Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate®

Working during pregnancy

Josephine R Fowler, MD, MSc
Larry Culpepper, MD, MPH
Section Editor
Charles J Lockwood, MD, MHCM
Deputy Editor
Kristen Eckler, MD, FACOG


Worldwide, women are working during all trimesters of pregnancy for reasons including financial necessity, preservation of insurance, career advancement, and preservation of postpartum leave time. Working pregnant women often request advice and assistance from their clinicians to manage challenges that occur while being pregnant at work. This topic will review issues including the impact of pregnancy on work, the impact of work on pregnancy, workplace exposure, leave time and discrimination, and requesting accommodations to enable pregnant women to continue working.

Topics related to occupational risks and exposure are presented separately.

(See "Overview of occupational and environmental risks to reproduction in females".)

(See "Overview of occupational and environmental health".)


In the United States, the percentage of women in the labor force rose from 30 to nearly 60 percent between 1950 and 2000 [1]. For 2015, 62.1 percent of women ages 16 years and older were anticipated to be in the workforce. Globally, 67 percent of women in developed countries between the ages of 15 to 64 years were employed in 2014 [2]. As the number of women in the workforce has risen, so has the number of women working while pregnant. As an example, for women pregnant with their first child, 66 percent of mothers worked while pregnant in 2008 compared with only 44 percent in the early 1960s [3]. In addition, women are working later into their pregnancies than ever before. In the early 1960s, 65 percent of pregnant women stopped work more than a month prior to delivery, while 35 percent continued working in their final month of pregnancy. By the late 2000s, the pattern had reversed, with 82 percent of pregnant women working until within one month of delivery and 18 percent stopping work earlier. More women are also returning to work within six months after their first birth than in previous decades (21 versus 73 percent from the early 1960s to the period of 2005 to 2007).


Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Dec 2016. | This topic last updated: Tue Dec 20 00:00:00 GMT+00:00 2016.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2017 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Bureau of Labor Statistics. A century of change: The US labor force, 1950 to 2050. http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2002/05/art2full.pdf (Accessed on October 04, 2016).
  2. Organisation for Economic Co-Operaton and Development. Employment: Labour force participation rate, by sex and age group, 2014. http://stats.oecd.org/ (Accessed on October 04, 2016).
  3. Pew Research Center. Working while pregnant is much more common that it used to be, 2015. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/03/31/working-while-pregnant-is-much-more-common-than-it-used-to-be/ (Accessed on October 04, 2016).
  4. Wood H, McKellar LV, Lightbody M. Nausea and vomiting in pregnancy: blooming or bloomin' awful? A review of the literature. Women Birth 2013; 26:100.
  5. Alstveit M, Severinsson E, Karlsen B. Living on the edge of being overstretched--a Norwegian qualitative study of employed pregnant women. Health Care Women Int 2010; 31:533.
  6. Mozurkewich EL, Luke B, Avni M, Wolf FM. Working conditions and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95:623.
  7. Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Zeitlin J, Lelong N, et al. Employment, working conditions, and preterm birth: results from the Europop case-control survey. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004; 58:395.
  8. Katz VL. Work and work-related stress in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2012; 55:765.
  9. MacDonald LA, Waters TR, Napolitano PG, et al. Clinical guidelines for occupational lifting in pregnancy: evidence summary and provisional recommendations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209:80.
  10. Bonde JP, Jørgensen KT, Bonzini M, Palmer KT. Miscarriage and occupational activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis regarding shift work, working hours, lifting, standing, and physical workload. Scand J Work Environ Health 2013; 39:325.
  11. Palmer KT, Bonzini M, Harris EC, et al. Work activities and risk of prematurity, low birth weight and pre-eclampsia: an updated review with meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med 2013; 70:213.
  12. Juhl M, Strandberg-Larsen K, Larsen PS, et al. Occupational lifting during pregnancy and risk of fetal death in a large national cohort study. Scand J Work Environ Health 2013; 39:335.
  13. Henry JD, Rendell PG. A review of the impact of pregnancy on memory function. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2007; 29:793.
  14. Anderson MV, Rutherford MD. Cognitive reorganization during pregnancy and the postpartum period: an evolutionary perspective. Evol Psychol 2012; 10:659.
  15. Logan DM, Hill KR, Jones R, et al. How do memory and attention change with pregnancy and childbirth? A controlled longitudinal examination of neuropsychological functioning in pregnant and postpartum women. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2014; 36:528.
  16. Salihu HM, Myers J, August EM. Pregnancy in the workplace. Occup Med (Lond) 2012; 62:88.
  17. Palmer KT, Bonzini M, Bonde JP, et al. Pregnancy: occupational aspects of management: concise guidance. Clin Med (Lond) 2013; 13:75.
  18. Bilhartz TD, Bilhartz P. Occupation as a risk factor for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2013; 22:188a.
  19. Nugteren JJ, Snijder CA, Hofman A, et al. Work-related maternal risk factors and the risk of pregnancy induced hypertension and preeclampsia during pregnancy. The Generation R Study. PLoS One 2012; 7:e39263.
  20. Chang PJ, Chu LC, Hsieh WS, et al. Working hours and risk of gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia. Occup Med (Lond) 2010; 60:66.
  21. Brooks-Gunn J, Han WJ, Waldfogel J. Maternal employment and child cognitive outcomes in the first three years of life: the NICHD Study of Early Child Care. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Child Dev 2002; 73:1052.
  22. Hill JL, Waldfogel J, Brooks-Gunn J, Han WJ. Maternal employment and child development: a fresh look using newer methods. Dev Psychol 2005; 41:833.
  23. Zoritch B, Roberts I, Oakley A. Day care for pre-school children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; :CD000564.
  24. Henrotin JB, Vaissière M, Etaix M, et al. Deprivation, occupational hazards and perinatal outcomes in pregnant workers. Occup Med (Lond) 2016.
  25. Labbe E, Blanquet M, Gerbaud L, et al. A new reliable index to measure individual deprivation: the EPICES score. Eur J Public Health 2015; 25:604.
  26. Gisselmann MD, Hemström O. The contribution of maternal working conditions to socio-economic inequalities in birth outcome. Soc Sci Med 2008; 66:1297.
  27. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 650: Physical Activity and Exercise During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126:e135.
  28. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Guidelines: Exercise in pregnancy (Statement No 4), 2015. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/exercise-in-pregnancy-statement-no.4/ (Accessed on October 12, 2016).
  29. Lee LJ, Symanski E, Lupo PJ, et al. Data linkage between the National Birth Defects Prevention Study and the Occupational Information Network (O*NET) to assess workplace physical activity, sedentary behaviors, and emotional stressors during pregnancy. Am J Ind Med 2016; 59:137.
