Treatment of diuretic-resistant ascites in patients with cirrhosis

INTRODUCTION

Ascites due to cirrhosis can be mobilized in approximately 90 percent of patients with a treatment regimen consisting of dietary sodium restriction (usually 88 meq [2000 mg/day]) and oral diuretics (usually consisting of spironolactone and furosemide) [1]. (See "Initial therapy of ascites in patients with cirrhosis".)

This topic review will discuss the approach to the 10 percent of patients who appear to be diuretic-resistant. This topic is also addressed in a guideline (updated for 2009) issued by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) (table 1) [2]. The AASLD guideline for the management of adult patients with ascites due to cirrhosis, as well as other AASLD guidelines, can be accessed through the AASLD web site at www.aasld.org/practiceguidelines/Pages/default.aspx.

DEFINITION

Diuretic-resistant ascites in patients with cirrhosis is considered to be present when one or both of the following two criteria is present in the absence of therapy with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), which can induce renal vasoconstriction and diminish diuretic responsiveness [3]:

  • An inability to mobilize ascites despite compliance with dietary sodium restriction (as confirmed by a 24-hour urine collection containing less than 78 meq of sodium or urine sodium less than the urine potassium on a random sample) and the administration of maximum tolerable doses of oral diuretics (400 mg per day of spironolactone and 160 mg per day of furosemide) [4]. The 78 meq of sodium represents the recommended 88 meq intake minus 10 meq in nonurinary losses. Patients who gain weight despite excreting more than 78 meq of sodium per day (or urine sodium > urine potassium on a random sample) are not compliant with the diet. (See "Patient information: Collection of a 24-hour urine specimen (Beyond the Basics)".)
  • The development of prohibitive diuretic-related complications, such as progressive azotemia, hepatic encephalopathy, or progressive electrolyte imbalance.

Differential diagnosis — Resistant ascites in patients with cirrhosis must be differentiated from malignant ascites due to peritoneal carcinomatosis, Budd-Chiari syndrome (hepatic vein thrombosis), or from chylous malignant ascites. These disorders are typically refractory to diuretic therapy because of an inability to mobilize the ascitic fluid [5]. In contrast, massive hepatic metastasis, another cause of malignant ascites, is due to intrahepatic portal hypertension and can be treated in a similar fashion to patients with cirrhosis [5].

                

