Medline ® Abstract for Reference 75
of 'Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) septic complications'
Air cholangiogram is not inferior to dye cholangiogram for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a randomized study of efficacy and safety.
Sud R, Puri R, Choudhary NS, Mehta A, Jain PK
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov;33(6):537-42. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic biliary drainage is the palliative treatment of choice in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction. Contrast injection can lead to cholangitis, whereas air cholangiography may have a lesser incidence of cholangitis.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study is to prospectively compare the efficacy and safety of air vs. dye cholangiogram in malignant hilar biliary obstruction.
METHODS: Patients with type II and III malignant hilar biliary stricture were included in a prospectively randomized manner at a tertiary care center. Unilateral self-expanding metal stent was placed in patients with a malignant hilar block using either air or dye as a contrast medium. Outcome measures were successful deployment, successful drainage, early complications, and procedure-related and 30-day mortality.
RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were randomized to air cholangiogram (25 patients, group A) or dye cholangiogram (24 patients, group B). Most of the patients had type II stricture (19 in group A and 20 in group B). Successful stenting and drainage were achieved in 25 (100 %) and 24 (96 %) in group A and 23 (95.8 %) and 22 (91.6 %) (p = ns), respectively. Cholangitis developed in 1 (4 %) and 4 (16.6 %) in group A and B, respectively (p < 0.05). There was no procedure-related or 30-day mortality.
CONCLUSION: Use of air cholangiography was as safe and as effective as dye cholangiography in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction, and it decreased the risk of post-ERCP cholangitis.
Medanta Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta The Medicity, Sector 38, Gurgaon, Haryana, 122 001, India.