UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Medline ® Abstract for Reference 75

of 'Post-ERCP perforation'

75
TI
CT before and after ERCP: detection of pancreatic pseudotumor, asymptomatic retroperitoneal perforation, and duodenal diverticulum.
AU
de Vries JH, Duijm LE, Dekker W, Guit GL, Ferwerda J, Scholten ET
SO
Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;45(3):231.
 
BACKGROUND: A prospective study was done to investigate the occurrence of morphologic changes after ERCP that present as pancreatic pseudotumor on CT scan. Fifty-eight patients underwent CT before and after ERCP. In addition, post-ERCP complications and the value of routinely obtained CT before ERCP were assessed.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients could be fully analyzed; 12 underwent a papillotomy (group 1). Pseudotumor of the pancreatic head was demonstrated on CT after ERCP in them (17%). No changes were seen in the 27 patients who underwent diagnostic ERCP (group 2) (p = 0.048). Asymptomatic retroperitoneal perforation after papillotomy was diagnosed in 3 patients (13%). Routinely obtained CT scans before ERCP defined a specific etiology of the biliary obstruction in 12% of patients not suggested by ultrasound. Duodenal diverticulum was found in 4 patients, resulting in a sensitivity of 36% and a specificity of 100% for CT. Oral contrast (600 ml) administered a few hours before endoscopy never hampered the endoscopist.
CONCLUSION: Pancreatic pseudotumor on CT after ERCP occurred only when papillotomy was performed. CT remains a valuable diagnostic tool after diagnostic ERCP. Asymptomatic perforation may occur following ERCP with papillotomy. Routinely obtained CT before ERCP was not profitable for the endoscopist in more than 80% of our patients.
AD
Department of Internal Medicine, Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands.
PMID