The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
What's new in infectious diseases

Disclosures: Elinor L Baron, MD, DTMH Employee of UpToDate, Inc. Allyson Bloom, MD Employee of UpToDate, Inc. Anna R Thorner, MD Employee of UpToDate, Inc. Jennifer Mitty, MD, MPH Employee of UpToDate, Inc.

Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these are addressed by vetting through a multi-level review process, and through requirements for references to be provided to support the content. Appropriately referenced content is required of all authors and must conform to UpToDate standards of evidence.

Conflict of interest policy

All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.
Literature review current through: Oct 2014. | This topic last updated: Nov 17, 2014.

The following represent additions to UpToDate from the past six months that were considered by the editors and authors to be of particular interest. The most recent What's New entries are at the top of each subsection.


Prophylactic antibiotics do not benefit patients with acute liver failure (October 2014)

The role of prophylactic antibiotics in the treatment of patients with acute liver failure is controversial. In a retrospective study of 1551 patients with acute liver failure, antimicrobial prophylaxis did not reduce the incidence of bloodstream infection or mortality [1]. Our approach to antibiotic prophylaxis is to not give patients prophylactic antibiotics, but instead give antibiotics only if there is evidence of active infection, positive surveillance culture results, or clinical deterioration. (See "Acute liver failure in adults: Management and prognosis", section on 'Infection surveillance and prevention'.)

Antibiotic decontamination of the digestive tract in the ICU and antimicrobial resistance (October 2014)

The use of prophylactic antibiotics to decontaminate the oropharyngeal and/or digestive tracts of critically ill patients and reduce the risk of infection confers a modest mortality benefit but is not widely used, in part, because of concern that it can promote antimicrobial resistance. A large multicenter cluster-randomized trial in intensive care units in the Netherlands compared resistance rates with selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD; antibiotics applied to the oropharynx only) and selective digestive decontamination (SDD; antibiotics applied to the oropharynx and through a nasogastric tube plus a different intravenous antibiotic) [2]. Rates of rectal colonization with highly resistant bacteria were overall lower with SDD than SOD, but colonization with aminoglycoside-resistant gram-negative bacilli increased more over time with SDD than SOD. Given the very low baseline rate of antimicrobial resistance in the Netherlands and the absence of a control group that received no prophylactic antibiotics, these findings do not sufficiently allay concerns about long-term antimicrobial resistance with antibiotic use for decontamination of the gastrointestinal tract. (See "Epidemiology and prevention of infections and antimicrobial resistance in the intensive care unit", section on 'Decontamination of the digestive tract'.)

Safety of fluoroquinolones in children (June 2014)

Fluoroquinolones are not recommended for routine use in children <18 years of age because studies in immature animals have demonstrated the development of arthropathy with erosions of the cartilage in weight-bearing joints. A study evaluated the risk of musculoskeletal toxicity during five years of follow-up in children who received levofloxacin or a comparator for acute otitis media or community-acquired pneumonia [3]. Of children identified with a musculoskeletal adverse event, the number that were considered “possibly related” to drug therapy was equally low in both groups. No musculoskeletal adverse event was considered “likely related” to levofloxacin. Nevertheless, until further data are available to confirm these findings, the use of fluoroquinolones in children should be limited to the treatment of infections for which no safe and effective alternative exists. (See "Fluoroquinolones", section on 'Use in children'.)

Cardiovascular outcomes and azithromycin use for pneumonia (June 2014)

Large observational studies have shown conflicting results with regards to a possible increase in cardiovascular mortality associated with azithromycin use. A more recent large cohort study evaluated the association between azithromycin use and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in more than 60,000 United States veterans ≥65 years of age who were hospitalized with pneumonia [4]. Ninety-day mortality was significantly lower in those who were treated with an azithromycin-containing regimen versus those who received other guideline-concordant antibiotics. Compared with patients who did not receive azithromycin, those who received azithromycin were slightly more likely to have a myocardial infarction, but not arrhythmias, heart failure, or any cardiac event. An analysis of these data suggested that seven deaths were averted for each non-fatal myocardial infarction associated with azithromycin use, reflecting a net benefit of azithromycin for patients ≥65 years of age with pneumonia. (See "Azithromycin, clarithromycin, and telithromycin", section on 'QT interval prolongation and cardiovascular events'.)

New antibiotics with activity against MRSA for skin and skin structure infections (June 2014, MODIFIED June 2014)

Antibiotic options for the treatment of skin infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are growing. Dalbavancin and oritavancin have a similar mechanism of action and spectrum of activity to vancomycin, but can be administered as once-weekly intravenous doses because of long half-lives. Tedizolid is from the same antibiotic class as linezolid and can be administered intravenously or orally once daily. In several large randomized trials of adults with acute cellulitis, wound infections, and abscesses, including infections caused by MRSA, these new agents had efficacy and safety profiles similar to vancomycin and/or linezolid with more convenient dosing [5-7]. Dalbavancin, tedizolid, and oritavancin have been approved for skin and skin structure infections by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2014. (See "Treatment of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults", section on 'Dalbavancin' and "Treatment of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults", section on 'Oritavancin'.)

