Consult the medical resource doctors trust

UpToDate is one of the most respected medical information resources in the world, used by over 360,000 doctors and thousands of patients to find answers to medical questions.

  • Content written by a faculty of over 4,000 physicians from leading medical institutions
  • Unbiased: free of advertising or pharmaceutical funding
  • Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • Continuously updated to incorporate new medical findings

Related articles included with a subscription

Preview Available
(subscription required for full access)

Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a symmetric, peripheral polyarthritis of unknown etiology that, untreated or if unresponsive to therapy, typically leads to deformity and destruction of joints through the erosion of cartilage and bone. This topic will review the diagnosis, diagnostic criteria, and differential diagnosis of this disorder. The clinical features of RA are discussed separately. (See "Clinical features of rheumatoid arthritis".)

DIAGNOSIS

There is no single clinical, radiologic, or serologic test that enables a diagnosis of RA to be made with certainty. As with other autoimmune rheumatic diseases, the diagnosis depends upon the aggregation of characteristic symptoms, signs, laboratory data, and radiologic findings. The diagnostic value of the following are discussed in more detail below:

  • Symmetrical peripheral polyarthritis
  • Morning stiffness
  • Rheumatoid nodules
  • Laboratory features
  • Radiographic bone erosions

Symmetric peripheral polyarthritis — Arthritis that affects the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of both hands is the single most characteristic clinical feature of RA (picture 1A-C). However, peripheral polyarthritis is also a common feature of other rheumatic diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (scleroderma), psoriatic arthritis, and rheumatic fever. As a result, this finding alone cannot be used to make a diagnosis of RA. On the other hand, symmetric polyarthritis, particularly of the MCP, metatarsophalangeal (MTP), and/or PIP joints, strongly suggests RA. (See "Evaluation of the adult with polyarticular pain".)

Some patients present with involvement of a single large joint, such as the shoulder or knee. In this setting, the diagnosis depends upon examination of the synovial fluid, additional laboratory tests, and imaging studies. In some cases, further follow-up is required before an accurate diagnosis can be rendered. This is often dependent upon the development of arthritis in the small joints of the hands, the wrist, elbows, or ankle. (See "Evaluation of the adult with monoarticular pain".)

To continue reading this article you need to subscribe.

