Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these are addressed by vetting through a multi-level review process, and through requirements for references to be provided to support the content. Appropriately referenced content is required of all authors and must conform to UpToDate standards of evidence.
INTRODUCTION — Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies for allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis include Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), Ayurvedic medicine, other single and multiple herb preparations, acupuncture, homeopathy, and several other modalities. CAM therapies continue to gain popularity in the United States and throughout the world for the treatment of asthma and allergies.
This review is limited to those therapies about which there is published literature specifically concerning the treatment of allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis. These therapies include traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), acupuncture, Ayurvedic medicine, a variety of herbal therapies, and several others.
CAM therapies for allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis are discussed in this topic review. CHM for allergic diseases and CAM therapies for asthma are reviewed elsewhere. (See "Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of allergic diseases" and "Investigational agents for asthma".)
OVERVIEW — Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is commonly defined as a group of diverse medical and healthcare systems, practices, and products that are not generally considered part of the conventional allopathic medical practices. Complementary therapies are used together with conventional allopathic medicine, while alternative therapies are used in place of conventional medicine. More general reviews of the principles of various CAM therapies are also found separately. (See "Overview of herbal medicine and dietary supplements" and "Complementary and alternative medicine in pediatrics" and "Acupuncture" and "Homeopathy".)
Popularity — More than 20 percent of the United States population appears to suffer from an atopic disorder, such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis, and over 42 percent of people (both adults and children) have used CAM for their atopic disorder [1,2]. The popularity of CAM therapies for allergic disease is even greater in some European countries . Thus, it is important to ask patients about the use of CAM therapies in a nonjudgmental manner .
The use of CAM is growing in Western countries because of the reputed effectiveness, low cost, and favorable safety profiles of some therapies. Patients are often interested in alternative therapy either because conventional therapies are unsatisfactory or because of concerns about side effects of synthetic drugs [5-7]. The chronic nature of allergic diseases and the paucity of preventive or curative treatments also stimulate interest in CAM therapies . There are marked cultural differences in use of CAM (eg, patients from Southeast Asia commonly use herbal remedies for allergic rhinitis) .
Barriers to integration with allopathic medicine — One of the major concerns with CAM is that it is perceived to be "natural" and therefore safe by patients, but an analysis of safety reporting in randomized trials of CAM found that reporting of adverse effects was largely inadequate . Improvement in safety reporting would facilitate integration into routine patient care. However, until this materializes, healthcare providers can familiarize themselves as much as possible with the available scientific literature on CAM. Evidence-based information of CAM therapies is available through several internet sites. (See "Overview of herbal medicine and dietary supplements", section on 'Internet evidence-based resources'.)
Given the high prevalence of allergic diseases and associated costs of the CAM treatments, high quality data about these therapies are needed so that practice guidelines can be established. In the United States, the NCCIH/National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health has been tasked with evaluating mechanisms, efficacy, and safety of botanical medicines through basic science studies, clinical research, and the establishment of dedicated botanical research centers .
The design of randomized placebo-controlled studies in CAM is complicated by difficulties in blinding, creating an appropriate placebo (particularly for acupuncture), and designing a control treatment when the mechanisms of actions of the modality in question are poorly delineated (such as homeopathy). Additionally, the difference in philosophy of CAM interventions from conventional health care allows for significant variation in the way CAM modalities are practiced (ie, therapies are often individualized for a particular patient and his/her specific disease state). Finally, the efficacy of CAM therapies may be heavily influenced by the patient's perception of his/her interaction with the provider, which is often more personal than the interaction between patients and allopathic healthcare providers. Thus, results may vary significantly among CAM providers and studies of CAM must also account for the influence of the patient-provider relationship.
TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE — Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) includes herbal therapy, acupuncture, massage, and dietary therapy. These practices originated in China and have been used in East Asia for centuries as a part of mainstream medical care. TCM treatments for allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis are reviewed separately. (See "Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of allergic diseases", section on 'Therapy for allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis'.)
ACUPUNCTURE AND ACUPRESSURE — Acupuncture is a component of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) that was originally thought to work on the principle of redistribution of Qi, the life energy. In TCM, disease is believed to originate from an imbalance of Qi or poor flow of Qi. The difficulties in designing trials of acupuncture are reviewed elsewhere. (See "Acupuncture", section on 'Basic theory' and "Acupuncture", section on 'Difficulties in research'.)
Studies of acupuncture for the treatment of allergic rhinitis have shown mixed results, with the most rigorous studies showing very modest clinical benefit [12-17]. A 2015 practice guideline suggested the potential use of acupuncture, but included limited data supporting its use in allergic rhinitis or allergic conjunctivitis .
●A systematic review identified 116 potentially relevant articles, of which 12 met criteria for inclusion by studying needle acupuncture, examining clinically relevant outcomes, and including a control, sham, or comparator treatment group . The results were different for seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis. There were no effects on seasonal symptoms, although some benefit was apparent for perennial symptoms. The magnitude of effect could not be estimated, although drug therapy could not be reduced as a result of acupuncture in either type of rhinitis.
