Fertility preservation in women with endometrial carcinoma
- Joshua P Kesterson, MD
Joshua P Kesterson, MD
- Chief, Division of Gynecologic Oncology
- Associate professor
- Penn State Hershey Medical Center
- Hershey, Pennsylvania
- Section Editors
- Barbara Goff, MD
Barbara Goff, MD
- Section Editor — Gynecologic Oncology
- Department Chair, Gynecologic Oncology
- University of Washington Medical Center
- Don S Dizon, MD, FACP
Don S Dizon, MD, FACP
- Section Editor – Gynecologic Oncology
- Head of Women's Cancers, Lifespan Cancer Institute
- Director of Medical Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital
- Associate Professor of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University
- Deputy Editors
- Sandy J Falk, MD, FACOG
Sandy J Falk, MD, FACOG
- Director, Editorial Relations — UpToDate
- Deputy Editor — Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health
- Instructor of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Part-time
- Harvard Medical School
- Sadhna R Vora, MD
Sadhna R Vora, MD
- Deputy Editor — Oncology
- Instructor in Medicine
- Harvard Medical School
Uterine cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries and is the second most common in developing countries (cervical cancer is more common). The incidence of endometrial carcinoma (EC) is increasing in developed countries due to increased obesity and longer life expectancy. (See "Endometrial carcinoma: Epidemiology and risk factors", section on 'Epidemiology'.)
The standard initial treatment of EC is hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and assessment of retroperitoneal lymph nodes. This is an acceptable option for the majority of women with EC, most of whom are postmenopausal. However, younger women may desire fertility-sparing treatment options. For women who are candidates for fertility preservation, the most common approach is progestin therapy and deferral of surgical staging until after completion of childbearing. Use of this approach is limited to women with low-risk disease, and with fertility preservation the risk of recurrent or persistent disease is higher than with hysterectomy.
Fertility preservation in women with EC is reviewed here. Related topics are discussed in detail separately, including:
●Overview (see "Overview of endometrial carcinoma")
●Histopathology and pathogenesis (see "Endometrial carcinoma: Histopathology and pathogenesis")To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information on subscription options, click below on the option that best describes you:
- http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/corp.html (Accessed on June 06, 2016).
- Lee NK, Cheung MK, Shin JY, et al. Prognostic factors for uterine cancer in reproductive-aged women. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:655.
- Duska LR, Garrett A, Rueda BR, et al. Endometrial cancer in women 40 years old or younger. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 83:388.
- Walsh C, Holschneider C, Hoang Y, et al. Coexisting ovarian malignancy in young women with endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106:693.
- Lu KH, Schorge JO, Rodabaugh KJ, et al. Prospective determination of prevalence of lynch syndrome in young women with endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:5158.
- Soliman PT, Broaddus RR, Schmeler KM, et al. Women with synchronous primary cancers of the endometrium and ovary: do they have Lynch syndrome? J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:9344.
- Kauff ND. How should women with early-onset endometrial cancer be evaluated for lynch syndrome? J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:5143.
- Creasman WT, Morrow CP, Bundy BN, et al. Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer 1987; 60:2035.
- Kumar S, Medeiros F, Dowdy SC, et al. A prospective assessment of the reliability of frozen section to direct intraoperative decision making in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 127:525.
- Mariani A, Dowdy SC, Keeney GL, et al. High-risk endometrial cancer subgroups: candidates for target-based adjuvant therapy. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 95:120.
- Kaku T, Yoshikawa H, Tsuda H, et al. Conservative therapy for adenocarcinoma and atypical endometrial hyperplasia of the endometrium in young women: central pathologic review and treatment outcome. Cancer Lett 2001; 167:39.
- Park JY, Kim DY, Kim TJ, et al. Hormonal therapy for women with stage IA endometrial cancer of all grades. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122:7.
- Goodman A. Endometrial cancer with concurrent ovarian malignancy: assessing the risks. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106:680.
- Chan JL, Letourneau J, Salem W, et al. Regret around fertility choices is decreased with pre-treatment counseling in gynecologic cancer patients. J Cancer Surviv 2017; 11:58.
- Dijkhuizen FP, Mol BW, Brölmann HA, Heintz AP. The accuracy of endometrial sampling in the diagnosis of patients with endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia: a meta-analysis. Cancer 2000; 89:1765.
- Leitao MM Jr, Kehoe S, Barakat RR, et al. Comparison of D&C and office endometrial biopsy accuracy in patients with FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 113:105.
- Vasconcelos C, Félix A, Cunha TM. Preoperative assessment of deep myometrial and cervical invasion in endometrial carcinoma: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and histopathologic evaluation. J Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 27:65.
