if the abdomen is not already open for cesarean delivery. (See 'Evaluation of the abdomen' above.)
●In hemodynamically unstable patients, temporizing maneuvers to reduce bleeding should be attempted prior to performing surgical procedures that take significant time to control hemorrhage. The option chosen depends on the urgency to control bleeding, the source of bleeding (intrauterine versus extrauterine), and the surgeon's expertise and preference:
•Manual aortic compression (in highly urgent settings) (see 'Manual aortic compression' above)
•Uterine tourniquet (see 'Uterine tourniquet' above)
•Intrauterine balloon tamponade (see 'Intrauterine balloon tamponade' above)
•Ligation of the uterine and utero-ovarian arteries (see 'Ligation of uterine and utero-ovarian arteries' above)
•Pelvic pack (see 'Pelvic pack' above)
•Clamp across utero-ovarian ligaments (note: will occlude fallopian tubes) (see 'Clamp across utero-ovarian ligaments' above)
•Arterial embolization (procedure of last resort) (see 'Arterial embolization' above)
•Internal iliac artery ligation (procedure of last resort) (see 'Internal iliac artery ligation' above)
●Intraoperative blood salvage may be arranged before laparotomy or requested during laparotomy, but its use is investigational in the obstetrical setting. (See 'Intraoperative blood salvage' above.)
●Bleeding from a hysterotomy incision can generally be controlled by suture ligation. The angles of a transverse incision should be clearly visualized to ensure that they, and any retracted vessels, are completely ligated. If possible, the ipsilateral ureter should be identified before the bleeding is controlled and, once the hemorrhage has been controlled, the integrity of the ureter should be ensured. (See 'Myometrial lacerations' above.)
●Focal bleeding from the placental implantation site, presumably due to a small area of morbidly adherent placenta, can be managed by local techniques, such as placement of hemostatic sutures or topical hemostatic substances directly into the placental bed or excision. (See 'Focal bleeding from the placental site' above.)
●Bilateral ligation of the uterine vessels (O'Leary stitch) is the preferred approach for controlling PPH from laceration of the uterine artery or branches of the utero-ovarian artery. If this does not control bleeding, the vessels of the utero-ovarian arcade are similarly ligated. (See 'Laceration of the uterine artery or utero-ovarian artery branches' above.)
●The interventions for reduction and control of bleeding due to atony are applied in rapid sequence until bleeding is controlled, which may be the result of the cumulative combined effect of multiple interventions. If uterine atony persists despite uterine massage and administration of uterotonic drugs and tranexamic acid, we suggest rapidly moving on to placement of uterine compression sutures, which are an effective method for reducing uterine blood loss related to atony. Manual compression of the uterus, insertion of an intrauterine balloon for tamponade, placement of a uterine tourniquet, and/or ligation of the uterine and utero-ovarian arteries can reduce ongoing heavy blood loss before attempting the procedure, and may obviate the need for the compression sutures. (See 'Atony' above.)
●Identification of an isolated bleeding point in the retroperitoneum is often impossible so it is rarely advisable to open the retroperitoneum or attempt dissection of an expanding retroperitoneal hematoma in a coagulopathic, hemodynamically unstable patient. Temporizing procedures can be used to stabilize the patient before beginning retroperitoneal surgery. (See 'Retroperitoneal bleeding' above.)
●Early resort to hysterectomy is appropriate in women with severe bleeding due to diffuse placenta accreta/increta/percreta or a large uterine rupture. Hysterectomy is generally a last resort in patients with atony, but should not be delayed in those who have severe coagulopathy and require prompt control of uterine hemorrhage to prevent death. (See 'Role of hysterectomy' above.)