Influenza vaccine administration by needle-free jet injector (June 2014)

Needle-free vaccine technology could be useful for immunizing needle-phobic patients and reducing the risk of needlestick injuries. In August 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved an intramuscular inactivated influenza vaccine (Afluria) for use with a jet injector device (PharmaJet Stratis needle-free injection system) for adults between 18 and 64 years of age [8]. The jet injector uses a high-pressure narrow jet of liquid vaccine to penetrate tissue [9]. In a randomized trial in healthy adults, the immune response to influenza vaccine was comparable when administered by jet injector device or needle and syringe. The jet injector device was associated with a higher frequency of local injection site reactions. (See "Seasonal influenza vaccination in adults", section on 'Needle-free jet injector'.)


Infection associated with contaminated endoscopes (October 2014)

In January 2014, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that since January 2013, 69 cases of New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM)-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) had been identified in the United States, 44 of which were from northeastern Illinois [10]. Further investigation identified 39 cases from one hospital [11]. The source of infection was subsequently traced to the elevator channel of a single duodenoscope (the endoscopes used for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP]). No lapses in the cleaning protocol were identified. It is theorized that the complex design of the elevator mechanism makes it more difficult to clean than other parts of endoscopes [11,12]. After changing duodenoscope reprocessing from high-level disinfection to gas sterilization with ethylene oxide, no new cases have been identified. Duodenoscopes should be considered as possible sources for CRE outbreaks in healthcare facilities. (See "Endoscope disinfection", section on 'Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae'.)

Prophylactic antibiotics before laparoscopic cholecystectomy (September 2014)

Multiple meta-analyses of randomized trials comparing antibiotic prophylaxis with no antibiotic or placebo prior to elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy have found no differences in the incidence of surgical site infection. These trials have generally included 50 to 175 patients in each arm and have used a single dose of antibiotics administered just prior to surgery. A subsequent large trial randomly assigned approximately 1000 low-risk patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy to no antibiotics or intravenous antibiotics given preoperatively and at 12 and 24 hours postoperatively [13]. In this later trial, the incidence of surgical site infection was lower for those who received perioperative antibiotics (0.8 versus 3.7 percent without antibiotics). Despite the added cost of antibiotic administration, overall hospital costs were lower in the prophylaxis group. Further investigation is needed to determine whether the infectious risk reduction of additional antibiotic doses outweighs the risks of toxicity or bacterial drug resistance associated with increased antibiotic usage. (See "Laparoscopic cholecystectomy", section on 'Antibiotics'.)

Perioperative asymptomatic bacteriuria and prosthetic joint infection (August 2014)

Some clinicians screen and treat for asymptomatic bacteriuria prior to joint arthroplasty, but evidence to support this practice is lacking. Although asymptomatic bacteriuria was associated with subsequent prosthetic joint infection in a prospective study of nearly 2500 patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty, treatment of the bacteriuria, which was at the discretion of the clinician, was not associated with a decreased risk of infection [14]. Furthermore, the organisms isolated from the urine were not the same as those from the surgical site infection in any patient. Although asymptomatic bacteriuria may be a marker for individuals at higher risk for subsequent prosthetic joint infection, it appears unlikely to be causative. We do not routinely perform urinalysis or culture in patients without urinary symptoms prior to or following joint arthroplasty. (See "Approach to the adult with asymptomatic bacteriuria", section on 'Patients undergoing joint arthroplasty'.)

Next-generation DNA sequencing for pathogen identification (June 2014)

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a method for determining DNA sequence by analyzing multiple DNA fragments in parallel; it allows sequencing of an exponentially greater number of genes than conventional DNA sequencing. Although NGS has been applied to the diagnosis of complex genetic disorders, a new report suggests it may also be helpful in identifying an infectious pathogen when microbial or serologic testing is unrevealing [15]. NGS was performed on the cerebrospinal fluid of a 14-year-old boy with unexplained fever and progressive neurologic deterioration in whom an extensive infectious disease evaluation had been negative. A species of Leptospira was identified, and antibiotic therapy was initiated with rapid clinical improvement. Subsequent testing confirmed the diagnosis. (See "Principles and clinical applications of next-generation DNA sequencing", section on 'Indications for next-generation sequencing'.)


T2Candida assay for the detection of candidemia (September 2014)

In 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cleared the T2Candida assay for the detection of bloodstream infection caused by C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, C. glabrata, and/or C. krusei [16]. The T2Candida test uses magnetic resonance technology to detect these pathogens from a blood specimen within three to five hours, but a specialized instrument is required to perform the assay. It has a sensitivity of 84 to 96 percent and a specificity of nearly 100 percent. The clinical utility of this technique requires further study. (See "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults", section on 'T2Candida'.)


Efficacy of the dengue vaccine CYD-TDV (October 2014)

No licensed vaccine is available for preventing dengue; thus far CYD-TDV, a live attenuated tetravalent vaccine, is the most promising. In a randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted among 10,275 children in the Asia-Pacific region, the overall protective efficacy of three CYD-TDV doses against virologically confirmed dengue was 55 percent in the intention-to-treat analysis [17]. The efficacy against dengue hemorrhagic fever was 80 percent after one or more doses and 89 percent after three doses. Therefore this vaccine is most effective for protection against severe disease. However, vaccine efficacy varied by dengue serotype, and it did not protect against serotype 2. The epidemiologic threshold of dengue activity upon which national vaccination programs are justified has yet to be determined. (See "Prevention and treatment of dengue virus infection", section on 'Vaccination'.)

