UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Downloading data from positive airway pressure devices in adults

Author
Aneesa M Das, MD
Section Editor
Nancy Collop, MD
Deputy Editor
Geraldine Finlay, MD

INTRODUCTION

Positive airway pressure (PAP) devices are primarily used to treat sleep disordered breathing including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Adherence and efficacy of PAP is routinely monitored subjectively. However, downloadable data from PAP devices provide objective data that complement subjective assessment to facilitate further management [1,2]. Documentation of adherence (ie, compliance) from these downloads is often mandated by insurers. Although downloading additional data from PAP devices has become commonplace, their accuracy in determining efficacy of treatment compared with in-laboratory polysomnography is uncertain and data demonstrating improved outcomes with their use are few.

Using device data downloads to determine adherence with and efficacy of PAP is discussed in this topic review. Details regarding use of downloadable information for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration following initiation are discussed separately. (See "Mode selection for positive airway pressure titration in adults with obstructive sleep apnea", section on 'Assessing adequacy of PAP settings' and "Mode selection for positive airway pressure titration in adult patients with central sleep apnea syndromes" and "Mode selection for positive airway pressure titration in adults with obstructive sleep apnea", section on 'Follow-up'.)

RATIONALE FOR DEVICE DOWNLOADS

Data from positive airway pressure (PAP) devices are downloaded for the following reasons:

Documentation of adherence (ie, compliance) to PAP devices is often mandated by third party insurers so that reimbursement can be justified. Adherence can be readily identified and quantified from device downloads. (See 'Assessing adherence' below.)

Downloadable data may also identify PAP efficacy. (See 'Assessing effectiveness' below.)

            
To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information on subscription options, click below on the option that best describes you:

Subscribers log in here

Literature review current through: Sep 2017. | This topic last updated: Jan 23, 2017.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2017 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Epstein LJ, Kristo D, Strollo PJ Jr, et al. Clinical guideline for the evaluation, management and long-term care of obstructive sleep apnea in adults. J Clin Sleep Med 2009; 5:263.
  2. Rauscher H, Formanek D, Popp W, Zwick H. Self-reported vs measured compliance with nasal CPAP for obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 1993; 103:1675.
  3. Weaver TE, Kribbs NB, Pack AI, et al. Night-to-night variability in CPAP use over the first three months of treatment. Sleep 1997; 20:278.
  4. Aurora RN, Collop NA, Jacobowitz O, et al. Quality measures for the care of adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med 2015; 11:357.
  5. Schwab RJ, Badr SM, Epstein LJ, et al. An official American Thoracic Society statement: continuous positive airway pressure adherence tracking systems. The optimal monitoring strategies and outcome measures in adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 188:613.
  6. Kribbs NB, Pack AI, Kline LR, et al. Objective measurement of patterns of nasal CPAP use by patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993; 147:887.
  7. Berry RB, Brooks R, Gamaldo CE, et al for the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events: Rules, Terminology and Technical Specifications, Version 2.4, www.aasmnet.org, American Academy of Sleep Medicine, Darien, IL 2017.
  8. Berry RB, Kushida CA, Kryger MH, et al. Respiratory event detection by a positive airway pressure device. Sleep 2012; 35:361.
  9. Kushida CA, Chediak A, Berry RB, et al. Clinical guidelines for the manual titration of positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med 2008; 4:157.
  10. Cilli A, Uzun R, Bilge U. The accuracy of autotitrating CPAP-determined residual apnea-hypopnea index. Sleep Breath 2013; 17:189.
  11. Desai H, Patel A, Patel P, et al. Accuracy of autotitrating CPAP to estimate the residual Apnea-Hypopnea Index in patients with obstructive sleep apnea on treatment with autotitrating CPAP. Sleep Breath 2009; 13:383.
  12. Ikeda Y, Kasai T, Kawana F, et al. Comparison between the apnea-hypopnea indices determined by the REMstar Auto M series and those determined by standard in-laboratory polysomnography in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Intern Med 2012; 51:2877.
  13. Prasad B, Carley DW, Herdegen JJ. Continuous positive airway pressure device-based automated detection of obstructive sleep apnea compared to standard laboratory polysomnography. Sleep Breath 2010; 14:101.
  14. Li QY, Berry RB, Goetting MG, et al. Detection of upper airway status and respiratory events by a current generation positive airway pressure device. Sleep 2015; 38:597.
  15. Reiter J, Zleik B, Bazalakova M, et al. Residual Events during Use of CPAP: Prevalence, Predictors, and Detection Accuracy. J Clin Sleep Med 2016; 12:1153.
  16. Huang HC, Hillman DR, McArdle N. Control of OSA during automatic positive airway pressure titration in a clinical case series: predictors and accuracy of device download data. Sleep 2012; 35:1277.