Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point-of-care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors and editors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

Choose from the list below to learn more about subscriptions for a:


Subscribers log in here


Umbilical cord prolapse

INTRODUCTION

Umbilical cord prolapse is a rare obstetrical emergency that occurs when the umbilical cord descends alongside or beyond the fetal presenting part. It is life-threatening to the fetus since blood flow through the umbilical vessels is usually compromised from compression of the cord between the fetus and the uterus, cervix, or pelvic inlet. There are two types of cord prolapse:

Overt prolapse, which is the most common, refers to protrusion of the cord in advance of the fetal presenting part, often through the cervical os and into or beyond the vagina. The fetal membranes are invariably ruptured in these cases and the cord is visible or palpable on examination.

Occult prolapse occurs when the cord descends alongside, but not past, the presenting part. It can occur with intact or ruptured membranes. The diagnosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a sudden, prolonged fetal heart rate deceleration. An occult prolapse often cannot be diagnosed with certainty, but is suggested by clinical features (eg, fetal bradycardia) and findings at cesarean delivery.

INCIDENCE

Cord prolapse occurs in 0.14 to 0.62 percent of deliveries [1].  

RISK FACTORS AND ETIOLOGY

Pregnancy characteristics that increase the risk of cord prolapse are generally not modifiable, but awareness of patients at high risk may help facilitate prompt diagnosis and delivery when prolapse occurs. The two major etiologic categories of cord prolapse are:

               

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Sep 2014. | This topic last updated: Oct 23, 2013.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Koonings PP, Paul RH, Campbell K. Umbilical cord prolapse. A contemporary look. J Reprod Med 1990; 35:690.
  2. Barclay M. Umbilical cord prolapse and other cord accidents. In: Gynecology and Obstetrics, Sciarra JJ (Ed), JB Lippincott, Philadelphia 1989. p.1.
  3. Ylä-Outinen A, Heinonen PK, Tuimala R. Predisposing and risk factors of umbilical cord prolapse. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1985; 64:567.
  4. Uygur D, Kiş S, Tuncer R, et al. Risk factors and infant outcomes associated with umbilical cord prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002; 78:127.
  5. Murphy DJ, MacKenzie IZ. The mortality and morbidity associated with umbilical cord prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102:826.
  6. Critchlow CW, Leet TL, Benedetti TJ, Daling JR. Risk factors and infant outcomes associated with umbilical cord prolapse: a population-based case-control study among births in Washington State. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170:613.
  7. Qureshi NS, Taylor DJ, Tomlinson AJ. Umbilical cord prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 86:29.
  8. Altaras M, Potashnik G, Ben-Adereth N, Leventhal H. The use of vacuum extraction in cases of cord prolapse during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1974; 118:824.
  9. Gabbay-Benziv R, Maman M, Wiznitzer A, et al. Umbilical cord prolapse during delivery - risk factors and pregnancy outcome: a single center experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 27:14.
  10. Kahana B, Sheiner E, Levy A, et al. Umbilical cord prolapse and perinatal outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 84:127.
  11. Roberts WE, Martin RW, Roach HH, et al. Are obstetric interventions such as cervical ripening, induction of labor, amnioinfusion, or amniotomy associated with umbilical cord prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176:1181.
  12. Berghella V. Prolapsed cord after external cephalic version in a patient with premature rupture of membranes and transverse lie. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001; 99:274.
  13. Boyle JJ, Katz VL. Umbilical cord prolapse in current obstetric practice. J Reprod Med 2005; 50:303.
  14. Usta IM, Mercer BM, Sibai BM. Current obstetrical practice and umbilical cord prolapse. Am J Perinatol 1999; 16:479.
  15. Gannard-Pechin E, Ramanah R, Cossa S, et al. [Umbilical cord prolapse: a case study over 23 years]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2012; 41:574.
  16. Duval C, Lemoine JP, Ba S, Demory JE. [Prolapse of the umbilical cord. 79 cases]. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet 1987; 82:163.
  17. Vago T. Prolopse of the umbilical cord: a method of management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970; 107:967.
  18. Lin MG. Umbilical cord prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2006; 61:269.
  19. Barrett JM. Funic reduction for the management of umbilical cord prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165:654.
  20. Katz Z, Shoham Z, Lancet M, et al. Management of labor with umbilical cord prolapse: a 5-year study. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 72:278.
  21. Prabulos AM, Philipson EH. Umbilical cord prolapse. Is the time from diagnosis to delivery critical? J Reprod Med 1998; 43:129.
  22. Siassakos D, Hasafa Z, Sibanda T, et al. Retrospective cohort study of diagnosis-delivery interval with umbilical cord prolapse: the effect of team training. BJOG 2009; 116:1089.
  23. Nizard J, Cromi A, Molendijk H, Arabin B. Neonatal outcome following prolonged umbilical cord prolapse in preterm premature rupture of membranes. BJOG 2005; 112:833.
  24. Poetker DM, Rijhsinghani A. Fetal survival after umbilical cord prolapse for more than three days. A case report. J Reprod Med 2001; 46:776.
  25. Gilbert WM, Jacoby BN, Xing G, et al. Adverse obstetric events are associated with significant risk of cerebral palsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203:328.e1.
  26. Lange IR, Manning FA, Morrison I, et al. Cord prolapse: is antenatal diagnosis possible? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151:1083.
  27. Ezra Y, Strasberg SR, Farine D. Does cord presentation on ultrasound predict cord prolapse? Gynecol Obstet Invest 2003; 56:6.
  28. Raga F, Osborne N, Ballester MJ, Bonilla-Musoles F. Color flow Doppler: a useful instrument in the diagnosis of funic presentation. J Natl Med Assoc 1996; 88:94.
  29. Kinugasa M, Sato T, Tamura M, et al. Antepartum detection of cord presentation by transvaginal ultrasonography for term breech presentation: potential prediction and prevention of cord prolapse. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2007; 33:612.