  30. Fernandez RC, Marino JL, Varcoe TJ, et al. Fixed or Rotating Night Shift Work Undertaken by Women: Implications for Fertility and Miscarriage. Semin Reprod Med 2016; 34:74.
  31. Lin YC, Chen MH, Hsieh CJ, Chen PC. Effect of rotating shift work on childbearing and birth weight: a study of women working in a semiconductor manufacturing factory. World J Pediatr 2011; 7:129.
  32. Cardwell MS. Stress: pregnancy considerations. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2013; 68:119.
  33. Wadhwa PD, Entringer S, Buss C, Lu MC. The contribution of maternal stress to preterm birth: issues and considerations. Clin Perinatol 2011; 38:351.
  34. Scheinost D, Sinha R, Cross SN, et al. Does prenatal stress alter the developing connectome? Pediatr Res 2016.
  35. Dayan J, Creveuil C, Marks MN, et al. Prenatal depression, prenatal anxiety, and spontaneous preterm birth: a prospective cohort study among women with early and regular care. Psychosom Med 2006; 68:938.
  36. Larsen AD, Hannerz H, Thulstrup AM, et al. Psychosocial job strain and risk of congenital malformations in offspring--a Danish National cohort study. BJOG 2014; 121:830.
  37. United States Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Substance data sheet for occupational exposure to lead. https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=10031 (Accessed on October 12, 2016).
  38. United States Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Toxic and hazardous substances, hazard communication. https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_id=10099&p_table=STANDARDS (Accessed on October 12, 2016).
  39. http://www.epa.gov/hg/effects.htm (Accessed on May 12, 2014).
  40. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp.asp?id=115&tid=24 (Accessed on May 12, 2014).
  41. Frazier LM. Reproductive disorders associated with pesticide exposure. J Agromedicine 2007; 12:27.
  42. Birks L, Casas M, Garcia AM, et al. Occupational Exposure to Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals and Birth Weight and Length of Gestation: A European Meta-Analysis. Environ Health Perspect 2016; 124:1785.
  43. Lyall K, Croen LA, Sjödin A, et al. Polychlorinated Biphenyl and Organochlorine Pesticide Concentrations in Maternal Mid-Pregnancy Serum Samples: Association with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disability. Environ Health Perspect 2016.
  44. Laslo-Baker D, Barrera M, Knittel-Keren D, et al. Child neurodevelopmental outcome and maternal occupational exposure to solvents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004; 158:956.
  45. Rouvet JF, Westall C, Koren G, Till C. Maternal occupational exposure to organic solvents during pregnancy and infant visual processing. University of Toronto, Workplace Safety and Insurance Board of Ontario, 2006.
  46. Taskinen H, Kyyrönen P, Hemminki K, et al. Laboratory work and pregnancy outcome. J Occup Med 1994; 36:311.
  47. Cordier S, Garlantézec R, Labat L, et al. Exposure during pregnancy to glycol ethers and chlorinated solvents and the risk of congenital malformations. Epidemiology 2012; 23:806.
  48. O'Brien JL, Langlois PH, Lawson CC, et al. Maternal occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and craniosynostosis among offspring in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2016; 106:55.
  49. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Preventing occupational exposure to antineoplastic and other hazardous drugs in healthcare settings, 2004. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2004-165/pdfs/2004-165.pdf (Accessed on October 12, 2016).
  50. Dranitsaris G, Johnston M, Poirier S, et al. Are health care providers who work with cancer drugs at an increased risk for toxic events? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2005; 11:69.
  51. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Regulatory guide 8.13: Instruction concerning prenatal radiation exposure, 1999. http://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0037/ML003739505.pdf (Accessed on October 12, 2016).
  52. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Standards for protection against radiation 20.1208: Dose equivalent to an embryo/fetus, 2015. http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part020/part020-1208.html (Accessed on October 04, 2016).
  53. Shaw GM. Adverse human reproductive outcomes and electromagnetic fields: a brief summary of the epidemiologic literature. Bioelectromagnetics 2001; Suppl 5:S5.
  54. Robert E. Intrauterine effects of electromagnetic fields--(low frequency, mid-frequency RF, and microwave): review of epidemiologic studies. Teratology 1999; 59:292.
  55. Cawdell-Smith J, Upfold J, Edwards M, Smith M. Neural tube and other developmental anomalies in the guinea pig following maternal hyperthermia during early neural tube development. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen 1992; 12:1.
  56. Graham JM Jr, Edwards MJ, Edwards MJ. Teratogen update: gestational effects of maternal hyperthermia due to febrile illnesses and resultant patterns of defects in humans. Teratology 1998; 58:209.
  57. Graham JM, Edwards MJ, Lipson AH, Webster WS. Gestational hyperthermia as a cause for Moebius syndrome. Teratology 1988; 37:461.
  58. Edwards MJ. Review: Hyperthermia and fever during pregnancy. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2006; 76:507.
  59. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Criteria for a recommended standard: Occupational exposure to heat and hot environments, 2016. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2016-106/pdfs/2016-106.pdf (Accessed on October 04, 2016).
