Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate®

Genetic association studies: Principles and applications

John Attia, MD, PhD, FRCPC, FRACP
Gordon Guyatt, MD
Section Editor
Benjamin A Raby, MD, MPH
Deputy Editor
Jennifer S Tirnauer, MD


Interest in the genetic determinants of disease originated with Gregor Mendel's observations on the genetics of the pea in the 1860s. Subsequent studies have identified many of the genes responsible for "Mendelian" diseases, conditions that follow a clear familial pattern. However, diseases inherited in a Mendelian fashion (eg, Huntington disease and cystic fibrosis) are rare.

More recently, the Human Genome Project has generated growing interest in genetic contribution to "complex" diseases. Such diseases combine some familial predisposition with a large environmental contribution. Examples include cardiovascular disease, diabetes, asthma, cancer, and obesity.

This topic will discuss the principles and clinical applications of genetic association studies in the elucidation of the genetic basis for common diseases with complex genetic components. Additional discussions of modes of inheritance and a glossary of genetic terms are presented separately. (See "Inheritance patterns of monogenic disorders (Mendelian and non-Mendelian)" and "Principles of complex trait genetics" and "Genetics: Glossary of terms" and "Inheritance patterns of monogenic disorders (Mendelian and non-Mendelian)", section on 'Causes of non-Mendelian inheritance'.)


Genetic association studies — Genetic association studies are analogous to traditional epidemiologic association studies. Instead of seeking association between traditional risk variables (eg, hypertension) and disease outcomes (eg, stroke), a genetic association study looks for an association between a genetic variable and a specified condition.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms — The genetic variable most commonly studied is a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP, pronounced "snip"). A SNP is a base pair change that occurs in at least 1 percent of the population. SNPs are not clearly deleterious, in contrast to mutations, which occur less frequently and generally have an adverse effect on protein function. (See "Overview of genetic variation".)


Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Jul 2017. | This topic last updated: Mar 24, 2017.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2017 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Dawn Teare M, Barrett JH. Genetic linkage studies. Lancet 2005; 366:1036.
  2. Visscher PM, Montgomery GW. Genome-wide association studies and human disease: from trickle to flood. JAMA 2009; 302:2028.
  3. Freedman ML, Monteiro AN, Gayther SA, et al. Principles for the post-GWAS functional characterization of cancer risk loci. Nat Genet 2011; 43:513.
  4. www.hugenavigator.net (Accessed on August 04, 2015).
  5. Thakkinstian A, Han P, McEvoy M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between complement factor H Y402H polymorphisms and age-related macular degeneration. Hum Mol Genet 2006; 15:2784.
  6. Iyengar SK, Elston RC. The genetic basis of complex traits: rare variants or "common gene, common disease"? Methods Mol Biol 2007; 376:71.
  7. Estivill X, Bancells C, Ramos C. Geographic distribution and regional origin of 272 cystic fibrosis mutations in European populations. The Biomed CF Mutation Analysis Consortium. Hum Mutat 1997; 10:135.
  8. Samani NJ, Erdmann J, Hall AS, et al. Genomewide association analysis of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:443.
  9. Zeggini E, Weedon MN, Lindgren CM, et al. Replication of genome-wide association signals in UK samples reveals risk loci for type 2 diabetes. Science 2007; 316:1336.
  10. Matarín M, Brown WM, Scholz S, et al. A genome-wide genotyping study in patients with ischaemic stroke: initial analysis and data release. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6:414.
  11. International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium, Hafler DA, Compston A, et al. Risk alleles for multiple sclerosis identified by a genomewide study. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:851.
  12. Easton DF, Pooley KA, Dunning AM, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies novel breast cancer susceptibility loci. Nature 2007; 447:1087.
  13. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 2007; 447:661.
  14. Plenge RM, Seielstad M, Padyukov L, et al. TRAF1-C5 as a risk locus for rheumatoid arthritis--a genomewide study. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:1199.
  15. Coon KD, Myers AJ, Craig DW, et al. A high-density whole-genome association study reveals that APOE is the major susceptibility gene for sporadic late-onset Alzheimer's disease. J Clin Psychiatry 2007; 68:613.
  16. Li H, Wetten S, Li L, et al. Candidate single-nucleotide polymorphisms from a genomewide association study of Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 2008; 65:45.
  17. Prokopenko I, Langenberg C, Florez JC, et al. Variants in MTNR1B influence fasting glucose levels. Nat Genet 2009; 41:77.
  18. Bouatia-Naji N, Bonnefond A, Cavalcanti-Proença C, et al. A variant near MTNR1B is associated with increased fasting plasma glucose levels and type 2 diabetes risk. Nat Genet 2009; 41:89.
  19. Weedon MN, Lango H, Lindgren CM, et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies 20 loci that influence adult height. Nat Genet 2008; 40:575.
  20. Lettre G, Jackson AU, Gieger C, et al. Identification of ten loci associated with height highlights new biological pathways in human growth. Nat Genet 2008; 40:584.
  21. Maher B. Personal genomes: The case of the missing heritability. Nature 2008; 456:18.
  22. Hunt KA, Mistry V, Bockett NA, et al. Negligible impact of rare autoimmune-locus coding-region variants on missing heritability. Nature 2013; 498:232.
  23. Turkmen A, Lin S. Are rare variants really independent? Genet Epidemiol 2017; 41:363.
  24. Wain LV, Armour JA, Tobin MD. Genomic copy number variation, human health, and disease. Lancet 2009; 374:340.
  25. Weiss LA, Shen Y, Korn JM, et al. Association between microdeletion and microduplication at 16p11.2 and autism. N Engl J Med 2008; 358:667.
  26. Conrad DF, Pinto D, Redon R, et al. Origins and functional impact of copy number variation in the human genome. Nature 2010; 464:704.
  27. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Craddock N, Hurles ME, et al. Genome-wide association study of CNVs in 16,000 cases of eight common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 2010; 464:713.
  28. Zuk O, Hechter E, Sunyaev SR, Lander ES. The mystery of missing heritability: Genetic interactions create phantom heritability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109:1193.
  29. Skinner MK, Manikkam M, Guerrero-Bosagna C. Epigenetic transgenerational actions of environmental factors in disease etiology. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2010; 21:214.
  30. Chen Q, Yan W, Duan E. Epigenetic inheritance of acquired traits through sperm RNAs and sperm RNA modifications. Nat Rev Genet 2016; 17:733.
  31. Visscher PM, Hill WG, Wray NR. Heritability in the genomics era--concepts and misconceptions. Nat Rev Genet 2008; 9:255.
  32. Yang J, Benyamin B, McEvoy BP, et al. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat Genet 2010; 42:565.
  33. Yang J, Manolio TA, Pasquale LR, et al. Genome partitioning of genetic variation for complex traits using common SNPs. Nat Genet 2011; 43:519.
  34. Little J, Bradley L, Bray MS, et al. Reporting, appraising, and integrating data on genotype prevalence and gene-disease associations. Am J Epidemiol 2002; 156:300.
  35. Little J, Higgins JP, Ioannidis JP, et al. STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE Statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 150:206.
  36. Attia J, Ioannidis JP, Thakkinstian A, et al. How to use an article about genetic association: B: Are the results of the study valid? JAMA 2009; 301:191.
  37. Attia J, Ioannidis JP, Thakkinstian A, et al. How to use an article about genetic association: C: What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA 2009; 301:304.
  38. Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Alexiou GA, Gouvias TC, Ioannidis JP. An empirical evaluation of multifarious outcomes in pharmacogenetics: beta-2 adrenoceptor gene polymorphisms in asthma treatment. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2006; 16:705.
