UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2016 UpToDate®

The mental status examination in adults

Author
Po-Haong Lu, PsyD
Section Editor
Mario F Mendez, MD, PhD
Deputy Editor
Janet L Wilterdink, MD

INTRODUCTION

Despite the technological advances in neuroimaging, there is still no way of directly observing cognitive function. Neuroscientists and clinicians continue to rely on the mental status or neuropsychological examination for much of their knowledge of the state and functioning of the brain. The study of the behavioral expression of brain dysfunction is the essence of mental status examination and neuropsychological assessment, which is critical to diagnostic accuracy, patient care and treatment planning, rehabilitation and treatment evaluation, and research.

Methods of examining cognition include:

Bedside or clinic mental status testing. This is generally the initial assessment of cognition and mental status and can be brief or more extensive depending on the setting and level of concern.

Mental status scales. These are usually used as a screening tool but also as a baseline measure to follow patients over time.

Neuropsychological testing for extensive evaluation.

              

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Nov 2016. | This topic last updated: Wed Jul 23 00:00:00 GMT 2014.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2016 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Strub RL, Black FW. The Mental Status Examination in Neurology, 2nd ed, FA Davis, Philadelphia 1989.
  2. Mendez MF, Cummings JL. Mental status assessment. In: Dementia: A Clinical Approach, Butterworth Heinemann, Philadelphia 2003.
  3. Reitan RM, Wolfson D. he Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and Clinical Interpretation, Neuropsychology Press, Tucson, AZ 1989.
  4. Lezak MD. Neuropsychological Assessment, 4th ed, Oxford University Press, New York 2004.
  5. Corrigan JD, Hinkeldey NS. Relationships between parts A and B of the Trail Making Test. J Clin Psychol 1987; 43:402.
  6. Gaudino EA, Geisler MW, Squires NK. Construct validity in the Trail Making Test: what makes Part B harder? J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1995; 17:529.
  7. O'Donnell WE, Reynolds DM, De Soto CB. Neuropsychological impairment scale (NIS): initial validation study using trailmaking test (A & B) and WAIS digit symbol (scaled score) in a mixed grouping of psychiatric, neurological, and normal patients. J Clin Psychol 1983; 39:746.
  8. Wechlser, D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 3rd edition: Administration and Scoring Manual, Psychological Corporation, San Antonio 1997.
  9. Meyers J, Meyers K. Rey Complex Figure and Recognition Trial: Professional Manual, Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, Fl 1995.
  10. Uttl B, Pilkenton-Taylor C. Letter cancellation performance across the adult life span. Clin Neuropsychol 2001; 15:521.
  11. Weintraub S. Neuropsychological assessment of mental state. In: Principles of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology, Mesulam MM (Ed), Oxford University Press, New York 2000.
  12. Weintraub S, Peavy GM, O'Connor M, et al. Three words three shapes: A clinical test of memory. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2000; 22:267.
  13. Turcotte J, Gagnon S, Poirier M. The effect of old age on the learning of supraspan sequences. Psychol Aging 2005; 20:251.
  14. Cerhan JH, Ivnik RJ, Smith GE, et al. Diagnostic utility of letter fluency, category fluency, and fluency difference scores in Alzheimer's disease. Clin Neuropsychol 2002; 16:35.
  15. Berthier ML. Poststroke aphasia : epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment. Drugs Aging 2005; 22:163.
  16. Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. Boston Naming Test, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia 1983.
  17. Benton AL, Hamsher KdeS. Multilingual Aphasia Examination. AJA Associates, Iowa City 1989.
  18. Gross RG, Grossman M. Update on apraxia. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2008; 8:490.
  19. Wheaton LA, Hallett M. Ideomotor apraxia: a review. J Neurol Sci 2007; 260:1.
  20. Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B. The FAB: a Frontal Assessment Battery at bedside. Neurology 2000; 55:1621.
  21. Heaton RK, Chelune GJ, Talley JL, et al. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual: Revised and Expanded, Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL 1993.
  22. COMALLI PE Jr, WAPNER S, WERNER H. Interference effects of Stroop color-word test in childhood, adulthood, and aging. J Genet Psychol 1962; 100:47.