Ebola outbreak in 2014 (August 2014, MODIFIED October 2014)

The largest outbreak of Ebola virus infection reported to date is occurring in West Africa. The countries with widespread transmission include Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone [18]. Cases outside of West Africa have occurred in healthcare workers caring for patients with Ebola virus disease, as well as a returning traveler. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have provided information to help clinicians evaluate and manage patients with suspected Ebola virus disease [19,20]. The decision to test an individual who may have been exposed to Ebola virus depends upon when the potential exposure occurred, the risk of exposure, and whether or not the individual is displaying signs and symptoms consistent with Ebola virus disease (eg, fever, severe headache, myalgias, gastrointestinal symptoms, or unexplained hemorrhage). If testing is indicated, patients should be isolated. Infection control precautions include standard, contact, and droplet precautions, as well as the correct use of appropriate personal protective equipment [21,22]. Clinicians can refer to the CDC and WHO websites for additional information. (See "Diagnosis and treatment of Ebola and Marburg virus disease" and "Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical manifestations of Ebola and Marburg virus disease".)

Efficacy of oral cholera vaccine in an epidemic setting (May 2014)

Shanchol, one of two internationally-available oral cholera vaccines, has been demonstrated in trials to provide protection against cholera several years after vaccination. However, its efficacy in the first few months after administration, and thus its utility in response to an epidemic, was previously unknown. After a 2012 cholera outbreak in Guinea, a nonselective mass vaccination campaign with Shanchol was undertaken. A small study that compared vaccination rates through this campaign between individuals who developed cholera within six months after the outbreak onset and individuals who did not develop cholera estimated vaccine efficacy at 87 percent [23]. (See "Overview of cholera", section on 'Vaccines'.)


Efficacy of second-line antiretroviral regimens in resource-limited settings (September 2014)

In resource-limited settings, the choice of an antiretroviral regimen for HIV infection following virologic failure with an initial regimen must often be made without knowledge of the presence of resistance mutations. There has been concern that drug resistance following failure of a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) based regimen would render subsequent NRTI-based regimens less effective. However, in a trial from sub-Saharan Africa that included 1277 HIV-infected individuals who had failed treatment with a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) plus two NRTIs, rates of virologic suppression were similar with a boosted protease inhibitor plus two to three NRTIs or plus an integrase inhibitor (88 and 87 percent, respectively) [24]. Virologic suppression rates with boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy were lower. These data support the World Health Organization recommendations to use a boosted protease inhibitor with at least two NRTIs as a second line regimen in resource limited settings. (See "The impact of antiretroviral therapy on morbidity and mortality of HIV infection in resource-limited settings", section on 'Drug resistance'.)

Treatment guidelines for adults with HIV infection (July 2014)

The 2014 International Antiviral Society-USA panel (IAS-USA) has published antiretroviral treatment guidelines for adults with HIV infection [25]. These guidelines are generally in agreement with the 2014 Department of Health and Human Services panel recommendations [26]. ART should be initiated for virtually all treatment-naïve HIV-infected individuals. Recommended regimens contain a backbone of two different nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and a third drug, which may be an integrase inhibitor, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, or a boosted protease inhibitor. (See "Selecting antiretroviral regimens for the treatment-naïve HIV-infected patient", section on 'Recommendations of others'.)

Suicidality among HIV-infected individuals receiving efavirenz (July 2014)

Efavirenz is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor that is often included as part of a first-line antiretroviral regimen for treatment-naïve HIV-infected individuals. Recent data suggest that efavirenz is associated with long-term mental health consequences, including suicidality. In an analysis of 5332 HIV-infected individuals who had participated in four antiretroviral treatment trials, receipt of an efavirenz-containing regimen was associated with a twofold increase in suicidality (a combined measure of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and completed suicides) compared with regimens that did not contain efavirenz [27]. We do not use efavirenz-based regimens for treatment naïve patients with mental health disorders given the many other available treatment options. (See "Selecting antiretroviral regimens for the treatment-naïve HIV-infected patient", section on 'Efavirenz'.)

Testing algorithms to diagnose HIV infection (July 2014)

We agree with new recommendations from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to use a combination assay that detects HIV antigen and antibodies as the initial test for laboratory-based HIV screening and diagnosis for patients two years and older (algorithm 1) [28]. If the initial test is reactive, an HIV-1/HIV-2 differentiation assay should be performed as a confirmatory test. Testing with an antibody-only assay followed by a confirmatory Western blot is no longer recommended. In comparison, the new algorithm is better able to diagnose acute infection when antibody may not yet be detectable (eg, "window period of acute HIV infection") and can provide information as to whether the patient is infected with HIV-1, HIV-2, or both. Reactive rapid antibody tests performed in community-based settings should be confirmed using this new algorithm as well. (See "Screening and diagnostic testing for HIV infection", section on 'Testing algorithm'.)

