BACKGROUND. We reviewed 120 microsurgical reconstructions of a hepatic artery in living related liver transplantation and discussed the problems encountered. METHODS. From January 1991 to July 1994 we performed a series of 105 living related liver transplantations on children with end-stage liver disease. Arterial reconstruction was performed under the optical field of a continuous zoom magnification of approximately 10 times with an operating microscope. RESULTS. Twenty-six percent of the graft arteries were less than 2 mm in diameter. The time required for an arterial reconstruction was 49.5 +/- 1.8 minutes. In 15 of the 31 cases in which there were two graft arteries, two arterial reconstructions were required. The caliber differences between the graft artery and the recipient artery in 30 instances was dealt with by cutting an undersized artery obliquely (17 instances), by fish-mouth method (10 instances), by end-to-side anastomosis (1 instance), or by funnelization method (2 instances). In one case we performed an intimal dissection of a recipient hepatic artery and substituted a splenic artery. Consequently, hepatic arterial thrombosis occurred in only two cases (1.7%). CONCLUSIONS. Microsurgical technique has overcome the high risk of hepatic arterial thrombosis in cases of fine graft arteries, enabled the reconstruction of arteries with caliber difference, and decreased arterial complications with its delicate manipulation.
AD
Second Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan.
PMID
8560381
20
TI
Innovative techniques for and results of portal vein reconstruction in living-related liver transplantation.
BACKGROUND: Portal vein reconstruction is a crucial factor affecting the outcome of a successful living-related liver transplantation. We describe here our experience with portal vein reconstruction in 314 cases of living-related liver transplantation with use of novel surgical modalities to enable the transplant surgeons to deal with any size mismatch between the donor's and recipient's portal veins. METHODS: Portal vein reconstruction was classified into 2 major groups, anastomosis without and with a vein graft. When there was no stenosis of the recipient portal vein and the diameter was the same, the portal trunk was used for anastomosis. When the diameter mismatch was minimal, branch patch anastomosis was feasible. When the recipient portal vein was significantly stenotic and the portal vein of the graft was long enough, we removed the stenotic trunk and constructed an anastomosis between the graft portal vein and the confluence of the recipient portal vein. When the graft portal vein was short, a vein graft was interposed. The vein patch technique was preferable when the diameter of the graft vein was not large enough for the interposition technique. RESULTS: Anastomosis without vein graft included trunk anastomosis (n = 156), branch patch anastomosis (n = 39), and confluence anastomosis (n = 22). Anastomosis with vein graft used the interposition technique (n = 77) and vein patch technique (n = 27). The origin of the grafts was mostly from the maternal left ovarian vein (70%) or the paternal inferior mesenteric vein (27%). Complications relatedto portal vein reconstruction occurred in 16 (5%) patients: portal vein thrombosis in 8, stenosis in 7, and fatal rupture in 1 patient. The incidence of complications was similar for all techniques except for confluence anastomosis. CONCLUSION: Our innovative techniques should be helpful for overcoming diameter or length mismatches in portal vein reconstruction in pediatric liver transplantation.
AD
Department of Transplantation Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan.
