Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Microdeletion syndromes (chromosomes 12 to 22)

Carlos A Bacino, MD, FACMG
Section Editor
Helen V Firth, DM, FRCP, DCH
Deputy Editor
Elizabeth TePas, MD, MS


Chromosome deletions that span at least 5 megabases (Mb) are usually microscopically visible on chromosome-banded karyotypes. Microdeletions, or submicroscopic deletions, are chromosomal deletions that are too small to be detected by light microscopy using conventional cytogenetic methods. Specialized testing is needed to identify these deletions. Microdeletions are typically 1 to 3 Mb long and involve several contiguous genes. The exact size and location of a microdeletion that causes a syndrome may vary, but a specific "critical region" is consistently involved. Most phenotypic effects of these microdeletions are due to haploinsufficiency of a few critical genes or, in some cases, a single gene.

This topic reviews microdeletion syndromes involving chromosomes 12 through 22. Microdeletion syndromes involving chromosomes 1 through 11 are discussed separately, as are microduplication syndromes and congenital abnormalities of the sex chromosomes. Other congenital chromosomal abnormalities, such as trisomies, are also reviewed in detail elsewhere. (See "Microdeletion syndromes (chromosomes 1 to 11)" and "Microduplication syndromes" and "Sex chromosome abnormalities" and "Congenital cytogenetic abnormalities".)


Genomic disorders are diseases that result from the loss or gain of chromosomal/DNA material. The most common and better delineated genomic disorders are divided in two main categories: those resulting from copy number losses (deletion syndromes) and copy number gains (duplication syndromes). (See "Genomic disorders: An overview".)

Copy number variations (CNVs) are submicroscopic genomic differences in the number of copies of one or more sections of DNA that result in DNA gains or losses (figure 1). Some CNVs are pathogenic and cause syndromic disorders with consistent phenotypic features, as are discussed here. Other CNVs are associated with disease susceptibility or resistance, and the same CNV can be associated with several diverse disorders. Still other CNVs are part of normal genetic variation and have no recognized disease association. Contiguous gene syndromes can occur when CNVs affect several adjacent genes. (See "Overview of genetic variation", section on 'Copy number variations (CNVs)' and "Basic principles of genetic disease", section on 'Copy number variation'.)

The main mechanism that leads to disease in genomic disorders secondary to deletions and duplications is a change in the copy number of a dose-sensitive gene or genes. Other disease mechanisms include interference with imprinted genes and with regulatory elements outside genes. (See "Genomic disorders: An overview", section on 'Disease mechanisms'.)

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information on subscription options, click below on the option that best describes you:

Subscribers log in here

Literature review current through: Nov 2017. | This topic last updated: Jun 20, 2016.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2017 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Mitter D, Ullmann R, Muradyan A, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlations in patients with retinoblastoma and interstitial 13q deletions. Eur J Hum Genet 2011; 19:947.
  2. GeneReviews: Retinoblastoma. http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/books/NBK1452/ (Accessed on April 21, 2014).
  3. Burnside RD, Pasion R, Mikhail FM, et al. Microdeletion/microduplication of proximal 15q11.2 between BP1 and BP2: a susceptibility region for neurological dysfunction including developmental and language delay. Hum Genet 2011; 130:517.
  4. Doornbos M, Sikkema-Raddatz B, Ruijvenkamp CA, et al. Nine patients with a microdeletion 15q11.2 between breakpoints 1 and 2 of the Prader-Willi critical region, possibly associated with behavioural disturbances. Eur J Med Genet 2009; 52:108.
  5. Murthy SK, Nygren AO, El Shakankiry HM, et al. Detection of a novel familial deletion of four genes between BP1 and BP2 of the Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome critical region by oligo-array CGH in a child with neurological disorder and speech impairment. Cytogenet Genome Res 2007; 116:135.
  6. Sempere Pérez A, Manchón Trives I, Palazón Azorín I, et al. [15Q11.2 (BP1-BP2) microdeletion, a new syndrome with variable expressivity]. An Pediatr (Barc) 2011; 75:58.
  7. Cox DM, Butler MG. The 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion syndrome: a review. Int J Mol Sci 2015; 16:4068.
  8. Williams CA, Angelman H, Clayton-Smith J, et al. Angelman syndrome: consensus for diagnostic criteria. Angelman Syndrome Foundation. Am J Med Genet 1995; 56:237.