●Patients with persistent severe hemorrhage can enter a lethal downward spiral characterized by hypothermia, coagulopathy, and metabolic acidosis. To abort the cycle, the bleeding area is tightly packed and the wound dressed, but left open, and the patient is transferred to an intensive care unit for continuous monitoring, replacement of appropriate blood products, and correction of physiologic derangements. (See 'Management of persistent bleeding after hysterectomy' above.)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT — The author and UpToDate would like to acknowledge Dr. Allan J Jacobs, who contributed to earlier versions of this topic review.
- Taylor A, Sharma M, Tsirkas P, et al. Reducing blood loss at open myomectomy using triple tourniquets: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2005; 112:340.
- Breen M. Temporary treatment of severe postpartum hemorrhage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012; 118:253.
- Luotonen J. [Management of epistaxis]. Duodecim 1987; 103:101.
- Doumouchtsis SK, Nikolopoulos K, Talaulikar V, et al. Menstrual and fertility outcomes following the surgical management of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review. BJOG 2014; 121:382.
- Mason BA. Postpartum hemorrhage and arterial embolization. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1998; 10:475.
- Vedantham S, Goodwin SC, McLucas B, Mohr G. Uterine artery embolization: an underused method of controlling pelvic hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176:938.
- Sentilhes L, Gromez A, Clavier E, et al. Predictors of failed pelvic arterial embolization for severe postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113:992.
- Søvik E, Stokkeland P, Storm BS, et al. The use of aortic occlusion balloon catheter without fluoroscopy for life-threatening post-partum haemorrhage. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012; 56:388.
- Bazin M, Bonnin M, Bolandard F, et al. [Post-partum haemorrhage in delivery room: anaesthetists' practioner in Auvergne]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2011; 30:397.
- Harma M, Harma M, Kunt AS, et al. Balloon occlusion of the descending aorta in the treatment of severe post-partum haemorrhage. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 44:170.
- Shih JC, Liu KL, Shyu MK. Temporary balloon occlusion of the common iliac artery: new approach to bleeding control during cesarean hysterectomy for placenta percreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193:1756.
- Matsubara S, Kuwata T, Usui R, et al. Important surgical measures and techniques at cesarean hysterectomy for placenta previa accreta. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013; 92:372.
- Minas V, Gul N, Shaw E, Mwenenchanya S. Prophylactic balloon occlusion of the common iliac arteries for the management of suspected placenta accreta/percreta: conclusions from a short case series. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 291:461.
- Evans S, McShane P. The efficacy of internal iliac artery ligation in obstetric hemorrhage. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1985; 160:250.
- Buckley B. Interventional radiology in abnormal placentation. RANZCOG O & G Magazine 2010; 12:56. https://www.google.com/search?q=Buckley+B.+Interventional+radiology+in+abnormal+placentation.+RANZCOG+O+%26+G+Magazine+2010%3B+12%3B56.&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoft:en-US:IE-Address&ie=&oe=&gws_rd=ssl (Accessed on July 01, 2017).
- Dubreuil-Chambardel L. Traite des variations du system arteriel variations des arteres du pelvis et du membre inferieur, Masson et Cie, Paris 1925.
- Joshi VM, Otiv SR, Majumder R, et al. Internal iliac artery ligation for arresting postpartum haemorrhage. BJOG 2007; 114:356.
- Rebarber A, Lonser R, Jackson S, et al. The safety of intraoperative autologous blood collection and autotransfusion during cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179:715.
- Rainaldi MP, Tazzari PL, Scagliarini G, et al. Blood salvage during caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80:195.
- Liumbruno GM, Meschini A, Liumbruno C, Rafanelli D. The introduction of intra-operative cell salvage in obstetric clinical practice: a review of the available evidence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 159:19.
- Liumbruno GM, Liumbruno C, Rafanelli D. Intraoperative cell salvage in obstetrics: is it a real therapeutic option? Transfusion 2011; 51:2244.
- Oei SG, Winger CB, Kerkkamp HE, et al. Cell salvage: how safe in obstetrics. Int J Obstet Anesth 2000; 9:143.
