Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point-of-care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors and editors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

Choose from the list below to learn more about subscriptions for a:


Subscribers log in here


Related Searches

The decision to intubate

INTRODUCTION

The first step in any resuscitation is the verification or establishment of a patent and protected airway. Emergent defibrillation is the sole, occasional exception to this principle. Without adequate oxygenation and ventilation, all other potentially life-saving maneuvers will fail. Most often, clinicians secure the airway of an unstable patient through placement of a cuffed endotracheal tube.

The emergency clinician should be able to determine the need for a definitive airway quickly and confidently. Nevertheless, the standard resuscitation guides provide little more than brief, generalized statements about when to intubate [1-3].

This topic review discusses how to determine the need for intubation and provides a simple decision tool that is applicable to virtually all emergency patients regardless of age and presenting condition. Discussions of other aspects of airway management are found elsewhere. (See "Rapid sequence intubation in adults" and "Emergent endotracheal intubation in children" and "The failed airway in adults" and "The difficult airway in adults".)

DECIDING TO INTUBATE: FOUR QUESTION ASSESSMENT

Emergency clinicians must often perform tracheal intubation under stressful conditions. Skillful execution of tracheal intubation requires a good understanding of several methods of intubation, how to identify the potentially difficult intubation, the drugs best suited for airway management in different clinical scenarios, and management of the difficult or failed airway. Deficiency in any of these areas reduces the likelihood of a good patient outcome. (See "Rapid sequence intubation in adults" and "Emergent endotracheal intubation in children" and "The failed airway in adults" and "The difficult airway in adults".)

Even knowledgeable emergency clinicians, however, can contribute to patient morbidity and mortality by waiting too long to intubate. Inappropriate delays in airway management can convert a relatively controlled opportunity to secure the airway into a "crash" airway scenario, eliminating the opportunity for a well-planned, methodical approach. As examples, clinicians should not postpone intubation until the patient with anaphylaxis develops stridor or wait for worsening of hoarseness in the patient with smoke inhalation.

      

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Mar 2014. | This topic last updated: Jul 2, 2013.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Advanced Trauma Life Support for Doctors, 7th, American College of Surgeons, 2004. p.41.
  2. ECC Committee, Subcommittees and Task Forces of the American Heart Association. 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2005; 112:IV1.
  3. Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122:S876.
  4. Walls RM. The decision to intubate. In: Manual of Emergency Airway Management, Walls RM, Murphy MF, Luten RC, Schneider RE. (Eds), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2004.
  5. Christ A, Arranto CA, Schindler C, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of aspiration pneumonitis in ICU overdose patients. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32:1423.
  6. Miller CD, Rebuck JA, Ahern JW, Rogers FB. Daily evaluation of macroaspiration in the critically ill post-trauma patient. Curr Surg 2005; 62:504.
  7. Bleach NR. The gag reflex and aspiration: a retrospective analysis of 120 patients assessed by videofluoroscopy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1993; 18:303.
  8. Moulton C, Pennycook A, Makower R. Relation between Glasgow coma scale and the gag reflex. BMJ 1991; 303:1240.
  9. Davies AE, Kidd D, Stone SP, MacMahon J. Pharyngeal sensation and gag reflex in healthy subjects. Lancet 1995; 345:487.
  10. Chan B, Gaudry P, Grattan-Smith TM, McNeil R. The use of Glasgow Coma Scale in poisoning. J Emerg Med 1993; 11:579.
  11. Hummler HD, Engelmann A, Pohlandt F, et al. Decreased accuracy of pulse oximetry measurements during low perfusion caused by sepsis: Is the perfusion index of any value? Intensive Care Med 2006; 32:1428.
  12. Talke P, Stapelfeldt C. Effect of peripheral vasoconstriction on pulse oximetry. J Clin Monit Comput 2006; 20:305.
  13. Bardi G, Pierotello R, Desideri M, et al. Nasal ventilation in COPD exacerbations: early and late results of a prospective, controlled study. Eur Respir J 2000; 15:98.
  14. Bott J, Carroll MP, Conway JH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of nasal ventilation in acute ventilatory failure due to chronic obstructive airways disease. Lancet 1993; 341:1555.
  15. Keenan SP, Kernerman PD, Cook DJ, et al. Effect of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation on mortality in patients admitted with acute respiratory failure: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 1997; 25:1685.
  16. Confalonieri M, Aiolfi S, Gandola L, et al. Severe exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated with BiPAP by nasal mask. Respiration 1994; 61:310.
  17. Kramer N, Meyer TJ, Meharg J, et al. Randomized, prospective trial of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 151:1799.
  18. Putinati S, Ballerin L, Piattella M, et al. Is it possible to predict the success of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure due to COPD? Respir Med 2000; 94:997.