- Sironi S, Taccagni G, Garancini P, et al. Myometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma: assessment by MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158:565.
- DelMaschio A, Vanzulli A, Sironi S, et al. Estimating the depth of myometrial involvement by endometrial carcinoma: efficacy of transvaginal sonography vs MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 160:533.
- Yamashita Y, Mizutani H, Torashima M, et al. Assessment of myometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma: transvaginal sonography vs contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161:595.
- Manfredi R, Mirk P, Maresca G, et al. Local-regional staging of endometrial carcinoma: role of MR imaging in surgical planning. Radiology 2004; 231:372.
- Barwick TD, Rockall AG, Barton DP, Sohaib SA. Imaging of endometrial adenocarcinoma. Clin Radiol 2006; 61:545.
- Kinkel K, Kaji Y, Yu KK, et al. Radiologic staging in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Radiology 1999; 212:711.
- Zarbo G, Caruso G, Caruso S, et al. Endometrial cancer: preoperative evaluation of myometrial infiltration magnetic resonance imaging versus transvaginal ultrasonography. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2000; 21:95.
- Varpula MJ, Klemi PJ. Staging of uterine endometrial carcinoma with ultra-low field (0.02 T) MRI: a comparative study with CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17:641.
- Montz FJ, Bristow RE, Bovicelli A, et al. Intrauterine progesterone treatment of early endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186:651.
- Dhar KK, NeedhiRajan T, Koslowski M, Woolas RP. Is levonorgestrel intrauterine system effective for treatment of early endometrial cancer? Report of four cases and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 97:924.
- Jadoul P, Donnez J. Conservative treatment may be beneficial for young women with atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial adenocarcinoma. Fertil Steril 2003; 80:1315.
- Gunderson CC, Fader AN, Carson KA, Bristow RE. Oncologic and reproductive outcomes with progestin therapy in women with endometrial hyperplasia and grade 1 adenocarcinoma: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 125:477.
- Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Bodurka DC, et al. Hormonal therapy for the management of grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma: a literature review. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 95:133.
- Ushijima K, Yahata H, Yoshikawa H, et al. Multicenter phase II study of fertility-sparing treatment with medroxyprogesterone acetate for endometrial carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia in young women. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:2798.
- Abu Hashim H, Ghayaty E, El Rakhawy M. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system vs oral progestins for non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213:469.
- Orbo A, Vereide A, Arnes M, et al. Levonorgestrel-impregnated intrauterine device as treatment for endometrial hyperplasia: a national multicentre randomised trial. BJOG 2014; 121:477.
- Qin Y, Yu Z, Yang J, et al. Oral Progestin Treatment for Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016; 26:1081.
- Gallos ID, Yap J, Rajkhowa M, et al. Regression, relapse, and live birth rates with fertility-sparing therapy for endometrial cancer and atypical complex endometrial hyperplasia: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207:266.e1.
- Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes after fertility-sparing management using oral progestin for young women with endometrial cancer (KGOG 2002). Eur J Cancer 2013; 49:868.
- Bakkum-Gamez JN, Kalogera E, Keeney GL, et al. Conservative management of atypical hyperplasia and grade I endometrial carcinoma: Review of the literature and presentation of a series. J Gynecol Surg 2012; 28:262.
- Eftekhar Z, Izadi-Mood N, Yarandi F, et al. Efficacy of megestrol acetate (megace) in the treatment of patients with early endometrial adenocarcinoma: our experiences with 21 patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009; 19:249.
- Koskas M, Uzan J, Luton D, et al. Prognostic factors of oncologic and reproductive outcomes in fertility-sparing management of endometrial atypical hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2014; 101:785.
- Schindler AE, Campagnoli C, Druckmann R, et al. Classification and pharmacology of progestins. Maturitas 2003; 46 Suppl 1:S7.
- Thigpen JT, Brady MF, Alvarez RD, et al. Oral medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a dose-response study by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17:1736.
- Simpson AN, Feigenberg T, Clarke BA, et al. Fertility sparing treatment of complex atypical hyperplasia and low grade endometrial cancer using oral progestin. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 133:229.
- Randall TC, Kurman RJ. Progestin treatment of atypical hyperplasia and well-differentiated carcinoma of the endometrium in women under age 40. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90:434.
- Kim MK, Seong SJ, Kim YS, et al. Combined medroxyprogesterone acetate/levonorgestrel-intrauterine system treatment in young women with early-stage endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209:358.e1.
- Park JY, Lee SH, Seong SJ, et al. Progestin re-treatment in patients with recurrent endometrial adenocarcinoma after successful fertility-sparing management using progestin. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 129:7.
