Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

The use of inhaler devices in children

Robert H Moore, MD
Section Editors
Gregory Redding, MD
Robert A Wood, MD
Deputy Editor
Elizabeth TePas, MD, MS


The pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) has been a mainstay in the treatment of respiratory diseases, especially asthma, since its introduction in 1956. It is the most commonly prescribed delivery system for administering inhaled bronchodilators and anti-inflammatory agents worldwide [1,2]. Spacer devices, when used properly, substantially improve the delivery of pMDI-generated aerosols to the distal airways. The pMDI, used alone or in combination with a spacer or valved-holding chamber, is the most convenient and cost-effective way to administer aerosolized medications for most patients.

Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are a separate group of medication aerosolizing devices widely used in the management of adult and pediatric pulmonary disease. These devices eliminate the need for propellants and are less dependent upon coordination of inhalation and device actuation. Short- and long-acting beta agonists and inhaled glucocorticoids are available for administration via DPIs.

The effectiveness of both delivery systems is dependent upon several factors, including the properties of the agent administered, design, temperature, humidity, and patient technique [3,4]. Device technique should be assessed during every encounter to ensure optimal use and drug delivery to the lungs. The use of pMDIs and DPIs in children is discussed here. Other aspects of aerosol therapy, including the use of nebulizers, are presented separately. (See "Delivery of inhaled medication in children" and "Use of medication nebulizers in children".)


A pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) contains drug, which usually is either crystallized or in solution, along with the propellant and a surfactant (picture 1) [2].

Propellants — The most common type of propellants used are the hydrofluoroalkanes (HFA). In some cases (such as with HFA beclomethasone), the use of HFA has increased the output of respirable particles [5,6], improved the delivery of drug to the lower airways, and decreased deposition in the oropharynx compared with previously used propellants [7]. Improved delivery to peripheral airways may necessitate the reduction of drug dose, particularly when using an inhaled glucocorticoid [8]. (See 'Spacer devices' below.)

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information on subscription options, click below on the option that best describes you:

Subscribers log in here

Literature review current through: Sep 2017. | This topic last updated: Sep 08, 2017.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2017 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Brocklebank D, Wright J, Cates C. Systematic review of clinical effectiveness of pressurised metered dose inhalers versus other hand held inhaler devices for delivering corticosteroids in asthma. BMJ 2001; 323:896.
  2. Fink JB. Aerosol device selection: evidence to practice. Respir Care 2000; 45:874.
  3. Newman SP. A comparison of lung deposition patterns between different asthma inhalers. J Aerosol Med 1995; 8 Suppl 3:S21.
  4. Newman SP. Aerosol generators and delivery systems. Respir Care 1991; 36:939.
  5. Chuffart AA, Sennhauser FH, Wildhaber JH, Swiss Paediatric Respiratory Physiology Research Group. Factors affecting the efficiency of aerosol therapy with pressurised metered-dose inhalers through plastic spacers. Swiss Med Wkly 2001; 131:14.
  6. Barry PW, O'Callaghan C. In vitro comparison of the amount of salbutamol available for inhalation from different formulations used with different spacer devices. Eur Respir J 1997; 10:1345.
  7. Leach CL, Davidson PJ, Boudreau RJ. Improved airway targeting with the CFC-free HFA-beclomethasone metered-dose inhaler compared with CFC-beclomethasone. Eur Respir J 1998; 12:1346.
  8. Matthys H, Nowak D, Hader S, Kunkel G. Efficacy of chlorofluorocarbon-free beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms day-1 delivered as an extrafine aerosol in adults with moderate asthma. Respir Med 1998; 92 Suppl A:17.
  9. Guidry GG, Brown WD, Stogner SW, George RB. Incorrect use of metered dose inhalers by medical personnel. Chest 1992; 101:31.
  10. Larsen JS, Hahn M, Kochevar JW, et al. Administration errors with a conventional metered dose inhaler versus a novel breath actuated device. Ann Allergy 1993; 71:103.
  11. Hanania NA, Wittman R, Kesten S, Chapman KR. Medical personnel's knowledge of and ability to use inhaling devices. Metered-dose inhalers, spacing chambers, and breath-actuated dry powder inhalers. Chest 1994; 105:111.
  12. Shrestha M, Parupia H, Andrews B, et al. Metered-dose inhaler technique of patients in an urban ED: prevalence of incorrect technique and attempt at education. Am J Emerg Med 1996; 14:380.
  13. Jones JS, Holstege CP, Riekse R, et al. Metered-dose inhalers: do emergency health care providers know what to teach? Ann Emerg Med 1995; 26:308.
  14. Ari A, Hess D, Myers TR, Rau JL. A guide to aerosol delivery devices for respiratory therapists, 2nd ed, American Assocation for Respiratory Care, 2009.
  15. Rickard KA. Not running on empty. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2006; 97:558.
  16. Cain WT, Oppenheimer JJ. The misconception of using floating patterns as an accurate means of measuring the contents of metered-dose inhaler devices. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2001; 87:417.
  17. Ogren RA, Baldwin JL, Simon RA. How patients determine when to replace their metered-dose inhalers. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1995; 75:485.
  18. Pedersen S, Mortensen S. Use of different inhalation devices in children. Lung 1990; 168 Suppl:653.
  19. Newman SP, Newhouse MT. Effect of add-on devices for aerosol drug delivery: deposition studies and clinical aspects. J Aerosol Med 1996; 9:55.
  20. Levison H. Spacers in childhood asthma--is there one for all occasions? Ann Allergy 1990; 64:323.
  21. Bowton DL. Metered-dose inhalers versus hand-held nebulizers. Some answers and new questions. Chest 1992; 101:298.
  22. König P. Spacer devices used with metered-dose inhalers. Breakthrough or gimmick? Chest 1985; 88:276.
  23. Pedersen S. Aerosol treatment of bronchoconstriction in children, with or without a tube spacer. N Engl J Med 1983; 308:1328.
  24. Cunningham SJ, Crain EF. Reduction of morbidity in asthmatic children given a spacer device. Chest 1994; 106:753.
  25. Crompton GK. Problems patients have using pressurized aerosol inhalers. Eur J Respir Dis Suppl 1982; 119:101.
  26. Toogood JH, Baskerville J, Jennings B, et al. Use of spacers to facilitate inhaled corticosteroid treatment of asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984; 129:723.
  27. Kim CS, Eldridge MA, Sackner MA. Oropharyngeal deposition and delivery aspects of metered-dose inhaler aerosols. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 135:157.
  28. Agertoft L, Pedersen S. Influence of spacer device on drug delivery to young children with asthma. Arch Dis Child 1994; 71:217.
  29. Schultz A, Le Souëf TJ, Venter A, et al. Aerosol inhalation from spacers and valved holding chambers requires few tidal breaths for children. Pediatrics 2010; 126:e1493.
  30. Zar HJ, Brown G, Donson H, et al. Home-made spacers for bronchodilator therapy in children with acute asthma: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 354:979.
  31. Zar HJ, Weinberg EG, Binns HJ, et al. Lung deposition of aerosol--a comparison of different spacers. Arch Dis Child 2000; 82:495.
  32. Zar HJ, Liebenberg M, Weinberg EG, et al. The efficacy of alternative spacer devices for delivery of aerosol therapy to children with asthma. Ann Trop Paediatr 1998; 18:75.
  33. Teo J, Kwang LW, Yip WC. An inexpensive spacer for use with metered-dose bronchodilators in young asthmatic children. Pediatr Pulmonol 1988; 5:244.
  34. Wildhaber JH, Devadason SG, Eber E, et al. Effect of electrostatic charge, flow, delay and multiple actuations on the in vitro delivery of salbutamol from different small volume spacers for infants. Thorax 1996; 51:985.
  35. Anhøj J, Bisgaard H, Lipworth BJ. Effect of electrostatic charge in plastic spacers on the lung delivery of HFA-salbutamol in children. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 47:333.
  36. Wildhaber JH, Devadason SG, Hayden MJ, et al. Electrostatic charge on a plastic spacer device influences the delivery of salbutamol. Eur Respir J 1996; 9:1943.
  37. Barry PW, O'Callaghan C. The effect of delay, multiple actuations and spacer static charge on the in vitro delivery of budesonide from the Nebuhaler. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1995; 40:76.
  38. Bisgaard H. A metal aerosol holding chamber devised for young children with asthma. Eur Respir J 1995; 8:856.
  39. Bisgaard H, Anhøj J, Klug B, Berg E. A non-electrostatic spacer for aerosol delivery. Arch Dis Child 1995; 73:226.
  40. Piérart F, Wildhaber JH, Vrancken I, et al. Washing plastic spacers in household detergent reduces electrostatic charge and greatly improves delivery. Eur Respir J 1999; 13:673.
  41. Wildhaber JH, Janssens HM, Piérart F, et al. High-percentage lung delivery in children from detergent-treated spacers. Pediatr Pulmonol 2000; 29:389.
  42. Mitchell JP, Coppolo DP, Nagel MW. Electrostatics and inhaled medications: influence on delivery via pressurized metered-dose inhalers and add-on devices. Respir Care 2007; 52:283.
  43. Kenyon CJ, Thorsson L, Borgström L, Newman SP. The effects of static charge in spacer devices on glucocorticosteroid aerosol deposition in asthmatic patients. Eur Respir J 1998; 11:606.
  44. Rubin BK, Fink JB. Aerosol therapy for children. Respir Care Clin N Am 2001; 7:175.
  45. Amirav I, Newhouse MT. Aerosol therapy with valved holding chambers in young children: importance of the facemask seal. Pediatrics 2001; 108:389.
  46. Hayden JT, Smith N, Woolf DA, et al. A randomised crossover trial of facemask efficacy. Arch Dis Child 2004; 89:72.
  47. Shah SA, Berlinski AB, Rubin BK. Force-dependent static dead space of face masks used with holding chambers. Respir Care 2006; 51:140.
  48. Amirav I, Newhouse MT. Review of optimal characteristics of face-masks for valved-holding chambers (VHCs). Pediatr Pulmonol 2008; 43:268.
  49. Chavez A, McCracken A, Berlinski A. Effect of face mask dead volume, respiratory rate, and tidal volume on inhaled albuterol delivery. Pediatr Pulmonol 2010; 45:224.
  50. Fok TF, Lam K, Chan CK, et al. Aerosol delivery to non-ventilated infants by metered dose inhaler: should a valved spacer be used? Pediatr Pulmonol 1997; 24:204.
  51. Marguet C, Couderc L, Le Roux P, et al. Inhalation treatment: errors in application and difficulties in acceptance of the devices are frequent in wheezy infants and young children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2001; 12:224.
  52. Barry PW, Robertson CF, O'Callaghan C. Optimum use of a spacer device. Arch Dis Child 1993; 69:693.
  53. Lin YZ, Hsieh KH. Metered dose inhaler and nebuliser in acute asthma. Arch Dis Child 1995; 72:214.
  54. Rubilar L, Castro-Rodriguez JA, Girardi G. Randomized trial of salbutamol via metered-dose inhaler with spacer versus nebulizer for acute wheezing in children less than 2 years of age. Pediatr Pulmonol 2000; 29:264.
  55. Schuh S, Johnson DW, Stephens D, et al. Comparison of albuterol delivered by a metered dose inhaler with spacer versus a nebulizer in children with mild acute asthma. J Pediatr 1999; 135:22.
  56. Wildhaber JH, Devadason SG, Hayden MJ, et al. Aerosol delivery to wheezy infants: a comparison between a nebulizer and two small volume spacers. Pediatr Pulmonol 1997; 23:212.