●A subsequent randomized controlled trial demonstrated statistically significant but clinically modest improvement in the primary endpoint of total nasal symptom score after the fourth week of treatment. Improvement was not sustained one week after completion of the four-week course, but was surprisingly present three weeks later .
●In a multicenter randomized trial of 422 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis to birch and grass pollen (ACUSAR – ACUpuncture in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis), subjects were treated with eight weeks of acupuncture with rescue antihistamine (RA), sham acupuncture with RA, or RA alone . Rhinitis-related quality of life and antihistamine use were measured after the eight weeks of treatment, an additional eight weeks later, and one year later. When compared with sham acupuncture with RA and RA alone, acupuncture with RA resulted in an improvement of 0.5 points and a reduction in medication use of 0.7 points, where 1 point was equivalent to taking one less 10 mg cetirizine tablet daily. Thus, the benefit was statistically significant, but of questionable clinical importance. In a cost-effectiveness analysis of these data, the authors concluded that while acupuncture did cause small improvements in quality of life, it was very expensive and may not be a cost-effective intervention for allergic rhinitis .
Critique of the protocol used in ACUSAR included the use of more needles in the acupuncture patients versus the sham patients (16 compared with 10) and a larger fraction of patients in the acupuncture arm having high expectations for acupuncture efficacy at baseline (85 versus 73 percent) . In addition, the study was performed in two centers in South Korea and China, and pollen counts during the years of treatment and observation, which can dramatically influence results, were not reported. (See "Acupuncture", section on 'Trials for conditions other than pain'.)
In summary, the best trials of acupuncture for allergic rhinitis support limited benefit. Despite this, acupuncture may be a reasonable option for interested patients with relatively mild disease who wish to minimize medication use and find the cost of therapy acceptable.
Acupressure is similar to acupuncture but does not involve needles. Stainless steel pellets in adhesive discs are applied to specified points (acupoints) on the ear, and the pellets are pressed firmly into the skin. In a randomized sham-controlled trial, ear acupressure was studied for the treatment of mild to moderate perennial allergic rhinitis of 245 adults for eight weeks with a follow-up period of 12 weeks . Subjects were treated for 5 to 10 minutes weekly by a practitioner in a clinic and instructed to perform the therapy three times daily at home, for 10 seconds per session. There was a small but statistically significant improvement in sneezing and quality of life in the acupressure group after eight weeks, with additional improvements in most measures of nasal symptoms at the end of the follow-up period compared with the sham group. These findings are interesting, although additional studies will be required to make more definitive recommendations about the utility of this therapy.
AYURVEDA — Ayurvedic medicine is a medical tradition originating from India and derived from the teachings of ancient Hindu healers, which first appeared in text between 1500 and 1000 BC. Like TCM, Ayurvedic therapeutic interventions include yoga, meditation, breathing exercises, and herbal preparations. In its truest form, Ayurveda exists for the "promotion of health" rather than the treatment of specific disease states that have already begun to affect the body.
Ayurvedic herbal therapies have been evaluated in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Aller-7 is a mixture of seven Indian herbs (Albizia lebbeck, Terminalia chebula, Terminalia bellerica, Phyllanthus emblica, Piper nigrum, Piper longum, and Zingiber officinale) . In vitro studies examining the mixture demonstrated antihistaminic and antiinflammatory properties. In an experimental model using the nonspecific mast cell degranulating agent 48/80 ("antihistamine model"), Aller-7 appeared to be equivalent to cetirizine. In the best human study to date, Aller-7 was compared with placebo in 545 adult patients with allergic rhinitis (171 of whom took part in randomized protocols, while the others were treated in an open label fashion, treated for 12 weeks with 660 mg Aller-7 twice daily by mouth) . Clinically significant effects were noted at 6 and 12 weeks, which included 10 to 20 percent improvement in congestion, rhinorrhea, and sneezing compared with the placebo group in those patients in randomized protocols. Adverse effects were almost twice that of placebo and were largely mild gastrointestinal issues (eg, gastritis, discomfort, and dryness of mouth). Aller-7 is commercially available.
HERBAL THERAPIES (SYSTEMIC) — A variety of herbal preparations may be used by patients with allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis, although scientific evaluation of herbal products has been limited and only those that have been evaluated in published clinical trials are reviewed here. A 2007 systematic review identified 16 randomized controlled trials that met eligibility criteria . The agents discussed in this section are listed by their English names and their Latin or pharmacopeial names.
Most herbal preparations contain several components, each with potentially varying physiologic and pharmacologic properties. However, herbal therapies that differ by name may contain identical components and thus share similar clinical effects and adverse effects. This is important when trying to analyze studies that attribute a clinical or physiologic property to a specific herbal preparation.
In many countries, herbal medicines are minimally regulated and uncommonly monitored for adverse events by national surveillance systems. However, the increasing popularity of herbal medicines has led to concerns over their safety, quality, and efficacy on the part of health authorities and the general public. In response to these concerns, the World Health Organization has published formal monographs on selected medicinal plants to establish quality standards of herbal products and outline the parameters for their safe and effective use . Safety issues surrounding the use of herbal medications are reviewed elsewhere. (See "Overview of herbal medicine and dietary supplements" and "Hepatotoxicity due to herbal medications and dietary supplements".)
Choice of brand — Patients who use herbs often ask their providers what brand should be used. Lack of regulatory reform in the herbal industry makes it difficult for the clinician to provide an informed response. One option is to recommend brands that have been tested by independent sources, such as Consumer Labs, and found to meet minimum quality criteria . For ethical reasons, supplements sold through practitioners' offices or multilevel marketing plans should be avoided.
Children and pregnant or lactating women — Very few studies of herbal therapies have been conducted on infants and children or in pregnant and lactating women . Issues of particular concern include proper dosing in young children and greater susceptibility of fetuses and children to potential contaminants. We therefore discourage the use of herbal therapies in these patient groups.
Specific herbal agents
Butterbur (Petasites hybridus) — Extracts from the root of butterbur (Petasites hybridus) contain petasins, compounds that are believed to possess medicinal properties possibly by altering the leukotriene pathway . A systematic review of small, but randomized trials comparing herbal therapies with either placebo or active drug found evidence of efficacy based upon six double-blind randomized-controlled trials . In three of these, butterbur compared favorably with standard doses of nonsedating antihistamines (cetirizine, 10 mg daily and fexofenadine, 180 mg daily) [29-31]. Butterbur preparations are available under a variety of brand names.
Multiple portions of the butterbur plant can contain pyrrolizidine alkaloids, compounds that have hepatotoxic and potentially mutagenic and carcinogenic effects in humans [32,33]. At least 40 reports have appeared worldwide concerning hepatotoxicity with use of butterbur . Most cases of pyrrolizidine alkaloid toxicity result in moderate to severe liver damage. Early signs and symptoms include nausea and acute upper abdominal pain, while more advanced toxicity may present with abdominal distension, jaundice, and the development of ascites. In some cases, if the ingestion of the source is not stopped, the toxicity can lead to hepatic fibrosis and potentially fatal cirrhosis. Manufacturing processes can reduce the content of alkaloids and consumers should choose products that are labeled as low in pyrrolizidine alkaloids. However, they should also be aware of this potential hazard and be advised about early symptoms.
Tinofend (Tinospora cordifolia) — Tinofend is an Indian herbal medication containing extract from the stem of Tinospora cordifolia. In a double-blind randomized trial of 75 patients with allergic rhinitis, those receiving T. cordifolia (at a dose of 300 mg three times daily for eight weeks) reported statistically significant improvement in sneezing, nasal discharge, nasal obstruction, and nasal pruritus, compared with those receiving placebo . The drug was well tolerated, although it caused an increase in total blood leukocyte count in 70 percent of patients in the active treatment group, compared with 11 percent of those receiving placebo; a statistically significant difference. This was attributed to a possible "immunostimulatory" effect by the authors. There have been limited reports of hepatic toxicity, although several in vitro analyses performed by a manufacturer were reassuring [36,37].
Cinnamon bark, Spanish needle, and acerola — A combination of cinnamon bark extract, dehydrated Spanish Needle (Bidens pilosa) leaf and stem, and acerola fruit concentrate (at a dose of 450 mg three times daily) was compared with loratadine (10 mg once daily) and placebo in a randomized double-blind crossover study of 20 subjects with allergic rhinitis and sensitization to timothy grass pollen . Subjects took each study medication for two days and then underwent a nasal allergen challenge procedure with timothy pollen, after which nasal symptoms were assessed and nasal lavage fluid was examined for allergic mediators. Only loratadine significantly reduced symptoms acutely during the challenge, although both the botanical product and loratadine significantly reduced nasal symptoms two to eight hours after the challenge, compared with placebo. The magnitude of effect with both treatments was clinically significant. The botanical product appears to inhibit the production of prostaglandin D2 following challenge, which may suggest a steroid-like impact that affects the late-phase response of allergic inflammation. Long-term use has not been studied. This product is commercially available .
Benifuuki green tea — Benifuuki green tea is a specific cultivar that is rich in O-methylated epigallocatechin-3-O-(3-O-methyl) gallate or O-methylated EGCG, a compound that has anti-allergy properties [40-43]. In a randomized trial of 51 adults with Japanese cedar pollinosis, one-half of the group was assigned to drink 700 mL of Benifuuki tea daily, while the others drank a tea that does not contain O-methylated EGCG [43,44]. In the group drinking Benifuuki tea, the symptoms of pollinosis were significantly reduced, quality of life was improved, and the seasonal increase in peripheral blood eosinophils seen in the control group was suppressed. Although the effects were not sufficiently large to suggest that the tea could replace conventional therapies, the authors suggested that Benifuuki tea could be a useful adjunctive treatment.
