Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Medline ® Abstract for Reference 62

of 'Treatment of male sexual dysfunction'

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover study of patient preference for tadalafil 20 mg or sildenafil citrate 50 mg during initiation of treatment for erectile dysfunction.
Govier F, Potempa AJ, Kaufman J, Denne J, Kovalenko P, Ahuja S
Clin Ther. 2003;25(11):2709.
BACKGROUND: Tadalafil is a phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor approved in>30 countries for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). It has been shown to improve erectile function compared with placebo in Phase III studies, but clinical experience comparing tadalafil with the PDE5 inhibitor sildenafil citrate is lacking.
OBJECTIVE: This study compared patient preference for tadalafil 20 mg or sildenafil 50 mg during initial treatment for ED. It also compared the tolerability of the 2 agents at these doses.
METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, fixed-dose, 2-period crossover trial took place at 13 sites in the United States and Germany. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 4 weeks of treatment with tadalafil 20 mg or sildenafil 50 mg, followed by the alternative treatment, to be taken as needed up to once daily before sexual activity.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 215 men withED, 109 randomized to the tadalafil-sildenafil sequence and 106 to the sildenafil-tadalafil sequence. Their mean age was 49.8 years; 84.7% were sildenafil naive and 15.3% had undergone a previous inadequate trial of sildenafil. Most patients had moderate ED (60.5%) of>or=1 year's duration (74.9%). Of 190 evaluable patients, 126 (66.3%) preferred to initiate treatment with tadalafil, compared with 64 (33.7%) with sildenafil (P<0.001). Patients' preference did not differ by age, duration of ED, treatment sequence, or previous sildenafil exposure. Both medications were well tolerated, with no significant differences in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. Headache (11.2% tadalafil, 8.8% sildenafil), dyspepsia (6.0% and 4.2%, respectively), nasopharyngitis (4.7% and 2.8%), and flushing (2.8% and 4.7%) were the most common adverse events. The rate of ocular disturbances was low: 1 patient experienced intermittent bilateral reduction in visual acuity with tadalafil, and 2 exhibited conjunctival hyperemia or eyelid edema with sildenafil.
CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil 20 mg was preferred to sildenafil 50 mg for the initiation of ED therapy in this study population. Both medications were well tolerated.
Department of Urology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington 98111, USA. urofeg@vmmc.org