  9. Williams CA, Beaudet AL, Clayton-Smith J, et al. Angelman syndrome 2005: updated consensus for diagnostic criteria. Am J Med Genet A 2006; 140:413.
  10. GeneReviews: Angelman Syndrome. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1144/ (Accessed on January 18, 2012).
  11. Larson AM, Shinnick JE, Shaaya EA, et al. Angelman syndrome in adulthood. Am J Med Genet A 2015; 167A:331.
  12. Kishino T, Lalande M, Wagstaff J. UBE3A/E6-AP mutations cause Angelman syndrome. Nat Genet 1997; 15:70.
  13. Matsuura T, Sutcliffe JS, Fang P, et al. De novo truncating mutations in E6-AP ubiquitin-protein ligase gene (UBE3A) in Angelman syndrome. Nat Genet 1997; 15:74.
  14. Sahoo T, Peters SU, Madduri NS, et al. Microarray based comparative genomic hybridization testing in deletion bearing patients with Angelman syndrome: genotype-phenotype correlations. J Med Genet 2006; 43:512.
  15. Saitoh S, Buiting K, Cassidy SB, et al. Clinical spectrum and molecular diagnosis of Angelman and Prader-Willi syndrome patients with an imprinting mutation. Am J Med Genet 1997; 68:195.
  16. Malcolm S, Clayton-Smith J, Nichols M, et al. Uniparental paternal disomy in Angelman's syndrome. Lancet 1991; 337:694.
  17. Buiting K, Gross S, Lich C, et al. Epimutations in Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes: a molecular study of 136 patients with an imprinting defect. Am J Hum Genet 2003; 72:571.
  18. Buiting K, Lich C, Cottrell S, et al. A 5-kb imprinting center deletion in a family with Angelman syndrome reduces the shortest region of deletion overlap to 880 bp. Hum Genet 1999; 105:665.
  19. Abaied L, Trabelsi M, Chaabouni M, et al. A novel UBE3A truncating mutation in large Tunisian Angelman syndrome pedigree. Am J Med Genet A 2010; 152A:141.
  20. Peters SU, Beaudet AL, Madduri N, Bacino CA. Autism in Angelman syndrome: implications for autism research. Clin Genet 2004; 66:530.
  21. Horsthemke B, Buiting K. Imprinting defects on human chromosome 15. Cytogenet Genome Res 2006; 113:292.
  22. Horsthemke B, Dittrich B, Buiting K. Imprinting mutations on human chromosome 15. Hum Mutat 1997; 10:329.
  23. Schaaf CP, Gonzalez-Garay ML, Xia F, et al. Truncating mutations of MAGEL2 cause Prader-Willi phenotypes and autism. Nat Genet 2013; 45:1405.
  24. Buiting K, Di Donato N, Beygo J, et al. Clinical phenotypes of MAGEL2 mutations and deletions. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2014; 9:40.
  25. Sahoo T, del Gaudio D, German JR, et al. Prader-Willi phenotype caused by paternal deficiency for the HBII-85 C/D box small nucleolar RNA cluster. Nat Genet 2008; 40:719.
  26. Miller DT, Shen Y, Weiss LA, et al. Microdeletion/duplication at 15q13.2q13.3 among individuals with features of autism and other neuropsychiatric disorders. J Med Genet 2009; 46:242.
  27. Sharp AJ, Mefford HC, Li K, et al. A recurrent 15q13.3 microdeletion syndrome associated with mental retardation and seizures. Nat Genet 2008; 40:322.
  28. van Bon BW, Mefford HC, Menten B, et al. Further delineation of the 15q13 microdeletion and duplication syndromes: a clinical spectrum varying from non-pathogenic to a severe outcome. J Med Genet 2009; 46:511.
  29. GeneReviews: 15q13.3 Microdeletion. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK50780/ (Accessed on January 18, 2012).
  30. Prasun P, Hankerd M, Kristofice M, et al. Compound heterozygous microdeletion of chromosome 15q13.3 region in a child with hypotonia, impaired vision, and global developmental delay. Am J Med Genet A 2014; 164A:1815.
  31. Hildebrand MS, Avenarius MR, Smith RJH. CATSPER-related male infertility. In: GeneReviews, Pagon RA, Bird TD, Dolan CR, Stephens K (Eds), Seattle (WA), University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2009 Dec 03. PMID: 20301780.
  32. GeneReviews: CATSPER-Related Male Infertility. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22925/ (Accessed on January 18, 2012).
