Consult the medical resource doctors trust

UpToDate is one of the most respected medical information resources in the world, used by over 360,000 doctors and thousands of patients to find answers to medical questions.

  • Content written by a faculty of over 4,000 physicians from leading medical institutions
  • Unbiased: free of advertising or pharmaceutical funding
  • Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • Continuously updated to incorporate new medical findings

Incidence, risk factors, and pathology of ectopic pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

Ectopic pregnancy occurs when the developing blastocyst becomes implanted at a site other than the endometrium of the uterine cavity. The most common extra-uterine location is the fallopian tube, which accounts for 98 percent of all ectopic gestations (picture 1A-B). Management of these pregnancies has changed dramatically over the years [1]. The guiding principle has become a conservative approach that attempts to save the tube, rather than salpingectomy. However, it is important to remember that hemorrhage from ectopic pregnancy is still the leading cause of pregnancy related maternal death in the first trimester and accounts for 4 to 10 percent of all pregnancy related deaths, despite improved diagnostic methods leading to earlier detection and treatment [2,3].

The incidence, risk factors, and pathology of ectopic pregnancy will be reviewed here. The clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment (medical and surgical) of this disorder are discussed separately. (See "Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management of ectopic pregnancy" and "Methotrexate treatment of tubal and interstitial ectopic pregnancy" and "Surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy and prognosis for subsequent fertility".)

INCIDENCE AND EPIDEMIOLOGY

The prevalence of ectopic pregnancy among women who go to an emergency department with first trimester bleeding, pain, or both ranges from six to 16 percent [4]. The overall incidence of ectopic pregnancy increased during the mid twentieth century, plateauing at approximately almost 20 per 1000 pregnancies in the early 1990s, the last time national data were reported by the Centers for Disease Control [2]. This rising incidence is strongly associated with an increased incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease [5].

The current incidence of ectopic pregnancy is difficult to estimate from available data (hospitalizations, insurance billing records) because inpatient hospital treatment of ectopic pregnancy has decreased and multiple health care visits for a single ectopic pregnancy have increased [6]. Furthermore, since the incidence is expressed as the number of ectopic pregnancies/1000 pregnancies, the denominator is difficult to determine accurately since early pregnancy failures that do not result in delivery or hospitalization are often not counted.

Ectopic pregnancy occurs with some seasonal variation and is most common in June and December [7]. The reason is unclear; the authors postulated that reproduction is seasonal, depends on photoperiod and temperature, and varies with different latitudes. Therefore, depending on the location of the investigation, ectopic pregnancy may show different seasonal rhythmicities. An altered maturation of the follicle and oocyte may negatively influence reproductive outcome in the transition between two reproductive steady states of high and low overall fecundity.

To continue reading this article you need to subscribe.