Yupingfeng granules — Yupingfeng granules contain Astragalus membranaceus, Atractylodes, and Pastinaca sativa. In one study, 118 patients were randomized to cromoglycate drops combined with Yupingfeng granules or cromoglycate alone. In the combined group, 92 percent experienced control of symptoms, compared with 75 percent with cromoglycate alone .
Ayurvedic herbal mixes — These are discussed above. (See 'Ayurveda' above.)
NASAL SPRAYS, POWDERS, AND OINTMENTS — Nasal sprays containing either dilute capsaicin or inert cellulose have demonstrated efficacy in randomized controlled trials.
Capsaicin (Capsicum annum) — Capsaicin, derived from red peppers, is believed to act in other forms of rhinitis by desensitizing nasal nerve fibers and reducing nasal hyper-responsiveness . In a randomized study of 42 patients with allergic and nonallergic rhinitis, an intranasal solution of capsaicin and eucalyptol (added to reduce the burning sensation that some patient experience with capsaicin) used twice a day for two weeks was compared with placebo . There was a statistically greater reduction in total nasal symptom score, with the greatest improvement in nasal congestion, sinus pain and pressure, and headache, while the reduction in sneezing, rhinorrhea, and postnasal drip did not differ between the active and placebo groups. This product is commercially available .
Cellulose powder — The intranasal application of inert, micronized cellulose powder has been proposed to block mucosal allergen absorption. Some products suggest application every three hours. Products are available in many countries . Some efficacy has been demonstrated in a small number of randomized controlled trials [50-53]. The largest included 53 children (ages 8 to 18 years) with birch pollen-allergic rhinitis who were randomized to cellulose powder or a control preparation of lactose powder . Subjects were monitored for symptoms throughout the birch pollen season of one year. There was a significant reduction in total symptom scores from the nose and specifically for rhinorrhea, without adverse effects. However, another randomized trial of 20 subjects with a crossover design found no benefit . This study evaluated patients with seasonal grass or ragweed allergy who were treated with a nasal spray containing cellulose powder or placebo and then nasally challenged. There was no significant reduction in peak nasal inspiratory flow, total nasal symptoms, or number of sneezes.
Cellulose nasal powders have been available for nearly 20 years in some countries (United Kingdom). As far as the author and editors are aware, there are no reports of adverse effects with prolonged use. It seems logical that these products would interfere with the absorption of other nasal sprays used to treat allergic rhinitis, so if symptom control worsens on the combination, then the combination should be avoided.
Allergen-absorbing ointment — Another method of blocking allergen absorption into the nasal mucosa makes use of a petrolatum-based ointment containing long chain hydrocarbons . In a randomized controlled crossover study, 115 adult and pediatric subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis and sensitivities to dust mites and other allergens were assigned to active treatment or a placebo ointment. Ointments were applied three times daily, each for a 14-day period. No other allergy therapies were allowed. There was a large placebo effect, which may have been due to allergen blocking properties in the placebo gel (containing carboxymethylcellulose), although there was a significantly greater improvement in total nasal symptom scores in the active treatment group. Other smaller studies have also shown efficacy with the same or similar ointments [56-59]. However, comparative studies with allopathic treatments, such as intranasal glucocorticoids or oral antihistamines, are lacking.
CAM THERAPIES WITH MINIMAL EVIDENCE OF EFFICACY — A variety of other herbal preparations, homeopathic products, and miscellaneous therapies have been suggested for the treatment of allergic rhinitis or conjunctivitis. However, studies have either been of low quality or failed to show benefit.
Homeopathy — Homeopathy works on the principle of treatment with "similars." The remedies prescribed by homeopathic practitioners are essentially extremely dilute solutions of drugs known to cause the very symptoms that are to be treated. However, some products labeled as "homeopathic" can in fact contain substantial amounts of active ingredients and therefore could cause side effects and drug interactions.
According to the literature reviewed, 3 to 4 percent of CAM users use homeopathy and about 75 percent of patients seen by homeopathic practitioners report symptomatic improvement. However, meta-analyses and systematic reviews have repeatedly concluded that homeopathy is not different from placebo in the treatment of any medical disorder, including allergic rhinitis . (See "Homeopathy".)
Other herbal preparations — Other herbal preparations, for which evidence of efficacy for allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis is limited or lacking, include quercetin, stinging nettle, Perilla frutescens, gingko, milk thistle, and grape seed extract.
●Quercetin – Bioflavonoids, such as quercetin, have been of interest in the treatment of allergic diseases based upon studies showing that these compounds could act as mast cell-stabilizing agents, inhibiting the release of histamine, interleukin-8 (IL-8), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and inhibiting the formation of prostaglandin D2 in a dose-dependent fashion . Quercetin is one of the components of an Artemisia abrotanum intranasal spray that was administered to 12 patients with allergic rhinitis, conjunctivitis, or asthma in a small uncontrolled study . All subjects reported improvement in symptoms within five minutes of application, which lasted several hours. Ocular symptoms also improved with intranasal application. Quercetin is also found in Spanish needle. (See 'Cinnamon bark, Spanish needle, and acerola' above.)
●Stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) – Extracts from the root and leaves of stinging nettle (Radix urticae) have been used to treat allergic rhinitis. A very small clinical effect was noted in one randomized trial . The Latin genus name comes from the term "burn" due to the urticate (stinging) nature of its hairs secondary to the content histamine and other pruritogenic compounds.
Stinging nettle has no known contraindications or drug interactions, although contact with fresh leaves causes allergic type reactions, such as urticaria and burning and itching upon application to mucosal surfaces, and ingestion is known to cause mild gastrointestinal disturbances and rare diarrhea. It is also used homeopathically. (See 'Homeopathy' above.)
●Perilla frutescens – Perilla frutescens is an Asian herb. Two doses of a preparation enriched for rosmarinic acid was compared with placebo in a randomized controlled trial of 29 patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis . A significant difference was seen in quality of life between the higher dose P. frutescens and placebo after three weeks of treatment, although specific nasal and ocular symptoms were not statistically different.
●Eucalyptus – The steam distillation of eucalyptus leaves generates an oil rich in 1,8-cineole. A clinical study showed that five minutes of inhalation resulted in the sensation of cooling and increased nasal airflow . Eucalyptus preparations have been studied as a nasal decongestant during acute infectious rhinitis when applied in conjunction with camphor, menthol, or steam with improvements in symptoms .
●Menthol – Menthol can be used as a topical therapy for rhinitis due to its coolant effect. Menthol acts through the menthol and cold receptor "transient receptor potential channel melastatin 8" (TRPM8) in normal human nasal mucosa [67,68].
●Gingko biloba – There are limited studies in support of the treatment of allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis [69,70] using solutions of gingko biloba extract, although one study did reflect a positive trend for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis when applying the extract topically .
●Milk thistle – Silybum marianum, or silymarin, is a compound extracted from milk thistle. It has antioxidant and antifibrotic properties and has been most extensively studied in the treatment of liver disease . One study showed that subjects with allergic rhinitis treated with cetirizine, who also took silymarin, had reduced symptoms compared with those taking antihistamine alone . However, this herbal agent has been known to inhibit cytochrome P450 2C8 and 2C9, and alterations in drug levels are of a major concern as it has been shown to decrease the trough concentrations of indinavir in humans [73,74]. It is not recommended for the treatment of allergic rhinitis at this time.
●Grape seed extract – Grape seed extract has antioxidant properties and is marketed for the treatment of a variety of illnesses. However, a placebo-controlled study did not demonstrate any positive effect of grape seed extract on the treatment of allergic rhinitis .
Laser therapies — Laser therapies deliver light energy to specific targets, including endobronchial tissues, tympanic membranes, blood, and skin. Laser therapy is described with various terms in the literature, including laser ablation, photodynamic therapy (PDT) of bronchial tissue, endobronchial helium-neon laser irradiation (ELI), and laseropuncture (laser acupuncture) [76-83].
There are no controlled trials of laser therapies for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. An uncontrolled series described 42 patients with refractory rhinitis (allergic and nonallergic) who were treated with a single treatment with a diode laser under local anesthesia . Twenty-five reported subjective improvement in nasal symptomatology, especially nasal congestion/obstruction, and positive effects on quality of life, up to six years later. Nonallergic rhinitis has also been treated with laser therapy .
Other types of treatments — Several other CAM therapies have been studied in respiratory or inflammatory diseases, but not specifically in allergic rhinitis. These include apitherapy (ie, bee sting therapy), behavior modification techniques, and speleo- or halotherapy (ie, cave air therapy and salt inhalation therapy, respectively). Thus, these are not discussed further.
INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.
Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.):
●Basics topic (see "Patient education: Alternative medicine (The Basics)")
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
●It is prudent to ask patients about the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in a nonjudgmental manner because a significant percentage of patients have tried or are actively using these therapies to treat allergic disorders. The lack of well-designed studies makes it difficult for clinicians to recommend CAM therapies with confidence. However, patients who do wish to pursue CAM should consider the financial costs (which may be substantial) and be aware that CAM products are not monitored in the ways prescription medications are. (See 'Overview' above.)
●Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) includes herbal therapy, acupuncture, massage, and dietary therapy. The use of TCM for allergic rhinitis is reviewed elsewhere. (See "Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of allergic diseases", section on 'Therapy for allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis'.)
●Studies of acupuncture for the treatment of allergic rhinitis have shown modest benefit, although it is difficult to estimate the size of the effect in most positive studies. (See 'Acupuncture and acupressure' above.)
●There are several herbal therapies that have demonstrated efficacy, including Ayurvedic mixes, butterbur, and Tinofend. Patients interested in these therapies should become familiar with the reported side effects and understand that these products are not systematically monitored for safety by drug regulatory bodies. We suggest that pregnant and nursing patients be advised to avoid herbal therapies (Grade 2C). (See 'Herbal therapies (systemic)' above.)