  33. Mefford HC, Rosenfeld JA, Shur N, et al. Further clinical and molecular delineation of the 15q24 microdeletion syndrome. J Med Genet 2012; 49:110.
  34. Klopocki E, Graul-Neumann LM, Grieben U, et al. A further case of the recurrent 15q24 microdeletion syndrome, detected by array CGH. Eur J Pediatr 2008; 167:903.
  35. McInnes LA, Nakamine A, Pilorge M, et al. A large-scale survey of the novel 15q24 microdeletion syndrome in autism spectrum disorders identifies an atypical deletion that narrows the critical region. Mol Autism 2010; 1:5.
  36. Sharp AJ, Selzer RR, Veltman JA, et al. Characterization of a recurrent 15q24 microdeletion syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 2007; 16:567.
  37. Van Esch H, Backx L, Pijkels E, Fryns JP. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia is part of the new 15q24 microdeletion syndrome. Eur J Med Genet 2009; 52:153.
  38. Magoulas PL, El-Hattab AW. Chromosome 15q24 microdeletion syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2012; 7:2.
  39. GeneReviews: 15q24 Microdeletion Syndrome http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/books/NBK84258/ (Accessed on April 08, 2014).
  40. Punnett HH, Zakai EH. Old syndromes and new cytogenetics. Dev Med Child Neurol 1990; 32:824.
  41. Breuning MH, Dauwerse HG, Fugazza G, et al. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome caused by submicroscopic deletions within 16p13.3. Am J Hum Genet 1993; 52:249.
  42. RUBINSTEIN JH, TAYBI H. Broad thumbs and toes and facial abnormalities. A possible mental retardation syndrome. Am J Dis Child 1963; 105:588.
  43. Hennekam RC. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet 2006; 14:981.
  44. Hennekam RC, Lommen EJ, Strengers JL, et al. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome in a mother and son. Eur J Pediatr 1989; 148:439.
  45. GeneReviews: Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1526/ (Accessed on January 18, 2012).
  46. Roelfsema JH, White SJ, Ariyürek Y, et al. Genetic heterogeneity in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: mutations in both the CBP and EP300 genes cause disease. Am J Hum Genet 2005; 76:572.
  47. Tsai AC, Dossett CJ, Walton CS, et al. Exon deletions of the EP300 and CREBBP genes in two children with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome detected by aCGH. Eur J Hum Genet 2011; 19:43.
  48. Hannes FD, Sharp AJ, Mefford HC, et al. Recurrent reciprocal deletions and duplications of 16p13.11: the deletion is a risk factor for MR/MCA while the duplication may be a rare benign variant. J Med Genet 2009; 46:223.
  49. Heinzen EL, Radtke RA, Urban TJ, et al. Rare deletions at 16p13.11 predispose to a diverse spectrum of sporadic epilepsy syndromes. Am J Hum Genet 2010; 86:707.
  50. Nagamani SC, Erez A, Bader P, et al. Phenotypic manifestations of copy number variation in chromosome 16p13.11. Eur J Hum Genet 2011; 19:280.
  51. de Kovel CG, Trucks H, Helbig I, et al. Recurrent microdeletions at 15q11.2 and 16p13.11 predispose to idiopathic generalized epilepsies. Brain 2010; 133:23.
  52. Human Genome Browser (HG18). http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgGateway?db=hg18 (Accessed on April 09, 2014).
  53. Ballif BC, Hornor SA, Jenkins E, et al. Discovery of a previously unrecognized microdeletion syndrome of 16p11.2-p12.2. Nat Genet 2007; 39:1071.
  54. Fernandez BA, Roberts W, Chung B, et al. Phenotypic spectrum associated with de novo and inherited deletions and duplications at 16p11.2 in individuals ascertained for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. J Med Genet 2010; 47:195.
  55. Hanson E, Nasir RH, Fong A, et al. Cognitive and behavioral characterization of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2010; 31:649.
  56. Kumar RA, KaraMohamed S, Sudi J, et al. Recurrent 16p11.2 microdeletions in autism. Hum Mol Genet 2008; 17:628.
  57. GeneReviews: 16p11.2 Microdeletion. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11167/ (Accessed on January 18, 2012).
  58. Weiss LA, Shen Y, Korn JM, et al. Association between microdeletion and microduplication at 16p11.2 and autism. N Engl J Med 2008; 358:667.
  59. Kumar RA, Marshall CR, Badner JA, et al. Association and mutation analyses of 16p11.2 autism candidate genes. PLoS One 2009; 4:e4582.