Timing of antiretroviral initiation in HIV-infected patients with cryptococcal meningitis (July 2014)

HIV-infected individuals with cryptococcal meningitis can develop paradoxical worsening of cryptococcal disease following initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) because immune reconstitution can result in a local inflammatory reaction at sites of a pre-existing infection. Thus, the timing of ART initiation must weigh this risk against the potential advantage of early immune recovery in severely immunosuppressed patients. In a randomized trial of 177 HIV-infected patients with cryptococcal meningitis in Uganda and South Africa, mortality was higher when ART was initiated within one or two weeks after starting antifungal therapy compared with five weeks after starting antifungal therapy [29]. Most excess deaths associated with early ART initiation occurred two to five weeks after initiation of antifungal therapy. Based on results from this and other trials, we suggest that initiation of ART be delayed for at least four weeks after antifungal therapy has been started. For patients with access to close medical follow-up and preventative therapy, we typically start ART 10 weeks after the initiation of antifungal therapy to minimize the risks of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) and drug interactions. (See "Clinical management and monitoring during antifungal therapy of the HIV-infected patient with cryptococcal meningoencephalitis", section on 'Timing of antiretroviral therapy'.)

Guidelines on pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention (June 2014)

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with daily use of tenofovir-emtricitabine, a combination antiretroviral agent, can reduce the risk of HIV acquisition in uninfected individuals who are at high risk of infection. In 2014, the US Public Health Service formally released clinical practice guidelines to help providers decide which patients may benefit from PrEP [30]. The guidelines also advise on the evaluation and monitoring of patients who decide to initiate PrEP. To optimize the efficacy of PrEP, they stress the importance of a comprehensive approach to care that includes HIV testing prior to and during treatment, as well as adherence and risk reduction counseling. UpToDate recommendations are largely consistent with these guidelines. (See "Pre-exposure prophylaxis against HIV infection", section on 'Approach to pre-exposure prophylaxis against HIV'.)

Antiretroviral use in HIV-infected pregnant women (May 2014)

Earlier initiation of an antiretroviral regimen in HIV-infected pregnant women is associated with increased likelihood of viral suppression by the time of delivery and thus decreased risk of transmission, but must be weighed against potential fetal effects of first trimester drug exposure in women who do not warrant prompt treatment for their own health. Women who present to care later in pregnancy should initiate an antiretroviral regimen without delay. In 2014, the Department of Health and Human Services in the United States published updated guidelines on the evaluation and management of HIV-infected pregnant women [31]. Given increasing experience with certain antiretroviral agents during pregnancy, the list of preferred agents has grown. This now includes tenofovir-emtricitabine, tenofovir with lamivudine, abacavir-lamivudine, and efavirenz. Zidovudine-lamivudine, lopinavir-ritonavir, and ritonavir-boosted atazanavir remain preferred agents. We agree with the guidelines’ recommendation that antiretroviral regimens for treatment-naïve pregnant women be constructed from these agents as long as there are no issues with drug resistance. (See "Use of antiretroviral medications in pregnant HIV-infected patients and their infants in resource-rich settings".)

CD4 cell count monitoring for well-controlled HIV-infected patients (May 2014)

For HIV-infected individuals, CD4 cell count monitoring informs prognosis and the need for continued prophylaxis to prevent opportunistic infections. Among patients on stable antiretroviral therapy (ART) whose CD4 cell count has stabilized at a level well above the threshold for developing an opportunistic infection, CD4 cell count monitoring has traditionally been performed every 6 to 12 months. In 2014, the Department of Health and Human Services of the United States and the International Antiviral Society-USA panel issued new recommendations for less frequent monitoring in patients who have achieved consistent viral suppression and CD4 cell counts well above the threshold for opportunistic infections (eg, >300 cells/microL) on at least two years of ART [25,26]. In such patients, we monitor the CD4 cell count every 12 months if the CD4 cell count is between 300 and 500 cells/microL. If the CD4 cell count is >500 cells/microL, CD4 cell count monitoring is optional. More frequent testing is warranted for changes in clinical status (ie, receipt of immunosuppressive therapy or virologic failure). (See "Patient monitoring during HIV antiretroviral therapy", section on 'CD4 cell count monitoring'.)


Effectiveness of prior zoster vaccination in patients receiving chemotherapy (October 2014)

Live vaccines are contraindicated in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. It is therefore ideal to give indicated vaccines prior to the initiation of chemotherapy, when feasible. However, there has been some concern that chemotherapy might reduce the protective effect of vaccinations. A cohort study has demonstrated that zoster vaccine administered prior to the oncologic diagnosis remains effective in patients ≥60 years of age who are receiving chemotherapy for a solid tumor [32]. The incidence rate of herpes zoster among the unvaccinated group was almost twice that of the vaccinated group. (See "Immunizations in patients with cancer", section on 'Zoster vaccine'.)


FDA approval of a meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (October 2014)

Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B is responsible for approximately one-third of cases of meningococcal disease in the United States and has caused outbreaks on college campuses in the recent past. Previously licensed meningococcal vaccines in the United States do not protect against serogroup B. In October 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration approved a serogroup B meningococcal vaccine (Trumenba) for use in individuals 10 through 25 years of age [33]. The United States Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices has not yet released recommendations for its use. (See "Meningococcal vaccines", section on 'In children and adolescents' and "Meningococcal vaccines", section on 'Group B meningococcus vaccines'.)

Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in adults ≥65 years of age (September 2014)

The 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) has been recommended for many years in the United States for all adults ≥65 years of age. In September 2014, the United States Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) began also recommending the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) for all adults ≥65 years of age [34]. Current recommendations for individuals ≥65 years of age who have not previously received either PCV13 or PPSV23 are to administer PCV13 followed 6 to 12 months later by PPSV23 (algorithm 2). In patients who have already received PPSV23, at least one year should elapse before they are given PCV13.

The ACIP revision was prompted by results from the CAPiTA trial. This randomized placebo-controlled trial, including approximately 85,000 adults ≥65 years of age in the Netherlands, demonstrated the efficacy of PCV13 against vaccine-type pneumococcal pneumonia, vaccine-type nonbacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia, and vaccine-type invasive pneumococcal disease [35]. However, some concern has been raised that since this trial began before PCV13 was used routinely in infants in the Netherlands, it might not answer the question of whether its use in adults is efficacious in countries that routinely vaccinate infants. (See "Pneumococcal vaccination in adults", section on 'Indications'.)

ACIP recommendations for the 2014-2015 influenza season (August 2014)

In August 2014 the United States Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) released updated recommendations for the prevention of seasonal influenza with vaccines [36]. Important changes from previous recommendations include:

A preferential recommendation for the nasal spray vaccine (live attenuated influenza vaccine, LAIV) over the intramuscular injection (inactivated influenza vaccine, IIV) for children two through eight years of age who do not have specific contraindications to the nasal vaccine (eg, asthma, egg allergy, diabetes, immunosuppression). UpToDate agrees with this recommendation, but also prefers LAIV for children older than eight years. If LAIV is not immediately available, IIV should be administered to avoid missing an opportunity for influenza immunization. (See "Seasonal influenza in children: Prevention with vaccines", section on 'LAIV compared with IIV'.)

Changes to the dosing schedule for children six months through eight years of age (algorithm 3). (See "Seasonal influenza in children: Prevention with vaccines", section on 'Schedule'.)

Recommendations for adults are largely unchanged. (See "Seasonal influenza vaccination in adults", section on 'Overview'.)

Efficacy of high-dose influenza vaccine in elderly adults (August 2014)

Due to concern that standard-dose influenza vaccines may be less effective in elderly adults than in younger adults, a high-dose influenza vaccine, Fluzone high-dose, has been developed. In a trial that included more than 30,000 adults ≥65 years of age, Fluzone high-dose was modestly more effective than standard-dose Fluzone [37]. Among individuals in the high-dose group, 1.4 percent had laboratory-confirmed influenza associated with an influenza-like illness compared with 1.9 percent in the standard-dose group (relative efficacy 24.2 percent). The rates of serious adverse events were similar with the high-dose and standard-dose vaccines. For individuals ≥65 years of age, we prefer Fluzone high-dose when available rather than a standard-dose inactivated vaccine. However, the United States Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices has not stated a preference for Fluzone high-dose over the standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine in older adults [36,38]. (See "Seasonal influenza vaccination in adults", section on 'High-dose vaccine' and "Seasonal influenza vaccination in adults", section on 'Choice of vaccine formulation'.)

WHO poliovirus vaccination recommendations for travelers exiting 10 countries (June 2014)

In May 2014, the World Health Organization issued poliovirus vaccination recommendations for all residents and long-term visitors (>4 weeks) exiting 10 poliovirus-affected countries in order to prevent further spread of the disease [39]. The recommendations apply to Afghanistan, Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Iraq, Israel, Nigeria, Pakistan, Somalia, and Syria. A dose of a poliovirus vaccine should be given within the year prior to exit from those countries. The burden for implementation of these recommendations lies with the poliovirus-affected countries. Although these recommendations are for vaccination on exit from the listed countries, travel health practitioners should be aware of individual country requirements in order to discuss whether vaccination prior to travel to the listed countries might be advisable. In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that travelers to poliovirus-affected areas be fully vaccinated against poliovirus, including a one-time booster dose for adults [40]. (See "Poliovirus vaccination", section on 'Recommendations for travelers'.)

Influenza vaccine administration by needle-free jet injector (June 2014)

Needle-free vaccine technology could be useful for immunizing needle-phobic patients and reducing the risk of needlestick injuries. In August 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved an intramuscular inactivated influenza vaccine (Afluria) for use with a jet injector device (PharmaJet Stratis needle-free injection system) for adults between 18 and 64 years of age [8]. The jet injector uses a high-pressure narrow jet of liquid vaccine to penetrate tissue [9]. In a randomized trial in healthy adults, the immune response to influenza vaccine was comparable when administered by jet injector device or needle and syringe. The jet injector device was associated with a higher frequency of local injection site reactions. (See "Seasonal influenza vaccination in adults", section on 'Needle-free jet injector'.)


