Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Clinical features, diagnosis, and staging of gastric cancer

Paul F Mansfield, MD, FACS
Section Editor
Kenneth K Tanabe, MD
Deputy Editors
Diane MF Savarese, MD
Shilpa Grover, MD, MPH, AGAF


Most patients with gastric cancer in the United States are symptomatic and already have advanced incurable disease at the time of presentation. At diagnosis, approximately 50 percent have disease that extends beyond locoregional confines, and only one-half of those who appear to have locoregional tumor involvement can undergo a potentially curative resection. Surgically curable early gastric cancers are usually asymptomatic and only infrequently detected outside the realm of a screening program. Screening is not widely performed, except in countries which have a very high incidence, such as Japan, Venezuela, and Chile. (See "Gastric cancer screening".)

The common presenting symptoms and diagnostic approaches to gastric cancer will be reviewed here. Epidemiology, issues related to screening for high-risk patients, and the treatment of gastric cancer are discussed separately. (See "Epidemiology of gastric cancer" and "Gastric cancer screening" and "Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of gastric cancer" and "Surgical management of invasive gastric cancer" and "Systemic therapy for locally advanced unresectable and metastatic esophageal and gastric cancer".)


Weight loss and persistent abdominal pain are the most common symptoms at initial diagnosis (table 1) [1].

Weight loss usually results from insufficient caloric intake rather than increased catabolism and may be attributable to anorexia, nausea, abdominal pain, early satiety, and/or dysphagia.

When present, abdominal pain tends to be epigastric, vague and mild early in the disease but more severe and constant as the disease progresses.

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information on subscription options, click below on the option that best describes you:

Subscribers log in here

Literature review current through: Nov 2017. | This topic last updated: Mar 10, 2017.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2017 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Wanebo HJ, Kennedy BJ, Chmiel J, et al. Cancer of the stomach. A patient care study by the American College of Surgeons. Ann Surg 1993; 218:583.
  2. Kahrilas PJ, Kishk SM, Helm JF, et al. Comparison of pseudoachalasia and achalasia. Am J Med 1987; 82:439.
  3. Morgenstern L. The Virchow-Troisier node: a historical note. Am J Surg 1979; 138:703.
  4. Pieslor PC, Hefter LG. Umbilical metastasis from prostatic carcinoma--Sister Joseph nodule. Urology 1986; 27:558.
  5. Gilliland R, Gill PJ. Incidence and prognosis of Krukenberg tumour in Northern Ireland. Br J Surg 1992; 79:1364.
  6. Winne BURCHARD BE. Blumer's shelf tumor with primary carcinoma of the lung. A case report. J Int Coll Surg 1965; 44:477.
  7. Fuchs CS, Mayer RJ. Gastric carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1995; 333:32.
  8. Dantzig PI. Sign of Leser-Trélat. Arch Dermatol 1973; 108:700.
  9. Brown J, Winkelmann RK. Acanthosis nigricans: a study of 90 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 1968; 47:33.
  10. Antman KH, Skarin AT, Mayer RJ, et al. Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and cancer: a review. Medicine (Baltimore) 1979; 58:377.
  11. Wakashin M, Wakashin Y, Iesato K, et al. Association of gastric cancer and nephrotic syndrome. An immunologic study in three patients. Gastroenterology 1980; 78:749.
  12. Sack GH Jr, Levin J, Bell WR. Trousseau's syndrome and other manifestations of chronic disseminated coagulopathy in patients with neoplasms: clinical, pathophysiologic, and therapeutic features. Medicine (Baltimore) 1977; 56:1.
  13. Poveda F, González-García J, Picazo ML, et al. Systemic polyarteritis nodosa as the initial manifestation of a gastric adenocarcinoma. J Intern Med 1994; 236:679.
  14. Graham DY, Schwartz JT, Cain GD, Gyorkey F. Prospective evaluation of biopsy number in the diagnosis of esophageal and gastric carcinoma. Gastroenterology 1982; 82:228.
  15. Karita M, Tada M. Endoscopic and histologic diagnosis of submucosal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract using combined strip biopsy and bite biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40:749.
  16. Wang HH, Jonasson JG, Ducatman BS. Brushing cytology of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Obsolete or not? Acta Cytol 1991; 35:195.
  17. Dooley CP, Larson AW, Stace NH, et al. Double-contrast barium meal and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. A comparative study. Ann Intern Med 1984; 101:538.
  18. Longo WE, Zucker KA, Zdon MJ, Modlin IM. Detection of early gastric cancer in an aggressive endoscopy unit. Am Surg 1989; 55:100.
  19. The General Rules for the Gastric Cancer Study in Surgery and Pathology, 12th, Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer (Ed), Kanahara Shuppan, Tokyo 1993.
  20. American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, 7th, Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al (Eds), Springer, New York 2010. p.117.
  21. Ajani JA, In H, Sano T, et al.. Stomach.. In: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th, Amin MB. (Ed), AJCC, Chicago 2017. p.203.
  22. Sano T, Coit DG, Kim HH, et al. Proposal of a new stage grouping of gastric cancer for TNM classification: International Gastric Cancer Association staging project. Gastric Cancer 2017; 20:217.
  23. Rüdiger Siewert J, Feith M, Werner M, Stein HJ. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: results of surgical therapy based on anatomical/topographic classification in 1,002 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 2000; 232:353.
  24. Warneke VS, Behrens HM, Hartmann JT, et al. Cohort study based on the seventh edition of the TNM classification for gastric cancer: proposal of a new staging system. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:2364.
  25. Kim SJ, Kim HH, Kim YH, et al. Peritoneal metastasis: detection with 16- or 64-detector row CT in patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer. Radiology 2009; 253:407.
  26. Lowy AM, Mansfield PF, Leach SD, Ajani J. Laparoscopic staging for gastric cancer. Surgery 1996; 119:611.
  27. Feussner H, Omote K, Fink U, et al. Pretherapeutic laparoscopic staging in advanced gastric carcinoma. Endoscopy 1999; 31:342.
  28. Power DG, Schattner MA, Gerdes H, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound can improve the selection for laparoscopy in patients with localized gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 208:173.
  29. Davies J, Chalmers AG, Sue-Ling HM, et al. Spiral computed tomography and operative staging of gastric carcinoma: a comparison with histopathological staging. Gut 1997; 41:314.
  30. Sussman SK, Halvorsen RA Jr, Illescas FF, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma: CT versus surgical staging. Radiology 1988; 167:335.
  31. Abdalla EK, Pisters PW. Staging and preoperative evaluation of upper gastrointestinal malignancies. Semin Oncol 2004; 31:513.
  32. Minami M, Kawauchi N, Itai Y, et al. Gastric tumors: radiologic-pathologic correlation and accuracy of T staging with dynamic CT. Radiology 1992; 185:173.
  33. Rossi M, Broglia L, Maccioni F, et al. Hydro-CT in patients with gastric cancer: preoperative radiologic staging. Eur Radiol 1997; 7:659.
  34. Düx M, Richter GM, Hansmann J, et al. Helical hydro-CT for diagnosis and staging of gastric carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999; 23:913.
  35. Lee IJ, Lee JM, Kim SH, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-channel multidetector CT in the evaluation of gastric cancer: differentiation of mucosal cancer (T1a) from submucosal involvement (T1b and T2). Radiology 2010; 255:805.
  36. D'Elia F, Zingarelli A, Palli D, Grani M. Hydro-dynamic CT preoperative staging of gastric cancer: correlation with pathological findings. A prospective study of 107 cases. Eur Radiol 2000; 10:1877.
  37. Sohn KM, Lee JM, Lee SY, et al. Comparing MR imaging and CT in the staging of gastric carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:1551.
  38. Kienle P, Buhl K, Kuntz C, et al. Prospective comparison of endoscopy, endosonography and computed tomography for staging of tumours of the oesophagus and gastric cardia. Digestion 2002; 66:230.
  39. Wakelin SJ, Deans C, Crofts TJ, et al. A comparison of computerised tomography, laparoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound in the preoperative staging of oesophago-gastric carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 2002; 41:161.
  40. Yan C, Zhu ZG, Yan M, et al. Value of multidetector-row computed tomography in the preoperative T and N staging of gastric carcinoma: a large-scale Chinese study. J Surg Oncol 2009; 100:205.
  41. Yoshida S, Tanaka S, Kunihiro K, et al. Diagnostic ability of high-frequency ultrasound probe sonography in staging early gastric cancer, especially for submucosal invasion. Abdom Imaging 2005; 30:518.
  42. Mocellin S, Pasquali S. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the preoperative locoregional staging of primary gastric cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; :CD009944.
  43. Willis S, Truong S, Gribnitz S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer: accuracy and impact on surgical therapy. Surg Endosc 2000; 14:951.
  44. Meining A, Dittler HJ, Wolf A, et al. You get what you expect? A critical appraisal of imaging methodology in endosonographic cancer staging. Gut 2002; 50:599.
  45. Yeung HW, Macapinlac H, Karpeh M, et al. Accuracy of FDG-PET in Gastric Cancer. Preliminary Experience. Clin Positron Imaging 1998; 1:213.
  46. Harris KM, Kelly S, Berry E, et al. Systematic review of endoscopic ultrasound in gastro-oesophageal cancer. Health Technol Assess 1998; 2:i.
  47. Bhandari S, Shim CS, Kim JH, et al. Usefulness of three-dimensional, multidetector row CT (virtual gastroscopy and multiplanar reconstruction) in the evaluation of gastric cancer: a comparison with conventional endoscopy, EUS, and histopathology. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59:619.
  48. Kwee RM, Kwee TC. Imaging in local staging of gastric cancer: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:2107.
  49. Pollack BJ, Chak A, Sivak MV Jr. Endoscopic ultrasonography. Semin Oncol 1996; 23:336.
  50. Kelly S, Harris KM, Berry E, et al. A systematic review of the staging performance of endoscopic ultrasound in gastro-oesophageal carcinoma. Gut 2001; 49:534.
  51. Botet JF, Lightdale CJ, Zauber AG, et al. Preoperative staging of gastric cancer: comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT. Radiology 1991; 181:426.
  52. Fukuya T, Honda H, Hayashi T, et al. Lymph-node metastases: efficacy for detection with helical CT in patients with gastric cancer. Radiology 1995; 197:705.
  53. de Manzoni G, Pedrazzani C, Di Leo A, et al. Experience of endoscopic ultrasound in staging adenocarcinoma of the cardia. Eur J Surg Oncol 1999; 25:595.
  54. Tsendsuren T, Jun SM, Mian XH. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in preoperative TNM staging of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12:43.
  55. Chang KJ, Katz KD, Durbin TE, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40:694.
  56. Nickl NJ, Bhutani MS, Catalano M, et al. Clinical implications of endoscopic ultrasound: the American Endosonography Club Study. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44:371.
  57. McGrath K, Brody D, Luketich J, Khalid A. Detection of unsuspected left hepatic lobe metastases during EUS staging of cancer of the esophagus and cardia. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101:1742.
  58. Yun M, Lim JS, Noh SH, et al. Lymph node staging of gastric cancer using (18)F-FDG PET: a comparison study with CT. J Nucl Med 2005; 46:1582.
  59. De Potter T, Flamen P, Van Cutsem E, et al. Whole-body PET with FDG for the diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002; 29:525.
  60. Stahl A, Ott K, Weber WA, et al. FDG PET imaging of locally advanced gastric carcinomas: correlation with endoscopic and histopathological findings. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30:288.
  61. Kim SK, Kang KW, Lee JS, et al. Assessment of lymph node metastases using 18F-FDG PET in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006; 33:148.
  62. Mukai K, Ishida Y, Okajima K, et al. Usefulness of preoperative FDG-PET for detection of gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2006; 9:192.
  63. Chen J, Cheong JH, Yun MJ, et al. Improvement in preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma with positron emission tomography. Cancer 2005; 103:2383.
  64. McAteer D, Wallis F, Couper G, et al. Evaluation of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography in gastric and oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Radiol 1999; 72:525.
  65. Kinkel K, Lu Y, Both M, et al. Detection of hepatic metastases from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract by using noninvasive imaging methods (US, CT, MR imaging, PET): a meta-analysis. Radiology 2002; 224:748.
  66. Smyth E, Schöder H, Strong VE, et al. A prospective evaluation of the utility of 2-deoxy-2-[(18) F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography in staging locally advanced gastric cancer. Cancer 2012; 118:5481.
  67. Yoshioka T, Yamaguchi K, Kubota K, et al. Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET in patients with advanced, metastatic, or recurrent gastric cancer. J Nucl Med 2003; 44:690.
  68. Horie Y, Miura K, Matsui K, et al. Marked elevation of plasma carcinoembryonic antigen and stomach carcinoma. Cancer 1996; 77:1991.
  69. Kodama I, Koufuji K, Kawabata S, et al. The clinical efficacy of CA 72-4 as serum marker for gastric cancer in comparison with CA19-9 and CEA. Int Surg 1995; 80:45.
  70. Carpelan-Holmström M, Louhimo J, Stenman UH, et al. CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 improve the diagnostic accuracy in gastrointestinal cancers. Anticancer Res 2002; 22:2311.
  71. Lai IR, Lee WJ, Huang MT, Lin HH. Comparison of serum CA72-4, CEA, TPA, CA19-9 and CA125 levels in gastric cancer patients and correlation with recurrence. Hepatogastroenterology 2002; 49:1157.
  72. Marrelli D, Pinto E, De Stefano A, et al. Clinical utility of CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 72-4 in the follow-up of patients with resectable gastric cancer. Am J Surg 2001; 181:16.
  73. Mihmanli M, Dilege E, Demir U, et al. The use of tumor markers as predictors of prognosis in gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2004; 51:1544.
  74. Marrelli D, Pinto E, De Stefano A, et al. Preoperative positivity of serum tumor markers is a strong predictor of hematogenous recurrence of gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 2001; 78:253.
  75. Kochi M, Fujii M, Kanamori N, et al. Evaluation of serum CEA and CA19-9 levels as prognostic factors in patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2000; 3:177.
  76. Bold RJ, Ota DM, Ajani JA, Mansfield PF. Peritoneal and serum tumor markers predict recurrence and survival of patients with resectable gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 1999; 2:1.
  77. Ishigami S, Natsugoe S, Hokita S, et al. Clinical importance of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels in gastric cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol 2001; 32:41.
  78. Kim DY, Kim HR, Shim JH, et al. Significance of serum and tissue carcinoembryonic antigen for the prognosis of gastric carcinoma patients. J Surg Oncol 2000; 74:185.
  79. Marrelli D, Roviello F, De Stefano A, et al. Prognostic significance of CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 preoperative serum levels in gastric carcinoma. Oncology 1999; 57:55.
  80. Nakata B, Hirakawa-YS Chung K, Kato Y, et al. Serum CA 125 level as a predictor of peritoneal dissemination in patients with gastric carcinoma. Cancer 1998; 83:2488.
  81. Tocchi A, Costa G, Lepre L, et al. The role of serum and gastric juice levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19.9 and CA72.4 in patients with gastric cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1998; 124:450.
  82. Sakamoto J, Nakazato H, Teramukai S, et al. Association between preoperative plasma CEA levels and the prognosis of gastric cancer following curative resection. Tumor Marker Committee, Japanese Foundation for Multidisciplinary Treatment of Cancer, Tokyo, Japan. Surg Oncol 1996; 5:133.
  83. Takahashi Y, Takeuchi T, Sakamoto J, et al. The usefulness of CEA and/or CA19-9 in monitoring for recurrence in gastric cancer patients: a prospective clinical study. Gastric Cancer 2003; 6:142.
  84. Duraker N, Celik AN. The prognostic significance of preoperative serum CA 19-9 in patients with resectable gastric carcinoma: comparison with CEA. J Surg Oncol 2001; 76:266.
  85. Liu X, Cheng Y, Sheng W, et al. Clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors in alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric cancers: analysis of 104 cases. J Surg Oncol 2010; 102:249.
  86. Kono K, Amemiya H, Sekikawa T, et al. Clinicopathologic features of gastric cancers producing alpha-fetoprotein. Dig Surg 2002; 19:359.
  87. Chang YC, Nagasue N, Kohno H, et al. Clinicopathologic features and long-term results of alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85:1480.
  88. Ushiku T, Uozaki H, Shinozaki A, et al. Glypican 3-expressing gastric carcinoma: distinct subgroup unifying hepatoid, clear-cell, and alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric carcinomas. Cancer Sci 2009; 100:626.
  89. Watt I, Stewart I, Anderson D, et al. Laparoscopy, ultrasound and computed tomography in cancer of the oesophagus and gastric cardia: a prospective comparison for detecting intra-abdominal metastases. Br J Surg 1989; 76:1036.
  90. Sarela AI, Lefkowitz R, Brennan MF, Karpeh MS. Selection of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma for laparoscopic staging. Am J Surg 2006; 191:134.
  91. Simon M, Mal F, Perniceni T, et al. Accuracy of staging laparoscopy in detecting peritoneal dissemination in patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Dis Esophagus 2016; 29:236.
  92. Leake PA, Cardoso R, Seevaratnam R, et al. A systematic review of the accuracy and indications for diagnostic laparoscopy prior to curative-intent resection of gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2012; 15 Suppl 1:S38.
  93. Abe S, Yoshimura H, Tabara H, et al. Curative resection of gastric cancer: limitation of peritoneal lavage cytology in predicting the outcome. J Surg Oncol 1995; 59:226.
  94. Bando E, Yonemura Y, Endou Y, et al. Immunohistochemical study of MT-MMP tissue status in gastric carcinoma and correlation with survival analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Oncol Rep 1998; 5:1483.
  95. Burke EC, Karpeh MS Jr, Conlon KC, Brennan MF. Peritoneal lavage cytology in gastric cancer: an independent predictor of outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 1998; 5:411.
  96. Leake PA, Cardoso R, Seevaratnam R, et al. A systematic review of the accuracy and utility of peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2012; 15 Suppl 1:S27.