Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Left anterior fascicular block

William H Sauer, MD
Section Editor
Ary L Goldberger, MD
Deputy Editor
Brian C Downey, MD, FACC


In the discussion that follows, it is assumed that the reader understands the general concepts of cardiac vectors, asynchronous activation of the ventricles (delayed as in fascicular or bundle branch block, or early as in pre-excitation), and the effects that asynchrony has on the duration, morphology and amplitude of the QRS complex. (See "ECG tutorial: Physiology of the conduction system" and "General principles of asynchronous activation and preexcitation".)


The classic hypothesis was that the left bundle branch divides into two fascicles of rapidly conducting Purkinje fibers (ie, phase 0 dependent on the rapid inward sodium current) (figure 1) [1]. An understanding of their function stresses that they primarily affect the direction of depolarization [2]:

The left anterior fascicle crosses the left ventricular outflow tract and terminates in the Purkinje system of the anterolateral wall of the left ventricle.

The left posterior fascicle appears as an extension of the main bundle and fans out extensively posteriorly toward the papillary muscle and inferoposteriorly to the free wall of the left ventricle.

In addition, a third fascicle, called the left septal, medial, or median fascicle, is found in nearly 65 percent of people [3,4]. This fascicle runs to the interventricular septum, and can arise from the common left bundle or from the anterior, posterior or both fascicles.

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information on subscription options, click below on the option that best describes you:

Subscribers log in here

Literature review current through: Sep 2017. | This topic last updated: Nov 19, 2015.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2017 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Rosenbaum M, Elizari MV, Lazzari JO. The Hemiblocks. Tampa Tracings, Tampa, 1970.
  2. Elizari MV, Acunzo RS, Ferreiro M. Hemiblocks revisited. Circulation 2007; 115:1154.
  3. Demoulin JC, Kulbertus HE. Histopathological examination of concept of left hemiblock. Br Heart J 1972; 34:807.
  4. Uhley HN. Some controversy regarding the peripheral distribution of the conduction system. Am J Cardiol 1972; 30:919.
  5. Myerburg RJ, Nilsson K, Gelband H. Physiology of canine intraventricular conduction and endocardial excitation. Circ Res 1972; 30:217.
  6. Durrer D, van Dam RT, Freud GE, et al. Total excitation of the isolated human heart. Circulation 1970; 41:899.
  7. Surawicz B, Childers R, Deal BJ, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part III: intraventricular conduction disturbances: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53:976.
  8. Yano K, Peskoe SM, Rhoads GG, et al. Left axis deviation and left anterior hemiblock among 8,000 Japanese-American men. Am J Cardiol 1975; 35:809.
  9. Willems JL, Robles de Medina EO, Bernard R, et al. Criteria for intraventricular conduction disturbances and pre-excitation. World Health Organizational/International Society and Federation for Cardiology Task Force Ad Hoc. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 5:1261.
  10. Cohen SI, Lau SH, Stein E, et al. Variations of aberrant ventricular conduction in man: evidence of isolated and combined block within the specialized conduction system. An electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic study. Circulation 1968; 38:899.
  11. Rosenbaum MB, Yesurón J, Lázzari JO, Elizari MV. Left anterior hemiblock obscuring the diagnosis of right bundle branch block. Circulation 1973; 48:298.
  12. Blackburn H, Vasquez CL, Keys A. The aging electrocardiogram. A common aging process or latent coronary artery disease? Am J Cardiol 1967; 20:618.
  13. Ostrander LD Jr. Left axis deviation: prevalence, associated conditions, and prognosis. An epidemiologic study. Ann Intern Med 1971; 75:23.
  14. Seavey PW, Sexton TS. Left axis deviation. An electrocardiographic mortality study. Trans Assoc Life Insur Med Dir Am 1971; 54:27.
  15. Mandyam MC, Soliman EZ, Heckbert SR, et al. Long-term outcomes of left anterior fascicular block in the absence of overt cardiovascular disease. JAMA 2013; 309:1587.
  16. Habicht JM, Scherr P, Zerkowski HR, Hoffmann A. Late conduction defects following aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis 2000; 9:629.
  17. Khalil MM, Rifaie OA. Electrocardiographic changes in obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Respir Med 1998; 92:25.
  18. DePadua FI, Pereirnha A, Lopes MG. Conduction defects. In: Comprehensive Electrocardiography: Theory and Practice in Health and Disease, MacFarlane P, Veitch Lawrie TD (Eds), Pergamon Press, New York 1989. p.459.
  19. Chandrashekhar Y, Kalita HC, Anand IS. Left anterior fascicular block: an ischaemic response during treadmill testing. Br Heart J 1991; 65:51.
  20. Assali A, Sclarovsky S, Herz I, et al. Importance of left anterior hemiblock development in inferior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79:672.
  21. Ozdemir K, Uluca Y, Daniş G, et al. Importance of left anterior hemiblock development in inferior wall acute myocardial infarction. Angiology 2001; 52:743.
  22. Ammann P, Naegeli B, Rickli H, et al. Characteristics of patients with abnormal stress technetium Tc 99m sestamibi SPECT studies without significant coronary artery diameter stenoses. Clin Cardiol 2003; 26:521.
  23. Cortigiani L, Bigi R, Gigli G, et al. Prognostic implications of intraventricular conduction defects in patients undergoing stress echocardiography for suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Med 2003; 115:12.
  24. Zhang ZM, Rautaharju PM, Soliman EZ, et al. Different patterns of bundle-branch blocks and the risk of incident heart failure in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study. Circ Heart Fail 2013; 6:655.
  25. Cinca J, Mendez A, Puig T, et al. Differential clinical characteristics and prognosis of intraventricular conduction defects in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2013; 15:877.
  26. Tripp IG, Armstrong GP, Stewart JT, et al. Atrial pacing should be used more frequently in sinus node disease. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005; 28:291.
  27. Schneider JF, Thomas HE Jr, Kreger BE, et al. Newly acquired left bundle-branch block: the Framingham study. Ann Intern Med 1979; 90:303.
  28. Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices): developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2008; 117:e350.