Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Uterine rupture after previous cesarean delivery

Mark B Landon, MD
Heather Frey, MD, MSCI
Section Editor
Vincenzo Berghella, MD
Deputy Editor
Vanessa A Barss, MD, FACOG


Clinically significant uterine rupture after previous cesarean delivery refers to complete disruption of all uterine layers, including the serosa, leading to changes in maternal or fetal status. It is a life-threatening pregnancy complication for both mother and fetus. Other adverse outcomes include complications related to severe hemorrhage, bladder laceration, hysterectomy, and neonatal morbidity related to intrauterine hypoxia. Most uterine ruptures in resource-rich countries are associated with a trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC). In resource-limited countries, many uterine ruptures are related to obstructed labor and lack of access to operative delivery.

By comparison, a uterine dehiscence (or uterine window) has been loosely defined as a clinically occult and incomplete disruption that does not lead to any serious maternal or neonatal consequences. It is often incidentally discovered at the time of cesarean delivery.

This topic will review clinical findings, risk factors, prediction, and management of uterine rupture in women who have had a previous cesarean delivery. We use the terms "rupture" and "dehiscence" to refer to clinically significant and clinically occult disruption, respectively, although others have used these terms interchangeably. Counseling women about TOLAC risks and success rates, choosing the route of delivery after a previous cesarean delivery, and management of induction and labor in TOLAC are discussed separately:

(See "Choosing the route of delivery after cesarean birth".)

(See "Use of calculators and models for predicting vaginal birth after a previous cesarean delivery".)

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information on subscription options, click below on the option that best describes you:

Subscribers log in here

Literature review current through: Sep 2017. | This topic last updated: Oct 12, 2017.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2017 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Panel. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8-10, 2010. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115:1279.
  2. Guise JM, Denman MA, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115:1267.
  3. Landon MB, Lynch CD. Optimal timing and mode of delivery after cesarean with previous classical incision or myomectomy: a review of the data. Semin Perinatol 2011; 35:257.
  4. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:2581.
  5. Rossi AC, Prefumo F. Pregnancy outcomes of induced labor in women with previous cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 291:273.
  6. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:3.
  7. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:450. Reaffirmed 2017.
  8. Hamilton EF, Bujold E, McNamara H, et al. Dystocia among women with symptomatic uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184:620.
  9. Khan KS, Rizvi A. The partograph in the management of labor following cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1995; 50:151.
  10. Vachon-Marceau C, Demers S, Goyet M, et al. Labor Dystocia and the Risk of Uterine Rupture in Women with Prior Cesarean. Am J Perinatol 2016; 33:577.
  11. Harper LM, Cahill AG, Roehl KA, et al. The pattern of labor preceding uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207:210.e1.
  12. Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: New insights. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No.191. (Prepared by the Oregon Health & Science University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10057-I). AHRQ Publication No. 10-E003. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD 2010. http://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/research/findings/evidence-based-reports/vbacup-evidence-report.pdf (Accessed on April 06, 2016).
  13. Landon MB. Predicting uterine rupture in women undergoing trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. Semin Perinatol 2010; 34:267.
  14. Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, et al. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108:12.
  15. Macones GA, Cahill A, Pare E, et al. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192:1223.
  16. Roberge S, Chaillet N, Boutin A, et al. Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011; 115:5.
  17. Tahseen S, Griffiths M. Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1 and repeat (third) caesarean sections. BJOG 2010; 117:5.
  18. Al-Zirqi I, Daltveit AK, Forsén L, et al. Risk factors for complete uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216:165.e1.
  19. Roberge S, Demers S, Berghella V, et al. Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211:453.
  20. Lannon SM, Guthrie KA, Vanderhoeven JP, Gammill HS. Uterine rupture risk after periviable cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125:1095.
  21. Jastrow N, Demers S, Chaillet N, et al. Lower uterine segment thickness to prevent uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcomes: a multicenter prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215:604.e1.
  22. Jastrow N, Vikhareva O, Gauthier RJ, et al. Can third-trimester assessment of uterine scar in women with prior Cesarean section predict uterine rupture? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47:410.
  23. Naji O, Abdallah Y, Bij De Vaate AJ, et al. Standardized approach for imaging and measuring Cesarean section scars using ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39:252.
  24. Naji O, Daemen A, Smith A, et al. Changes in Cesarean section scar dimensions during pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41:556.
  25. Kok N, Wiersma IC, Opmeer BC, et al. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42:132.
  26. Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Phillippe HJ, Nisand I. Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus. Lancet 1996; 347:281.
  27. Bergeron ME, Jastrow N, Brassard N, et al. Sonography of lower uterine segment thickness and prediction of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113:520.
  28. Cheung VY. Sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness: is it truly predictive of uterine rupture? J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2008; 30:148.
  29. Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34:90.
  30. Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. Cesarean section scar defects: agreement between transvaginal sonographic findings with and without saline contrast enhancement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35:75.
  31. Klemm P, Koehler C, Mangler M, et al. Laparoscopic and vaginal repair of uterine scar dehiscence following cesarean section as detected by ultrasound. J Perinat Med 2005; 33:324.
  32. Schepker N, Garcia-Rocha GJ, von Versen-Höynck F, et al. Clinical diagnosis and therapy of uterine scar defects after caesarean section in non-pregnant women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 291:1417.
  33. Donnez O, Jadoul P, Squifflet J, Donnez J. Laparoscopic repair of wide and deep uterine scar dehiscence after cesarean section. Fertil Steril 2008; 89:974.
  34. Vikhareva Osser O, Valentin L. Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117:525.
  35. Ridgeway JJ, Weyrich DL, Benedetti TJ. Fetal heart rate changes associated with uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103:506.