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article you must have access through your hospital or your group practice, log in to your personal subscription, or purchase a personal subscription. For more information, click below.
Literature review current through: Apr 2013. | This topic last updated: Apr 3, 2013.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2013 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Arroyo V, Ginès P, Gerbes AL, et al. Definition and diagnostic criteria of refractory ascites and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. International Ascites Club. Hepatology 1996; 23:164.
  2. Runyon BA, AASLD Practice Guidelines Committee. Management of adult patients with ascites due to cirrhosis: an update. Hepatology 2009; 49:2087.
  3. Runyon BA. Refractory ascites. Semin Liver Dis 1993; 13:343.
  4. Stiehm AJ, Mendler MH, Runyon BA. Detection of diuretic-resistance or diuretic-sensitivity by the spot urine Na/K ratio in 729 specimens from cirrhosis with ascites: approximately 90% accuracy compared to 24-hr urine Na excretion. Hepatology 2002; 36:222A.
  5. Pockros PJ, Esrason KT, Nguyen C, et al. Mobilization of malignant ascites with diuretics is dependent on ascitic fluid characteristics. Gastroenterology 1992; 103:1302.
  6. Han SH, Reynolds TB, Fong TL. Nephrogenic ascites. Analysis of 16 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 1998; 77:233.
  7. Pérez-Ayuso RM, Arroyo V, Planas R, et al. Randomized comparative study of efficacy of furosemide versus spironolactone in nonazotemic cirrhosis with ascites. Relationship between the diuretic response and the activity of the renin-aldosterone system. Gastroenterology 1983; 84:961.
  8. Saló J, Guevara M, Fernández-Esparrach G, et al. Impairment of renal function during moderate physical exercise in cirrhotic patients with ascites: relationship with the activity of neurohormonal systems. Hepatology 1997; 25:1338.
  9. Ginés P, Quintero E, Arroyo V, et al. Compensated cirrhosis: natural history and prognostic factors. Hepatology 1987; 7:122.
  10. Sersté T, Melot C, Francoz C, et al. Deleterious effects of beta-blockers on survival in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites. Hepatology 2010; 52:1017.
  11. Wong F, Salerno F. Beta-blockers in cirrhosis: friend and foe? Hepatology 2010; 52:811.
  12. Kalambokis GN, Tsianos EV. Vasoconstrictor therapy for patients with cirrhosis with ascites but without hepatorenal syndrome. Hepatology 2008; 48:686.
  13. Singh V, Dhungana SP, Singh B, et al. Midodrine in patients with cirrhosis and refractory or recurrent ascites: a randomized pilot study. J Hepatol 2012; 56:348.
  14. Singh V, Singh A, Singh B, et al. Midodrine and clonidine in patients with cirrhosis and refractory or recurrent ascites: a randomized pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108:560.
  15. D'Amico G, Morabito A, Pagliaro L, Marubini E. Survival and prognostic indicators in compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci 1986; 31:468.
  16. Bories P, Garcia Compean D, Michel H, et al. The treatment of refractory ascites by the LeVeen shunt. A multi-centre controlled trial (57 patients). J Hepatol 1986; 3:212.
  17. Arroyo V, Bosch J, Gaya-Beltrán J, et al. Plasma renin activity and urinary sodium excretion as prognostic indicators in nonazotemic cirrhosis with ascites. Ann Intern Med 1981; 94:198.
  18. Ginés P, Arroyo V, Quintero E, et al. Comparison of paracentesis and diuretics in the treatment of cirrhotics with tense ascites. Results of a randomized study. Gastroenterology 1987; 93:234.
  19. Ginès P, Titó L, Arroyo V, et al. Randomized comparative study of therapeutic paracentesis with and without intravenous albumin in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 1988; 94:1493.
  20. Ginès A, Fernández-Esparrach G, Monescillo A, et al. Randomized trial comparing albumin, dextran 70, and polygeline in cirrhotic patients with ascites treated by paracentesis. Gastroenterology 1996; 111:1002.
  21. Luca A, Feu F, García-Pagán JC, et al. Favorable effects of total paracentesis on splanchnic hemodynamics in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites. Hepatology 1994; 20:30.
  22. Nevens F, Bustami R, Scheys I, et al. Variceal pressure is a factor predicting the risk of a first variceal bleeding: a prospective cohort study in cirrhotic patients. Hepatology 1998; 27:15.
  23. Kravetz D, Romero G, Argonz J, et al. Total volume paracentesis decreases variceal pressure, size, and variceal wall tension in cirrhotic patients. Hepatology 1997; 25:59.
  24. Duggal P, Farah KF, Anghel G, et al. Safety of paracentesis in inpatients. Clin Nephrol 2006; 66:171.
  25. Runyon BA, Antillon MR, Montano AA. Effect of diuresis versus therapeutic paracentesis on ascitic fluid opsonic activity and serum complement. Gastroenterology 1989; 97:158.
  26. Solà R, Andreu M, Coll S, et al. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients treated using paracentesis or diuretics: results of a randomized study. Hepatology 1995; 21:340.
  27. Evans LT, Kim WR, Poterucha JJ, Kamath PS. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in asymptomatic outpatients with cirrhotic ascites. Hepatology 2003; 37:897.
  28. Pascual S, Such J, Pérez-Mateo M. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and refractory ascites. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95:3686.
  29. Runyon BA. Patient selection is important in studying the impact of large-volume paracentesis on intravascular volume. Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92:371.
  30. Luca A, García-Pagán JC, Bosch J, et al. Beneficial effects of intravenous albumin infusion on the hemodynamic and humoral changes after total paracentesis. Hepatology 1995; 22:753.
  31. Peltekian KM, Wong F, Liu PP, et al. Cardiovascular, renal, and neurohumoral responses to single large-volume paracentesis in patients with cirrhosis and diuretic-resistant ascites. Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92:394.
  32. Alessandria C, Elia C, Mezzabotta L, et al. Prevention of paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction in cirrhosis: standard vs half albumin doses. A prospective, randomized, unblinded pilot study. Dig Liver Dis 2011; 43:881.
  33. Bernardi M, Caraceni P, Navickis RJ, Wilkes MM. Albumin infusion in patients undergoing large-volume paracentesis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Hepatology 2012; 55:1172.
  34. Singh V, Dheerendra PC, Singh B, et al. Midodrine versus albumin in the prevention of paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction in cirrhotics: a randomized pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103:1399.
