Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Overview of rectal procidentia (rectal prolapse)

Madhulika G Varma, MD
Scott R Steele, MD, FACS, FASCRS
Section Editor
Martin Weiser, MD
Deputy Editor
Wenliang Chen, MD, PhD


Rectal procidentia, also called rectal prolapse, is a pelvic floor disorder that typically occurs in older adult women but can occur in men and women of all ages [1,2]. Rectal prolapse results in local symptoms (eg, pain, bleeding, and seepage), bowel dysfunction (eg, constipation, incontinence), and a diminished and disabled quality of life [3,4].

An occult rectal prolapse involves intussusception, a "telescoping" of the bowel on itself internally, without protruding through the anal verge and is not a true rectal prolapse [1]. An occult prolapse (ie, intussusception) does not always lead to full thickness rectal prolapse, although patients may experience similar symptoms (eg, obstructed defecation, seepage) [5-7]. (See 'Clinical features' below.)


The pelvic floor, also called the pelvic diaphragm, includes muscles (eg, levator ani, coccygeus) and fascia that support the pelvic organs of the lower abdominal cavity (eg, rectum, bladder, uterus) (figure 1 and figure 2). The pelvic floor separates the true pelvis from the perineum. The linked figures illustrate the pelvic anatomy for men (figure 3 and figure 4 and figure 5) and women (figure 6 and figure 7). The female pelvic anatomy is reviewed elsewhere. (See "Surgical female pelvic anatomy".)


A complete rectal prolapse is the protrusion of all layers of the rectum through the anus, manifesting as concentric rings of rectal mucosa (picture 1). No standard method of classification has been widely accepted [3]. Complete rectal procidentia is a circumferential full thickness rectal wall prolapse beyond the anal canal [8,9]. Partial procidentia involves prolapse of the mucosa only.


Rectal procidentia is uncommon, with an incidence between 0.25 to 0.42 percent in the adult population [2,10], and the prevalence is estimated at 1 percent in adults over age 65 years [3,10].

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information on subscription options, click below on the option that best describes you:

Subscribers log in here

Literature review current through: Nov 2017. | This topic last updated: Mar 02, 2017.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2017 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Felt-Bersma RJ, Tiersma ES, Cuesta MA. Rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocele, solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, and enterocele. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2008; 37:645.
  2. Kairaluoma MV, Kellokumpu IH. Epidemiologic aspects of complete rectal prolapse. Scand J Surg 2005; 94:207.
  3. Stein EA, Stein DE. Rectal procidentia: diagnosis and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2006; 16:189.
  4. Tou S, Brown SR, Malik AI, Nelson RL. Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; :CD001758.
  5. Felt-Bersma RJ, Cuesta MA. Rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocele, and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2001; 30:199.
  6. Mellgren A, Schultz I, Johansson C, Dolk A. Internal rectal intussusception seldom develops into total rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40:817.
  7. Wijffels NA, Collinson R, Cunningham C, Lindsey I. What is the natural history of internal rectal prolapse? Colorectal Dis 2010; 12:822.
  8. Lowry AC, Simmang CL, Boulos P, et al. Consensus statement of definitions for anorectal physiology and rectal cancer Report of the Tripartite Consensus. 1999. fascrs.org/physicians/practice_parameters/definition_consesus_statement_anorectal_physiology_rectal_cancer/.
  9. Kumar AS. Prolapse: What is that hanging outside of me? whcenter.org/documents/cme/Kumar_Prolapse_WhatIsThat.pdf (Accessed on January 04, 2012).
  10. Patel SM, Lembo AJ. Constipation: Rectal prolapse and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. In: Sleisenger and Fordtan's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease, 8th, Feldman M. (Ed), Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia 2006. Vol 1, p.230.
  11. Madiba TE, Baig MK, Wexner SD. Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Arch Surg 2005; 140:63.
  12. Marceau C, Parc Y, Debroux E, et al. Complete rectal prolapse in young patients: psychiatric disease a risk factor of poor outcome. Colorectal Dis 2005; 7:360.
  13. Mellgren A, Bremmer S, Johansson C, et al. Defecography. Results of investigations in 2,816 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37:1133.
  14. Hiltunen KM, Matikainen M, Auvinen O, Hietanen P. Clinical and manometric evaluation of anal sphincter function in patients with rectal prolapse. Am J Surg 1986; 151:489.
  15. Keighley MR, Fielding JW, Alexander-Williams J. Results of Marlex mesh abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 100 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 1983; 70:229.
  16. Moschvowitz AV. The pathogenesis, anatomy and cure of prolapse of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1912; 15:7.
  17. Brodén B, Snellman B. Procidentia of the rectum studied with cineradiography. A contribution to the discussion of causative mechanism. Dis Colon Rectum 1968; 11:330.
  18. Kuijpers HC. Treatment of complete rectal prolapse: to narrow, to wrap, to suspend, to fix, to encircle, to plicate or to resect? World J Surg 1992; 16:826.
  19. Nicholls RJ. Rectal prolapse and the solitary ulcer syndrome. Ann Ital Chir 1994; 65:157.
  20. Okamoto N, Maeda K, Kato R, et al. Dynamic pelvic three-dimensional computed tomography for investigation of pelvic abnormalities in patients with rectocele and rectal prolapse. J Gastroenterol 2006; 41:802.
  21. Hecht EM, Lee VS, Tanpitukpongse TP, et al. MRI of pelvic floor dysfunction: dynamic true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus HASTE. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191:352.
  22. Madoff RD, Mellgren A. One hundred years of rectal prolapse surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42:441.
  23. Kim DS, Tsang CB, Wong WD, et al. Complete rectal prolapse: evolution of management and results. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42:460.
  24. Steele SR, Varma MG, Prichard D, et al. The evolution of evaluation and management of urinary or fecal incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Curr Probl Surg 2015; 52:92.
  25. Steele SR, Varma MG, Prichard D, et al. The evolution of evaluation and management of urinary or fecal incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Curr Probl Surg 2015; 52:17.
  26. Kaufman HS, Buller JL, Thompson JR, et al. Dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and cystocolpoproctography alter surgical management of pelvic floor disorders. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44:1575.
  27. Maglinte DD, Bartram CI, Hale DA, et al. Functional imaging of the pelvic floor. Radiology 2011; 258:23.
  28. Glasgow SC, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, et al. Preoperative anal manometry predicts continence after perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49:1052.
  29. Williams JG, Wong WD, Jensen L, et al. Incontinence and rectal prolapse: a prospective manometric study. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34:209.
  30. Woods R, Voyvodic F, Schloithe AC, et al. Anal sphincter tears in patients with rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 2003; 5:544.
  31. Ris F, Colin JF, Chilcott M, et al. Altemeier's procedure for rectal prolapse: analysis of long-term outcome in 60 patients. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14:1106.
  32. Ternent CA, Bastawrous AL, Morin NA, et al. Practice parameters for the evaluation and management of constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50:2013.
  33. Jorge JM, Habr-Gama A, Wexner SD. Biofeedback therapy in the colon and rectal practice. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2003; 28:47.
  34. Khaikin M, Wexner SD. Treatment strategies in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12:3168.