  36. Ayres AW, Johnson TR, Hayashi R. Characteristics of fetal heart rate tracings prior to uterine rupture. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001; 74:235.
  37. Desseauve D, Bonifazi-Grenouilleau M, Fritel X, et al. Fetal heart rate abnormalities associated with uterine rupture: a case-control study: A new time-lapse approach using a standardized classification. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 197:16.
  38. Matsuo K, Scanlon JT, Atlas RO, Kopelman JN. Staircase sign: a newly described uterine contraction pattern seen in rupture of unscarred gravid uterus. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2008; 34:100.
  39. Cahill AG, Odibo AO, Allsworth JE, Macones GA. Frequent epidural dosing as a marker for impending uterine rupture in patients who attempt vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202:355.e1.
  40. Markou GA, Muray JM, Poncelet C. Risk factors and symptoms associated with maternal and neonatal complications in women with uterine rupture. A 16 years multicentric experience. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017; 217:126.
  41. Tauchi M, Hasegawa J, Oba T, et al. A case of uterine rupture diagnosed based on routine focused assessment with sonography for obstetrics. J Med Ultrason (2001) 2016; 43:129.
  42. Oba T, Hasegawa J, Arakaki T, et al. Reference values of focused assessment with sonography for obstetrics (FASO) in low-risk population. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 29:3449.
  43. Vaknin Z, Maymon R, Mendlovic S, et al. Clinical, sonographic, and epidemiologic features of second- and early third-trimester spontaneous antepartum uterine rupture: a cohort study. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28:478.
  44. Kamaya A, Ro K, Benedetti NJ, et al. Imaging and diagnosis of postpartum complications: sonography and other imaging modalities. Ultrasound Q 2009; 25:151.
  45. Hunter TJ, Maouris P, Dickinson JE. Prenatal detection and conservative management of a partial fundal uterine dehiscence. Fetal Diagn Ther 2009; 25:123.
  46. Liao CY, Ding DC. Repair of uterine rupture in twin gestation after laparoscopic cornual resection. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009; 16:493.
  47. Ogbole GI, Ogunseyinde OA, Akinwuntan AL. Intrapartum rupture of the uterus diagnosed by ultrasound. Afr Health Sci 2008; 8:57.
  48. Fekih M, Memmi A, Nouri S, et al. Asymptomatic horn rudimentary pregnant uterine rupture with a viable fetus. Tunis Med 2009; 87:633.
  49. Attarde VY, Patil P, Chaudhari R, et al. Sonographic findings of uterine rupture with expulsion of the fetus into broad ligament. J Clin Ultrasound 2009; 37:50.
  50. Yazawa H, Endo S, Hayashi S, et al. Spontaneous uterine rupture in the 33rd week of IVF pregnancy after laparoscopically assisted enucleation of uterine adenomatoid tumor. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2011; 37:452.
  51. Has R, Topuz S, Kalelioglu I, Tagrikulu D. Imaging features of postpartum uterine rupture: a case report. Abdom Imaging 2008; 33:101.
  52. Waseem M, Cunningham-Deshong H, Gernsheimer J. Abdominal pain in a postpartum patient. J Emerg Med 2011; 41:261.
  53. Walsh CA, Baxi LV. Rupture of the primigravid uterus: a review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2007; 62:327.
  54. Wylie BJ, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al. Comparison of transverse and vertical skin incision for emergency cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115:1134.
  55. Gerli S, Baiocchi G, Favilli A, Di Renzo GC. New treatment option for early spontaneous rupture of a postmyomectomy gravid uterus. Fertil Steril 2011; 96:e97.
  56. Goynumer G, Teksen A, Durukan B, Wetherilt L. Spontaneous uterine rupture during a second trimester pregnancy with a history of laparoscopic myomectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2009; 35:1132.
  57. Majumdar S, Warren R, Ifaturoti O. Fetal survival following posterior uterine wall rupture during labour with intact previous caesarean section scar. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2007; 276:537.
  58. Shahid A, Olowu O, Kandasamy G, et al. Laparoscopic management of a 16-week ruptured rudimentary horn pregnancy: a case and literature review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010; 282:121.
  59. Hassan CH, Karim AK, Ismail NA, Omar MH. Case report of ruptured non-communicating right rudimentary horn pregnancy: an acute emergency. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) 2011; 54:125.
  60. Estrella JL, Soriano-Estrella AL. Conservative management of uterine rupture in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a report of 2 cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009; 19:1666.
  61. Yang B. Bladder rupture associated with uterine rupture at delivery. Int Urogynecol J 2011; 22:625.
  62. Kapoor DS, Sharma SD, Alfirevic Z. Management of unscarred ruptured uterus. J Perinat Med 2003; 31:337.
  63. Martínez-Garza PA, Robles-Landa LP, Roca-Cabrera M, et al. Spontaneous uterine rupture: report of two cases. Cir Cir 2012; 80:81.
  64. Chen CH, Wang PH, Lin JY, et al. Uterine rupture secondary to placenta percreta in a near-term pregnant woman with a history of hysterotomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2011; 37:71.
  65. Jang DG, Lee GS, Yoon JH, Lee SJ. Placenta percreta-induced uterine rupture diagnosed by laparoscopy in the first trimester. Int J Med Sci 2011; 8:424.