- Clausen C, Lönn L, Langhoff-Roos J. Management of placenta percreta: a review of published cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93:138.
- Faranesh R, Romano S, Shalev E, Salim R. Suggested approach for management of placenta percreta invading the urinary bladder. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110:512.
- Chandraharan E, Rao S, Belli AM, Arulkumaran S. The Triple-P procedure as a conservative surgical alternative to peripartum hysterectomy for placenta percreta. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012; 117:191.
- Miller DT, Roque DM, Santin AD. Use of Monsel solution to treat obstetrical hemorrhage: a review and comparison to other topical hemostatic agents. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212:725.
- O'Leary JL, O'Leary JA. Uterine artery ligation in the control of intractable postpartum hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1966; 94:920.
- O'Leary JA. Uterine artery ligation in the control of postcesarean hemorrhage. J Reprod Med 1995; 40:189.
- AbdRabbo SA. Stepwise uterine devascularization: a novel technique for management of uncontrolled postpartum hemorrhage with preservation of the uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171:694.
- Sentilhes L, Trichot C, Resch B, et al. Fertility and pregnancy outcomes following uterine devascularization for severe postpartum haemorrhage. Hum Reprod 2008; 23:1087.
- Roman H, Sentilhes L, Cingotti M, et al. Uterine devascularization and subsequent major intrauterine synechiae and ovarian failure. Fertil Steril 2005; 83:755.
- Kayem G, Kurinczuk JJ, Alfirevic Z, et al. Uterine compression sutures for the management of severe postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117:14.
- Gottlieb AG, Pandipati S, Davis KM, Gibbs RS. Uterine necrosis: a complication of uterine compression sutures. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112:429.
- B-Lynch C. Partial ischemic necrosis of the uterus following a uterine brace compression suture. BJOG 2005; 112:126.
- Joshi VM, Shrivastava M. Partial ischemic necrosis of the uterus following a uterine brace compression suture. BJOG 2004; 111:279.
- Reyftmann L, Nguyen A, Ristic V, et al. [Partial uterine wall necrosis following Cho hemostatic sutures for the treatment of postpartum hemorrhage]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2009; 37:579.
- El-Hamamy E. Partial ischemic necrosis of the uterus following a uterine brace compression suture. BJOG 2005; 112:126.
- Pechtor K, Richards B, Paterson H. Antenatal catastrophic uterine rupture at 32 weeks of gestation after previous B-Lynch suture. BJOG 2010; 117:889.
- Gizzo S, Saccardi C, Patrelli TS, et al. Fertility rate and subsequent pregnancy outcomes after conservative surgical techniques in postpartum hemorrhage: 15 years of literature. Fertil Steril 2013; 99:2097.
- Poujade O, Grossetti A, Mougel L, et al. Risk of synechiae following uterine compression sutures in the management of major postpartum haemorrhage. BJOG 2011; 118:433.
- B-Lynch C, Coker A, Lawal AH, et al. The B-Lynch surgical technique for the control of massive postpartum haemorrhage: an alternative to hysterectomy? Five cases reported. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104:372.
- Ferguson JE, Bourgeois FJ, Underwood PB. B-Lynch suture for postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95:1020.
- Allam MS, B-Lynch C. The B-Lynch and other uterine compression suture techniques. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005; 89:236.
- Sentilhes L, Gromez A, Razzouk K, et al. B-Lynch suture for massive persistent postpartum hemorrhage following stepwise uterine devascularization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008; 87:1020.
- Smith KL, Baskett TF. Uterine compression sutures as an alternative to hysterectomy for severe postpartum hemorrhage. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003; 25:197.
- Fuglsang J. Later reproductive health after B-Lynch sutures: a follow-up study after 10 years' clinical use of the B-Lynch suture. Fertil Steril 2014; 101:1194.
- Cowan AD, Miller ES, Grobman WA. Subsequent pregnancy outcome after B-lynch suture placement. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124:558.