  60. Pucilowska J, Vithayathil J, Tavares EJ, et al. The 16p11.2 deletion mouse model of autism exhibits altered cortical progenitor proliferation and brain cytoarchitecture linked to the ERK MAPK pathway. J Neurosci 2015; 35:3190.
  61. Guha S, Rees E, Darvasi A, et al. Implication of a rare deletion at distal 16p11.2 in schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiatry 2013; 70:253.
  62. Schaaf CP, Goin-Kochel RP, Nowell KP, et al. Expanding the clinical spectrum of the 16p11.2 chromosomal rearrangements: three patients with syringomyelia. Eur J Hum Genet 2011; 19:152.
  63. Bochukova EG, Huang N, Keogh J, et al. Large, rare chromosomal deletions associated with severe early-onset obesity. Nature 2010; 463:666.
  64. Walters RG, Jacquemont S, Valsesia A, et al. A new highly penetrant form of obesity due to deletions on chromosome 16p11.2. Nature 2010; 463:671.
  65. Bruno DL, Anderlid BM, Lindstrand A, et al. Further molecular and clinical delineation of co-locating 17p13.3 microdeletions and microduplications that show distinctive phenotypes. J Med Genet 2010; 47:299.
  66. Jones KL, Gilbert EF, Kaveggia EG, Opitz JM. The MIller-Dieker syndrome. Pediatrics 1980; 66:277.
  67. Stratton RF, Dobyns WB, Airhart SD, Ledbetter DH. New chromosomal syndrome: Miller-Dieker syndrome and monosomy 17p13. Hum Genet 1984; 67:193.
  68. Dobyns WB, Stratton RF, Parke JT, et al. Miller-Dieker syndrome: lissencephaly and monosomy 17p. J Pediatr 1983; 102:552.
  69. Greenberg F, Stratton RF, Lockhart LH, et al. Familial Miller-Dieker syndrome associated with pericentric inversion of chromosome 17. Am J Med Genet 1986; 23:853.
  70. vanTuinen P, Dobyns WB, Rich DC, et al. Molecular detection of microscopic and submicroscopic deletions associated with Miller-Dieker syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 1988; 43:587.
  71. Dhellemmes C, Girard S, Dulac O, et al. Agyria--pachygyria and Miller-Dieker syndrome: clinical, genetic and chromosome studies. Hum Genet 1988; 79:163.
  72. Oostra BA, de Rijk-van Andel JF, Eussen HJ, et al. DNA analysis in patients with lissencephaly type I and other cortical dysplasias. Am J Med Genet 1991; 40:383.
  73. Nagamani SC, Zhang F, Shchelochkov OA, et al. Microdeletions including YWHAE in the Miller-Dieker syndrome region on chromosome 17p13.3 result in facial dysmorphisms, growth restriction, and cognitive impairment. J Med Genet 2009; 46:825.
  74. Pilz DT, Macha ME, Precht KS, et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis with LIS1 specific probes reveals a high deletion mutation rate in isolated lissencephaly sequence. Genet Med 1998; 1:29.
  75. De Rijk-van Andel JF, Catsman-Berrevoets CE, Halley DJ, et al. Isolated lissencephaly sequence associated with a microdeletion at chromosome 17p13. Hum Genet 1991; 87:509.
  76. Schiff M, Delahaye A, Andrieux J, et al. Further delineation of the 17p13.3 microdeletion involving YWHAE but distal to PAFAH1B1: four additional patients. Eur J Med Genet 2010; 53:303.
  77. Tenney JR, Hopkin RJ, Schapiro MB. Deletion of 14-3-3{varepsilon} and CRK: a clinical syndrome with macrocephaly, developmental delay, and generalized epilepsy. J Child Neurol 2011; 26:223.
  78. GeneReviews: Hereditary Neuropathy with Liability to Pressure Palsies. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1392/ (Accessed on January 25, 2012).
  79. Carmona-Mora P, Walz K. Retinoic Acid Induced 1, RAI1: A Dosage Sensitive Gene Related to Neurobehavioral Alterations Including Autistic Behavior. Curr Genomics 2010; 11:607.
  80. Greenberg F, Guzzetta V, Montes de Oca-Luna R, et al. Molecular analysis of the Smith-Magenis syndrome: a possible contiguous-gene syndrome associated with del(17)(p11.2). Am J Hum Genet 1991; 49:1207.
