Find Print
0 Find synonyms

Find synonyms Find exact match

What's new in oncology
Official reprint from UpToDate® ©2017 UpToDate®
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2017 UpToDate, Inc.
What's new in oncology
All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.
Literature review current through: Mar 2017. | This topic last updated: Apr 24, 2017.

The following represent additions to UpToDate from the past six months that were considered by the editors and authors to be of particular interest. The most recent What's New entries are at the top of each subsection.


Adjuvant trastuzumab in early HER2-positive breast cancer (February 2017)

In the Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial, over 5000 women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early breast cancer who had completed adjuvant chemotherapy were randomly assigned to observation or to the addition of trastuzumab for one or two years [1-4]. In the final report of this study, at a median of 11 years of follow-up, one year of trastuzumab improved disease-free and overall survival relative to observation [2]. There were no further improvements with extension to two years of trastuzumab, but the incidence of cardiotoxicity was higher. These results support our approach of administering adjuvant trastuzumab for one year to those with HER2-positive early breast cancer. (See "Adjuvant systemic therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer", section on 'Treatment duration'.)

Duration of adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer (July 2016, Modified February 2017)

For postmenopausal women receiving adjuvant treatment with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) for hormone-positive breast cancer, the minimum duration of treatment is five years. While data from the MA17R trial demonstrated that extending the duration from 5 to 10 years improved recurrence-free survival [5], preliminary results from the NSABP-B42, DATA, and IDEAL trials, reported at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, have not confirmed this benefit [6-8]. No study has demonstrated a benefit in overall survival with extended adjuvant AI therapy, and bone-related toxic effects are more frequent among those receiving extended treatment. While variations in methodology likely account for the differences in recurrence-free survival between the studies, the magnitude of any potential benefit is likely to be greatest for those at highest risk for recurrence. While we previously had recommended an extended course of AI adjuvant therapy for most postmenopausal women with nonmetastatic hormone-positive disease, based on the new data, we now suggest offering extended adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy to those with high-risk disease (eg, node-positive or ≥T3 disease). (See "Adjuvant endocrine therapy for non-metastatic, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer", section on 'Duration of endocrine treatment'.)

Fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (November 2016)

Results from the phase III FALCON trial, which included 462 women with metastatic estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer who had not received prior hormone therapy, demonstrated improved progression-free survival with fulvestrant over anastrazole (16.6 versus 13.8 months) [9]. Quality of life outcomes were similar between the two groups. These data support our approach of using fulvestrant as an alternative to either an aromatase inhibitor or an aromatase inhibitor plus CDK 4/6 inhibitor in the first-line setting for patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. (See "Treatment approach to metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: Endocrine therapy", section on 'Fulvestrant'.)

CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus letrozole in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (November 2016)

The addition of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors to aromatase inhibition improves outcomes in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

In a phase III study of 700 postmenopausal women with recurrent or metastatic, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer receiving first-line letrozole, the addition of the CDK 4/6 inhibitor ribociclib improved progression-free survival [10]. Ribociclib was associated with higher rates of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (eg, neutropenia, leukopenia, and elevated transaminases), though over 90 percent of patients were able to complete therapy.

In a phase III study of over 600 postmenopausal women with metastatic, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, the combination of palbociclib and letrozole demonstrated improved progression-free survival and objective response rate compared with letrozole alone [11]. Rates of neutropenia, fatigue, and diarrhea were higher with the combination.

Given improved disease outcomes but higher rates of toxicities, we offer the combination of CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus letrozole to patients with higher burdens of disease who are able to accept the increased risks of this treatment. (See "Treatment approach to metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: Endocrine therapy", section on 'CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus letrozole'.)

Obesity as a risk factor for cardiotoxicity from anthracycline and trastuzumab-based regimens (November 2016)

Among patients receiving anthracyclines or sequential treatment with anthracyclines and trastuzumab for breast cancer, being obese or overweight increases the risk of developing cardiotoxicity [12]. Obesity or being overweight are factors favoring a nonanthracycline-based regimen, but should be balanced with other disease and patient risk factors in the selection of an appropriate adjuvant treatment regimen. (See "Cardiotoxicity of trastuzumab and other HER2-targeted agents", section on 'Risk factors' and "Adjuvant systemic therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer", section on 'Choice of chemotherapy'.)

Surgical margin in breast conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ (October 2016)

For women undergoing breast conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), surgical resection margins have a significant impact on local recurrence, but the optimal margin has been controversial. A meta-analysis found a 2 mm margin was associated with a twofold reduction in local recurrence rates compared with a positive margin, and equivalent recurrence rates compared with wider margins [13]. A multidisciplinary consensus guideline advises that 2 mm be the standard for an adequate margin in DCIS treated with breast conserving surgery followed by whole breast irradiation [14]. Clinical judgment is advised when determining whether patients with a negative but <2 mm margin require re-excision. (See "Breast conserving therapy", section on 'Margins for DCIS'.)

Mammography associated with breast cancer overdiagnosis (October 2016)

A study examining data for women age 40 years and older from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database calculated size-specific breast cancer case fatality rates prior to and after the widespread adoption of mammography screening [15]. The authors estimated that approximately 80 percent of cancers identified by screening would not have caused clinical symptoms. Moreover, the authors calculated that at least two-thirds of the reduction in mortality associated with large tumors may be attributed to improved cancer treatments rather than screening. While acknowledging that cancer overdiagnosis does occur, and that randomized trials demonstrating benefit of mammography were largely conducted prior to modern therapy and imaging, we continue to suggest breast cancer screening for women ages 50 to 74 years, with individualized decision making for those between the ages of 40 and 50 years, given that the overall burden of evidence suggests benefit to screening. (See "Screening for breast cancer: Evidence for effectiveness and harms", section on 'Overdiagnosis'.)