  66. Hornemann A, Bohlmann MK, Diedrich K, et al. Spontaneous uterine rupture at the 21st week of gestation caused by placenta percreta. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 284:875.
  67. Medel JM, Mateo SC, Conde CR, et al. Spontaneous uterine rupture caused by placenta percreta at 18 weeks' gestation after in vitro fertilization. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2010; 36:170.
  68. Sivanesan K, Singh M, Granger K. A case of ruptured uterus at 27 weeks of gestation complicated by placenta accreta. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010; 282:107.
  69. Wang LM, Wang PH, Chen CL, et al. Uterine preservation in a woman with spontaneous uterine rupture secondary to placenta percreta on the posterior wall: a case report. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2009; 35:379.
  70. Ansar A, Rauf N, Bano K, Liaquat N. Spontaneous rupture of primigravid uterus due to morbidly adherent placenta. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2009; 19:732.
  71. Wen SW, Huang L, Liston R, et al. Severe maternal morbidity in Canada, 1991-2001. CMAJ 2005; 173:759.
  72. Chauhan SP, Martin JN Jr, Henrichs CE, et al. Maternal and perinatal complications with uterine rupture in 142,075 patients who attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189:408.
  73. Kaczmarczyk M, Sparén P, Terry P, Cnattingius S. Risk factors for uterine rupture and neonatal consequences of uterine rupture: a population-based study of successive pregnancies in Sweden. BJOG 2007; 114:1208.
  74. Bujold E, Gauthier RJ. Neonatal morbidity associated with uterine rupture: what are the risk factors? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186:311.
  75. Leung AS, Leung EK, Paul RH. Uterine rupture after previous cesarean delivery: maternal and fetal consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169:945.
  76. Holmgren C, Scott JR, Porter TF, et al. Uterine rupture with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: decision-to-delivery time and neonatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119:725.
  77. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Number 155 (Replaces guideline Number 147), February 2005. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005; 89:319.
  78. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Green-top guidelines No. 45: Birth after previous cesarean birth. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_45.pdf (Accessed on October 12, 2017).
  79. Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee Opinion No. 697: Planned Home Birth. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 129:e117.
  80. Tilden EL, Cheyney M, Guise JM, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: neonatal outcomes and United States birth setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216:403.e1.
  81. Grünebaum A, McCullough LB, Arabin B, Chervenak FA. Serious adverse neonatal outcomes such as 5-minute Apgar score of zero and seizures or severe neurologic dysfunction are increased in planned home births after cesarean delivery. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0173952.
  82. Cox KJ, Bovbjerg ML, Cheyney M, Leeman LM. Planned Home VBAC in the United States, 2004-2009: Outcomes, Maternity Care Practices, and Implications for Shared Decision Making. Birth 2015; 42:299.
  83. Chibber R, El-Saleh E, Al Fadhli R, et al. Uterine rupture and subsequent pregnancy outcome--how safe is it? A 25-year study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 23:421.
  84. Usta IM, Hamdi MA, Musa AA, Nassar AH. Pregnancy outcome in patients with previous uterine rupture. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007; 86:172.
  85. Lim AC, Kwee A, Bruinse HW. Pregnancy after uterine rupture: a report of 5 cases and a review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2005; 60:613.
  86. Fox NS, Gerber RS, Mourad M, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in patients with prior uterine rupture or dehiscence. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123:785.
  87. Sadeghi H, Rutherford T, Rackow BW, et al. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: case series and review of the literature. Am J Perinatol 2010; 27:111.
  88. Naim NM, Ahmad S, Siraj HH, et al. Advanced abdominal pregnancy resulting from late uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111:502.
  89. Hamar BD, Levine D, Katz NL, Lim KH. Expectant management of uterine dehiscence in the second trimester of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102:1139.
  90. Oyelese Y, Tchabo JG, Chapin B, et al. Conservative management of uterine rupture diagnosed prenatally on the basis of sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22:977.
  91. Cotton DB. Infant survival with prolonged uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 142:1059.
  92. Palacios-Jaraquemada JM, Fiorillo A, von Petery F, et al. Uterine repair and successful pregnancy after myometrial and placental rupture with massive haemoperitoneum. BJOG 2009; 116:456.
  93. Chen FP. Term delivery after repair of a uterine rupture during the second trimester in a previously unscarred uterus: a case report. J Reprod Med 2007; 52:981.
  94. Matsunaga JS, Daly CB, Bochner CJ, Agnew CL. Repair of uterine dehiscence with continuation of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104:1211.
  95. Surico D, Amadori R, Vigone A, et al. Successful delivery after surgical repair of uterine rupture at 15 weeks of gestation: case report and brief review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 204:5.