  35. Ochs A, Rössle M, Haag K, et al. The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt procedure for refractory ascites. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:1192.
  36. Somberg KA, Lake JR, Tomlanovich SJ, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for refractory ascites: assessment of clinical and hormonal response and renal function. Hepatology 1995; 21:709.
  37. Wong W, Liu P, Blendis L, Wong F. Long-term renal sodium handling in patients with cirrhosis treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for refractory ascites. Am J Med 1999; 106:315.
  38. Nazarian GK, Ferral H, Bjarnason H, et al. Effect of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt on quality of life. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167:963.
  39. Lebrec D, Giuily N, Hadengue A, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: comparison with paracentesis in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites: a randomized trial. French Group of Clinicians and a Group of Biologists. J Hepatol 1996; 25:135.
  40. Rössle M, Ochs A, Gülberg V, et al. A comparison of paracentesis and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting in patients with ascites. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:1701.
  41. Ginès P, Uriz J, Calahorra B, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting versus paracentesis plus albumin for refractory ascites in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2002; 123:1839.
  42. Salerno F, Merli M, Riggio O, et al. Randomized controlled study of TIPS versus paracentesis plus albumin in cirrhosis with severe ascites. Hepatology 2004; 40:629.
  43. Sanyal AJ, Genning C, Reddy KR, et al. The North American Study for the Treatment of Refractory Ascites. Gastroenterology 2003; 124:634.
  44. Saab S, Nieto JM, Ly D, Runyon BA. TIPS versus paracentesis for cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; :CD004889.
  45. D'Amico G, Luca A, Morabito A, et al. Uncovered transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for refractory ascites: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2005; 129:1282.
  46. Salerno F, Cammà C, Enea M, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for refractory ascites: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Gastroenterology 2007; 133:825.
  47. Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, et al. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology 2001; 33:464.
  48. Martinet JP, Fenyves D, Legault L, et al. Treatment of refractory ascites using transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): a caution. Dig Dis Sci 1997; 42:161.
  49. Sanyal AJ, Freedman AM, Shiffman ML, et al. Portosystemic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: results of a prospective controlled study. Hepatology 1994; 20:46.
  50. Bureau C, Garcia-Pagan JC, Otal P, et al. Improved clinical outcome using polytetrafluoroethylene-coated stents for TIPS: results of a randomized study. Gastroenterology 2004; 126:469.
  51. Pozzi M, Carugo S, Boari G, et al. Evidence of functional and structural cardiac abnormalities in cirrhotic patients with and without ascites. Hepatology 1997; 26:1131.
  52. Boyer TD, Haskal ZJ. American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Practice Guidelines: the role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation in the management of portal hypertension. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16:615.
  53. Stanley MM, Ochi S, Lee KK, et al. Peritoneovenous shunting as compared with medical treatment in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and massive ascites. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study on Treatment of Alcoholic Cirrhosis with Ascites. N Engl J Med 1989; 321:1632.
  54. Ginès P, Arroyo V, Vargas V, et al. Paracentesis with intravenous infusion of albumin as compared with peritoneovenous shunting in cirrhosis with refractory ascites. N Engl J Med 1991; 325:829.
  55. Rosemurgy AS, Zervos EE, Clark WC, et al. TIPS versus peritoneovenous shunt in the treatment of medically intractable ascites: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2004; 239:883.
  56. Runyon, BA. Ascites and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. In: Sleisenger and Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease, Pathophysiology/Diagnosis/Management, 7th ed, Feldman, M, Friedman, LS, Sleisenger, MH (Eds), WB Saunders, Philadelphia 2002. p.1517.
  57. Castells A, Saló J, Planas R, et al. Impact of shunt surgery for variceal bleeding in the natural history of ascites in cirrhosis: a retrospective study. Hepatology 1994; 20:584.
  58. Rosemurgy AS, Goode SE, Zwiebel BR, et al. A prospective trial of transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic stent shunts versus small-diameter prosthetic H-graft portacaval shunts in the treatment of bleeding varices. Ann Surg 1996; 224:378.
  59. N'Kontchou G, Seror O, Bourcier V, et al. Partial splenic embolization in patients with cirrhosis: efficacy, tolerance and long-term outcome in 32 patients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 17:179.
  60. Shah R, Mahour GH, Ford EG, Stanley P. Partial splenic embolization. An effective alternative to splenectomy for hypersplenism. Am Surg 1990; 56:774.
  61. Ou HY, Huang TL, Chen TY, et al. Emergency splenic arterial embolization for massive variceal bleeding in liver recipient with left-sided portal hypertension. Liver Transpl 2005; 11:1136.
  62. McDermott VG, England RE, Newman GE. Case report: bleeding gastric varices secondary to splenic vein thrombosis successfully treated by splenic artery embolization. Br J Radiol 1995; 68:928.
  63. Pålsson B, Hallén M, Forsberg AM, Alwmark A. Partial splenic embolization: long-term outcome. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2003; 387:421.
  64. Xu RY, Liu B, Lin N. Therapeutic effects of endoscopic variceal ligation combined with partial splenic embolization for portal hypertension. World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10:1072.
  65. Chang CY, Singal AK, Ganeshan SV, et al. Use of splenic artery embolization to relieve tense ascites following liver transplantation in a patient with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Liver Transpl 2007; 13:1532.
  66. Licata G, Tuttolomondo A, Licata A, et al. Clinical Trial: High-dose furosemide plus small-volume hypertonic saline solutions vs. repeated paracentesis as treatment of refractory ascites. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009; 30:227.
  67. Boyer TD. Tolvaptan and hyponatremia in a patient with cirrhosis. Hepatology 2010; 51:699.
  68. Wong F, Watson H, Gerbes A, et al. Satavaptan for the management of ascites in cirrhosis: efficacy and safety across the spectrum of ascites severity. Gut 2012; 61:108.