Transvaginal cervical cerclage

INTRODUCTION

Cervical cerclage refers to a variety of surgical procedures in which sutures, wires, or synthetic tape are used to reinforce the cervix. By mechanically increasing the tensile strength of the cervix, the occurrence of adverse perinatal events associated with cervical insufficiency may be reduced. Adverse perinatal events associated with cervical insufficiency include:

Prolapse of the fetal membranes into the vagina

Intraamniotic infection

Preterm premature rupture of the fetal membranes (PPROM)

Preterm labor and delivery

                            

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Oct 2014. | This topic last updated: Sep 26, 2014.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Roberts D, Jorgensen AL. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 4:CD008991.
  2. Harger JH. Cerclage and cervical insufficiency: an evidence-based analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100:1313.
  3. American College of Obstericians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Cervical insufficiency. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102:1091.
  4. Treadwell MC, Bronsteen RA, Bottoms SF. Prognostic factors and complication rates for cervical cerclage: a review of 482 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165:555.
  5. Romero R, Gonzalez R, Sepulveda W, et al. Infection and labor. VIII. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in patients with suspected cervical incompetence: prevalence and clinical significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167:1086.
  6. Mays JK, Figueroa R, Shah J, et al. Amniocentesis for selection before rescue cerclage. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95:652.
  7. Berghella V, Ludmir J, Simonazzi G, Owen J. Transvaginal cervical cerclage: evidence for perioperative management strategies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209:181.
  8. Rust OA, Atlas RO, Reed J, et al. Revisiting the short cervix detected by transvaginal ultrasound in the second trimester: why cerclage therapy may not help. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185:1098.
  9. Kusanovic JP, Espinoza J, Romero R, et al. Clinical significance of the presence of amniotic fluid 'sludge' in asymptomatic patients at high risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30:706.
  10. Espinoza J, Gonçalves LF, Romero R, et al. The prevalence and clinical significance of amniotic fluid 'sludge' in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25:346.
  11. Bujold E, Pasquier JC, Simoneau J, et al. Intra-amniotic sludge, short cervix, and risk of preterm delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2006; 28:198.
  12. Gorski LA, Huang WH, Iriye BK, Hancock J. Clinical implication of intra-amniotic sludge on ultrasound in patients with cervical cerclage. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36:482.
  13. Berghella V, Seibel-Seamon J. Contemporary use of cervical cerclage. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 50:468.
  14. Kessler I, Shoham Z, Lancet M, et al. Complications associated with genital colonization in pregnancies with and without cerclage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1988; 27:359.
  15. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 120: Use of prophylactic antibiotics in labor and delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117:1472.
  16. Novy MJ, Ducsay CA, Stanczyk FZ. Plasma concentrations of prostaglandin F2 alpha and prostaglandin E2 metabolites after transabdominal and transvaginal cervical cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156:1543.
  17. Berghella V, Prasertcharoensuk W, Cotter A, et al. Does indomethacin prevent preterm birth in women with cervical dilatation in the second trimester? Am J Perinatol 2009; 26:13.
  18. Miller ES, Grobman WA, Fonseca L, Robinson BK. Indomethacin and antibiotics in examination-indicated cerclage: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123:1311.
  19. Visintine J, Airoldi J, Berghella V. Indomethacin administration at the time of ultrasound-indicated cerclage: is there an association with a reduction in spontaneous preterm birth? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198:643.e1.
  20. Yoon HJ, Hong JY, Kim SM. The effect of anesthetic method for prophylactic cervical cerclage on plasma oxytocin: a randomized trial. Int J Obstet Anesth 2008; 17:26.
  21. Scheerer LJ, Lam F, Bartolucci L, Katz M. A new technique for reduction of prolapsed fetal membranes for emergency cervical cerclage. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74:408.