- Gallos ID, Krishan P, Shehmar M, et al. LNG-IUS versus oral progestogen treatment for endometrial hyperplasia: a long-term comparative cohort study. Hum Reprod 2013; 28:2966.
- Pronin SM, Novikova OV, Andreeva JY, Novikova EG. Fertility-Sparing Treatment of Early Endometrial Cancer and Complex Atypical Hyperplasia in Young Women of Childbearing Potential. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015; 25:1010.
- Baker J, Obermair A, Gebski V, Janda M. Efficacy of oral or intrauterine device-delivered progestin in patients with complex endometrial hyperplasia with atypia or early endometrial adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 125:263.
- Nilsson CG, Haukkamaa M, Vierola H, Luukkainen T. Tissue concentrations of levonorgestrel in women using a levonorgestrel-releasing IUD. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1982; 17:529.
- Cade TJ, Quinn MA, Rome RM, Neesham D. Progestogen treatment options for early endometrial cancer. BJOG 2010; 117:879.
- Wildemeersch D, Janssens D, Pylyser K, et al. Management of patients with non-atypical and atypical endometrial hyperplasia with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: long-term follow-up. Maturitas 2007; 57:210.
- Varma R, Soneja H, Bhatia K, et al. The effectiveness of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia--a long-term follow-up study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 139:169.
- Wheeler DT, Bristow RE, Kurman RJ. Histologic alterations in endometrial hyperplasia and well-differentiated carcinoma treated with progestins. Am J Surg Pathol 2007; 31:988.
- Mirena (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system) package insert.
- Lajer H, Elnegaard S, Christensen RD, et al. Survival after stage IA endometrial cancer; can follow-up be altered? A prospective nationwide Danish survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012; 91:976.
- Kim MK, Yoon BS, Park H, et al. Conservative treatment with medroxyprogesterone acetate plus levonorgestrel intrauterine system for early-stage endometrial cancer in young women: pilot study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2011; 21:673.
- Kim MK, Seong SJ, Song T, et al. Comparison of dilatation & curettage and endometrial aspiration biopsy accuracy in patients treated with high-dose oral progestin plus levonorgestrel intrauterine system for early-stage endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 130:470.
- Eskander RN, Randall LM, Berman ML, et al. Fertility preserving options in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205:103.
- Kimmig R, Strowitzki T, Müller-Höcker J, et al. Conservative treatment of endometrial cancer permitting subsequent triplet pregnancy. Gynecol Oncol 1995; 58:255.
- Lowe MP, Cooper BC, Sood AK, et al. Implementation of assisted reproductive technologies following conservative management of FIGO grade I endometrial adenocarcinoma and/or complex hyperplasia with atypia. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 91:569.
- Paulson RJ, Sauer MV, Lobo RA. Pregnancy after in vitro fertilization in a patient with stage I endometrial carcinoma treated with progestins. Fertil Steril 1990; 54:735.
- Vaccarello L, Apte SM, Copeland LJ, et al. Endometrial carcinoma associated with pregnancy: A report of three cases and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 1999; 74:118.
- Mitsushita J, Toki T, Kato K, et al. Endometrial carcinoma remaining after term pregnancy following conservative treatment with medroxyprogesterone acetate. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 79:129.
- Arendas K, Aldossary M, Cipolla A, et al. Hysteroscopic resection in the management of early-stage endometrial cancer: report of 2 cases and review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015; 22:34.
- Laurelli G, Di Vagno G, Scaffa C, et al. Conservative treatment of early endometrial cancer: preliminary results of a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 120:43.
- Mazzon I, Corrado G, Masciullo V, et al. Conservative surgical management of stage IA endometrial carcinoma for fertility preservation. Fertil Steril 2010; 93:1286.
- Chang YN, Zhang Y, Wang YJ, et al. Effect of hysteroscopy on the peritoneal dissemination of endometrial cancer cells: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2011; 96:957.
- Lee TS, Jung JY, Kim JW, et al. Feasibility of ovarian preservation in patients with early stage endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 104:52.
- Wright JD, Buck AM, Shah M, et al. Safety of ovarian preservation in premenopausal women with endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:1214.
- INCIDENCE IN REPRODUCTIVE-AGE WOMEN
- RISKS OF FERTILITY PRESERVATION
- SELECTION OF CANDIDATES
- Selection criteria
- Pretreatment evaluation
- FERTILITY-SPARING THERAPY OPTIONS
- Progestin therapy
- - Oral agents
- Efficacy, agent, and dose
- Predictors of response
- Time interval to response
- Risk and timing of recurrence
- - Progestin intrauterine device
- - Clinical protocol
- Treatment regimen
- - Reproductive outcomes
- Hysteroscopic resection
- Other options
- SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS