Ethical issues in the care of the patient with end-stage renal disease
- Holly M Koncicki, MD
Holly M Koncicki, MD
- Assistant Professor
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
- Lionel U Mailloux, MD, FACP
Lionel U Mailloux, MD, FACP
- Clinical Professor of Medicine
- Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine
- Section Editors
- Steve J Schwab, MD
Steve J Schwab, MD
- Editor-in-Chief — Nephrology
- Section Editor — Dialysis
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center
- R Sean Morrison, MD
R Sean Morrison, MD
- Section Editor — Selected End Stage Conditions
- Hermann Merkin Professor of Palliative Care
- Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Although dialysis successfully treats patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), there are patients who have additional clinical characteristics that draw into question the appropriateness or continuation of such therapy. Not every patient benefits from renal replacement therapy to the same degree.
The universal availability of dialysis in the United States allows the nephrologist to consider its application in every patient in whom it might be indicated. In this setting, each patient and clinical setting must be judged individually . As an example, the issues and concerns surrounding a 45-year-old patient with adult polycystic kidney disease are entirely different from those of a 90 year old with severe arteriosclerosis.
The general ethical issues surrounding the dialytic or conservative care of patients with ESRD are presented in this topic review. Issues regarding kidney transplantation are discussed elsewhere. (See "Evaluation of the potential renal transplant recipient".)
Practical considerations regarding the decision to forego dialysis and the ongoing medical care of patients who forego dialysis are discussed separately. (See "Withdrawal from and withholding of dialysis" and "Conservative care of end-stage renal disease".)
ETHICAL FRAMEWORK IN DECISION MAKING
Decisions involving the initiation or maintenance of dialysis, particularly among patients who are suboptimal candidates for chronic dialysis therapy, involve several ethical principles, collectively called principalism . (See "Ethical issues in palliative care", section on 'Applying principlism in palliative care'.)To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information on subscription options, click below on the option that best describes you:
- Moss AH. Revised dialysis clinical practice guideline promotes more informed decision-making. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5:2380.
- Ho A, Spencer M, McGuire M. When Frail Individuals or Their Families Request Nonindicated Interventions: Usefulness of the Four-Box Ethical Approach. J Am Geriatr Soc 2015; 63:1674.
- President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Making health care decisions: The legal and ethical implications of informed consent in the patient-practitioner relationship. United States Government Printing Office; Washington, DC 1982.
- Wright AA, Zhang B, Ray A, et al. Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA 2008; 300:1665.
- Janssen DJ, Spruit MA, Schols JM, et al. Insight into advance care planning for patients on dialysis. J Pain Symptom Manage 2013; 45:104.
- Combs SA, Culp S, Matlock DD, et al. Update on end-of-life care training during nephrology fellowship: a cross-sectional national survey of fellows. Am J Kidney Dis 2015; 65:233.
- Buckman R, Kason Y. How to Break Bad News - A Guide for Health Care Professionals, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 1992. p.65.
- Schell JO, Cohen RA. A communication framework for dialysis decision-making for frail elderly patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2014; 9:2014.
- Koncicki HM, Schell JO. Communication Skills and Decision Making for Elderly Patients With Advanced Kidney Disease: A Guide for Nephrologists. Am J Kidney Dis 2016; 67:688.
- Wachterman MW, Marcantonio ER, Davis RB, et al. Relationship between the prognostic expectations of seriously ill patients undergoing hemodialysis and their nephrologists. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173:1206.
- Carson RC, Juszczak M, Davenport A, Burns A. Is maximum conservative management an equivalent treatment option to dialysis for elderly patients with significant comorbid disease? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4:1611.
- Weisbord SD. Symptoms and their correlates in chronic kidney disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2007; 14:319.
- Da Silva-Gane M, Wellsted D, Greenshields H, et al. Quality of life and survival in patients with advanced kidney failure managed conservatively or by dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2012; 7:2002.
- Detering KM, Hancock AD, Reade MC, Silvester W. The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2010; 340:c1345.
- Messinger-Rapport BJ, Baum EE, Smith ML. Advance care planning: Beyond the living will. Cleve Clin J Med 2009; 76:276.
- Respecting Choices. http://www.gundersenhealth.org/respecting-choices (Accessed on August 15, 2013).
- Holley JL. Advance care planning in CKD/ESRD: an evolving process. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2012; 7:1033.
- Sudore RL, Fried TR. Redefining the "planning" in advance care planning: preparing for end-of-life decision making. Ann Intern Med 2010; 153:256.
- Song MK, Ward SE, Fine JP, et al. Advance care planning and end-of-life decision making in dialysis: a randomized controlled trial targeting patients and their surrogates. Am J Kidney Dis 2015; 66:813.
- Elpern EH, Covert B, Kleinpell R. Moral distress of staff nurses in a medical intensive care unit. Am J Crit Care 2005; 14:523.
- Singer PA, Thiel EC, Naylor CD, et al. Life-sustaining treatment preferences of hemodialysis patients: implications for advance directives. J Am Soc Nephrol 1995; 6:1410.
- Swartz RD, Perry E, Schneider C, et al. The option to withdraw from chronic dialysis treatment. Adv Ren Replace Ther 1994; 1:264.
- Holley JL, Nespor S, Rault R. The effects of providing chronic hemodialysis patients written material on advance directives. Am J Kidney Dis 1993; 22:413.
- Holley JL, Nespor S, Rault R. Chronic in-center hemodialysis patients' attitudes, knowledge, and behavior towards advance directives. J Am Soc Nephrol 1993; 3:1405.
- Holley JL, Foulks CJ, Moss AH. Nephrologists' reported attitudes about factors influencing recommendations to initiate or withdraw dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1991; 1:1284.
- Mendelssohn DC, Singer PA. Advance directives in dialysis. Adv Ren Replace Ther 1994; 1:240.
- Perry E, Buck C, Newsome J, et al. Dialysis staff influence patients in formulating their advance directives. Am J Kidney Dis 1995; 25:262.
- Cohen LM, McCue JD, Germain M, Woods A. Denying the dying. Advance directives and dialysis discontinuation. Psychosomatics 1997; 38:27.
- Swartz RD, Perry E. Advance directives are associated with "good deaths" in chronic dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 1993; 3:1623.
- Moss AH, Hozayen O, King K, et al. Attitudes of patients toward cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the dialysis unit. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 38:847.
- Anderson JE, Sikorski I, Finucane TE. Advance care planning by or on behalf of peritoneal dialysis patients in long-term care. Am J Kidney Dis 2006; 48:122.
- Davison SN. Facilitating advance care planning for patients with end-stage renal disease: the patient perspective. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 1:1023.
- Davison SN, Torgunrud C. The creation of an advance care planning process for patients with ESRD. Am J Kidney Dis 2007; 49:27.
- Perry E, Swartz J, Brown S, et al. Peer mentoring: a culturally sensitive approach to end-of-life planning for long-term dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2005; 46:111.
- O'Hare AM, Szarka J, McFarland LV, et al. Provider Perspectives on Advance Care Planning for Patients with Kidney Disease: Whose Job Is It Anyway? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2016; 11:855.
- Moss AH, Stocking CB, Sachs GA, Siegler M. Variation in the attitudes of dialysis unit medical directors toward decisions to withhold and withdraw dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1993; 4:229.
- Lowance DC. Factors and guidelines to be considered in offering treatment to patients with end-stage renal disease: a personal opinion. Am J Kidney Dis 1993; 21:679.
- Payne K, Taylor RM, Stocking C, Sachs GA. Physicians' attitudes about the care of patients in the persistent vegetative state: a national survey. Ann Intern Med 1996; 125:104.
- Moss AH. To use dialysis appropriately: the emerging consensus on patient selection guidelines. Adv Ren Replace Ther 1995; 2:175.
- Hirsch DJ, West ML, Cohen AD, Jindal KK. Experience with not offering dialysis to patients with a poor prognosis. Am J Kidney Dis 1994; 23:463.
- ETHICAL FRAMEWORK IN DECISION MAKING
- Application of ethical principles to decisions regarding dialysis
- EDUCATION AND COMMUNICATION WITH THE PATIENT
- Importance of communication
- How to communicate
- Quality of life
- ADVANCE CARE PLANNING AND ADVANCE DIRECTIVES
- Benefits of advance care planning in dialysis patients
- SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS