Consult the medical resource doctors trust

UpToDate is one of the most respected medical information resources in the world, used by over 360,000 doctors and thousands of patients to find answers to medical questions.

  • Content written by a faculty of over 4,000 physicians from leading medical institutions
  • Unbiased: free of advertising or pharmaceutical funding
  • Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • Continuously updated to incorporate new medical findings

Related articles included with a subscription

Female condoms

INTRODUCTION

The female condom lines the vagina and shields the introitus, thus providing a physical barrier between male and female genitalia and secretions during sexual intercourse. It is designed to protect against both pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and is available without prescription. There are no contraindications to its use, but it may not be appropriate for women who are not comfortable touching their genitals or who may have other problems with insertion. Female condoms account for less than 1 percent of condoms produced globally [1].

FEMALE CONDOM

The Reality female condom (FC1) is the only model currently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It is a soft, loose-fitting polyurethane sheath or pouch with two flexible polyurethane rings. One ring lies within the closed end of the sheath, and serves as an insertion mechanism and internal anchor. The other ring forms the external, open edge of the device; it remains outside the vagina after insertion. There is silicone-based lubricant on the inside of the condom, but additional lubrication can be used. The condom is about 17 cm (6.5 inches) in length (similar to a male condom). The expiration date is five years from the date of manufacture.

Variations to the Reality design described above are available in some areas of the world. Female condoms can also be made of a nitrile polymer, which is a synthetic latex. These condoms perform similarly to the Reality condom [2,3]. The nitrile female condom, known as FC2, is available in 77 countries [4] and received FDA approval in 2009. The FDA's approval states that the FC2 Female Condom is indicated for preventing pregnancy, HIV/AIDS, and other sexually transmitted infections. In addition, the FC2 may make less noise during intercourse than the Reality female condom and is projected to be cheaper when mass produced. The Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH) Woman's Condom (WC) is another new female condom currently in development [5].

The female condom prevents pre-ejaculatory fluid and sperm from entering the vagina. No spermicide is required, but spermicide may be used as a lubricant or for extra protection against pregnancy.

EFFECTIVENESS

No randomized trials comparing the clinical effectiveness of male and female condoms for prevention of pregnancy and STIs have been performed. However, two randomized crossover trials in the United States and Brazil used the proxy measures of breakage, slippage, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as indicators of semen exposure [6,7]. Participants used both condom types, completed condom-specific questionnaires to report problems, and collected precoital and postcoital samples of vaginal fluid for PSA. The PSA detection rates were similar for both the female and male condoms [8]. However, users in both trials reported female condoms were associated with significantly more mechanical problems (eg, slippage, breakage, incorrect penetration) than male condoms.

To continue reading this article you need to subscribe.

Read the rest of this article and others like it

The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use (click here) ©2010 UpToDate, Inc.
References Top
  1. Center for Health and Gender Equity. Saving lives now: Female condoms and the role of US foreign aid. Takoma Park, MD, 2008.
  2. Smit, J, Beksinska, M, Vijayakumar, G, Mabude, Z. Short-term acceptability of the Reality polyurethane female condom and a synthetic latex prototype: a randomized crossover trial among South African women. Contraception 2006; 73:394.
  3. Beksinska, M, Smit, J, Mabude, Z, et al. Performance of the Reality polyurethane female condom and a synthetic latex prototype: a randomized crossover trial among South African women. Contraception 2006; 73:386.
  4. Second generation of female condom receives FDA committee approval. Contraceptive Technology Update 2009; 30:25.
  5. Schwartz, JL, Barnhart, K, Creinin, MD, et al. Comparative crossover study of the PATH Woman's Condom and the FC Female Condom. Contraception 2008; 78:465.
  6. Galvao, LW, et al. Abstract Effectiveness of female and male condoms in preventing exposure to semen during vaginal intercourse: a randomized trial. Contraception 2005; 71:130.
  7. Macaluso, M, Blackwell, R, Jamieson, DJ, et al. Efficacy of the Male Latex Condom and of the Female Polyurethane Condom as Barriers to Semen during Intercourse: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Epidemiol 2007; 166:88.
  8. Chen, MP, Macaluso, M, Blackwell, R, et al. Self-reported mechanical problems during condom use and semen exposure. Comparison of two randomized trials in the United States of America and Brazil. Sex Transm Dis 2007; 34:557.
  9. Vijayakumar, G, Mabude, Z, Smit, J, et al. A review of female-condom effectiveness: patterns of use and impact on protected sex acts and STI incidence. Int J STD AIDS 2006; 17:652.
  10. Farr, G, Gabelnick, H, Sturgen, K, Dorflinger, L. Contraceptive efficacy and acceptability of the female condom. Am J Public Health 1994; 84:1960.
  11. Bounds, W, Guillebaud, J, Newman, GG. Female condom (Femidom). A clinical study of its use-effectiveness and patient acceptability. The British Journal of Family Planning 1992; 18:36.
  12. Trussell, J. Contraceptive efficacy of the Reality female condom. Contraception 1998; 58:147.
  13. Drew, WL, Blair, M, Miner, RC, Conant, M. Evaluation of the virus permeability of a new condom for women. Sex Transm Dis 1990; 17:110.
  14. Voeller, B, Coulter, SL, Mayhan, KG. Gas, dye, and viral transport through polyurethane condoms. JAMA 1991; 266:2986.
  15. Soper, DE, Shoupe, D, Shangold, GA, et al. Prevention of vaginal trichomoniasis by compliant use of the female condom. Sex Transm Dis 1993; 20:137.
  16. French, PP, Latka, M, Gollub, EL, Rogers, C, et al. Use-effectiveness of the female versus male condom in preventing sexually transmitted disease in women. Sex Transm Dis 2003; 30:433.
  17. Fontanet, AL, Saba, J, Chandelying, V, Sakondhavat, C, et al. Protection against sexually transmitted diseases by granting sex workers in Thailand the choice of using the male or female condom: results from a randomized controlled trial. AIDS 1998; 12:1851.
  18. Hoke, TH, Feldblum, PJ, Van Damme, K, et al. Temporal trends in sexually transmitted infection prevalence and condom use following introduction of the female condom to Madagascar sex workers. Int J STD AIDS 2007; 18:461.
  19. Feldblum, PJ, Kuyoh, MA, Bwayo, JJ, et al. Female condom introduction and sexually transmitted infection prevalence: results of a community intervention trial in Kenya. AIDS 2001; 15:1037.
  20. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines 2006. http://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment/2006/clinical.htm#clinical2. (Accessed July 30, 2007).
  21. Renzi, C, Tabet, SR, Stucky, JA, et al. Safety and acceptability of the Reality condom for anal sex among men who have sex with men. AIDS 2003; 17:727.
  22. Hoffman, S, Mantell, J, Exner, T, Stein, Z. The future of the female condom. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2004; 36:120.
  23. Hatzell, T, Feldblum, PJ, Homan, RK, Gmach, RD. The female condom: is "just as good" good enough?. Sex Transm Dis 2003; 30:440.
  24. Joanis, C, Latka, M, Glover, LH, Hamel, S. Structural integrity of the female condom after a single use, washing, and disinfection. Contraception 2000; 62:63.
  25. Potter, B, Gerofi, J, Pope, M, Farley, T. Structural integrity of the polyurethane female condom after multiple cycles of disinfection, washing, drying and relubrication. Contraception 2003; 67:65.
  26. Pettifor, AE, Rees, HV, Beksinska, ME, et al. In vitro assessment of the structural integrity of the female condom after multiple wash, dry, and re-lubrication cycles. Contraception 2000; 61:271.
  27. www.who.int/reproductive-health/stis/reuse.en.html. (Accessed May 16, 2007).
white circle LOG IN
white circle DEMO