●Patients who seek advice about what brand of herbal medicine to use can be referred to independent sources such as Consumer Labs, which tests various brands of herbal therapies for content and quality. (See 'Choice of brand' above.)
●Nasal sprays consisting of dilute solutions of capsaicin have shown efficacy for allergic rhinitis in randomized trials when administered several times daily. (See 'Nasal sprays, powders, and ointments' above.)
●A variety of other herbal preparations, homeopathic products, and miscellaneous therapies have been suggested for the treatment of allergic rhinitis or conjunctivitis. However, studies have either been of low quality or failed to show benefit. (See 'CAM therapies with minimal evidence of efficacy' above.)
- Kapoor S, Bielory L. Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: complementary treatments for the 21st century. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2009; 9:121.
- Kemper KJ, Vohra S, Walls R, et al. American Academy of Pediatrics. The use of complementary and alternative medicine in pediatrics. Pediatrics 2008; 122:1374.
- Schäfer T. Epidemiology of complementary alternative medicine for asthma and allergy in Europe and Germany. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2004; 93:S5.
- Kern J, Bielory L. Complementary and alternative therapy (CAM) in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2014; 14:479.
- Heimall J, Bielory L. Defining complementary and alternative medicine in allergies and asthma: benefits and risks. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2004; 27:93.
- Heimall J, Bielory L. Complementary and alternative therapy in treatment of allergic diseases. In: Allergy, Mahmoudi M (Ed), McGraw-Hill/Medical Publishing Division, 2007.
- Mainardi T, Kapoor S, Bielory L. Complementary and alternative medicine: herbs, phytochemicals and vitamins and their immunologic effects. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 123:283.
- Li XM, Brown L. Efficacy and mechanisms of action of traditional Chinese medicines for treating asthma and allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 123:297.
- Yen HR, Liang KL, Huang TP, et al. Characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine use for children with allergic rhinitis: a nationwide population-based study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 79:591.
- Turner LA, Singh K, Garritty C, et al. An evaluation of the completeness of safety reporting in reports of complementary and alternative medicine trials. BMC Complement Altern Med 2011; 11:67.
- National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Expanding Horizons of Health Care: Strategic Plan 2005-2009. NIH publication no. 04-5568., National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine; NIH, Bethesda, MD 2005.
- Lee MS, Pittler MH, Shin BC, et al. Acupuncture for allergic rhinitis: a systematic review. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2009; 102:269.
- Choi SM, Park JE, Li SS, et al. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial testing the effects of acupuncture on allergic rhinitis. Allergy 2013; 68:365.
- Brinkhaus B, Ortiz M, Witt CM, et al. Acupuncture in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158:225.
- Xue CC, An X, Cheung TP, et al. Acupuncture for persistent allergic rhinitis: a randomised, sham-controlled trial. Med J Aust 2007; 187:337.
- Ng DK, Chow PY, Ming SP, et al. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of acupuncture for the treatment of childhood persistent allergic rhinitis. Pediatrics 2004; 114:1242.
- Brinkhaus B, Witt CM, Jena S, et al. Acupuncture in patients with allergic rhinitis: a pragmatic randomized trial. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2008; 101:535.
- Seidman MD, Gurgel RK, Lin SY, et al. Clinical practice guideline: Allergic rhinitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 152:S1.
- Reinhold T, Roll S, Willich SN, et al. Cost-effectiveness for acupuncture in seasonal allergic rhinitis: economic results of the ACUSAR trial. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2013; 111:56.
- Ortiz M, Witt CM, Binting S, et al. A randomised multicentre trial of acupuncture in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis--trial intervention including physician and treatment characteristics. BMC Complement Altern Med 2014; 14:128.
- Zhang CS, Xia J, Zhang AL, et al. Ear acupressure for perennial allergic rhinitis: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2014; 28:e152.
- Amit A, Saxena VS, Pratibha N, et al. Mast cell stabilization, lipoxygenase inhibition, hyaluronidase inhibition, antihistaminic and antispasmodic activities of Aller-7, a novel botanical formulation for allergic rhinitis. Drugs Exp Clin Res 2003; 29:107.
- Saxena VS, Venkateshwarlu K, Nadig P, et al. Multicenter clinical trials on a novel polyherbal formulation in allergic rhinitis. Int J Clin Pharmacol Res 2004; 24:79.
- Guo R, Pittler MH, Ernst E. Herbal medicines for the treatment of allergic rhinitis: a systematic review. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2007; 99:483.
- The WHO publications are available through the WHO website. http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Js4927e/ (Accessed on January 03, 2013).
- www.ConsumerLabs.com (Accessed on January 04, 2013).
- Gardiner P. Dietary supplement use in children: concerns of efficacy and safety. Am Fam Physician 2005; 71:1068, 1071.
- Jackson CM, Lee DK, Lipworth BJ. The effects of butterbur on the histamine and allergen cutaneous response. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2004; 92:250.
- Schapowal A, Study Group. Treating intermittent allergic rhinitis: a prospective, randomized, placebo and antihistamine-controlled study of Butterbur extract Ze 339. Phytother Res 2005; 19:530.