  81. Seranski P, Hoff C, Radelof U, et al. RAI1 is a novel polyglutamine encoding gene that is deleted in Smith-Magenis syndrome patients. Gene 2001; 270:69.
  82. Slager RE, Newton TL, Vlangos CN, et al. Mutations in RAI1 associated with Smith-Magenis syndrome. Nat Genet 2003; 33:466.
  83. Williams SR, Girirajan S, Tegay D, et al. Array comparative genomic hybridisation of 52 subjects with a Smith-Magenis-like phenotype: identification of dosage sensitive loci also associated with schizophrenia, autism, and developmental delay. J Med Genet 2010; 47:223.
  84. Girirajan S, Elsas LJ 2nd, Devriendt K, Elsea SH. RAI1 variations in Smith-Magenis syndrome patients without 17p11.2 deletions. J Med Genet 2005; 42:820.
  85. Williams SR, Zies D, Mullegama SV, et al. Smith-Magenis syndrome results in disruption of CLOCK gene transcription and reveals an integral role for RAI1 in the maintenance of circadian rhythmicity. Am J Hum Genet 2012; 90:941.
  86. Colley AF, Leversha MA, Voullaire LE, Rogers JG. Five cases demonstrating the distinctive behavioural features of chromosome deletion 17(p11.2 p11.2) (Smith-Magenis syndrome). J Paediatr Child Health 1990; 26:17.
  87. Smith AC, Dykens E, Greenberg F. Behavioral phenotype of Smith-Magenis syndrome (del 17p11.2). Am J Med Genet 1998; 81:179.
  88. GeneReviews: Smith-Magenis Syndrome. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1310/ (Accessed on January 25, 2012).
  89. Guérin-Moreau M, Colin E, Nguyen S, et al. Dermatologic features of Smith-Magenis syndrome. Pediatr Dermatol 2015; 32:337.
  90. Smith AC, Dykens E, Greenberg F. Sleep disturbance in Smith-Magenis syndrome (del 17 p11.2). Am J Med Genet 1998; 81:186.
  91. Gropman AL, Duncan WC, Smith AC. Neurologic and developmental features of the Smith-Magenis syndrome (del 17p11.2). Pediatr Neurol 2006; 34:337.
  92. Potocki L, Shaw CJ, Stankiewicz P, Lupski JR. Variability in clinical phenotype despite common chromosomal deletion in Smith-Magenis syndrome [del(17)(p11.2p11.2)]. Genet Med 2003; 5:430.
  93. Mefford HC, Clauin S, Sharp AJ, et al. Recurrent reciprocal genomic rearrangements of 17q12 are associated with renal disease, diabetes, and epilepsy. Am J Hum Genet 2007; 81:1057.
  94. Nagamani SC, Erez A, Shen J, et al. Clinical spectrum associated with recurrent genomic rearrangements in chromosome 17q12. Eur J Hum Genet 2010; 18:278.
  95. Laffargue F, Bourthoumieu S, Llanas B, et al. Towards a new point of view on the phenotype of patients with a 17q12 microdeletion syndrome. Arch Dis Child 2015; 100:259.
  96. Moreno-De-Luca D, SGENE Consortium, Mulle JG, et al. Deletion 17q12 is a recurrent copy number variant that confers high risk of autism and schizophrenia. Am J Hum Genet 2010; 87:618.
  97. Koolen DA, Vissers LE, Pfundt R, et al. A new chromosome 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome associated with a common inversion polymorphism. Nat Genet 2006; 38:999.
  98. Sharp AJ, Hansen S, Selzer RR, et al. Discovery of previously unidentified genomic disorders from the duplication architecture of the human genome. Nat Genet 2006; 38:1038.
  99. Koolen DA, Kramer JM, Neveling K, et al. Mutations in the chromatin modifier gene KANSL1 cause the 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome. Nat Genet 2012; 44:639.
  100. Zollino M, Orteschi D, Murdolo M, et al. Mutations in KANSL1 cause the 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome phenotype. Nat Genet 2012; 44:636.
  101. GeneReviews: KANSL1-Related Intellectual Disability Syndrome. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK24676/ (Accessed on April 09, 2014).
  102. Koolen DA, Sharp AJ, Hurst JA, et al. Clinical and molecular delineation of the 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome. J Med Genet 2008; 45:710.
  103. Sharkey FH, Morrison N, Murray R, et al. 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome: further expanding the clinical phenotype. Cytogenet Genome Res 2009; 127:61.