Flexible sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer screening in older women (January 2017)

Flexible sigmoidoscopy is one of several screening modalities recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. However, sigmoidoscopy is less effective at detecting lesions in the right side of the colon (beyond the 60 cm reach of the sigmoidoscope) than the left side, and right-sided lesions are more common in older women. A study that pooled results from three randomized trials (nearly 300,000 individuals) comparing screening by sigmoidoscopy with no screening found that the incidence of CRC at 10 to 12 years was decreased in men but, in women, only in those younger than 60 years [16]. Current screening recommendations do not indicate gender-based preferences for screening options, but these findings call into question the effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy as a screening modality for women over age 60 years. (See "Tests for screening for colorectal cancer: Stool tests, radiologic imaging and endoscopy", section on 'Evidence of effectiveness' and "Screening for colorectal cancer: Strategies in patients at average risk", section on 'Comparison of tests'.)

Fecal immunochemical testing for colorectal cancer screening (January 2017)

Multiple test strategies are available for screening in people with average risk for colorectal cancer (CRC). Annual stool testing for occult blood using a guaiac reagent (gFOBT) has been widely implemented and is one of the screening strategies endorsed by the US Preventive Services Task Force. Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is another option and has the potential advantages of better test performance (improved sensitivity for CRC and advanced adenomas) and better patient adherence (one stool sample, no diet restrictions) compared with gFOBT. The US Multi-Society Task Force has published consensus guidelines recommending FIT over gFOBT when occult blood stool testing is elected for CRC screening [17]. (See "Tests for screening for colorectal cancer: Stool tests, radiologic imaging and endoscopy", section on 'Immunochemical tests for fecal blood' and "Screening for colorectal cancer: Strategies in patients at average risk", section on 'Comparison of tests'.)

Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in older adults (January 2017)

The effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) in older adults is uncertain. Randomized trials of screening colonoscopy have not been completed, and trials currently underway do not include adults 75 years and older. A study of Medicare beneficiaries found that undergoing colonoscopy believed to be for screening modestly decreased the risk of CRC (2.2 versus 2.6 percent in the no-screening group) over an eight-year period for those aged 70 to 74 years, with a smaller, but statistically non-significant, decrease in risk (2.8 versus 3.0 percent in the no-screening group) for those 75 to 79 years [18]. Adverse events following colonoscopy occurred in less than 1 percent. The decision whether to recommend screening for a patient at any age, but especially those over 75 years of age, should depend upon the patient's health status, anticipated life expectancy, risk for colorectal cancer (CRC), and personal values. (See "Screening for colorectal cancer: Strategies in patients at average risk", section on 'Screening in older adults'.)


Open versus laparoscopic resection for stage II or III colon cancer (March 2017)

In a trial involving over 1000 patients with stage II or III colon cancer, colon resection performed with complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation resulted in equally excellent five-year survivals (over 90 percent) whether surgery was performed open or laparoscopically [19]. Thus, surgeons treating colon cancer have a choice of techniques, but must follow strict oncologic principles, including complete mesocolic excision, to ensure optimal outcomes. (See "Surgical resection of primary colon cancer", section on 'Regional lymphadenectomy'.)

Telotristat for refractory carcinoid syndrome diarrhea (March 2017)

Telotristat inhibits the production of serotonin by carcinoid tumors and reduces the frequency of carcinoid syndrome diarrhea. The randomized TELESTAR trial compared two doses of oral telotristat (250 mg and 500 mg, each taken three times daily) against placebo in 135 patients who had uncontrolled symptoms from carcinoid syndrome despite treatment with a somatostatin analog [20]. Treatment with telotristat at either dose was associated with a reduction in bowel movement frequency compared with placebo, and the drug was well tolerated. Based upon these results, telotristat has been approved in the United States, in combination with somatostatin analog therapy, for the treatment of adults with diarrhea related to carcinoid syndrome that is inadequately controlled by somatostatin analog therapy alone [21]. The recommended dose is 250 mg three times daily [22]. (See "Treatment of the carcinoid syndrome", section on 'Telotristat'.)

Assessing response to chemoradiotherapy in anal cancer (February 2017)

An analysis of data from the ACT II trial supports the view that anal squamous cell cancers (SCCs) continue to regress for up to 26 weeks after the completion of chemoradiotherapy and that the decision to pursue surgery for persisting disease is best deferred until then [23]. The complete clinical response (cCR) rate increased over time, and 72 percent of those not in a cCR at 11 weeks achieved it at 26 weeks. Furthermore, the greatest separation in long-term outcomes between responders and nonresponders occurred when the assessment was delayed until 26 weeks. Based upon these results, we agree with updated guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommending that patients can be watched for up to six months following completion of chemoradiotherapy as long as there is no progressive disease during this period of follow-up. (See "Clinical features, staging, and treatment of anal cancer", section on 'Assessing the response to primary chemoradiotherapy'.)

HER2-targeted therapy in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (November 2016)

An expert panel convened by the College of American Pathologists (CAP), American Society of Clinical Pathology (ASCP) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has provided an evidence-based joint guideline on HER2 testing and clinical decision-making in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas [24]:

All patients who have documented advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma and who are considered good candidates for trastuzumab should have their tumor tissue tested for HER2 overexpression and/or amplification prior to trastuzumab treatment.

Because of intratumoral heterogeneity, a minimum of five biopsy specimens, and optimally six to eight, should be obtained to avoid false negative results. Laboratories/pathologists should perform immunohistochemical staining (IHC) first, with in situ hybridization (ISH) reserved for an IHC result of 2+ (equivocal).