- Lee DK, Gray RD, Robb FM, et al. A placebo-controlled evaluation of butterbur and fexofenadine on objective and subjective outcomes in perennial allergic rhinitis. Clin Exp Allergy 2004; 34:646.
- Schapowal A, Petasites Study Group. Randomised controlled trial of butterbur and cetirizine for treating seasonal allergic rhinitis. BMJ 2002; 324:144.
- Aydın AA, Zerbes V, Parlar H, Letzel T. The medical plant butterbur (Petasites): analytical and physiological (re)view. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2013; 75:220.
- Cao Y, Colegate SM, Edgar JA. Safety assessment of food and herbal products containing hepatotoxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids: interlaboratory consistency and the importance of N-oxide determination. Phytochem Anal 2008; 19:526.
- WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter, 2012. No 4. http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s19772en/s19772en.pdf (Accessed on January 03, 2013).
- Badar VA, Thawani VR, Wakode PT, et al. Efficacy of Tinospora cordifolia in allergic rhinitis. J Ethnopharmacol 2005; 96:445.
- Denis G, Gérard Y, Sahpaz S, et al. [Malarial prophylaxis with medicinal plants: toxic hepatitis due to Tinospora crispa]. Therapie 2007; 62:271.
- Chandrasekaran CV, Mathuram LN, Daivasigamani P, Bhatnagar U. Tinospora cordifolia, a safety evaluation. Toxicol In Vitro 2009; 23:1220.
- Corren J, Lemay M, Lin Y, et al. Clinical and biochemical effects of a combination botanical product (ClearGuard) for allergy: a pilot randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Nutr J 2008; 7:20.
- Available in the United States as ClearGuard. Information available at: http://www.nutrilite.com/en-us/Science/NHI/BestOfScience/clear-guard.aspx? (Accessed on March 01, 2013).
- Sano M, Suzuki M, Miyase T, et al. Novel antiallergic catechin derivatives isolated from oolong tea. J Agric Food Chem 1999; 47:1906.
- Fujimura Y, Tachibana H, Maeda-Yamamoto M, et al. Antiallergic tea catechin, (-)-epigallocatechin-3-O-(3-O-methyl)-gallate, suppresses FcepsilonRI expression in human basophilic KU812 cells. J Agric Food Chem 2002; 50:5729.
- Maeda-Yamamoto M, Inagaki N, Kitaura J, et al. O-methylated catechins from tea leaves inhibit multiple protein kinases in mast cells. J Immunol 2004; 172:4486.
- Maeda-Yamamoto M, Ema K, Monobe M, et al. Epicatechin-3-O-(3″-O-methyl)-gallate content in various tea cultivars (Camellia sinensis L.) and its in vitro inhibitory effect on histamine release. J Agric Food Chem 2012; 60:2165.
- Masuda S, Maeda-Yamamoto M, Usui S, Fujisawa T. 'Benifuuki' green tea containing o-methylated catechin reduces symptoms of Japanese cedar pollinosis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Allergol Int 2014; 63:211.
- Chen Y. Efficacy of sodium cromoglicate eye drops combined with yupingfeng granules in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. Eye Sci 2013; 28:201.
- Blom HM, Van Rijswijk JB, Garrelds IM, et al. Intranasal capsaicin is efficacious in non-allergic, non-infectious perennial rhinitis. A placebo-controlled study. Clin Exp Allergy 1997; 27:796.
- Bernstein JA, Davis BP, Picard JK, et al. A randomized, double-blind, parallel trial comparing capsaicin nasal spray with placebo in subjects with a significant component of nonallergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2011; 107:171.
- In the United States, a product called Sinus Buster is available without a prescription.
- One such product available in the US and many other countries is called Nasal Ease.
- Josling P, Steadman S. Use of cellulose powder for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Adv Ther 2003; 20:213.
- Emberlin JC, Lewis RA. A double blind, placebo-controlled cross over trial of cellulose powder by nasal provocation with Der p1 and Der f1. Curr Med Res Opin 2007; 23:2423.
- Åberg N, Dahl Å, Benson M. A nasally applied cellulose powder in seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) in children and adolescents; reduction of symptoms and relation to pollen load. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2011; 22:594.
- Emberlin JC, Lewis RA. A double blind, placebo controlled trial of inert cellulose powder for the relief of symptoms of hay fever in adults. Curr Med Res Opin 2006; 22:275.
- Paz Lansberg M, DeTineo M, Lane J, et al. A clinical trial of a microcrystalline cellulose topical nasal spray on the acute response to allergen challenge. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2016; 30:269.
- A product called "Pollen Blocker" cream is manufactured by Dr. Theiss Alergol and available on line.
- Li Y, Wang D, Liu Q, Liu J. Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study of efficacy of pollen blocker cream for perennial allergic rhinitis. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2013; 27:299.
- Bufe A. A simple advice for the prevention of pollen-induced allergic rhinitis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2000; 121:85.