  104. Shaw-Smith C, Pittman AM, Willatt L, et al. Microdeletion encompassing MAPT at chromosome 17q21.3 is associated with developmental delay and learning disability. Nat Genet 2006; 38:1032.
  105. GeneReviews: 17q21.31 Microdeletion Syndrome. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK24676/ (Accessed on January 25, 2012).
  106. Turleau C. Monosomy 18p. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2008; 3:4.
  107. Koshy B, Mandal K, Srivastava VM, et al. Familial 18p deletion syndrome and 18p partial trisomy inherited from a mother with balanced translocation. Clin Dysmorphol 2011; 20:148.
  108. Margarit E, Morales C, Rodríguez-Revenga L, et al. Familial 4.8 MB deletion on 18q23 associated with growth hormone insufficiency and phenotypic variability. Am J Med Genet A 2012; 158A:611.
  109. McGoey RR, Gedalia A, Marble M. Monosomy 18p and immunologic dysfunction: review of the literature and a new case report with thyroiditis, IgA deficiency, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Dysmorphol 2011; 20:127.
  110. Portnoï MF, Gruchy N, Marlin S, et al. Midline defects in deletion 18p syndrome: clinical and molecular characterization of three patients. Clin Dysmorphol 2007; 16:247.
  111. Xie CH, Yang JB, Gong FQ, Zhao ZY. Patent ductus arteriosus and pulmonary valve stenosis in a patient with 18p deletion syndrome. Yonsei Med J 2008; 49:500.
  112. Carvalho CA, Carvalho AV, Kiss A, et al. Keratosis pilaris and ulerythema ophryogenes in a woman with monosomy of the short arm of chromosome 18. An Bras Dermatol 2011; 86:S42.
  113. Jain N, Reitnauer PJ, Rao KW, et al. Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy associated with ring chromosome 18. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2011; 24:847.
  114. Browning MJ. Specific polysaccharide antibody deficiency in chromosome 18p deletion syndrome and immunoglobulin A deficiency. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2010; 20:263.
  115. GeneReviews: Alagille Syndrome. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1273/ (Accessed on January 25, 2012).
  116. GeneReviews: 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1523/ (Accessed on January 25, 2012).
  117. Ben-Shachar S, Ou Z, Shaw CA, et al. 22q11.2 distal deletion: a recurrent genomic disorder distinct from DiGeorge syndrome and velocardiofacial syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2008; 82:214.
  118. Nogueira SI, Hacker AM, Bellucco FT, et al. Atypical 22q11.2 deletion in a patient with DGS/VCFS spectrum. Eur J Med Genet 2008; 51:226.
  119. Rødningen OK, Prescott T, Eriksson AS, Røsby O. 1.4Mb recurrent 22q11.2 distal deletion syndrome, two new cases expand the phenotype. Eur J Med Genet 2008; 51:646.
  120. Phelan MC, Rogers RC, Saul RA, et al. 22q13 deletion syndrome. Am J Med Genet 2001; 101:91.
  121. Manning MA, Cassidy SB, Clericuzio C, et al. Terminal 22q deletion syndrome: a newly recognized cause of speech and language disability in the autism spectrum. Pediatrics 2004; 114:451.
  122. Okamoto N, Kubota T, Nakamura Y, et al. 22q13 Microduplication in two patients with common clinical manifestations: a recognizable syndrome? Am J Med Genet A 2007; 143A:2804.
  123. Peeters H, Vermeesch J, Fryns JP. A cryptic duplication 22q13.31 to qter leads to a distinct phenotype with mental retardation, microcephaly and mild facial dysmorphism. Genet Couns 2008; 19:365.
  124. Prasad C, Prasad AN, Chodirker BN, et al. Genetic evaluation of pervasive developmental disorders: the terminal 22q13 deletion syndrome may represent a recognizable phenotype. Clin Genet 2000; 57:103.
  125. Bonaglia MC, Giorda R, Mani E, et al. Identification of a recurrent breakpoint within the SHANK3 gene in the 22q13.3 deletion syndrome. J Med Genet 2006; 43:822.
  126. Dhar SU, del Gaudio D, German JR, et al. 22q13.3 deletion syndrome: clinical and molecular analysis using array CGH. Am J Med Genet A 2010; 152A:573.
  127. Wilson HL, Wong AC, Shaw SR, et al. Molecular characterisation of the 22q13 deletion syndrome supports the role of haploinsufficiency of SHANK3/PROSAP2 in the major neurological symptoms. J Med Genet 2003; 40:575.