Patients with HER2-positive tumors (IHC 3+ or ISH+) should be offered trastuzumab-containing combination chemotherapy as initial treatment. There is no evidence to support continuation of trastuzumab or other HER2-directed therapy beyond progression in patients initially treated with trastuzumab. (See "Systemic therapy for locally advanced unresectable and metastatic esophageal and gastric cancer", section on 'Assessment of HER2 status and selection of candidates for trastuzumab'.)

First-line chemotherapy for advanced esophagogastric cancer (October 2016)

There is no globally accepted first-line chemotherapy regimen for advanced, HER2-negative esophagogastric cancer. A network meta-analysis of 17 different chemotherapy regimens concluded that, based upon efficacy and toxicity, a fluoropyrimidine doublet regimen with oxaliplatin, irinotecan, or a taxane was preferred over a fluoropyrimidine/cisplatin doublet or anthracycline or docetaxel-containing triple therapy [25]. For most patients without a clinical trial option, we suggest a platinum/fluoropyrimidine doublet over triplet therapy. We generally prefer oxaliplatin plus a fluoropyrimidine but still consider a cisplatin/fluoropyrimidine doublet to be a reasonable alternative, given the lack of a phase III trial showing inferior results for a cisplatin versus oxaliplatin-containing regimen. (See "Systemic therapy for locally advanced unresectable and metastatic esophageal and gastric cancer", section on 'Is there an optimal combination regimen?'.)

Proton pump inhibitors may diminish capecitabine efficacy (October 2016)

Two recent studies suggest that proton pump inhibitors diminish the effectiveness of capecitabine in the treatment of colorectal and gastroesophageal cancer [26,27]. It is hypothesized that higher gastric pH levels may inhibit dissolution and absorption of capecitabine. Patients who are receiving a capecitabine-containing regimen for adjuvant treatment of colon cancer or other malignancies should, when possible, avoid taking concurrent proton pump inhibitors. (See "Adjuvant therapy for resected stage III (node-positive) colon cancer", section on 'Capecitabine'.)


Checkpoint inhibition immunotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (April 2017)

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the preferred initial treatment for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and upper urinary tract, and checkpoint inhibition immunotherapy with an agent targeting the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) protein or its ligand (PD-L1) has been shown to prolong survival in patients who relapse. In a multicenter, single-arm phase II study, atezolizumab was used as first-line therapy in patients who were not eligible for treatment with a cisplatin-based regimen [28]. In this study, the objective response rate was 23 percent, and 19 of 27 patients continue to respond at the time of analysis. Based upon these results, the US Food and Drug Administration approved atezolizumab as initial therapy for patients who are not a candidate for a cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimen. (See "Treatment of metastatic urothelial cancer of the bladder and urinary tract", section on 'Immunotherapy'.)

Quality of life in men with localized prostate cancer (March 2017)

Radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, brachytherapy, and active surveillance all are important options for the treatment of low-risk, clinically localized prostate cancer. Two large prospective studies using validated instruments provide important additional insights into the impact on quality of life for each of these treatment modalities [29,30]. The choice of therapeutic approach depends upon an informed patient decision incorporating knowledge about the potential advantages and disadvantages associated with each approach along with personal preferences (table 1 and table 2 and table 3). (See "Initial approach to low- and very low-risk clinically localized prostate cancer", section on 'Quality of life'.)

Hypofractionated radiation therapy for prostate cancer (March 2017)

Historically, conventional schedules for external beam radiation therapy (RT) for localized prostate cancer have used daily doses given for seven to eight weeks. In the randomized PROFIT trial, a hypofractionated RT schedule (a larger dose per fraction given over four weeks) was noninferior in terms of both efficacy and toxicity to a conventional schedule, confirming results from three other phase III trials [31]. For patients in whom costs and convenience are important considerations, hypofractionated RT is an appropriate alternative to a conventional schedule. (See "External beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer", section on 'Hypofractionation'.)

Adjuvant chemotherapy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (January 2017)

Patients with locally advanced urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract and those with positive lymph nodes following nephroureterectomy are at high risk for recurrence and death. A retrospective analysis of data from the National Cancer Database found that those receiving adjuvant chemotherapy had a significantly prolonged overall survival [32]. In the absence of randomized trials, we suggest adjuvant chemotherapy for these patients if they are fit for chemotherapy. (See "Malignancies of the renal pelvis and ureter", section on 'Adjuvant chemotherapy'.)

Chemotherapy for mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (January 2017)

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the primary treatment for patients with mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs). However, many patients require subsequent surgical resection of a residual thoracic mass. In a retrospective analysis, the combination of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) was associated with significantly more severe pulmonary toxicity and treatment-related deaths than the combination of etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (VIP) [33]. In the absence of randomized trials, we recommend VIP rather than BEP for the initial chemotherapy of mediastinal NSGCTs. (See "Extragonadal germ cell tumors involving the mediastinum and retroperitoneum", section on 'Systemic chemotherapy'.)

Cabozantinib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (October 2016)

Cabozantinib has been shown to be superior to everolimus in previously treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In the CABOSUN trial, cabozantinib increased progression-free survival compared with sunitinib in previously untreated patients with intermediate or high-risk renal cell carcinoma [34]. Cabozantinib may provide an important option for previously untreated patients with metastatic disease, although it currently is approved only for patients who have received prior antiangiogenic therapy. (See "Anti-angiogenic and molecularly targeted therapy for advanced or metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma", section on 'Cabozantinib versus sunitinib'.)


Hysterectomy-corrected cervical cancer mortality rates and racial variation (February 2017)

Cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates are known to vary across racial groups in the United States but can be underestimated if data are not adjusted for prior hysterectomy. In a population-based study that corrected for the prevalence of hysterectomy, cervical cancer mortality in black women was more than twice that of white women from 2000 to 2012 (10.1 versus 4.7 per 100,000) [35]. These data add to the body of evidence showing a racial disparity in cervical cancer mortality and support the need for research to identify and overcome the factors that account for this disparity. (See "Invasive cervical cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Incidence and mortality'.)