  60. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Controls for noise exposure, 2014. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/noisecontrol/default.html (Accessed on October 04, 2016).
  61. Kurppa K, Rantala K, Nurminen T, et al. Noise exposure during pregnancy and selected structural malformations in infants. Scand J Work Environ Health 1989; 15:111.
  62. Noise: a hazard for the fetus and newborn. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Environmental Health. Pediatrics 1997; 100:724.
  63. www.Reprotox.org (Accessed on September 22, 2009).
  64. Lalande NM, Hétu R, Lambert J. Is occupational noise exposure during pregnancy a risk factor of damage to the auditory system of the fetus? Am J Ind Med 1986; 10:427.
  65. Daniel T, Laciak J. [Clinical observations and experiments concerning the condition of the cochleovestibular apparatus of subjects exposed to noise in fetal life]. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 1982; 103:313.
  66. Nurminen T, Kurppa K. Occupational noise exposure and course of pregnancy. Scand J Work Environ Health 1989; 15:117.
  67. Selander J, Albin M, Rosenhall U, et al. Maternal Occupational Exposure to Noise during Pregnancy and Hearing Dysfunction in Children: A Nationwide Prospective Cohort Study in Sweden. Environ Health Perspect 2016; 124:855.
  68. Gerhardt KJ, Pierson LL, Huang X, et al. Effects of intense noise exposure on fetal sheep auditory brain stem response and inner ear histology. Ear Hear 1999; 20:21.
  69. Gerhardt KJ, Abrams RM. Fetal exposures to sound and vibroacoustic stimulation. J Perinatol 2000; 20:S21.
  70. Blackmore-Prince C, Harlow SD, Gargiullo P, et al. Chemical hair treatments and adverse pregnancy outcome among Black women in central North Carolina. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 149:712.
  71. Burnett C, Goldenthal EI, Harris SB, et al. Teratology and percutaneous toxicity studies on hair dyes. J Toxicol Environ Health 1976; 1:1027.
  72. Holly EA, Bracci PM, Hong MK, et al. West Coast study of childhood brain tumours and maternal use of hair-colouring products. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2002; 16:226.
  73. Gallicchio L, Miller S, Greene T, et al. Cosmetologists and reproductive outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113:1018.
  74. Kersemaekers WM, Roeleveld N, Zielhuis GA. Reproductive disorders due to chemical exposure among hairdressers. Scand J Work Environ Health 1995; 21:325.
  75. Efird JT, Holly EA, Cordier S, et al. Beauty product-related exposures and childhood brain tumors in seven countries: results from the SEARCH International Brain Tumor Study. J Neurooncol 2005; 72:133.
  76. McCall EE, Olshan AF, Daniels JL. Maternal hair dye use and risk of neuroblastoma in offspring. Cancer Causes Control 2005; 16:743.
  77. US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Pregnancy discrimination. https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/publications/fs-preg.cfm (Accessed on October 10, 2016).
  78. United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. Americans with Disabilities Act: Information and technical assistance. https://www.ada.gov/ada_intro.htm (Accessed on October 10, 2016).
  79. https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/history/35th/thelaw/pregnancy_discrimination-1978.html (Accessed on October 12, 2016).
  80. United States Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division. Family Medical Leave Act. https://www.dol.gov/whd/fmla/ (Accessed on October 09, 2016).
  81. Mayer G. The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA): Policy Issues, Library of Congress, Washington, DC 2013.
  82. https://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/whdfs28l.pdf (Accessed on December 02, 2016).
  83. Jou J, Kozhimannil KB, Blewett LA, et al. Workplace Accommodations for Pregnant Employees: Associations With Women's Access to Health Insurance Coverage After Childbirth. J Occup Environ Med 2016; 58:561.
  84. https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/pregnancy.cfm (Accessed on December 02, 2016).
  85. https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/pregnancy_new.cfm (Accessed on December 02, 2016).
  86. https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/pregnancy.cfm. (Accessed on December 02, 2016).
  87. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Office of Legal Counsel. EEOC enforcement guidance on pregnancy discrimination and related issues, 2015. https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/upload/pregnancy_guidance.pdf (Accessed on December 06, 2016).
  88. https://www.fairwork.gov.au/ (Accessed on October 12, 2016).
  89. Jackson RA, Gardner S, Torres LN, et al. My Obstetrician Got Me Fired: How Work Notes Can Harm Pregnant Patients and What to Do About It. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126:250.
  90. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Patient brochure: Pregnant and working: What you need to know, 2016. https://www.acog.org/-/media/Districts/District-IX/MembersOnly/PatientBrochure.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20161005T1353143834 (Accessed on October 05, 2016).
  91. Bayrampour H, Heaman M, Duncan KA, Tough S. Predictors of perception of pregnancy risk among nulliparous women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2013; 42:416.
  92. Department of Labor. Family Medical Leave Act regulations. The medical certification and verification process, 2007. https://www.dol.gov/whd/FMLA2007Report/Chapter6.pdf (Accessed on December 06, 2016).