  22. Goodlin RC. Cervical incompetence, hourglass membranes, and amniocentesis. Obstet Gynecol 1979; 54:748.
  23. Locatelli A, Vergani P, Bellini P, et al. Amnioreduction in emergency cerclage with prolapsed membranes: comparison of two methods for reducing the membranes. Am J Perinatol 1999; 16:73.
  24. Althuisius SM, Dekker GA, van Geijn HP, Hummel P. The effect of therapeutic McDonald cerclage on cervical length as assessed by transvaginal ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180:366.
  25. Funai EF, Paidas MJ, Rebarber A, et al. Change in cervical length after prophylactic cerclage. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94:117.
  26. Dijkstra K, Funai EF, O'Neill L, et al. Change in cervical length after cerclage as a predictor of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96:346.
  27. O'Connell MP, Lindow SW. Reversal of asymptomatic cervical length shortening with cervical cerclage: a preliminary study. Hum Reprod 2001; 16:172.
  28. Hershkovitz R, Burstein E, Pinku A. Tightening McDonald cerclage suture under sonographic guidance. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31:194.
  29. Groom KM, Shennan AH, Bennett PR. Ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage: outcome depends on preoperative cervical length and presence of visible membranes at time of cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187:445.
  30. Rust OA, Atlas RO, Meyn J, et al. Does cerclage location influence perinatal outcome? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189:1688.
  31. Berghella V, Rafael TJ, Szychowski JM, et al. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117:663.
  32. Shirodkar, VN. A new method of operative treatment for habitual abortion in the second trimester of pregnancy. Antiseptic 1955; 52:299.
  33. MCDONALD IA. Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 1957; 64:346.
  34. Berghella V, Odibo AO, To MS, et al. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106:181.
  35. Odibo AO, Berghella V, To MS, et al. Shirodkar versus McDonald cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with short cervical length. Am J Perinatol 2007; 24:55.
  36. Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomised trial of cervical cerclage. MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100:516.
  37. Kuhn, RPJ, Pepperell, RJ. Cervical ligation: a review of 242 pregnancies. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol 1977:79.
  38. Harger JH. Comparison of success and morbidity in cervical cerclage procedures. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 56:543.
  39. Peters WA 3rd, Thiagarajah S, Harbert GM Jr. Cervical cerclage: twenty years' experience. South Med J 1979; 72:933.
  40. Robboy MS. The management of cervical incompetence. UCLA experience with cerclage procedures. Obstet Gynecol 1973; 41:108.
  41. Perrotin F, Marret H, Ayeva-Derman M, et al. [Second trimester cerclage of short cervixes: which technique to use? A retrospective study of 25 cases]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2002; 31:640.
  42. Owen J, Hankins G, Iams JD, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201:375.e1.
  43. Althuisius SM, Dekker GA, Hummel P, et al. Final results of the Cervical Incompetence Prevention Randomized Cerclage Trial (CIPRACT): therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185:1106.
  44. Ezechi OC, Kalu BK, Nwokoro CA. Prophylactic cerclage for the prevention of preterm delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 85:283.
  45. Scheib S, Visintine JF, Miroshnichenko G, et al. Is cerclage height associated with the incidence of preterm birth in women with an ultrasound-indicated cerclage? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200:e12.
  46. Ludmir J, Jackson GM, Samuels P. Transvaginal cerclage under ultrasound guidance in cases of severe cervical hypoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78:1067.
  47. Woensdregt K, Norwitz ER, Cackovic M, et al. Effect of 2 stitches vs 1 stitch on the prevention of preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancies who undergo cervical cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198:396.e1.
  48. Giraldo-Isaza MA, Fried GP, Hegarty SE, et al. Comparison of 2 stitches vs 1 stitch for transvaginal cervical cerclage for preterm birth prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208:209.e1.
  49. Park JM, Tuuli MG, Wong M, et al. Cervical cerclage: one stitch or two? Am J Perinatol 2012; 29:477.