Rucaparib in BRCA mutation-associated advanced ovarian cancer (January 2017)

Poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have activity against BRCA mutation-associated epithelial ovarian cancer. The PARP inhibitor rucaparib is now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for BRCA mutation-associated advanced ovarian cancer that has been treated with two or more lines of chemotherapy, based on response rates of over 50 percent in such cancers [36,37]. We now offer rucaparib as an option in this setting. (See "Medical treatment for relapsed epithelial ovarian, fallopian tubal, or peritoneal cancer: Platinum-resistant disease", section on 'Patients with a BRCA mutation'.)

Risk of preterm delivery following loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) (November 2016)

Studies have consistently found an increased risk for preterm delivery in pregnancies conceived after cold knife conization, but data are mixed regarding the risk with laser conization and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). In the largest study of pregnancy outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), a Norwegian registry study of almost 10,000 births confirmed that prior treatment for CIN was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth compared with no prior treatment [38]. The strongest associations were for cold knife and laser conization, but a small increase in risk was also observed for LEEP. Women with CIN 2,3 who plan future childbearing should be counseled about the risks and benefits of both treatment and observation. (See "Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Reproductive effects of treatment", section on 'Risks of individual treatment methods'.)


Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy in head and neck cancer (November 2016)

The management of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck that is refractory to platinum-based chemotherapy is difficult. Clinical trials with antibodies that target the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) protein have demonstrated important clinical activity [39,40], and both pembrolizumab and nivolumab have now been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in this setting. Anti-PD-1 antibodies are the preferred approach for second-line therapy of metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck that has progressed after prior platinum-based chemotherapy. (See "Treatment of metastatic and recurrent head and neck cancer", section on 'PD-1 inhibitor immunotherapy'.)


Avelumab immunotherapy for metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (March 2017)

Chemotherapy historically has been the standard approach to treating advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Avelumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks the PD-1 ligand (PD-L1), was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration based on a phase II study demonstrating a 32 percent response rate (23 percent partial and 9 percent complete), relatively durable remissions (six-month progression-free survival 40 percent), and a favorable side effect profile [41,42]. Based upon these results, avelumab is our preferred treatment for patients with metastatic MCC. (See "Staging and treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma", section on 'Avelumab'.)

Targeted therapy for advanced melanoma with an NRAS mutation (March 2017)

Binimetinib, an inhibitor of MEK, is able to block the MAPK pathway in patients with advanced melanoma and an NRAS driver mutation. In a phase III trial in this patient population, binimetinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy in patients who had progressed during or after immunotherapy [43]. Binimetinib is not currently approved for use outside of a clinical trial setting. (See "Molecularly targeted therapy for metastatic melanoma", section on 'NRAS-mutated tumors'.)

Retreatment with BRAF and MEK inhibition in advanced melanoma (March 2017)

Targeted therapy with a combination of BRAF and MEK inhibition is an important treatment option for tumors that contain a driver mutation in BRAF. However, most patients eventually develop progressive disease. Results from a prospective phase II study provide evidence that retreatment with the combination of a BRAF and MEK inhibitor may be of value in patients who have acquired resistance to both mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors [44]. (See "Molecularly targeted therapy for metastatic melanoma", section on 'Retreatment'.)

Thrombotic microangiopathy from interferon (October 2016)

Drug-induced thrombotic microangiopathy (DITMA) has been described with a number of chemotherapeutic, immunosuppressive, and other drugs. Unlike thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), DITMA is not associated with severely reduced ADAMTS13 activity, and the principal treatment is drug discontinuation rather than plasma exchange. A new report has provided strong evidence for interferon as a cause of TMA [45]. Patients receiving interferon who develop signs of a TMA should have the drug discontinued promptly before organ failure develops. (See "Drug-induced thrombotic microangiopathy", section on 'Immunosuppressive agents'.)


Naldemedine for opioid-induced constipation (March 2017)

The benefit of naldemedine, an oral peripherally acting opioid receptor antagonist, for opioid-induced constipation (OIC) was shown in two identically designed 12-week phase III randomized trials conducted in patients with noncancer chronic pain and OIC [46]. In a preliminary report, naldemedine, compared with placebo, decreased constipation and was well tolerated with no signs or symptoms of opioid withdrawal or decrease in opioid analgesic efficacy. Naldemedine has been approved in the United States for OIC in adult patients with chronic noncancer pain [47]. It can be used off label in the cancer population. The European Medicines Agency has approved naldemedine for treatment of OIC without restriction to noncancer pain [48]. (See "Cancer pain management with opioids: Prevention and management of side effects", section on 'Other oral agents'.)

Scalp hypothermia to prevent chemotherapy-induced alopecia (March 2017)

Two prospective studies have evaluated the efficacy of two different automated scalp cooling devices in women with early stage breast cancer [49,50]:

In an interim analysis of a randomized trial comparing the Paxman Scalp Cooling device and no scalp hypothermia for women with breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (one-third anthracycline-based, the remainder taxane-based), one-half of the hypothermia group had limited hair loss (to less than 50 percent, not requiring a wig) compared with none in the control group [49]. Adverse events were all grade 1 and 2, including primarily headache and feeling cold. The success rate was higher with taxane-containing regimens.

In a multicenter prospective cohort study, 101 patients receiving non-anthracycline taxane-based chemotherapy and who used the DigniCap Scalp Cooling device were compared with 16 concurrently treated controls who did not use the device [50]. Two-thirds of the intervention group, compared with none of the control group, had limited hair loss (to less than 50 percent) one month after the end of chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 2.5 years, no patient developed scalp metastases.