- Schwetz S, Olze H, Melchisedech S, et al. Efficacy of pollen blocker cream in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130:979.
- Geisthoff UW, Blum A, Rupp-Classen M, Plinkert PK. Lipid-based Nose Ointment for Allergic Rhinitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 133:754.
- Passalacqua G, Bousquet PJ, Carlsen KH, et al. ARIA update: I--Systematic review of complementary and alternative medicine for rhinitis and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 117:1054.
- Weng Z, Zhang B, Asadi S, et al. Quercetin is more effective than cromolyn in blocking human mast cell cytokine release and inhibits contact dermatitis and photosensitivity in humans. PLoS One 2012; 7:e33805.
- Remberg P, Björk L, Hedner T, Sterner O. Characteristics, clinical effect profile and tolerability of a nasal spray preparation of Artemisia abrotanum L. for allergic rhinitis. Phytomedicine 2004; 11:36.
- Mittman P. Randomized, double-blind study of freeze-dried Urtica dioica in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Planta Med 1990; 56:44.
- Takano H, Osakabe N, Sanbongi C, et al. Extract of Perilla frutescens enriched for rosmarinic acid, a polyphenolic phytochemical, inhibits seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in humans. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2004; 229:247.
- Burrow A, Eccles R, Jones AS. The effects of camphor, eucalyptus and menthol vapour on nasal resistance to airflow and nasal sensation. Acta Otolaryngol 1983; 96:157.
- Food and Drug Administration. Over-the-counter drugs. Final monograph for OTC nasal decongestant drug products. Federal Register 1994; 41:38408.
- Keh SM, Facer P, Yehia A, et al. The menthol and cold sensation receptor TRPM8 in normal human nasal mucosa and rhinitis. Rhinology 2011; 49:453.
- Liu SC, Lu HH, Cheng LH, et al. Identification of the cold receptor TRPM8 in the nasal mucosa. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2015; 29:e112.
- Volkner JH. [Inhalations of extracts from Gingko biloba in vasomotor rhinitis and in the bronchitic syndrome]. Dtsch Med J 1967; 18:527.
- Russo V, Stella A, Appezzati L, et al. Clinical efficacy of a Ginkgo biloba extract in the topical treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. Eur J Ophthalmol 2009; 19:331.
- Abenavoli L, Capasso R, Milic N, Capasso F. Milk thistle in liver diseases: past, present, future. Phytother Res 2010; 24:1423.
- Bakhshaee M, Jabbari F, Hoseini S, et al. Effect of silymarin in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 145:904.
- Toxicity. Milk thistle and indinavir. TreatmentUpdate 2002; 14:4.
- Doehmer J, Weiss G, McGregor GP, Appel K. Assessment of a dry extract from milk thistle (Silybum marianum) for interference with human liver cytochrome-P450 activities. Toxicol In Vitro 2011; 25:21.
- Bernstein DI, Bernstein CK, Deng C, et al. Evaluation of the clinical efficacy and safety of grapeseed extract in the treatment of fall seasonal allergic rhinitis: a pilot study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2002; 88:272.
- Khmel'kova NG, Makarova VL, Melent'eva EM, et al. [Does laser irradiation affect bronchial obstruction?]. Probl Tuberk 1995; :41.
- Faradzheva NA. [Efficiency of a combination of haloaerosols and helium-neon laser in the multimodality treatment of patients with bronchial asthma]. Probl Tuberk Bolezn Legk 2007; :50.
- Provotorov VM, Chesnokov PE, Kuznetsov SI. [The clinical efficacy of treating patients with nonspecific lung diseases using low-energy laser irradiation and intrapulmonary drug administration]. Ter Arkh 1991; 63:18.
- Zamotaev IP, Mamontova LI, Zavolovskaia LI, Rudakova OM. [Effect of laser acupuncture on the pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with obstructive chronic lung diseases]. Klin Med (Mosk) 1991; 69:68.
- Morton AR, Fazio SM, Miller D. Efficacy of laser-acupuncture in the prevention of exercise-induced asthma. Ann Allergy 1993; 70:295.
- Gruber W, Eber E, Malle-Scheid D, et al. Laser acupuncture in children and adolescents with exercise induced asthma. Thorax 2002; 57:222.
- Esaulenko IE, Nikitin AV, Shatalova OL. [The use of laseropuncture in patients with bronchial asthma and concomitant chronic rhinosinusitis]. Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult 2009; :37.
- Nedeljković M, Ljustina-Pribić R, Savić K. Innovative approach to laser acupuncture therapy of acute obstruction in asthmatic children. Med Pregl 2008; 61:123.
- Tsai YL, Su CC, Lee HS, et al. Symptoms treatment for allergic rhinitis using diode laser: results after 6-year follow-up. Lasers Med Sci 2009; 24:230.
- Sandhu AS, Temple RH, Timms MS. Partial laser turbinectomy: two year outcomes in patients with allergic and non-allergic rhinitis. Rhinology 2004; 42:81.