  50. Brix N, Secher NJ, McCormack CD, et al. Randomised trial of cervical cerclage, with and without occlusion, for the prevention of preterm birth in women suspected for cervical insufficiency. BJOG 2013; 120:613.
  51. Andersen HF, Karimi A, Sakala EP, Kalugdan R. Prediction of cervical cerclage outcome by endovaginal ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171:1102.
  52. Guzman ER, Houlihan C, Vintzileos A, et al. The significance of transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix in women treated with emergency cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175:471.
  53. O'Brien JM, Hill AL, Barton JR. Funneling to the stitch: an informative ultrasonographic finding after cervical cerclage. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20:252.
  54. Hedriana HL, Lanouette JM, Haesslein HC, McLean LK. Is there value for serial ultrasonographic assessment of cervical lengths after a cerclage? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198:705.e1.
  55. Roman AS, Rebarber A, Sfakianaki AK, et al. Vaginal fetal fibronectin as a predictor of spontaneous preterm delivery in the patient with cervical cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189:1368.
  56. Duhig KE, Chandiramani M, Seed PT, et al. Fetal fibronectin as a predictor of spontaneous preterm labour in asymptomatic women with a cervical cerclage. BJOG 2009; 116:799.
  57. Bisulli M, Suhag A, Arvon R, et al. Interval to spontaneous delivery after elective removal of cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201:163.e1.
  58. Grant AM. Cervical cerclage. In: Pregnancy and Childbirth Module, Enkin MW, Keirse MJNC, Renfrew MJ, Neilson JP (Eds), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1994.
  59. Yeast JD, Garite TR. The role of cervical cerclage in the management of preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158:106.
  60. Blickstein I, Katz Z, Lancet M, Molgilner BM. The outcome of pregnancies complicated by preterm rupture of the membranes with and without cerclage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1989; 28:237.
  61. Ludmir J, Bader T, Chen L, et al. Poor perinatal outcome associated with retained cerclage in patients with premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84:823.
  62. McElrath TF, Norwitz ER, Lieberman ES, Heffner LJ. Management of cervical cerclage and preterm premature rupture of the membranes: should the stitch be removed? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183:840.
  63. McElrath TF, Norwitz ER, Lieberman ES, Heffner LJ. Perinatal outcome after preterm premature rupture of membranes with in situ cervical cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187:1147.
  64. Jenkins TM, Berghella V, Shlossman PA, et al. Timing of cerclage removal after preterm premature rupture of membranes: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183:847.
  65. Kominiarek MA, Kemp A. Perinatal outcome in preterm premature rupture of membranes at < or = 32 weeks with retained cerclage. J Reprod Med 2006; 51:533.
  66. Galyean A, Garite TJ, Maurel K, et al. Removal versus retention of cerclage in preterm premature rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211:399.e1.
  67. Aarts JM, Brons JT, Bruinse HW. Emergency cerclage: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1995; 50:459.
  68. Wong GP, Farquharson DF, Dansereau J. Emergency cervical cerclage: a retrospective review of 51 cases. Am J Perinatol 1993; 10:341.
  69. Simcox R, Shennan A. Cervical cerclage in the prevention of preterm birth. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 21:831.
  70. Bauer ME, Bateman BT, Bauer ST, et al. Maternal sepsis mortality and morbidity during hospitalization for delivery: temporal trends and independent associations for severe sepsis. Anesth Analg 2013; 117:944.
  71. Barth WH Jr. Cervical incompetence and cerclage: unresolved controversies. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1994; 37:831.
  72. Baxter JK, Airoldi J, Berghella V. Short cervical length after history-indicated cerclage: is a reinforcing cerclage beneficial? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193:1204.
  73. Rush RW, Isaacs S, McPherson K, et al. A randomized controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at high risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91:724.
  74. Lazar P, Gueguen S, Dreyfus J, et al. Multicentred controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at moderate risk of preterm delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91:731.
  75. Harger JH. Cervical cerclage: patient selection, morbidity, and success rates. Clin Perinatol 1983; 10:321.