These results confirm prior studies on the efficacy and safety of scalp hypothermia to reduce chemotherapy-induced alopecia. One of these devices (DigniCap) is FDA-cleared for this use in the United States. (See "Chemotherapy-induced alopecia", section on 'Efficacy and safety'.)

Early initiation of palliative care and survival (February 2017)

When initiated early in the disease course, palliative care improves clinical and quality of care outcomes; randomized trials in patients with cancer or advanced lung disease also report a survival advantage, although more diverse palliative care populations have not been studied. A meta-analysis of seven randomized trials involving 2184 patients concluded that there was no association between early initiation of palliative care and overall survival [51]. Previous reports of a possible survival advantage may have reflected bias in patient selection; only one of the seven trials was rated as having a low risk of bias. (See "Benefits, services, and models of subspecialty palliative care", section on 'Rationale for palliative care'.)

Palliative care during hematopoietic cell transplantation (February 2017)

For patients with serious life-threatening illness, comprehensive palliative care can be successfully integrated with disease-modifying treatment. The benefits of delivering palliative care alongside potentially curative treatment were shown in a randomized trial of inpatient palliative care consultation versus usual transplant care in 160 adults with hematologic malignancies undergoing autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation [52]. At two weeks posttransplant, the increase in depression, anxiety, and overall symptom burden was less in the intervention group, and the decrease in quality of life (QOL) was also smaller. Depression and QOL benefits persisted at three months. (See "Benefits, services, and models of subspecialty palliative care", section on 'Rationale for palliative care'.)

Antipsychotics for delirium in terminally ill patients (January 2017)

The benefit of antipsychotics for management of delirium in terminally ill patients has been called into question by a randomized trial in which 247 inpatients of a hospice or palliative care service with mild to moderately severe delirium were assigned to oral risperidone, haloperidol, or placebo every 12 hours for 72 hours [53]. All patients received individualized supportive care. Patients who received antipsychotics had more severe delirium, worse delirium-associated distress scores, more use of midazolam, more extrapyramidal effects, and worse short-term survival. In our view, this study does not justify abandoning the use of antipsychotics for severely agitated delirious patients but points to the importance of reversing precipitating causes, providing best supportive care for symptomatic distress associated with delirium, and the need for additional research on the use of antipsychotics. (See "Overview of managing common non-pain symptoms in palliative care", section on 'Treatment'.)

Dosing interval for zoledronic acid in patients with bone metastases (January 2017)

For patients with bone metastases from a solid tumor, the approved dose and schedule of administration for zoledronic acid to reduce the frequency of skeletal-related events (SREs) is 4 mg every three to four weeks. Less frequent dosing is supported by data from CALGB (Alliance) trial 70604, which randomly assigned 1822 patients with bone metastases from breast or prostate cancer or multiple myeloma to the same dose of zoledronic acid every 4 or every 12 weeks for two years, starting with the first dose. There was no difference in the proportion of patients who developed at least one SRE (29.5 versus 28.6 percent) [54]. There are now sufficient data in breast and castration-resistant prostate cancer to support dosing of zoledronic acid every 12 rather than every 4 weeks, and we suggest this approach for most patients. We still prefer every-four-week dosing, at least initially, for patients who have extensive or highly symptomatic bone metastases. (See "Osteoclast inhibitors for patients with bone metastases from breast, prostate, and other solid tumors", section on 'Dosing interval'.)

ASCO recommendations on palliative care in patients with advanced cancer (November 2016)

In response to increasing evidence from randomized trials that early palliative care offers benefits in terms of quality of life, mood, end-of-life care, and possibly even survival, an updated provisional clinical opinion from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) now recommends integrating dedicated palliative care services into the care of inpatients and outpatients with advanced cancer early in the disease course, concurrent with active treatment [55]. Essential components of palliative care may include symptom, distress, and functional status management; clarification of treatment goals; assistance with medical decision making; coordination with other care providers; and assessment and support of coping needs. (See "Benefits, services, and models of subspecialty palliative care", section on 'Rationale for palliative care'.)

Updated MASCC/ESMO guidelines for nausea and emesis related to cancer treatment (October 2016)

Updated guidelines for prevention and management of cancer therapy-associated nausea and vomiting are available from the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and the European Society of Medical Oncology (table 4), the consensus panel also provides guidance on the use of prophylactic antiemetics in patients undergoing radiation therapy. (See "Prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in adults", section on 'Recommendations for specific groups'.)


Olaratumab in combination for advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (November 2016)

Olaratumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) and blocks binding of PDGF ligands. In a randomized phase II study comparing doxorubicin with or without olaratumab in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) from a variety of histologic subtypes, initial combination therapy was associated with improved median overall survival (27 versus 15 months) [57]. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, mucositis, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were all more common with combined therapy. Based upon these results, and consistent with the recent approval of olaratumab in the United States for this indication [58], we suggest doxorubicin plus olaratumab rather than doxorubicin alone for first-line treatment of patients who cannot be cured with radiation or surgery and who have a type of STS for which anthracyclines represent appropriate chemotherapy. (See "Systemic treatment of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma", section on 'Doxorubicin plus olaratumab'.)

Potential interaction between high-dose methotrexate and levetiracetam (November 2016)

Levetiracetam is sometimes used for prophylaxis and treatment of seizures in patients undergoing high-dose methotrexate (MTX) treatment for brain or other central nervous system (CNS) cancers, including lymphomas. Health Canada has issued a safety review describing a potential interaction between the two drugs, noting 13 reports received by the levetiracetam manufacturer and concluding that concurrent use can lead to significantly elevated levels of MTX and increased risk of toxicity [59]. The labeling is being revised to recommend careful MTX blood level monitoring. Additional details are available from Lexi-Interact, the drug interactions tool included within UpToDate. (See "Therapeutic use and toxicity of high-dose methotrexate", section on 'Coadministered drugs that may interfere with excretion'.)


