Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Enhanced cardiac automaticity

Philip J Podrid, MD, FACC
Section Editor
Bernard J Gersh, MB, ChB, DPhil, FRCP, MACC
Deputy Editor
Brian C Downey, MD, FACC


Enhanced cardiac automaticity refers to the accelerated generation of an action potential by either normal pacemaker tissue (enhanced normal automaticity) or by abnormal tissue within the myocardium (abnormal automaticity). The discharge rate of normal or abnormal pacemakers may be accelerated by drugs, various forms of cardiac disease, reduction in extracellular potassium, or alterations of autonomic nervous system tone. Enhanced normal automaticity accounts for the occurrence of sinus tachycardia, while abnormal automaticity may result in various atrial or ventricular arrhythmias, for example, an accelerated idioventricular rhythm or an ectopic atrial tachycardia.

This topic will review the physiologic principles underlying both enhanced normal automaticity and automatic automaticity. The diagnosis and treatment of arrhythmias resulting from enhanced cardiac automaticity are discussed separately. (See "Sinus tachycardia: Evaluation and management" and "Focal atrial tachycardia".)


Enhanced normal automaticity is best understood by beginning with a brief review of the physiology and hierarchy of stimulation of normal cardiac automaticity. This will be followed by a discussion of the electrophysiologic principles underlying the normal and enhanced automaticity of the sinoatrial (SA) node, the subsidiary atrial pacemakers, the atrioventricular (AV) node, and the ventricles.

Normal automaticity — Normal automaticity involves the slow, progressive depolarization of the membrane potential (spontaneous diastolic depolarization or phase four depolarization) until a threshold potential is reached, at which point an action potential (figure 1 and figure 2) is initiated. Although automaticity is an intrinsic property of all myocardial cells, the occurrence of spontaneous activity is prevented by the natural hierarchy of pacemaker function. (See "Myocardial action potential and action of antiarrhythmic drugs".)

The spontaneous discharge rate of the SA nodal complex exceeds that of all other subsidiary or latent pacemakers. As a result, the impulse initiated by the SA node depresses the activity of subsidiary pacemaker sites before they can spontaneously depolarize to threshold. However, slowly depolarizing and previously suppressed pacemakers in the atrium, AV node, or ventricle can become active and assume pacemaker control of the cardiac rhythm if the SA node pacemaker becomes slow or unable to generate an impulse or if impulses generated by the SA node are unable to activate the surrounding atrial myocardium. The emergence of subsidiary or latent pacemakers under such circumstances is an appropriate fail-safe mechanism which assures that ventricular activation is maintained. A subsidiary pacemaker may also become activated if there is sympathetic stimulation or increased catecholamines, resulting in a pacemaker discharge rate that is faster than the rate of sinus node discharge. This represents an accelerated rhythm.

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information on subscription options, click below on the option that best describes you:

Subscribers log in here

Literature review current through: Sep 2017. | This topic last updated: Sep 22, 2017.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2017 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. DiFrancesco D. The pacemaker current (I(f)) plays an important role in regulating SA node pacemaker activity. Cardiovasc Res 1995; 30:307.
  2. Irisawa, H, Hagiwara, N . Ionic current in sinoatrial node cells. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1991; 2:531.
  3. Brown HF. Electrophysiology of the sinoatrial node. Physiol Rev 1982; 62:505.
  4. Reuter H. Calcium channel modulation by neurotransmitters, enzymes and drugs. Nature 1983; 301:569.
  5. Kameyama M, Hofmann F, Trautwein W. On the mechanism of beta-adrenergic regulation of the Ca channel in the guinea-pig heart. Pflugers Arch 1985; 405:285.
  6. Boineau JP, Canavan TE, Schuessler RB, et al. Demonstration of a widely distributed atrial pacemaker complex in the human heart. Circulation 1988; 77:1221.
  7. Bouman LN, Gerlings ED, Biersteker PA, Bonke FI. Pacemaker shift in the sino-atrial node during vagal stimulation. Pflugers Arch 1968; 302:255.
  8. Goldberg JM. Intra-SA-nodal pacemaker shifts induced by autonomic nerve stimulation in the dog. Am J Physiol 1975; 229:1116.
  9. Zipes DP. Specific arrhythmias: diagnosis and treatment. In: Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, Braunwald E (Ed), Saunders, Philadelphia 1992. p.667.
  10. Eckberg DL. Human sinus arrhythmia as an index of vagal cardiac outflow. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 1983; 54:961.
  11. Grossman P, Kollai M. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia, cardiac vagal tone, and respiration: within- and between-individual relations. Psychophysiology 1993; 30:486.
  12. Steinbeck G, Bonke FI, Allessie MA, Lammers WJ. The effect of ouabain on the isolated sinus node preparation of the rabbit studied with microelectrodes. Circ Res 1980; 46:406.
  13. Alboni P, Shantha N, Filippi L, et al. Clinical effects of digoxin on sinus node and atrioventricular node function after pharmacologic autonomic blockade. Am Heart J 1984; 108:1255.
  14. Wit AL, Cranefield PF. Triggered and automatic activity in the canine coronary sinus. Circ Res 1977; 41:434.
  15. Jones SB, Euler DE, Randall WC, et al. Atrial ectopic foci in the canine heart: hierarchy of pacemaker automaticity. Am J Physiol 1980; 238:H788.
  16. Wit AL, Fenoglio JJ Jr, Wagner BM, Bassett AL. Electrophysiological properties of cardiac muscle in the anterior mitral valve leaflet and the adjacent atrium in the dog. Possible implications for the genesis of atrial dysrhythmias. Circ Res 1973; 32:731.
  17. Hogan PM, Davis LD. Evidence for specialized fibers in the canine right atrium. Circ Res 1968; 23:387.
  18. James TN, Sherf L, Fine G, Morales AR. Comparative ultrastructure of the sinus node in man and dog. Circulation 1966; 34:139.
  19. Haïssaguerre M, Jaïs P, Shah DC, et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:659.
  20. Chen SA, Hsieh MH, Tai CT, et al. Initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating from the pulmonary veins: electrophysiological characteristics, pharmacological responses, and effects of radiofrequency ablation. Circulation 1999; 100:1879.
  21. Swerdlow CD, Liem LB. Atrial and junctional tachycardias: clinical presentation, course and therapy. In: Cardiac Electrophysiology. From Cell to Bedside, Zipes,DP, Jalife J (Eds), Saunders, Philadelphia 1990. p.742.
  22. Goldreyer BN, Gallagher JJ, Damato AN. The electrophysiologic demonstration of atrial ectopic tachycardia in man. Am Heart J 1973; 85:205.
  23. Kokubun S, Nishimura M, Noma A, Irisawa H. The spontaneous action potential of rabbit atrioventricular node cells. Jpn J Physiol 1980; 30:529.
  24. Noma A, Irisawa H, Kokobun S, et al. Slow current systems in the A-V node of the rabbit heart. Nature 1980; 285:228.
  25. Watanabe Y, Nishimura M, Noda T, et al. Atrioventricular junctional tachycardias. In: Cardiac Electrophysiology. From Cell to Bedside, Zipes DP, Jalife J (Eds), Saunders, Philadelphia 1990. p.564.
  26. DiFrancesco D. A new interpretation of the pace-maker current in calf Purkinje fibres. J Physiol 1981; 314:359.
  27. Hirano Y, Hiraoka M. Barium-induced automatic activity in isolated ventricular myocytes from guinea-pig hearts. J Physiol 1988; 395:455.
  28. Vassalle M. The relationship among cardiac pacemakers. Overdrive suppression. Circ Res 1977; 41:269.
  29. Vassalle M. Electrogenic suppression of automaticity in sheep and dog purkinje fibers. Circ Res 1970; 27:361.
  30. Allen JD, Brennan FJ, Wit AL. Actions of lidocaine on transmembrane potentials of subendocardial Purkinje fibers surviving in infarcted canine hearts. Circ Res 1978; 43:470.
  31. Friedman PL, Stewart JR, Wit AL. Spontaneous and induced cardiac arrhythmias in subendocardial Purkinje fibers surviving extensive myocardial infarction in dogs. Circ Res 1973; 33:612.
  32. Lazzara R, el-Sherif N, Scherlag BJ. Electrophysiological properties of canine Purkinje cells in one-day-old myocardial infarction. Circ Res 1973; 33:722.
  33. Dangman KH, Danilo P Jr, Hordof AJ, et al. Electrophysiologic characteristics of human ventricular and Purkinje fibers. Circulation 1982; 65:362.
  34. Horowitz LN, Spear JF, Moore EN. Subendocardial origin of ventricular arrhythmias in 24-hour-old experimental myocardial infarction. Circulation 1976; 53:56.
  35. Imanishi S. Calcium-sensitive discharges in canine Purkinje fibers. Jpn J Physiol 1971; 21:443.
  36. Imanishi S, Surawicz B. Automatic activity in depolarized guinea pig ventricular myocardium. Characteristics and mechanisms. Circ Res 1976; 39:751.
  37. Grant AO, Katzung BG. The effects of quinidine and verapamil on electrically induced automaticity in the ventricular myocardium of guinea pig. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1976; 196:407.
  38. Elharrar V, Zipes DP. Voltage modulation of automaticity in cardiac Purkinje fibers. In: The slow inward current and cardiac arrhythmias, Zipes DP, Bailey JC, Elharrar V (Eds), Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague 1980. p.357.
  39. Katzung BG. Effects of extracellular calcium and sodium on depolarization-induced automaticity in guinea pig papillary muscle. Circ Res 1975; 37:118.
  40. Pappano AJ, Carmeliet EE. Epinephrine and the pacemaking mechanism at plateau potentials in sheep cardiac Purkinje fibers. Pflugers Arch 1979; 382:17.
  41. Hauswirth O, Noble D, Tsien RW. The mechanism of oscillatory activity at low membrane potentials in cardiac Purkinje fibres. J Physiol 1969; 200:255.
  42. Katzung BG, Morgenstern JA. Effects of extracellular potassium on ventricular automaticity and evidence for a pacemaker current in mammalian ventricular myocardium. Circ Res 1977; 40:105.
  43. Ceremuzyński L, Staszewska-Barczak J, Herbaczynska-Cedro K. Cardiac rhythm disturbances and the release of catecholamines after acute coronary occlusion in dogs. Cardiovasc Res 1969; 3:190.
  44. Cameron JS, Han J. Effects of epinephrine on automaticity and the incidence of arrhythmias in Purkinje fibers surviving myocardial infarction. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1982; 223:573.
  45. Barber MJ, Mueller TM, Henry DP, et al. Transmural myocardial infarction in the dog produces sympathectomy in noninfarcted myocardium. Circulation 1983; 67:787.
  46. Nuss HB, Kääb S, Kass DA, et al. Cellular basis of ventricular arrhythmias and abnormal automaticity in heart failure. Am J Physiol 1999; 277:H80.
  47. Hoppe UC, Jansen E, Südkamp M, Beuckelmann DJ. Hyperpolarization-activated inward current in ventricular myocytes from normal and failing human hearts. Circulation 1998; 97:55.