Consult the medical resource doctors trust

UpToDate is one of the most respected medical information resources in the world, used by over 360,000 doctors and thousands of patients to find answers to medical questions.

  • Content written by a faculty of over 4,000 physicians from leading medical institutions
  • Unbiased: free of advertising or pharmaceutical funding
  • Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • Continuously updated to incorporate new medical findings

Related articles included with a subscription

Protein catabolic rate in maintenance dialysis

INTRODUCTION

The protein catabolic rate (PCR), also called the protein equivalent of nitrogen appearance (PNA), is the parameter used in most hemodialysis units to assess dietary protein intake in patients who are in a steady state. Suppose, for example, that a patient has a desirably low predialysis BUN. This finding could represent either a well nourished patient who is adequately dialyzed, or decreased protein intake which is usually a reflection of inadequate dialysis. The PCR will distinguish between these possibilities.

The PCR is determined by measuring the interdialytic appearance of urea in body fluids plus any urea lost in the urine in patients with residual renal function. Retrospective data from a large group of dialysis patients indicates that abnormalities in a number of standard laboratory measurements related to patient nutrition (plasma concentrations of albumin, creatinine, urea nitrogen, and transferrin) are associated with increased mortality [1]; however, only PCR is of value in prospectively predicting morbidity in hemodialysis patients [2]. (See "Assessment of nutritional status in end-stage renal disease".) In the National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCDS), for example, a PCR greater than 1 g/kg per day and a timed average urea concentration of 50 mg/dL (18 mmol/L) were associated with low morbidity [2]. The latter alone is insufficient, since it can be induced by a low protein intake.

Although PCR is often viewed as a variable that can be manipulated independently, it varies directly with the Kt/V, a measure of dialysis adequacy. (See "Kt/V and the adequacy of hemodialysis".) As examples:

  • In one study of a small group of hemodialysis patients, the intensity of dialysis was increased by enhancing dialysis time, blood flow, and/or membrane surface area [3]. As the Kt/V rose from 0.82 to 1.32 over a three month period, there was a concurrent elevation in PCR from 0.81 to 1.02 g/kg per day. The rise in PCR was indicative of increased protein intake (and better nutrition) due, presumably, to improved appetite. A second group in which the dialysis regimen was unchanged had no increase in either Kt/V or PCR.
  • In another report, converting 13 patients from conventional dialysis (3 x 4 hours/week) to three times per week nocturnal dialysis (3 x 8 hours/week) led to a significant increase in nPCR (1.39 g/kg per day at baseline to 2.25 g/kg per day at 12 months) [4].

The PCR is a function of protein catabolism and reflects protein intake only if the patient is in a steady state regarding nutrition. Unless there is obvious evidence of poor nutrition (eg, PCR below 0.8 g/kg per day) or underdialysis (eg, Kt/V <1,2), alterations in dialysis prescription should be undertaken only after clear trends in these parameters are apparent. This may require several months of monitoring PCR and Kt/V to ascertain that a significant change has occurred.

To continue reading this article you need to subscribe.

Read the rest of this article and others like it

The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use (click here) ©2009 UpToDate, Inc.
References Top
  1. Lowrie, EG, Lew, NL. Death risk in hemodialysis patients: The predictive value of commonly measured variables and an evaluation of death rate differences between facilities. Am J Kidney Dis 1990; 15:458.
  2. Laird, NM, Berkey, CS, Lowrie, EG. Modeling success or failure of dialysis therapy: the National Cooperative Dialysis Study. Kidney Int Suppl 1983; :S101.
  3. Lindsay, RM, Spanner, E, Heidenheim, RP, et al. Which comes first Kt/V or PCR — Chicken or egg? Kidney Int Suppl 1992; 38:S32.
  4. David, S, Kumpers, P, Eisenbach, GM, et al. Prospective evaluation of an in-centre conversion from conventional haemodialysis to an intensified nocturnal stragety. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009 [Epub ahead of print].
  5. Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative Guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines for nutrition in chronic renal failure. Guideline 8. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 35(Suppl 2):S28.
  6. Kloppenburg, WD, Stegeman, CA, Hooyschuur, M, et al. Assessing dialysis adequacy and dietary intake in the individual hemodialysis patient. Kidney Int 1999; 55:1961.
  7. Combe, C, McCullough, KP, Asano, Y, et al. Kidneay Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) and the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS): Nutrition guidelines, indicators, and practices. Am J Kidney Dis 2004; 5 Suppl 3:44.
  8. Shinaberger, CS, Kilpatrick, RD, Regidor, DL, et al. Longitudinal associations between dietary protein intake and survival in hemodialysis patients. Am j Kidney Dis 2006; 48:37.
  9. Jindal, KK, Goldstein, MB. Urea kinetic modeling in chronic hemodialysis: Benefits, problems, and practical solutions. Semin Dial 1988; 1:82.
  10. Lightfoot, BO, Caruana, RJ, Mulloy, LL, Fincher, ME. Simple formula for calculating normalized protein catabolic rate (NPCR) in hemodialysis (HD) patients (abstract). J Am Soc Nephrol 1993; 4:363.
  11. Keshaviah, PR, Nolph, KD. Protein catabolic rate calculations in CAPD patients. ASAIO Trans 1991; 37:M400.
  12. Keshaviah, PR, Nolph, KD, Moore, HL, et al. Lean body mass estimation by creatinine kinetics. J Am Soc Nephrol 1994; 4:1475.
  13. NKF-DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines. IV. Assessment of nutritional status specifically as it relates to peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 37(Suppl 1):S81.
  14. Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative Guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines for nutrition in chronic renal failure. Guideline 15. Am J Kidney Dis 2000. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 35(Suppl 2):S40.
  15. Tattersall, J, Martin-Malo, A, Pedrini, L, et al. European best practice guidelines on haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007; 22(Suppl 2):ii1.
  16. Bastani, B, McNeely, M, Schmitz, PG, et al. Serum bicarbonate is an independent determinant of protein catabolic rate in chronic hemodialysis. Am J Nephrol 1996; 16:382.
  17. Lindsay, RM, Bergstrom, J. Membrane biocompatibility and nutrition in maintenance haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1994; 9(Suppl 2):150.
white circle LOG IN
white circle DEMO