Ceritinib in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (January 2017)

For patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), inhibition of ALK is the preferred frontline approach. A randomized trial compared ceritinib, an ALK inhibitor, with pemetrexed and a platinum agent in such patients and found improved progression-free survival (17 versus 8 months) and, for those with brain metastasis, a higher intracranial objective response rate (73 versus 27 percent) [60]. Although we use ceritinib only for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who are intolerant of or who have progressed on the ALK inhibitor crizotinib, these data support further study of ceritinib in the frontline setting. (See "Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion oncogene positive non-small cell lung cancer", section on 'Ceritinib'.)

Screening interval for lung cancer (January 2017)

The optimal strategy for screening high-risk individuals for lung cancer is the subject of active study. In new results from the NELSON trial, in which almost 16,000 current or former smokers were randomly assigned to low-dose computed tomography (LDCT)-based screening versus observation only, extending the screening interval from 1 to 2.5 years reduced the proportion of cancers detected at an early stage [61]. These data support our approach to screen annually with LDCT when screening patients who are at high risk for lung cancer. (See "Screening for lung cancer", section on 'Other trials'.)

Atezolizumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (December 2016)

Novel immunotherapies are playing an increasing role in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly in patients who have progressed on chemotherapy. In a phase III trial enrolling approximately 1200 patients who had progressed on platinum-based chemotherapy, those randomly assigned to the PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab compared with docetaxel experienced an improvement in median overall survival (13.8 versus 9.6 months) with fewer side effects, regardless of PD-L1 expression or histology [62]. These data support our approach of offering patients who have progressed on prior chemotherapy (and targeted therapy, for those with EGFR or ALK genetic alterations) salvage treatment with immunotherapy. (See "Immunotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer with immune checkpoint inhibition", section on 'Following platinum-based chemotherapy'.)

Osimertinib versus chemotherapy in T790M, EGFR-positive NSCLC (December 2016)

In a randomized trial of over 400 patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had progressed on frontline EGFR inhibitors and demonstrated a T790M resistance mutation, osimertinib improved progression-free survival (10.1 versus 4.4 months) and objective response rate (71 versus 31 percent) relative to a platinum-based chemotherapy combination [63]. Osimertinib also resulted in fewer ≥ grade 3 toxicities (23 versus 47 percent). These data support our approach of using osimertinib in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with T790M-mediated resistance to EGFR inhibitors. (See "Systemic therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with an activating mutation in the epidermal growth factor receptor", section on 'Management of acquired resistance'.)

Pembrolizumab for PD-L1 high non-small cell lung cancer (October 2016)

In a phase III trial enrolling 305 patients with treatment-naïve advanced non- small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lacking a driver mutation and expressing PD-L1 in at least 50 percent of tumor cells, pembrolizumab monotherapy improved progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate compared with standard platinum-doublet chemotherapy [64]. It was also associated with lower treatment-related adverse effects. These data support our recommendation for frontline pembrolizumab in patients with a tumor that has at least 50 percent tumor cell staining for PD-L1 and lacks a driver mutation. (See "Immunotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer with immune checkpoint inhibition", section on 'First-line setting'.)

Revised indications for erlotinib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (October 2016)

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has revised indications for erlotinib to limit use to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors have a driving mutation in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [65]. This is based on results of the IUNO trial, in which erlotinib maintenance, compared with placebo, did not improve progression-free or overall survival in over 600 patients with advanced NSCLC that lacked an EGFR mutation and who had no progression after platinum-based chemotherapy. Given these results, we no longer suggest EGFR inhibitors as an option for maintenance or subsequent line therapy for NSCLC with wild-type EGFR. (See "Systemic therapy for the initial management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer without a driver mutation", section on 'Avoidance of EGFR TK inhibitors'.)


2017 revision of the AJCC/UICC TNM classification (December 2016)

The tumor (T), node (N), metastasis (M) staging classification from the combined American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) was extensively revised in the 8th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual in November 2016 [66]. Implementation of the new staging tables in the United States has been delayed until January 2018 to allow for the updating of protocols, guidelines, and software [67]. However, AJCC recommends that clinicians use the latest scientific information provided in the 8th edition for patient care, and UpToDate is including the 2017 TNM classification tables for all sites in addition to those of the 7th edition (2010), which remain in effect until January 2018. Outside of the United States, the UICC has implemented the 8th edition changes as of January 1, 2017. (See "Tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging system and other prognostic factors in cutaneous melanoma" and "Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) staging classification for breast cancer" and "Tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system for non-small cell lung cancer" and "Clinical presentation, histopathology, diagnostic evaluation, and staging of soft tissue sarcoma".)

Type 1 diabetes mellitus and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy (December 2016)

Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy with an anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor antibody, often in conjunction with ipilimumab, has resulted in the acute onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus in rare cases. This may be manifested by severe hyperglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis [68]. These patients have remained insulin-dependent for diabetic control following management of their acute episode. Blood glucose is typically monitored weekly during the first 12 weeks of therapy with the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab. (See "Toxicities associated with checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy", section on 'Type 1 diabetes mellitus'.)

Cardiotoxicity of checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy (November 2016)

Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy for melanoma and other cancers may result in severe or fatal cardiotoxicity, even in the absence of a history of significant cardiac risk factors [69]. High-dose steroids are indicated to treat myositis and other cardiac complications, but symptoms may progress in some cases despite steroids. The early institution of more aggressive immunosuppressive therapy and monitoring should be considered for patients without an immediate response to high-dose steroids. (See "Toxicities associated with checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy", section on 'Cardiotoxicity'.)

Early antiretroviral therapy and cancer risk in HIV-infected patients (October 2016)

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) should be initiated in all HIV-infected individuals to reduce AIDS and non-AIDS related events, regardless of the baseline CD4 count. Further analysis of a randomized trial in which over 4500 HIV-infected participants received ART immediately or delayed ART until the CD4 count was <350 cells/microL demonstrated a reduction in infection-related cancers (ie, those associated with human herpesvirus 8, Epstein-Barr virus, and human papillomavirus) with immediate ART (6 versus 23 cases with delayed ART) [70]. There was also a trend towards fewer noninfection-related malignancies with immediate ART. (See "When to initiate antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients", section on 'HIV-related comorbidities'.)

Use of UpToDate is subject to the Subscription and License Agreement.


  1. Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Procter M, Leyland-Jones B, et al. Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:1659.
  2. Cameron D, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Gelber RD. 11 years' follow-up of trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer: final analysis of the HERceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial. Lancet 2017.
  3. Gianni L, Dafni U, Gelber RD, et al. Treatment with trastuzumab for 1 year after adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a 4-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12:236.
  4. Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, et al. 2 years versus 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer (HERA): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2013; 382:1021.
  5. Goss PE, Ingle JN, Pritchard KI, et al. Extending Aromatase-Inhibitor Adjuvant Therapy to 10 Years. N Engl J Med 2016; 375:209.
  6. jan-Heijnen VC, Van Hellemond IE, Peer PG, et al. First results from the multicenter phase III DATA study comparing 3 versus 6 years of anastrozole after 2-3 years of tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2016; S1-03.
  7. Mamounas EP, Bandos H, Lembersky BC, Geyer CE. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate extended adjuvant endocrine therapy (5 years of letrozole) in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer who have completed previous adjuvant endocrine therapy: Initial results of NRG oncology/NSABP B-42. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2016; S1-05.
  8. Blok EJ, van de Velde CJH, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg EM, et al. Optimal duration of extended letrozole treatment after 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy; results of the randomized phase III IDEAL trial (BOOG 2006-05). San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2016; S1-04.
  9. Robertson JF, Bondarenko IM, Trishkina E, et al. Fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (FALCON): an international, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2016; 388:2997.
  10. Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, et al. Ribociclib as First-Line Therapy for HR-Positive, Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 2016; 375:1738.
  11. Finn RS, Martin M, Rugo HS, et al. Palbociclib and Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 2016; 375:1925.
  12. Guenancia C, Lefebvre A, Cardinale D, et al. Obesity As a Risk Factor for Anthracyclines and Trastuzumab Cardiotoxicity in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:3157.
  13. Marinovich ML, Azizi L, Macaskill P, et al. The Association of Surgical Margins and Local Recurrence in Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treated with Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Meta-Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:3811.
  14. Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery with Whole-Breast Irradiation in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:3801.
  15. Welch HG, Prorok PC, O'Malley AJ, Kramer BS. Breast-Cancer Tumor Size, Overdiagnosis, and Mammography Screening Effectiveness. N Engl J Med 2016; 375:1438.
  16. Holme Ø, Schoen RE, Senore C, et al. Effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in men and women and different age groups: pooled analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 2017; 356:i6673.
  17. Robertson DJ, Lee JK, Boland CR, et al. Recommendations on fecal immunochemical testing to screen for colorectal neoplasia: a consensus statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85:2.
  18. García-Albéniz X, Hsu J, Bretthauer M, Hernán MA. Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy to Prevent Colorectal Cancer Among Medicare Beneficiaries Aged 70 to 79 Years: A Prospective Observational Study. Ann Intern Med 2017; 166:18.
  19. Kitano S, Inomata M, Mizusawa J, et al. Survival outcomes following laparoscopic versus open D3 dissection for stage II or III colon cancer (JCOG0404): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 2:261.
  20. Kulke MH, Hörsch D, Caplin ME, et al. Telotristat Ethyl, a Tryptophan Hydroxylase Inhibitor for the Treatment of Carcinoid Syndrome. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:14.
  21. (Accessed on March 03, 2017).
  22. (Accessed on March 03, 2017).
  23. Glynne-Jones R, Sebag-Montefiore D, Meadows HM, et al.. Best time to assess complete clinical response. Lancet Oncol 2017.
  24. Bartley AN, Washington MK, Ventura CB, et al. HER2 Testing and Clinical Decision Making in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2016; 140:1345.
  25. Ter Veer E, Haj Mohammad N, van Valkenhoef G, et al. The Efficacy and Safety of First-line Chemotherapy in Advanced Esophagogastric Cancer: A Network Meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2016; 108.
  26. Chu MP, Hecht JR, Slamon D, et al. Association of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Capecitabine Efficacy in Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer: Secondary Analysis of the TRIO-013/LOGiC Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2016.
  27. Sun J, Ilich AI, Kim CA, et al. Concomitant Administration of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Capecitabine is Associated With Increased Recurrence Risk in Early Stage Colorectal Cancer Patients. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2016; 15:257.
  28. Balar AV, Galsky MD, Rosenberg JE, et al. Atezolizumab as first-line treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet 2017; 389:67.
  29. Barocas DA, Alvarez J, Resnick MJ, et al. Association between radiation therapy, surgery, or observation for localized prostate cancer and patient-reported outcomes after 3 years. JAMA 2017; 317:1127.
  30. Chen RC, Basak R, Meyer AM, et al. Association Between Choice of Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiotherapy, Brachytherapy, or Active Surveillance and Patient-Reported Quality of Life Among Men With Localized Prostate Cancer. JAMA 2017; 317:1141.