  39. Berkovic SF, Scheffer IE. Genetics of the epilepsies. Epilepsia 2001; 42 Suppl 5:16.
  40. Barnholtz-Sloan JS, McEvoy B, Shriver MD, Rebbeck TR. Ancestry estimation and correction for population stratification in molecular epidemiologic association studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008; 17:471.
  41. Pritchard JK, Rosenberg NA. Use of unlinked genetic markers to detect population stratification in association studies. Am J Hum Genet 1999; 65:220.
  42. Kittles RA, Chen W, Panguluri RK, et al. CYP3A4-V and prostate cancer in African Americans: causal or confounding association because of population stratification? Hum Genet 2002; 110:553.
  43. Frayling TM, Timpson NJ, Weedon MN, et al. A common variant in the FTO gene is associated with body mass index and predisposes to childhood and adult obesity. Science 2007; 316:889.
  44. Leek JT, Scharpf RB, Bravo HC, et al. Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data. Nat Rev Genet 2010; 11:733.
  45. Clayton DG, Walker NM, Smyth DJ, et al. Population structure, differential bias and genomic control in a large-scale, case-control association study. Nat Genet 2005; 37:1243.
  46. Akey JM, Zhang K, Xiong M, et al. The effect that genotyping errors have on the robustness of common linkage-disequilibrium measures. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 68:1447.
  47. Pompanon F, Bonin A, Bellemain E, Taberlet P. Genotyping errors: causes, consequences and solutions. Nat Rev Genet 2005; 6:847.
  48. www.tufts.edu/~mcourt01/Documents/Court%20lab%20-%20HW%20calculator.xls (Accessed on March 05, 2014).
  49. www.oege.org/software/hwe-mr-calc.shtml (Accessed on March 05, 2014).
  50. Cox DG, Kraft P. Quantification of the power of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium testing to detect genotyping error. Hum Hered 2006; 61:10.
  51. McCarthy MI, Abecasis GR, Cardon LR, et al. Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges. Nat Rev Genet 2008; 9:356.
  52. Sham PC, Purcell SM. Statistical power and significance testing in large-scale genetic studies. Nat Rev Genet 2014; 15:335.
  53. Moonesinghe R, Khoury MJ, Liu T, Ioannidis JP. Required sample size and nonreplicability thresholds for heterogeneous genetic associations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105:617.
  54. Franke A, McGovern DP, Barrett JC, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis increases to 71 the number of confirmed Crohn's disease susceptibility loci. Nat Genet 2010; 42:1118.
  55. Moffatt MF, Gut IG, Demenais F, et al. A large-scale, consortium-based genomewide association study of asthma. N Engl J Med 2010; 363:1211.
  56. Yu W, Wulf A, Yesupriya A, et al. HuGE Watch: tracking trends and patterns of published studies of genetic association and human genome epidemiology in near-real time. Eur J Hum Genet 2008; 16:1155.
  57. Salanti G, Southam L, Altshuler D, et al. Underlying genetic models of inheritance in established type 2 diabetes associations. Am J Epidemiol 2009; 170:537.
  58. Hunter DJ, Khoury MJ, Drazen JM. Letting the genome out of the bottle--will we get our wish? N Engl J Med 2008; 358:105.
  59. Janssens AC, Gwinn M, Bradley LA, et al. A critical appraisal of the scientific basis of commercial genomic profiles used to assess health risks and personalize health interventions. Am J Hum Genet 2008; 82:593.
  60. Zheng SL, Sun J, Wiklund F, et al. Cumulative association of five genetic variants with prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2008; 358:910.
  61. Janssens AC, van Duijn CM. Genome-based prediction of common diseases: advances and prospects. Hum Mol Genet 2008; 17:R166.
  62. McLeod HL, Krynetski EY, Relling MV, Evans WE. Genetic polymorphism of thiopurine methyltransferase and its clinical relevance for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 2000; 14:567.
  63. Irwig L, Bossuyt P, Glasziou P, et al. Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy are transferable. BMJ 2002; 324:669.
  64. Meigs JB, Shrader P, Sullivan LM, et al. Genotype score in addition to common risk factors for prediction of type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:2208.
  65. Jakobsdottir J, Gorin MB, Conley YP, et al. Interpretation of genetic association studies: markers with replicated highly significant odds ratios may be poor classifiers. PLoS Genet 2009; 5:e1000337.
  66. Emmerich J, Rosendaal FR, Cattaneo M, et al. Combined effect of factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210A on the risk of venous thromboembolism--pooled analysis of 8 case-control studies including 2310 cases and 3204 controls. Study Group for Pooled-Analysis in Venous Thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 2001; 86:809.
  67. Cushman M, Tsai AW, White RH, et al. Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in two cohorts: the longitudinal investigation of thromboembolism etiology. Am J Med 2004; 117:19.
  68. Ridker PM, Hennekens CH, Lindpaintner K, et al. Mutation in the gene coding for coagulation factor V and the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and venous thrombosis in apparently healthy men. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:912.
  69. Koster T, Rosendaal FR, de Ronde H, et al. Venous thrombosis due to poor anticoagulant response to activated protein C: Leiden Thrombophilia Study. Lancet 1993; 342:1503.
  70. The ALlele FREquency Database. Available at: http://alfred.med.yale.edu/alfred/index.asp (Accessed on March 05, 2014).
  71. International HapMap Project. Available at: www.hapmap.org (Accessed on March 05, 2014).
  72. Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D, et al. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science 1994; 266:66.
  73. Marteau TM, Lerman C. Genetic risk and behavioural change. BMJ 2001; 322:1056.
  74. Hamajima N, Suzuki K, Ito Y, Kondo T. Genotype announcement to Japanese smokers who attended a health checkup examination. J Epidemiol 2006; 16:45.