  57. Closa RM, Ceballos JM, Gómez-Papí A, et al. Efficacy of bronchodilators administered by nebulizers versus spacer devices in infants with acute wheezing. Pediatr Pulmonol 1998; 26:344.
  58. Chou KJ, Cunningham SJ, Crain EF. Metered-dose inhalers with spacers vs nebulizers for pediatric asthma. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1995; 149:201.
  59. Castro-Rodriguez JA, Rodrigo GJ. beta-agonists through metered-dose inhaler with valved holding chamber versus nebulizer for acute exacerbation of wheezing or asthma in children under 5 years of age: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Pediatr 2004; 145:172.
  60. Cates CJ, Crilly JA, Rowe BH. Holding chambers (spacers) versus nebulisers for beta-agonist treatment of acute asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; :CD000052.
  61. Deerojanawong J, Manuyakorn W, Prapphal N, et al. Randomized controlled trial of salbutamol aerosol therapy via metered dose inhaler-spacer vs. jet nebulizer in young children with wheezing. Pediatr Pulmonol 2005; 39:466.
  62. Rodrigo C, Rodrigo G. Salbutamol treatment of acute severe asthma in the ED: MDI versus hand-held nebulizer. Am J Emerg Med 1998; 16:637.
  63. Benton G, Thomas RC, Nickerson BG, et al. Experience with a metered-dose inhaler with a spacer in the pediatric emergency department. Am J Dis Child 1989; 143:678.
  64. Hickey RW, Gochman RF, Chande V, Davis HW. Albuterol delivered via metered-dose inhaler with spacer for outpatient treatment of young children with wheezing. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1994; 148:189.
  65. Fok TF, Monkman S, Dolovich M, et al. Efficiency of aerosol medication delivery from a metered dose inhaler versus jet nebulizer in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatr Pulmonol 1996; 21:301.
  66. Leversha AM, Campanella SG, Aickin RP, Asher MI. Costs and effectiveness of spacer versus nebulizer in young children with moderate and severe acute asthma. J Pediatr 2000; 136:497.
  67. Mandelberg A, Tsehori S, Houri S, et al. Is nebulized aerosol treatment necessary in the pediatric emergency department? Chest 2000; 117:1309.
  68. Newhouse MT. Asthma therapy with aerosols: are nebulizers obsolete? A continuing controversy. J Pediatr 1999; 135:5.
  69. Kercsmar CM. Aerosol treatment of acute asthma: and the winner is... J Pediatr 2000; 136:428.
  70. Dhand R. Aerosol therapy for asthma. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2000; 6:59.
  71. Konstan MW, Flume PA, Kappler M, et al. Safety, efficacy and convenience of tobramycin inhalation powder in cystic fibrosis patients: The EAGER trial. J Cyst Fibros 2011; 10:54.
  72. Nana A, Youngchaiyud P, Maranetra N, et al. Beta 2-agonists administered by a dry powder inhaler can be used in acute asthma. Respir Med 1998; 92:167.
  73. Drblik S, Lapierre G, Thivierge R, et al. Comparative efficacy of terbutaline sulphate delivered by Turbuhaler dry powder inhaler or pressurised metered dose inhaler with Nebuhaler spacer in children during an acute asthmatic episode. Arch Dis Child 2003; 88:319.
  74. Agertoft L, Pedersen S. Importance of the inhalation device on the effect of budesonide. Arch Dis Child 1993; 69:130.
  75. Selroos O, Backman R, Forsén KO, et al. Local side-effects during 4-year treatment with inhaled corticosteroids--a comparison between pressurized metered-dose inhalers and Turbuhaler. Allergy 1994; 49:888.
  76. Amirav I, Newhouse MT, Mansour Y. Measurement of peak inspiratory flow with in-check dial device to simulate low-resistance (Diskus) and high-resistance (Turbohaler) dry powder inhalers in children with asthma. Pediatr Pulmonol 2005; 39:447.
  77. Amirav I, Newhouse MT. To inhale or not to inhale: is that the question? A simple method of DPI instruction. J Pediatr 2010; 156:339.
  78. Kamps AW, Brand PL, Roorda RJ. Variation of peak inspiratory flow through dry powder inhalers in children with stable and unstable asthma. Pediatr Pulmonol 2004; 37:65.
  79. Nielsen KG, Auk IL, Bojsen K, et al. Clinical effect of Diskus dry-powder inhaler at low and high inspiratory flow-rates in asthmatic children. Eur Respir J 1998; 11:350.
  80. Burnell PK, Small T, Doig S, et al. Ex-vivo product performance of Diskus and Turbuhaler inhalers using inhalation profiles from patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med 2001; 95:324.
  81. Svartengren K, Lindestad P, Svartengren M, et al. Added external resistance reduces oropharyngeal deposition and increases lung deposition of aerosol particles in asthmatics. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 152:32.