  31. Catton CN, Lukka H, Gu CS, et al. Randomized Trial of a Hypofractionated Radiation Regimen for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2017; :JCO2016717397.
  32. Seisen T, Krasnow RE, Bellmunt J, et al. Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Nephroureterectomy for Locally Advanced and/or Positive Regional Lymph Node Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:852.
  33. Ranganath P, Kesler KA, Einhorn LH. Perioperative Morbidity and Mortality Associated With Bleomycin in Primary Mediastinal Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:4445.
  34. Choueiri TK, Halabi S, Sanford BL, et al. Cabozantinib Versus Sunitinib As Initial Targeted Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma of Poor or Intermediate Risk: The Alliance A031203 CABOSUN Trial. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:591.
  35. Beavis AL, Gravitt PE, Rositch AF. Hysterectomy-corrected cervical cancer mortality rates reveal a larger racial disparity in the United States. Cancer 2017; 123:1044.
  36. (Accessed on January 05, 2017).
  37. Kristeleit RS, Shapira-Frommer R, Oaknin A, et al. Clinical activity of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor rucaparib in patients (pts) with high-grade ovarian carcinoma (HGOC) and a BRCA mutation (BRCAmut): Analysis of pooled data from Study 10 (parts 1, 2a, and 3) and ARIEL2 (parts 1 and 2). ESMO 2016; 856O.
  38. Bjørge T, Skare GB, Bjørge L, et al. Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes After Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128:1265.
  39. (Accessed on August 08, 2016).
  40. Ferris RL, Blumenschein G Jr, Fayette J, et al. Nivolumab for Recurrent Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. N Engl J Med 2016; 375:1856.
  41. Kaufman HL, Russell J, Hamid O, et al. Avelumab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: a multicentre, single-group, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17:1374.
  42. (Accessed on March 25, 2017).
  43. Dummer R, Schadendorf D, Ascierto PA, et al. Binimetinib versus dacarbazine in patients with advanced NRAS-mutant melanoma (NEMO): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017.
  44. Schreuer M, Jansen Y, Planken S, et al. Combination of dabrafenib plus trametinib for BRAF and MEK inhibitor pretreated patients with advanced BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma: an open-label, single arm, dual-centre, phase 2 clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 2017.
  45. Kavanagh D, McGlasson S, Jury A, et al. Type I interferon causes thrombotic microangiopathy by a dose-dependent toxic effect on the microvasculature. Blood 2016; 128:2824.
  46. Hale ME, Wild J, Reddy J, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Naldemedine for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in subjects with chronic non-cancer pain receiving opioid therapy: results from two Phase 3 clinical trials (abstract 598). Data presented at the 2016 Digestive Disease Week, San Diego, CA, May 21, 2016. Abstract available online at (Accessed on March 30, 2017).
  47. (Accessed on March 30, 2017).
  48. (Accessed on March 30, 2017).
  49. Nangia J, Wang T, Osborne C, et al. Effect of a Scalp Cooling Device on Alopecia in Women Undergoing Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: The SCALP Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2017; 317:596.
  50. Rugo HS, Klein P, Melin SA, et al. Association Between Use of a Scalp Cooling Device and Alopecia After Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer. JAMA 2017; 317:606.
  51. Kavalieratos D, Corbelli J, Zhang D, et al. Association Between Palliative Care and Patient and Caregiver Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA 2016; 316:2104.
  52. El-Jawahri A, LeBlanc T, VanDusen H, et al. Effect of Inpatient Palliative Care on Quality of Life 2 Weeks After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2016; 316:2094.
  53. Agar MR, Lawlor PG, Quinn S, et al. Efficacy of Oral Risperidone, Haloperidol, or Placebo for Symptoms of Delirium Among Patients in Palliative Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177:34.
  54. Himelstein AL, Foster JC, Khatcheressian JL, et al. Effect of Longer-Interval vs Standard Dosing of Zoledronic Acid on Skeletal Events in Patients With Bone Metastases: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2017; 317:48.
  55. Ferrell BR, Temel JS, Tenin J. Integration of palliative care. J Clin Oncol 2016.
  56. Roila F, Molassiotis A, Herrstedt J, et al. 2016 MASCC and ESMO guideline update for the prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and of nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2016; 27:v119.
  57. Tap WD, Jones RL, Van Tine BA, et al. Olaratumab and doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone for treatment of soft-tissue sarcoma: an open-label phase 1b and randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet 2016; 388:488.
  58. (Accessed on October 19, 2016).
  59. (Accessed on October 28, 2016).
  60. De Castro Jr G, Tan DS, Crino L, et al. First-line Ceritinib Versus Chemotherapy in Patients With ALK-rearranged (ALK+) NSCLC: A Randomized, Phase 3 Study (ASCEND-4). WCLC 2016; PL03.07.
  61. Yousaf-Khan U, van der Aalst C, de Jong PA, et al. Final screening round of the NELSON lung cancer screening trial: the effect of a 2.5-year screening interval. Thorax 2017; 72:48.
  62. Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D, et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2017; 389:255.
  63. Mok TS, Wu Y-L, Ahn M-J, et al. Osimertinib or Platinum-Pemetrexed in EGFR T790M-Positive Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 2017; 376:629.
  64. Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, et al. Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 2016; 375:1823.
  65. FDA prescribing label for Tarceva (Accessed on October 24, 2016).
  66. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th, Amin MB. (Ed), American Joint Committee on Cancer, Chicago 2017.
  67. (Accessed on December 15, 2016).
  68. Okamoto M, Okamoto M, Gotoh K, et al. Fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus with anti-programmed cell death-1 therapy. J Diabetes Investig 2016; 7:915.
  69. Johnson DB, Balko JM, Compton ML, et al. Fulminant Myocarditis with Combination Immune Checkpoint Blockade. N Engl J Med 2016; 375:1749.
  70. Borges ÁH, Neuhaus J, Babiker AG, et al. Immediate Antiretroviral Therapy Reduces Risk of Infection-Related Cancer During Early HIV Infection. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 63:1668.
Topic 8361 Version 7133.0

Topic Outline



All topics are updated as new information becomes available. Our peer review process typically takes one to six weeks depending on the issue.