Shortened TB treatment with fluoroquinolone-containing regimen not effective (September 2014, MODIFIED October 2014)

Because of their highly bactericidal activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the use of fluoroquinolones in an antituberculous regimen has been hypothesized to allow a shorter duration of treatment. However, shortening treatment with a moxifloxacin-containing regimen to four months was not effective in a phase III trial that included 1931 patients with uncomplicated, smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis. The study demonstrated that each of two moxifloxacin-containing regimens (isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and moxifloxacin; or rifampin, pyrazinamide, ethambutol, and moxifloxacin) given for 17 weeks resulted in greater treatment failure and relapse compared with the standard control regimen of two months of isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol followed by four months of isoniazid and rifampin [41]. This was despite shorter times to negative sputum cultures with the moxifloxacin regimens than the control regimen. Subsequent studies using gatifloxacin as the fluoroquinolone or moxifloxacin in combination with other antituberculous agents similarly demonstrated worse outcomes with a shorter four-month regimen [42,43]. (See "Treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-negative patients", section on 'Fluoroquinolones'.)

Corticosteroids of limited benefit in tuberculous pericarditis (September 2014)

Whether corticosteroids are beneficial for patients with tuberculous pericarditis has been controversial. A randomized trial including 1400 adults initiating antimicrobial treatment for definite or probable tuberculous pericarditis in South Africa (approximately two-thirds of patients had concomitant HIV infection) demonstrated no effect of adjunctive corticosteroids on the primary composite efficacy outcome of death, cardiac tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis, or development of constrictive pericarditis [44]. Corticosteroid use did reduce the incidence of constrictive pericarditis alone (4.4 versus 7.8 percent). The overall lack of benefit may have reflected harm from corticosteroid treatment in patients with HIV, and it remains possible that patients without HIV could benefit from corticosteroids. Based on the totality of the evidence, we do not routinely use adjunctive corticosteroids in the absence of constrictive disease or high risk for constrictive disease. This approach is in disagreement with prior guidelines favoring routine use of corticosteroids for all patients with tuberculous pericarditis.

We continue to suggest administration of corticosteroids for patients with constrictive tuberculous pericarditis and for those felt to be at high risk of developing the condition (ie, large effusion, high level of pericardial fluid inflammatory cells, or early signs of constriction). (See "Tuberculous pericarditis", section on 'Role of corticosteroids'.)


Posaconazole ineffective for chronic Chagas disease (May 2014)

There has been interest in evaluating posaconazole for the treatment of chronic Chagas disease (Trypanosoma cruzi infection) because it has shown promise in animal models. However, in a randomized open-label trial of 78 patients with chronic Chagas disease, approximately 85 percent of patients who received posaconazole had treatment failure, defined as detectable T. cruzi DNA during the 10-month follow-up period after the end of treatment, compared with 38 percent of those who received benznidazole [45]. (See "Antitrypanosomal drug therapy for Chagas disease", section on 'New drugs'.)


Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C infection (December 2013, MODIFIED October 2014)

Interferon-free options for chronic genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are increasing. A once-daily combination pill of two direct-acting antiviral agents, ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, is becoming available in the United States and elsewhere. In several large open-label trials, ledipasvir-sofosbuvir achieved sustained virologic response (SVR) rates exceeding 90 percent in genotype 1 infected patients regardless of treatment history or presence of cirrhosis [46-48]. For all patients with chronic genotype 1 HCV infection, we favor the regimen of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir because of its efficacy, its favorable adverse effect profile, its ease of administration, and extensive data to support its use. For treatment-naïve patients, treatment duration is eight weeks for those without cirrhosis and a viral level <6 million international units/mL, and 12 weeks for those with cirrhosis or a higher viral level. For treatment-experienced patients, treatment duration is 12 weeks for those without cirrhosis and 24 weeks for those with cirrhosis. (See "Treatment regimens for chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1", section on 'Selection of treatment regimens'.)

Clusters of enterovirus D68 infections in the United States (September 2014)

Since August 2014, clusters of severe respiratory infections due to enterovirus D68 have been reported across the continental United States [49,50]. These have occurred predominantly in children with a prior history of asthma and have been generally characterized by low grade or absent fever with wheezing, dyspnea, hypoxia, and perihilar infiltrates. Infection has also been associated with rare cases of limb weakness with spinal cord lesions on imaging. The possibility of enterovirus D68 should thus be suspected in cases of severe respiratory illnesses without alternative explanation, particularly in young children. Treatment is supportive and prevention relies on basic hygienic measures, including handwashing with soap and water. Alcohol-based sanitizers may be ineffective against enteroviruses. Enterovirus D68 had previously been implicated in smaller clusters of respiratory infections but was otherwise rarely reported. Additional surveillance information can be found on the CDC website. (See "Virus-induced wheezing and asthma: An overview", section on 'Enterovirus D68 infection' and "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of enterovirus and parechovirus infections", section on 'Respiratory disease' and "Epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention of enterovirus and parechovirus infections", section on 'Serotypes and disease'.)

Chikungunya fever in the Caribbean and the Americas (July 2014)

Chikungunya is an arthropod-borne virus (arbovirus) endemic to West Africa that causes acute febrile polyarthralgia and arthritis. In December 2013, the first cases of chikungunya fever in the western hemisphere were reported in the Caribbean Island of Saint Martin [51,52]. Since then, local transmission has been confirmed in many countries and territories in the Caribbean, North America, Central America, and South America [51,53-56]. The first two cases of local transmission in the continental United States were reported in Florida in mid-July 2014 [55,56]; local transmission has been reported more widely in Puerto Rico [57]. (See "Chikungunya fever", section on 'Americas'.)

Risk of perinatal transmission of HBV in the United States (June 2014)

Administration of hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination and hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) to newborns of women with chronic HBV infection significantly reduces the risk of perinatal HBV transmission but does not eradicate it. In an observational study of over 4000 infants born to HBV-infected mothers in the United States between 1997 and 2010, over 95 percent received HBV vaccination and HBIG [58]. Perinatal transmission occurred in 3.40 percent of births to hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive mothers and 0.04 percent of births to HBeAg negative mothers. Among women whose HBV DNA results and HBeAg status were known, no HBV transmission occurred with a viral load less than 5 x107 IU/mL, regardless of the HBeAg status. (See "Hepatitis B and pregnancy", section on 'HBV DNA level'.)

Screening for Hepatitis B virus infection in the United States (June 2014)

Infection with Hepatitis B virus (HBV) can lead to chronic liver disease and is preventable with vaccination. The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has updated its statement on screening for HBV infection in nonpregnant adolescents and adults to recommend that individuals at high-risk for HBV infection be screened if they have not been vaccinated or if they were vaccinated without prior screening [59]. High-risk populations include persons born in regions with a prevalence of HBV ≥2 percent, US–born persons whose parents were born in regions with a prevalence ≥8 percent, injection drug users, men who have sex with men, household contacts of persons with HBV infection, and individuals with HIV infection. Existing guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease also support screening of high-risk individuals in the US. (See "Diagnosis of hepatitis B virus infection", section on 'Who should be tested or screened'.)

Use of UpToDate is subject to the Subscription and License Agreement.


  1. Karvellas CJ, Cavazos J, Battenhouse H, et al. Effects of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Blood Stream Infections in Patients With Acute Liver Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014.
  2. Oostdijk EA, Kesecioglu J, Schultz MJ, et al. Effects of decontamination of the oropharynx and intestinal tract on antibiotic resistance in ICUs: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 312:1429.
  3. Bradley JS, Kauffman RE, Balis DA, et al. Assessment of musculoskeletal toxicity 5 years after therapy with levofloxacin. Pediatrics 2014; 134:e146.
  4. Mortensen EM, Halm EA, Pugh MJ, et al. Association of azithromycin with mortality and cardiovascular events among older patients hospitalized with pneumonia. JAMA 2014; 311:2199.
  5. Boucher HW, Wilcox M, Talbot GH, et al. Once-weekly dalbavancin versus daily conventional therapy for skin infection. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:2169.
  6. Corey GR, Kabler H, Mehra P, et al. Single-dose oritavancin in the treatment of acute bacterial skin infections. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:2180.
  7. Moran GJ, Fang E, Corey GR, et al. Tedizolid for 6 days versus linezolid for 10 days for acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ESTABLISH-2): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2014; 14:696.
  8. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA updated communication on use of jet Injectors with inactivated influenza vaccines. (Accessed on August 21, 2014).
  9. McAllister L, Anderson J, Werth K, et al. Needle-free jet injection for administration of influenza vaccine: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2014; 384:674.
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Notes from the Field: New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography - Illinois, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014; 62:1051.
  11. Epstein L, Hunter JC, Arwady MA, et al. New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli associated with exposure to duodenoscopes. JAMA 2014; 312:1447.
  12. Rutala WA, Weber DJ. Gastrointestinal endoscopes: a need to shift from disinfection to sterilization? JAMA 2014; 312:1405.
  13. Matsui Y, Satoi S, Kaibori M, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2014; 9:e106702.
  14. Sousa R, Muñoz-Mahamud E, Quayle J, et al. Is Asymptomatic Bacteriuria a Risk Factor for Prosthetic Joint Infection? Clin Infect Dis 2014.
  15. Wilson MR, Naccache SN, Samayoa E, et al. Actionable diagnosis of neuroleptospirosis by next-generation sequencing. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:2408.
  16. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA news release. FDA allows marketing of the first test to identify five yeast pathogens directly from a blood sample. (Accessed on September 24, 2014).
  17. Capeding MR, Tran NH, Hadinegoro SR, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of a novel tetravalent dengue vaccine in healthy children in Asia: a phase 3, randomised, observer-masked, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2014; 384:1358.
  18. World Health Organization: Ebola response roadmap situation report:17 October 2014 (Accessed on October 17, 2014).
  19. World Health Organizaiton. Case definition recommendations for Ebola or Marburg Virus Diseases . (Accessed on August 18, 2014).
  20. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ebola Virus Disease Information for Clinicians in U.S. Healthcare Settings, (Accessed on August 11, 2014).
  21. World Health Organization. Interim Infection Prevention and Control Guidance for Care of Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Filovirus Haemorrhagic Fever in Health-Care Settings. with Focus on Ebola (Accessed on October 21, 2014).
  22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Infection prevention and control recommendations for hospitalized patients with known or suspected Ebola hemorrhagic fever in U.S. hospitals. (Accessed on October 21, 2014).
  23. Luquero FJ, Grout L, Ciglenecki I, et al. Use of Vibrio cholerae vaccine in an outbreak in Guinea. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:2111.
  24. Paton NI, Kityo C, Hoppe A, et al. Assessment of second-line antiretroviral regimens for HIV therapy in Africa. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:234.
  25. Günthard HF, Aberg JA, Eron JJ, et al. Antiretroviral treatment of adult HIV infection: 2014 recommendations of the International Antiviral Society-USA Panel. JAMA 2014; 312:410.
  26. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at (Accessed on May 01, 2014).
  27. Mollan KR, Smurzynski M, Eron JJ, et al. Association between efavirenz as initial therapy for HIV-1 infection and increased risk for suicidal ideation or attempted or completed suicide: an analysis of trial data. Ann Intern Med 2014; 161:1.
  28. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Laboratory Testing for the Diagnosis of HIV Infection:Updated Recommendations.
  29. Boulware DR, Meya DB, Muzoora C, et al. Timing of antiretroviral therapy after diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:2487.
  30. (Accessed on May 19, 2014).
  31. Panel on Treatment of HIV-Infected Pregnant Women and Prevention of Perinatal Transmission. Recommendations for Use of Antiretroviral Drugs in Pregnant HIV-1-Infected Women for Maternal Health and Interventions to Reduce Perinatal HIV Transmission in the United States. (Accessed on March 28, 2014).
  32. Tseng HF, Tartof S, Harpaz R, et al. Vaccination against zoster remains effective in older adults who later undergo chemotherapy. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 59:913.
  33. FDA news release. First vaccine approved by FDA to prevent serogroup B meningococcal disease. (Accessed on October 30, 2014).
  34. Tomczyk S, Bennett NM, Stoecker C, et al. Use of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine among adults aged ≥65 years: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014; 63:822.
  35. Bonten M, Bolkenbaas M, Huijts S, et al. Community acquired pneumonia immunization trial in adults (CAPiTA). Abstract no. 0541. Pneumonia 2014; 3:95. (Accessed on September 19, 2014).
  36. Grohskopf LA, Olsen SJ, Sokolow LZ, et al. Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) -- United States, 2014-15 influenza season. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014; 63:691.
  37. DiazGranados CA, Dunning AJ, Kimmel M, et al. Efficacy of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccine in older adults. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:635.
  38. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices--United States, 2013-2014. MMWR Recomm Rep 2013; 62:1.
  39. WHO statement on the meeting of the International Health Regulations Emergency Committee concerning the international spread of wild poliovirus. (Accessed on June 03, 2014).
  40. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Health Advisory. Guidance to US clinicians regarding new WHO polio vaccination requirements for travel by residents of and long-term visitors to countries with active polio transmission. (Accessed on June 03, 2014).
  41. Gillespie SH, Crook AM, McHugh TD, et al. Four-month moxifloxacin-based regimens for drug-sensitive tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:1577.
  42. Jindani A, Harrison TS, Nunn AJ, et al. High-dose rifapentine with moxifloxacin for pulmonary tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:1599.
  43. Merle CS, Fielding K, Sow OB, et al. A four-month gatifloxacin-containing regimen for treating tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:1588.
  44. Mayosi BM, Ntsekhe M, Bosch J, et al. Prednisolone and Mycobacterium indicus pranii in tuberculous pericarditis. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:1121.
  45. Molina I, Gómez i Prat J, Salvador F, et al. Randomized trial of posaconazole and benznidazole for chronic Chagas' disease. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1899.
  46. Afdhal N, Zeuzem S, Kwo P, et al. Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for untreated HCV genotype 1 infection. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1889.
  47. Kowdley KV, Gordon SC, Reddy KR, et al. Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 8 or 12 weeks for chronic HCV without cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1879.
  48. Afdhal N, Reddy KR, Nelson DR, et al. Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for previously treated HCV genotype 1 infection. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1483.
  49. Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services. Health alert: Respiratory illnesses due to enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) in Missouri. August 29, 2014. (Accessed on September 12, 2014).
  50. Midgley CM, Jackson MA, Selvarangan R, et al. Severe respiratory illness associated with enterovirus D68 - Missouri and Illinois, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014; 63:798.
  51. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Chikungunya in the Caribbean. (Accessed on June 02, 2014).
  52. Morens DM, Fauci AS. Chikungunya at the door--déjà vu all over again? N Engl J Med 2014; 371:885.
  53. Pan American Health Organization, World Health Organization. Chikungunya. (Accessed on July 21, 2014).
  54. Fischer M, Staples JE, Arboviral Diseases Branch, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC. Notes from the field: chikungunya virus spreads in the Americas - Caribbean and South America, 2013-2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014; 63:500.
  55. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC newsroom - press release. First Chikungunya case acquired in the United States reported in Florida. (Accessed on July 18, 2014).
  56. Florida Health. Florida Department of Health confirms first locally acquired cases of chikungunya fever. (Accessed on July 18, 2014).
  57. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Chikungunya virus in the United States. (Accessed on July 18, 2014).
  58. Kubo A, Shlager L, Marks AR, et al. Prevention of vertical transmission of hepatitis B: an observational study. Ann Intern Med 2014; 160:828.
  59. LeFevre ML, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for hepatitis B virus infection in nonpregnant adolescents and adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2014; 161:58.
Topic 8358 Version 3983.0

Topic Outline



All topics are updated as new information becomes available. Our peer review process typically takes one to six weeks depending on the issue.