Find Print
0 Find synonyms

Find synonyms Find exact match

What's new in nephrology and hypertension
UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2016 UpToDate®
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2016 UpToDate, Inc.
What's new in nephrology and hypertension
All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.
Literature review current through: Jul 2016. | This topic last updated: Aug 24, 2016.

The following represent additions to UpToDate from the past six months that were considered by the editors and authors to be of particular interest. The most recent What's New entries are at the top of each subsection.

ACUTE AND CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE

Plant-based low protein diet in chronic kidney disease (July 2016)

A randomized trial compared a very low protein, plant-based diet supplemented with ketoanalogues (KD) with a mixed source (plant- and animal-based) low-protein diet (LPD) among patients with a stable estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 [1]. At 18 months of follow-up, compared with the LPD group, fewer patients in the KD group reached the composite endpoint of >50 percent reduction in eGFR or initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) (42 versus 13 percent, respectively). Compared with the LPD group, fewer patients in the KD group required RRT (30 versus 11 percent).

Caution is warranted in interpreting these results, however. While there were no differences between groups in nutritional parameters, other studies have shown increased mortality among patients treated with a keto acid- and amino acid-supplemented very low protein diet. Concerns have also been raised about delayed registration of the trial in the public trials registry until after enrollment of some participants. (See "Dietary recommendations for patients with nondialysis CKD", section on 'Source of protein intake'.)

Early initiation of renal replacement therapy (June 2016)

It is unclear if the early initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) (ie, without an obvious indication such as severe hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, pulmonary edema or advanced uremic symptoms) provides any benefit to critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) compared with later initiations of RRT. Two new randomized trials have evaluated this in somewhat different patient populations. In the larger trial, 620 critically ill patients with severe AKI were randomized to early or delayed RRT [2]. There was no difference in 60-day mortality, and nearly one-half of patients in the delayed RRT group recovered without requiring RRT. In contrast, a second trial of 231 critically ill patients with more moderate AKI showed reduced 90-day mortality with earlier RRT [3]. In the delayed initiation group, only 11 patients ended up not requiring RRT, and early RRT reduced the duration of AKI and length of stay. However, we have lower confidence in the results of the smaller trial, because it is possible that the relatively small size of the trial resulted in an overestimate of the treatment benefit. It is otherwise difficult to understand how minor differences in the protocols and patient populations could achieve such dramatically different outcomes. Until further data are available, UpToDate suggests that RRT not be initiated in the absence of obvious clinical indications. (See "Renal replacement therapy (dialysis) in acute kidney injury in adults: Indications, timing, and dialysis dose", section on 'Timing of elective initiation'.)

Metformin use and reduced kidney function (April 2016)

The use of metformin is contraindicated in patients with factors predisposing to lactic acidosis, including impaired renal function. The precise renal thresholds for the safe use of metformin remain uncertain. Improved clinical outcomes with metformin have been reported in observational studies of patients with diabetes and renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 45 to 60 mL/min). On the basis of these studies, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revised its labeling of metformin, which previously had identified metformin as contraindicated in women and men with serum creatinine levels ≥1.4 mg/dL (124 micromol/L) and ≥1.5 mg/dL (133 micromol/L), respectively [4]. The use of metformin is contraindicated in patients with an eGFR <30 mL/min, and the initiation of metformin is not recommended in patients with an eGFR between 30 and 45 mL/min. For patients taking metformin whose eGFR falls below 45 mL/min, the benefits and risks of continuing treatment should be assessed, whereas metformin should be discontinued if the eGFR falls below 30 mL/min. For patients with eGFR between 30 and 60 mL/min, we typically reduce the metformin dose by half (no more than 1000 mg per day), although there are no data to support this approach. (See "Metformin in the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus", section on 'Contraindications'.)

Increased body weight and chronic kidney disease (March 2016)

Increased body weight is known to be associated with a higher risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD), which has been attributed to its association with conditions that cause CKD. A prospective cohort study from Korea now suggests that, compared with those of normal weight, even metabolically healthy overweight or obese individuals who are free from diabetes, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, and insulin resistance at baseline have a higher five-year cumulative incidence of CKD [5]. (See "Screening for chronic kidney disease", section on 'Risk factors for chronic kidney disease'.)

Medication to prevent contrast nephropathy (March 2016)

A meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of multiple interventions to reduce the risk of contrast nephropathy. Compared with saline alone or saline plus placebo, both low- and high-dose N-acetylcysteine given with saline reduced the risk of contrast nephropathy [6]. In addition, analysis of five studies (n = 1477) revealed that statins given with N-acetylcysteine and intravenous saline reduced the risk of contrast nephropathy compared with N-acetylcysteine and intravenous saline alone. The strength of the evidence in the meta-analysis was considered low, however, and we do not believe that there are sufficient data to support the use of statins solely for the prevention of contrast nephropathy. For at-risk patients, we suggest administration of acetylcysteine based upon its potential for benefit and low toxicity and cost. (See "Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy", section on 'Acetylcysteine'.)

Choice of contrast agent to prevent contrast nephropathy (March 2016)

The type of contrast agent affects the risk of contrast nephropathy. Nonionic agents tend to be safer with respect to contrast nephropathy compared with ionic contrast agents. It is not known, however, whether nonionic iso-osmolal agents are safer than nonionic low-osmolal agents. A meta-analysis that included 25 randomized trials comparing the nonionic iso-osmolal agent iodixanol with a diverse group of nonionic low-osmolal agents reported a slight reduction in the risk of nephropathy with iodixanol that did not meet study criteria for clinical importance [7]. There was no difference between groups in the risk for renal replacement therapy, cardiovascular outcomes, or death, and the strength of the evidence was only moderate. These findings are consistent with our recommendation to use either iodixanol or nonionic low-osmolal contrast agents. (See "Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy", section on 'Nonionic iso-osmolal agents'.)

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents may not improve quality of life in chronic kidney disease (February 2016)

While many clinicians believe that maintaining hemoglobin levels above 10 to 12 g/dL with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) improves quality of life, particularly in younger individuals with active lifestyles, a meta-analysis calls this into question. The meta-analysis included studies that examined the effect of ESAs on changes in health-related quality of life using validated instruments including the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36; 13 studies) and the Kidney Disease Questionnaire (KDQ; four studies) [8]. The achieved hemoglobin was 7.4 to 12 g/L in the placebo-treated and/or lower hemoglobin target group and 10.2 to 13.6 g/L in the higher hemoglobin target group. Overall, there were no significant differences between groups in any SF-36 or KDQ domains. These data suggest that the use of ESAs to treat anemia may not result in significant changes in health-related quality of life among CKD patients. (See "Anemia of chronic kidney disease: Target hemoglobin/hematocrit for patients treated with erythropoietic agents", section on 'Quality of life'.)

DIALYSIS

Dialysis and survival outcomes in older adults (May 2016)

Older patients may derive little survival benefit from dialysis. A well-designed retrospective study from the Netherlands compared survival outcomes among patients >70 years who opted for conservative care versus dialysis [9]. Survival was calculated from different starting points including the time at which the treatment decision was first made and from times at which the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was first <20, <15, and <10 mL/min/1.73 m2. The overall median survival was higher for those patients who opted for dialysis. However, the survival advantage conferred by dialysis was substantially reduced among patients >70 years who had cardiovascular or other severe comorbidity, and there was no difference between groups among patients older than 80 years. (See "Conservative care of end-stage renal disease", section on 'Who should be offered conservative care'.)

Cool-temperature dialysis and hemodynamic stability (April 2016)

Using cool-temperature dialysate may increase the hemodynamic stability of selected patients during hemodialysis. A recent meta-analysis showed that, compared with standard dialysis, cool-temperature dialysis reduced the risk of intradialytic hypotension by 68 percent [10]. Patients on cool-temperature dialysis were more likely to have uncomfortable symptoms during dialysis, such as chills, shivering, or cramps, although there was no effect on overall quality of life or dialysis adequacy, as assessed by the 36-question health survey assessment form. Cool-temperature dialysis is an effective strategy to increase hemodynamic stability in patients with intradialytic hypotension. (See "Intradialytic hypotension in an otherwise stable patient", section on 'Second-line approach'.)

GLOMERULAR DISEASE AND VASCULITIS

B7-1 blockade does not improve posttransplant nephrotic syndrome in patients with recurrent FSGS (August 2016)

Primary idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) frequently recurs after kidney transplantation and the optimal treatment is unknown. An initial report demonstrated that the protein B7-1 is more highly expressed within kidneys of patients with recurrent FSGS and could serve as a therapeutic target. However, in a series of nine patients with recurrent idiopathic FSGS following transplantation, treatment with a B7-1 inhibitor (abatacept or belatacept) did not induce remission of proteinuria [11]. Among all nine patients, expression of B7-1 within podocytes was undetectable in kidney biopsies performed at the time of disease recurrence. B7-1 expression in podocytes was similarly absent from the biopsies of 22 additional patients with recurrent FSGS. Thus, in contrast with the prior study, B7-1 was not expressed during FSGS recurrence and B7-1 blockade was not effective in the treatment of recurrent idiopathic FSGS. (See "Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in the transplanted kidney", section on 'Abatacept'.)

Rituximab in primary membranous nephropathy (July 2016)

Rituximab may have benefit among patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy with a moderate risk of progression. In one unblinded trial, 75 patients with persistent proteinuria greater than 3.5 g/day after six months of treatment with angiotensin inhibition, diuretics, and a statin (nonimmunosuppressive therapy) were randomly assigned to rituximab or no rituximab [12]. Nonimmunosuppressive therapy was continued in all patients. At six months, there was no significant difference in the primary composite endpoint of complete or partial remission of proteinuria between patients. However, in a post-trial observational phase that followed patients for an additional 12 months, the rate of complete or partial remission was higher among patients treated with rituximab (65 versus 34 percent). In addition, patients treated with rituximab had less proteinuria and higher serum albumin levels. The role of rituximab for patients with primary membranous nephropathy is uncertain and further data are awaited. (See "Treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy", section on 'Rituximab'.)

Potential mechanism of malignancy-associated membranous nephropathy (June 2016)

The production of antibodies produced against tumor antigens that also recognize similar or identical molecules present on podocytes is a possible mechanism for malignancy-associated membranous nephropathy (MN). In a case report of a patient with anti-PLA2R-negative MN and concomitantly diagnosed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder, the expression of thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A (THSD7A) was detected by immunohistochemistry on tumor cells but not on normal gallbladder tissue [13]. The patient also had elevated plasma levels of anti-THSD7A antibodies, which the authors proposed were formed against abnormally expressed THSD7A by tumor cells. Treatment with chemotherapy led to the disappearance of THSD7A antibodies in the plasma within two weeks and a marked reduction in proteinuria. In a series of 24 other patients with MN and THSD7A antibodies, six were found to have a malignancy. (See "Causes and diagnosis of membranous nephropathy", section on 'Malignancy'.)

HYPERTENSION

Goal blood pressure in older adults (June 2016)

Goal blood pressure in older adults was examined in the Systolic Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) [14]. SPRINT enrolled a subgroup of more than 2600 ambulatory adults aged 75 years or older, including 349 categorized as being fit, 1456 as less fit, and 815 as frail according to a validated frailty index. At 3.1 years, rates of both the primary cardiovascular endpoint and all-cause mortality were significantly lower among those assigned more intensive (goal <120 mmHg) versus less intensive (goal <140 mmHg) systolic blood pressure lowering. The benefit from more intensive blood pressure control was present in both fit and frail older adults. Serious adverse events were similar in the two treatment groups, and did not depend upon frailty. (See "Treatment of hypertension in the elderly patient, particularly isolated systolic hypertension", section on 'Goal blood pressure'.)

Antihypertensive therapy in patients not at high cardiovascular risk (April 2016)

The benefit of antihypertensive therapy in patients at low or moderate cardiovascular risk, including those who are normotensive, is unclear. The Third Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation trial (HOPE-3) randomly assigned 12,705 patients at moderate risk for cardiovascular disease (only 38 percent were hypertensive at baseline) to receive a fixed-dose combination of candesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide or placebo [15]. At 5.6 years, there was no significant difference in cardiovascular events. However, among a hypertensive subgroup (ie, those whose initial systolic pressure was in the highest tertile, or greater than 143 mmHg), antihypertensive therapy significantly reduced the incidence of major cardiovascular events (5.7 versus 7.5 percent, absolute benefit of 1.8 percent). Thus, antihypertensive therapy reduced cardiovascular events in patients with mild hypertension and low overall cardiovascular risk. (See "What is goal blood pressure in the treatment of hypertension?", section on 'Benefit in those with mild hypertension'.)

Meta-analysis of goal blood pressure trials (March 2016)

A meta-analysis of goal blood pressure trials (ie, comparing a more intensive versus a less intensive goal) included 16 studies (including the SPRINT trial) and 52,235 patients [16]. A standardized 10/5 mmHg reduction in systolic/diastolic pressure resulted in reductions in the relative risks of stroke, coronary heart disease, and cardiovascular death. A trend, that did not reach statistical significance, was also seen for reduction in heart failure and all-cause mortality. The absolute (as opposed to relative) risk reductions varied according to baseline cardiovascular risk. The absolute benefit from blood pressure reduction was substantially greater among patients who, at baseline, were considered high-risk for having a cardiovascular event over the subsequent 5 to 10 years. (See "What is goal blood pressure in the treatment of hypertension?", section on 'Evidence of benefit from treating hypertension'.)

TRANSPLANTATION

Calcineurin inhibitor-sparing strategies following kidney transplantation (July 2016)

A number of different immunosuppressive approaches have been evaluated to reduce the risk of developing chronic allograft nephropathy related to calcineurin inhibitor therapy after kidney transplantation. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 88 randomized controlled trials involving renal transplant recipients evaluated the outcomes of four strategies (minimization, conversion, withdrawal, and avoidance) to limit exposure to calcineurin inhibitors among renal transplant recipients [17]. Minimization of the calcineurin inhibitor dose, when combined with mycophenolate mofetil, resulted in better renal function, a lower risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection, and a lower rate of graft loss compared with standard calcineurin inhibitor doses. In general, conversion (primarily to a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor) and avoidance strategies did not provide benefit, whereas withdrawal strategies increased the risk of acute rejection. Thus, consideration should be given to calcineurin inhibitor therapy minimization to help prevent the development and progression of chronic renal allograft nephropathy. (See "Chronic renal allograft nephropathy", section on 'Reducing calcineurin inhibitor exposure'.)

Survival of recipients of HLA-mismatched kidneys (March 2016)

The success of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched kidney transplantation is reduced compared with HLA-matched kidneys. However, a multicenter study suggests higher survival rates for recipients of HLA-incompatible living-donor kidneys compared with waitlisted controls who either never receive a kidney or who receive an HLA-compatible deceased-donor kidney after a prolonged time on the waiting list [18]. The observed survival benefit persisted despite the presence of high donor-specific antibody (DSA) levels and independent of the desensitization protocol utilized. However, a few factors may have influenced these findings: data were reported from highly effective transplant centers and may not be generalizable to all centers, and the comparator group came from all patients on the waiting list rather than just active patients who would be considered suitable for transplantation, which may overestimate the apparent benefit of transplantation. (See "HLA matching and graft survival in kidney transplantation", section on 'Survival compared with waiting list'.)

Zika virus and tissue/gamete donation (March 2016)

Zika virus has been detected in a number of tissues and body fluids. To avoid possible transmission of Zika virus infection, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued donor deferral recommendations for hematopoietic stem cells, tissues, and donor sperm or eggs; the recommendations do not apply to solid organs [19]. Living donors with Zika virus infection or relevant epidemiologic exposure (residence in or travel to an area where mosquito-borne transmission of Zika virus infection has been reported, or unprotected sexual contact with a person who meets these criteria) should be considered ineligible for donation for six months. Deceased donors with Zika virus infection in the preceding six months should also be considered ineligible. The deferral period recommended by the FDA for blood donors with risk factors for Zika virus infection remains at four weeks. (See "Zika virus infection: An overview", section on 'Blood/tissue donation'.)

OTHER NEPHROLOGY

Microvascular outcomes with empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes (July 2016)

There are few trials evaluating microvascular outcomes in patients taking sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. Microvascular disease was a prespecified secondary outcome in a recent trial designed specifically to evaluate cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease (CVD) [20]. In this trial, 7028 patients with type 2 diabetes and established CVD were randomly assigned to empagliflozin or placebo once daily; the majority of patients were also taking metformin, antihypertensives, and lipid-lowering agents. Incident or worsening nephropathy occurred in 12.7 and 18.8 percent of patients in the empagliflozin and placebo groups, respectively. The reduction in nephropathy drove the improved composite microvascular endpoint (the initiation of retinal photocoagulation, vitreous hemorrhage, diabetes-related blindness, or incident or worsening nephropathy) for empagliflozin. The mechanism behind the reduction in incident or worsening nephropathy with empagliflozin is likely multifactorial, but is thought to be largely related to a direct renovascular effect of empagliflozin. Whether other SGLT2 inhibitors have similar renal effects is unknown. There have been reports of acute kidney injury, some requiring hospitalization and dialysis, in patients taking canagliflozin or dapagliflozin. (See "Management of persistent hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus", section on 'SGLT2 inhibitors'.)

Use of UpToDate is subject to the Subscription and License Agreement.

REFERENCES

  1. Garneata L, Stancu A, Dragomir D, et al. Ketoanalogue-Supplemented Vegetarian Very Low-Protein Diet and CKD Progression. J Am Soc Nephrol 2016; 27:2164.
  2. Gaudry S, Hajage D, Schortgen F, et al. Initiation Strategies for Renal-Replacement Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit. N Engl J Med 2016; 375:122.
  3. Zarbock A, Kellum JA, Schmidt C, et al. Effect of Early vs Delayed Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: The ELAIN Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2016; 315:2190.
  4. http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm494829.htm?source=govdelivery&utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery (Accessed on April 11, 2016).
  5. Chang Y, Ryu S, Choi Y, et al. Metabolically Healthy Obesity and Development of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med 2016; 164:305.
  6. Subramaniam RM, Suarez-Cuervo C, Wilson RF, et al. Effectiveness of Prevention Strategies for Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2016; 164:406.
  7. Eng J, Wilson RF, Subramaniam RM, et al. Comparative Effect of Contrast Media Type on the Incidence of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2016; 164:417.
  8. Collister D, Komenda P, Hiebert B, et al. The Effect of Erythropoietin-Stimulating Agents on Health-Related Quality of Life in Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2016; 164:472.
  9. Verberne WR, Geers AB, Jellema WT, et al. Comparative Survival among Older Adults with Advanced Kidney Disease Managed Conservatively Versus with Dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2016; 11:633.
  10. Mustafa RA, Bdair F, Akl EA, et al. Effect of Lowering the Dialysate Temperature in Chronic Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2016; 11:442.
  11. Delville M, Baye E, Durrbach A, et al. B7-1 Blockade Does Not Improve Post-Transplant Nephrotic Syndrome Caused by Recurrent FSGS. J Am Soc Nephrol 2016; 27:2520.
  12. Dahan K, Debiec H, Plaisier E, et al. Rituximab for Severe Membranous Nephropathy: A 6-Month Trial with Extended Follow-Up. J Am Soc Nephrol 2016.
  13. Hoxha E, Wiech T, Stahl PR, et al. A Mechanism for Cancer-Associated Membranous Nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:1995.
  14. Williamson JD, Supiano MA, Applegate WB, et al. Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2016; 315:2673.
  15. Lonn EM, Bosch J, López-Jaramillo P, et al. Blood-Pressure Lowering in Intermediate-Risk Persons without Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:2009.
  16. Thomopoulos C, Parati G, Zanchetti A. Effects of blood pressure lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension: 7. Effects of more vs. less intensive blood pressure lowering and different achieved blood pressure levels - updated overview and meta-analyses of randomized trials. J Hypertens 2016; 34:613.
  17. Sawinski D, Trofe-Clark J, Leas B, et al. Calcineurin Inhibitor Minimization, Conversion, Withdrawal, and Avoidance Strategies in Renal Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Transplant 2016; 16:2117.
  18. Orandi BJ, Luo X, Massie AB, et al. Survival Benefit with Kidney Transplants from HLA-Incompatible Live Donors. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:940.
  19. US Food and Drug Administration. Donor Screening Recommendations to Reduce the Risk of Transmission of Zika Virus by Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products: Guidance for Industry, March 2016. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/Tissue/UCM488582.pdf (Accessed on March 07, 2016).
  20. Wanner C, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin and Progression of Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2016; 375:323.
Topic 8352 Version 6658.0

Topic Outline

RELATED TOPICS

All topics are updated as new information becomes available. Our peer review process typically takes one to six weeks depending on the issue.