- Hayman RG, Arulkumaran S, Steer PJ. Uterine compression sutures: surgical management of postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99:502.
- Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Uccella S, et al. The Hayman technique: a simple method to treat postpartum haemorrhage. BJOG 2007; 114:362.
- Pereira A, Nunes F, Pedroso S, et al. Compressive uterine sutures to treat postpartum bleeding secondary to uterine atony. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106:569.
- Ouahba J, Piketty M, Huel C, et al. Uterine compression sutures for postpartum bleeding with uterine atony. BJOG 2007; 114:619.
- Cho JH, Jun HS, Lee CN. Hemostatic suturing technique for uterine bleeding during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96:129.
- Nelson GS, Birch C. Compression sutures for uterine atony and hemorrhage following cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006; 92:248.
- Hackethal A, Brueggmann D, Oehmke F, et al. Uterine compression U-sutures in primary postpartum hemorrhage after Cesarean section: fertility preservation with a simple and effective technique. Hum Reprod 2008; 23:74.
- Zheng J, Xiong X, Ma Q, et al. A new uterine compression suture for postpartum haemorrhage with atony. BJOG 2011; 118:370.
- Nanda S, Singhal SR. Hayman uterine compression stitch for arresting atonic postpartum hemorrhage: 5 years experience. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 50:179.
- Alouini S, Coly S, Mégier P, et al. Multiple square sutures for postpartum hemorrhage: results and hysteroscopic assessment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205:335.e1.
- Hess JR, Lawson JH. The coagulopathy of trauma versus disseminated intravascular coagulation. J Trauma 2006; 60:S12.
- Sagraves SG, Toschlog EA, Rotondo MF. Damage control surgery--the intensivist's role. J Intensive Care Med 2006; 21:5.
- Rotondo MF, Zonies DH. The damage control sequence and underlying logic. Surg Clin North Am 1997; 77:761.
- Abdel-Razeq SS, Campbell K, Funai EF, et al. Normative postpartum intraabdominal pressure: potential implications in the diagnosis of abdominal compartment syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203:149.e1.
- Dildy GA, Scott JR, Saffer CS, Belfort MA. An effective pressure pack for severe pelvic hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108:1222.
- Finan MA, Fiorica JV, Hoffman MS, et al. Massive pelvic hemorrhage during gynecologic cancer surgery: "pack and go back". Gynecol Oncol 1996; 62:390.
- Ghourab S, Al-Nuaim L, Al-Jabari A, et al. Abdomino-pelvic packing to control severe haemorrhage following caesarean hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 19:155.
- Awonuga AO, Merhi ZO, Khulpateea N. Abdominal packing for intractable obstetrical and gynecologic hemorrhage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006; 93:160.
- Howard RJ, Straughn JM Jr, Huh WK, Rouse DJ. Pelvic umbrella pack for refractory obstetric hemorrhage secondary to posterior uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100:1061.
- Robie GF, Morgan MA, Payne GG Jr, Wasemiller-Smith L. Logothetopulos pack for the management of uncontrollable postpartum hemorrhage. Am J Perinatol 1990; 7:327.
- Hallak M, Dildy GA 3rd, Hurley TJ, Moise KJ Jr. Transvaginal pressure pack for life-threatening pelvic hemorrhage secondary to placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78:938.
- Dildy GA, Scott JR, Saffer CS, Belfort MA. Pelvic pressure pack for catastrophic postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95:S7.
- Deffieux X, Vinchant M, Wigniolle I, et al. Maternal outcome after abdominal packing for uncontrolled postpartum hemorrhage despite peripartum hysterectomy. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0177092.
- Dildy GA, Belfort MA, Adair CD, et al. Initial experience with a dual-balloon catheter for the management of postpartum hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210:136.e1.
- Charoenkwan K. Effective use of the Bakri postpartum balloon for posthysterectomy pelvic floor hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210:586.e1.