Consult the medical resource doctors trust
UpToDate is one of the most respected medical information resources in the world, used by over 360,000 doctors and thousands of patients to find answers to medical questions.
Related articles included with a subscription
![]() | Preview Available (subscription required for full access) |













Related Searches
| AuthorKeith B Isaacson, MD | Section EditorTommaso Falcone, MD, FRCSC, FACOG | Deputy EditorSandy J Falk, MD |
As a subscriber you will have access to the full contents of this article
Women with abnormal uterine bleeding known to be unrelated to malignancy can choose from a variety of therapeutic options: watchful waiting, medical therapy, or surgical therapy. Surgical therapy is usually considered for women who fail medical therapy. (See "Menorrhagia", section on 'Medical therapy'.) Hysterectomy is the definitive surgical procedure. Endometrial ablation/resection is a more conservative surgical approach in which only the lining of the uterus is destroyed or removed.
Endometrial ablation is not intended to replace hysterectomy, but to offer women another choice for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding. Women who want permanent cessation of menses can choose hysterectomy. Those who are more concerned about preserving the uterus or desire an outpatient procedure with minimal morbidity may find that endometrial ablation is the better choice. Women who participate in this decision making process are more likely to be satisfied with their treatment outcome.
INDICATIONS AND CONTRAINDICATIONS
Overview — The indication for endometrial ablation is treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding known to be unrelated to malignancy.
Candidates for endometrial ablation should meet all of the following criteria:
| References |
Top
|
![]() |
Please wait |