Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2018 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Choledocholithiasis: Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management

Mustafa A Arain, MD
Martin L Freeman, MD
Section Editor
Douglas A Howell, MD, FASGE, FACG
Deputy Editor
Shilpa Grover, MD, MPH, AGAF


Choledocholithiasis refers to the presence of gallstones within the common bile duct. According to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), over 20 million Americans are estimated to have gallbladder disease (defined as the presence of gallstones on transabdominal ultrasound or a history of cholecystectomy) [1]. Among those with gallbladder disease, the exact incidence and prevalence of choledocholithiasis are not known, but it has been estimated that 5 to 20 percent of patients have choledocholithiasis at the time of cholecystectomy, with the incidence increasing with age [2-8].

In Western countries, most cases of choledocholithiasis are secondary to the passage of gallstones from the gallbladder into the common bile duct. Primary choledocholithiasis (ie, formation of stones within the common bile duct) is less common. Primary choledocholithiasis typically occurs in the setting of bile stasis (eg, patients with cystic fibrosis), resulting in a higher propensity for intraductal stone formation. Older adults with large bile ducts and periampullary diverticular are at elevated risk for the formation of primary bile duct stones. Patients with recurrent or persistent infection involving the biliary system are also at risk, a phenomenon seen most commonly in populations from East Asia. (See "Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis".)

The causes of primary choledocholithiasis often affect the biliary tract diffusely, so patients may have both extrahepatic and intrahepatic biliary stones. Intrahepatic stones may be complicated by recurrent pyogenic cholangitis.

This topic will review the clinical manifestations and diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. The treatment of choledocholithiasis, as well as the epidemiology and the general management of patients with gallstones, are discussed separately:

(See "Endoscopic management of bile duct stones: Standard techniques and mechanical lithotripsy".)

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information on subscription options, click below on the option that best describes you:

Subscribers log in here

Literature review current through: Dec 2017. | This topic last updated: Aug 10, 2017.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2018 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Everhart JE, Khare M, Hill M, Maurer KR. Prevalence and ethnic differences in gallbladder disease in the United States. Gastroenterology 1999; 117:632.
  2. Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, et al. A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 2004; 239:28.
  3. Hunter JG. Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration. Am J Surg 1992; 163:53.
  4. Petelin JB. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 2003; 17:1705.
  5. Neuhaus H, Feussner H, Ungeheuer A, et al. Prospective evaluation of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy 1992; 24:745.
  6. Houdart R, Perniceni T, Darne B, et al. Predicting common bile duct lithiasis: determination and prospective validation of a model predicting low risk. Am J Surg 1995; 170:38.
  7. O'Neill CJ, Gillies DM, Gani JS. Choledocholithiasis: overdiagnosed endoscopically and undertreated laparoscopically. ANZ J Surg 2008; 78:487.
  8. Prat F, Meduri B, Ducot B, et al. Prediction of common bile duct stones by noninvasive tests. Ann Surg 1999; 229:362.
  9. Fitzgerald JE, White MJ, Lobo DN. Courvoisier's gallbladder: law or sign? World J Surg 2009; 33:886.
  10. Abboud PA, Malet PF, Berlin JA, et al. Predictors of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44:450.
  11. Yang MH, Chen TH, Wang SE, et al. Biochemical predictors for absence of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2008; 22:1620.
  12. Sox, HC, Blatt, et al. Medical decision making, Butterworths, Boston 1988. p.67.
  13. Tse F, Barkun JS, Barkun AN. The elective evaluation of patients with suspected choledocholithiasis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60:437.
  14. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Maple JT, Ben-Menachem T, et al. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71:1.
  15. Iranmanesh P, Frossard JL, Mugnier-Konrad B, et al. Initial cholecystectomy vs sequential common duct endoscopic assessment and subsequent cholecystectomy for suspected gallstone migration: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 312:137.
  16. Petrov MS, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, et al. Early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus conservative management in acute biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Ann Surg 2008; 247:250.
  17. Tse F, Yuan Y. Early routine endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography strategy versus early conservative management strategy in acute gallstone pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; :CD009779.
  18. Freeman ML. Pancreatic stents for prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5:1354.
  19. Elmunzer BJ, Scheiman JM, Lehman GA, et al. A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2012; 366:1414.
  20. Gurusamy KS, Giljaca V, Takwoingi Y, et al. Ultrasound versus liver function tests for diagnosis of common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; :CD011548.
  21. Einstein DM, Lapin SA, Ralls PW, Halls JM. The insensitivity of sonography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984; 142:725.
  22. Laing FC, Jeffrey RB, Wing VW. Improved visualization of choledocholithiasis by sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984; 143:949.
  23. O'Connor HJ, Hamilton I, Ellis WR, et al. Ultrasound detection of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with ERCP in the postcholecystectomy patient. Gastrointest Radiol 1986; 11:161.
  24. Wermke W, Schulz HJ. [Sonographic diagnosis of bile duct calculi. Results of a prospective study of 222 cases of choledocholithiasis]. Ultraschall Med 1987; 8:116.
  25. Pasanen PA, Partanen KP, Pikkarainen PH, et al. A comparison of ultrasound, computed tomography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant jaundice and cholestasis. Eur J Surg 1993; 159:23.
  26. Urquhart P, Speer T, Gibson R. Challenging clinical paradigms of common bile duct diameter. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74:378.
  27. Hunt DR. Common bile duct stones in non-dilated bile ducts? An ultrasound study. Australas Radiol 1996; 40:221.
  28. Prat F, Amouyal G, Amouyal P, et al. Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common-bileduct lithiasis. Lancet 1996; 347:75.
  29. Gurusamy KS, Giljaca V, Takwoingi Y, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; :CD010339.
  30. Giljaca V, Gurusamy KS, Takwoingi Y, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; :CD011549.
  31. Tse F, Liu L, Barkun AN, et al. EUS: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67:235.
  32. Kaltenthaler E, Vergel YB, Chilcott J, et al. A systematic review and economic evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography compared with diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Health Technol Assess 2004; 8:iii, 1.
  33. Verma D, Kapadia A, Eisen GM, Adler DG. EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64:248.
  34. Ledro-Cano D. Suspected choledocholithiasis: endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography? A systematic review. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 19:1007.
  35. Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen O, et al. Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut 1999; 44:118.
  36. Machi J, Tateishi T, Oishi AJ, et al. Laparoscopic ultrasonography versus operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: review of the literature and a comparison with open intraoperative ultrasonography. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 188:360.
  37. Videhult P, Sandblom G, Rasmussen IC. How reliable is intraoperative cholangiography as a method for detecting common bile duct stones? : A prospective population-based study on 1171 patients. Surg Endosc 2009; 23:304.
  38. Massarweh NN, Devlin A, Elrod JA, et al. Surgeon knowledge, behavior, and opinions regarding intraoperative cholangiography. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 207:821.
  39. MacFadyen BV. Intraoperative cholangiography: past, present, and future. Surg Endosc 2006; 20 Suppl 2:S436.
  40. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S, et al. Intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Routine vs selective policy. Surg Endosc 1994; 8:302.
  41. Shively EH, Wieman TJ, Adams AL, et al. Operative cholangiography. Am J Surg 1990; 159:380.
  42. Vezakis A, Davides D, Ammori BJ, et al. Intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2000; 14:1118.
  43. Jones DB, Dunnegan DL, Soper NJ. Results of a change to routine fluorocholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 1995; 118:693.
  44. Woods MS, Traverso LW, Kozarek RA, et al. Biliary tract complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy are detected more frequently with routine intraoperative cholangiography. Surg Endosc 1995; 9:1076.
  45. Soper NJ, Dunnegan DL. Routine versus selective intra-operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 1992; 16:1133.
  46. Hauer-Jensen M, Karesen R, Nygaard K, et al. Prospective randomized study of routine intraoperative cholangiography during open cholecystectomy: long-term follow-up and multivariate analysis of predictors of choledocholithiasis. Surgery 1993; 113:318.
  47. Kullman E, Borch K, Lindström E, et al. Value of routine intraoperative cholangiography in detecting aberrant bile ducts and bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1996; 83:171.
  48. Stuart SA, Simpson TI, Alvord LA, Williams MD. Routine intraoperative laparoscopic cholangiography. Am J Surg 1998; 176:632.
  49. Snow LL, Weinstein LS, Hannon JK, Lane DR. Evaluation of operative cholangiography in 2043 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case for the selective operative cholangiogram. Surg Endosc 2001; 15:14.
  50. Nickkholgh A, Soltaniyekta S, Kalbasi H. Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a survey of 2,130 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2006; 20:868.
  51. Machi J, Oishi AJ, Tajiri T, et al. Routine laparoscopic ultrasound can significantly reduce the need for selective intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2007; 21:270.
  52. Machi J, Johnson JO, Deziel DJ, et al. The routine use of laparoscopic ultrasound decreases bile duct injury: a multicenter study. Surg Endosc 2009; 23:384.
  53. Soto JA, Velez SM, Guzmán J. Choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with oral-contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:943.
  54. Soto JA, Alvarez O, Múnera F, et al. Diagnosing bile duct stones: comparison of unenhanced helical CT, oral contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography, and MR cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:1127.
  55. Ishikawa M, Tagami Y, Toyota T, et al. Can three-dimensional helical CT cholangiography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy be a substitute study for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2000; 10:351.
  56. Polkowski M, Palucki J, Regula J, et al. Helical computed tomographic cholangiography versus endosonography for suspected bile duct stones: a prospective blinded study in non-jaundiced patients. Gut 1999; 45:744.
  57. Jiménez Cuenca I, del Olmo Martínez L, Pérez Homs M. Helical CT without contrast in choledocholithiasis diagnosis. Eur Radiol 2001; 11:197.
  58. Tseng CW, Chen CC, Chen TS, et al. Can computed tomography with coronal reconstruction improve the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23:1586.
  59. Grubnik VV, Tkachenko AI, Ilyashenko VV, Vorotyntseva KO. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus open surgery: comparative prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2012; 26:2165.