Read the rest of this article and others like it

The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use (click here) ©2009 UpToDate, Inc.
References Top
  1. Yao, M, Tulandi, T. Current Status of Surgical and Non-Surgical Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1997; 67:421.
  2. Ectopic pregnancy--United States, 1990-1992. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1995; 44:46.
  3. Fylstra, DL. Tubal pregnancy: a review of current diagnosis and treatment. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1998; 53:320.
  4. Murray, H, Baakdah, H, Bardell, T, Tulandi, T. Diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy. CMAJ 2005; 173:905.
  5. Kamwendo, F, Forslin, L, Bodin, L, Danielsson, D. Epidemiology of ectopic pregnancy during a 28 year period and the role of pelvic inflammatory disease. Sex Transm Infect 2000; 76:28.
  6. Zane, SB, Kieke, BA Jr, Kendrick, JS, Bruce, C. Surveillance in a time of changing health care practices: estimating ectopic pregnancy incidence in the United States. Matern Child Health J 2002; 6:227.
  7. Cagnacci, A, Landi, S, Volpe, A. Rhythmic variation in the rate of ectopic pregnancy throughout the year. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180:1067.
  8. Ankum, WM, Mol, BWJ, Van Der Veen, F, Bossuyt, PMM. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 1996; 65:1093.
  9. Bouyer, J, Coste, J, Shojaei, T, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a comprehensive analysis based on a large case-control, population-based study in France. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157:185.
  10. Peterson, HB, Xia, Z, Hughes, JM, et al. The risk of ectopic pregnancy after tubal sterilization. US Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group. N Engl J Med 1997; 336:762.
  11. Goldberg, JM, Falcone, T. Effect of diethylstilbesterol on reproductive function. Fertil Steril 1999; 72:1.
  12. Mol, BW, Ankum, WM, Bossuyt, PM, Van der, Veen F. Contraception and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Contraception 1995; 52:337.
  13. Sivin, I. Dose- and age-dependent ectopic pregnancy risks with intrauterine contraception. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78:291.
  14. Backman, T, Rauramo, I, Huhtala, S, Koskenvuo, M. Pregnancy during the use of levonorgestrel intrauterine system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190:50.
  15. Hillis, SD, Owens, BS, Marchbanks, PA, et al. Recurrent chlamydial infections increase the risks of hospitalization for ectopic pregnancy and pelvic inflammatory disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176:103.
  16. Cohen, J, Mayaux, MF, Guihard-Moscato, ML, et al. In Vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: A collaborative study of 1163 pregnancies on the incidence and risk factors of ectopic pregnancies. Hum Reprod 1986; 1:255.
  17. Gemzell, C, Guillome, J, Wang, CF. Ectopic pregnancy following treatment with human chorionic gonadotropins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 143:761.
  18. McBain, JC, Evans, JH, Peperell, R, et al. An unexpected high rate of ectopic pregnancy following the induction of ovulation with human pituitary and chorionic gonadotropin. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1980; 87:5.
  19. Saraiya, M, Berg, CJ, Kendrick, JS, et al. Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178:493.
  20. Strandell, A, Thorburn, J, Hamberger, L. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 1999; 71:282.
  21. Nazari, A, Askari, HA, Check, JH, O'Shaughnessy, A. Embryo transfer technique as a cause of ectopic pregnancy in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1993; 60:919.
  22. www.cdc.gov/ART/ART02/download.htm (accessed November 1, 2005).
  23. Wolner-Hanssen, P, Eschenbach, DA, Paavonen, J, et al. Association between vaginal douching and acute pelvic inflammatory disease. JAMA 1990; 263:1936.
  24. Pisarska, MD, Carson, SA, Buster, JE. Ectopic pregnancy. Lancet 1998; 351:1115.
  25. Nybo Andersen, AM, Wohlfahrt, J, Christens, P et al. Maternal age and fetal loss; population based linkage study. BMJ 2000; 320:1708.
  26. Storeide, O, Veholmen, M, Eide, M, et al. The incidence of ectopic pregnancy in Hordaland county, Norway 1976-1993. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76:345.
  27. Bouyer, J, Coste, J, Fernandez, H, et al. Sites of ectopic pregnancy: a 10 year population-based study of 1800 cases. Hum Reprod 2002; 17:3224.
  28. Lopez, HB, Micheelsen, U, Berendtsen, H, Kock, K. Ectopic pregnancy and its associated endometrial changes. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1994; 38:104.
  29. Senterman, M, Jibodh, R, Tulandi, T. Histopathologic study of ampullary and isthmic tubal ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159:939.
  30. Kutluay, L, Vicdan, K, Turan, C, et al. Tubal histopathology in ectopic pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1994; 57:91.
  31. Attar, E. Endocrinology of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2004; 31:779.
  32. Timor-Tritsch, IE, Yeh, MN, Peisner, DB, et al. The use of transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161:157.
  33. Coste, J, Fernandez, H, Joye, N, et al. Role of chromosome abnormalities in ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2000; 74:1259.
  34. Goddijn, M, van der, Veen F, Schuring-Blom, GH, et al. Cytogenetic characteristics of ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod 1996; 11:2769.
  35. Gaudoin, MR, Coulter, KL, Robins, AM, et al. Is the incidence of ovarian ectopic pregnancy increasing?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1996; 70:141.
  36. Spiegelberg, O. Zur casvistik des ovarials schwangerschaft. Arch Gynack 1878; 13:73.
  37. Rotas, MA, Haberman, S, Levgur, M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:1373.
  38. Ash, A, Smith, A, Maxwell, D. Caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG 2007; 114:253.
  39. Hassiakos, D, Bakas, P, Pistofidis, G, Creatsas, G. Heterotopic pregnancy at 16 weeks of gestation after in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2002; 266:124.
  40. Strafford, JC, Ragan, WD. Abdominal pregnancy. Review of current management. Obstet Gynecol 1977; 50:548.
  41. Martin, JN Jr, Sessums, JK, Martin, RW, et al. Abdominal pregnancy: current concepts of management. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71:549.
white circle LOG IN
white circle DEMO