Read the rest of this article and others like it

The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use (click here) ©2010 UpToDate, Inc.
References Top
  1. Lee, DM, Schur, PH. Clinical utility of the anti-CCP assay in patients with rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62:870.
  2. Nishimura, K, Sugiyama, D, Kogata, Y, et al. Meta-analysis: Diagnostic accuracy of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody and rheumatoid factor for rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146:797.
  3. Finckh, A, Liang, MH. Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis: bayes clears the haze. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146:816.
  4. Niwa, Y, Iio, A, Niwa, G, et al. Serum albumin metabolism in rheumatic diseases: relationship to corticosteroids and peptic ulcer. J Clin Lab Immunol 1990; 31:11.
  5. Kuper, IH, van Leeuwen, MA, van Riel, PL, et al. Influence of a ceiling effect on the assessment of radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis during the first 6 years of disease. J Rheumatol 1999; 26:268.
  6. van der Heijde, DM, van Leeuwen, MA, van Riel, PL, et al. Biannual radiographic assessments of hands and feet in a three-year prospective followup of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1992; 35:26.
  7. Fuchs, HA, Kaye, JJ, Callahan, LF, et al. Evidence of significant radiographic damage in rheumatoid arthritis within the first 2 years of disease. J Rheumatol 1989; 16:585.
  8. Klarlund, M, Ostergaard, M, Jensen, KE, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging, radiography, and scintigraphy of the finger joints: one year follow up of patients with early arthritis. The TIRA Group. Ann Rheum Dis 2000; 59:521.
  9. McQueen, FM. The use of MRI in early RA. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008; 47:1597.
  10. McQueen, FM, Stewart, N, Crabbe, J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals a high prevalence of erosions at four months after symptom onset. Ann Rheum Dis 1998; 57:350.
  11. McQueen, FM, Benton, N, Perry, D, et al. Bone edema scored on magnetic resonance imaging scans of the dominant carpus at presentation predicts radiographic joint damage of the hands and feet six years later in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48:1814.
  12. Ostendorf, B, Scherer, A, Modder, U, Schneider, M. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging of the forefeet in early rheumatoid arthritis when findings on imaging of the metacarpophalangeal joints of the hands remain normal. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50:2094.
  13. McQueen, FM, Stewart, N, Crabbe, J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals progression of erosions despite clinical improvement. Ann Rheum Dis 1999; 58:156.
  14. Ejbjerg, BJ, Narvestad, E, Jacobsen, S, et al. Optimised, low cost, low field dedicated extremity MRI is highly specific and sensitive for synovitis and bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis wrist and finger joints: comparison with conventional high field MRI and radiography. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64:1280.
  15. Naraghi, AM, White, LM, Patel, C, et al. Comparison of 1.0-T extremity MR and 1.5-T conventional high-field-Strength MR in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Radiology 2009; 251:829.
  16. Terslev, L, Torp-Pedersen, S, Savnik, A, et al. Doppler ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of synovial inflammation of the hand in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48:2434.
  17. Szkudlarek, M, Narvestad, E, Klarlund, M, et al. Ultrasonography of the metatarsophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography, and clinical examination. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50:2103.
  18. Pincus, T, Callahan, LF. How many types of patients meet classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis? (editorial). J Rheumatol 1994; 21:1385.
  19. Arnett, FC, Edworthy, SM, Bloch, DA, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988; 31:315.
  20. Smith, CA, Petty, RE, Tingle, AJ. Rubella virus and arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1987; 13:265.
  21. Smith, CA, Woolf, AD, Lenci, M. Parvoviruses: Infections and arthropathies. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1987; 13: 249.
  22. Sato, K, Maruyama, I, Maruyama, Y, et al. Arthritis in patients infected with human T lymphotropic virus type I. Arthritis Rheum 1991; 34:714.
  23. Venables, PJ. Polymyositis-associated overlap syndromes. Br J Rheumatol 1996; 35:305.
  24. Cronin, ME. Musculoskeletal manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1988; 14:99.
  25. Kirk, JA, Ansell, BM, Bywaters, EG. The hypermobility syndrome. Musculoskeletal complaints associated with generalized joint hypermobility. Ann Rheum Dis 1967; 26:419.
  26. Yunus, MB, Masi, AT, Calabro, JJ, et al. Primary fibromyalgia (fibrositis): Clinical study of 50 patients with matched normal controls. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1981; 11:151.
  27. Toivanen, A. Reactive arthritis. In: Rheumatology, Klippel, Dieppe (Eds), Mosby, London, 1994. p. 4.9.1.
  28. Moll, JM, Wright, V. Psoriatic arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1973; 3:55.
  29. Chandran, G, Ahern, MJ, Seshadri, P, Coghlan, D. Rheumatic manifestations of the myelodysplastic syndromes: a comparative study. Aust N Z J Med 1996; 26:683.
  30. Barrow, MV, Holubar, K. Multicentric reticulohistiocytosis. A review of 33 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 1969; 48:287.
  31. Gorman, JD, Danning, C, Schumacher, HR, et al. Multicentric reticulohistiocytosis: Case report with immunohistochemical analysis and literature review. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43:930.
  32. Matejicka, C, Morgan, GJ, Schlegelmilch, JG. Multicentric reticulohistiocytosis treated successfully with an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent: comment on the article by Gorman et al. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48:864.
  33. Calamia, KT, Walsh, JS, Bradley, T, et al. Treatment of multicentric reticulohistiocytosis with etanercept: a case report (abstract). Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48:S618.
  34. Goto, H, Inaba, M, Kobayashi, K, et al. Successful treatment of multicentric reticulohistiocytosis with alendronate: evidence for a direct effect of bisphosphonate on histiocytes. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48:3538.
  35. Codriansky, KA, Runger, TM, Bhawan, J, et al. Multicentric reticulohistiocytosis: a systemic osteoclastic disease?. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 59:444.
  36. Fam, AG, Hanna, W, Mak, V, Assaad, D. Fibroblastic rheumatism: clinical and histologic evolution of cutaneous manifestations. J Rheumatol 1998; 25:2261.
  37. Lee, JM, Sundel, RP, Liang, MG. Fibroblastic rheumatism: case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Dermatol 2002; 19:532.
  38. Pedersen, JK, Poulsen, T, Horslev-Petersen, K. Fibroblastic rheumatism: a Scandinavian case report. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64:156.
white circle LOG IN
white circle DEMO