UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2016 UpToDate®

The approach to ovarian cancer in older women

Authors
William P Tew, MD
Kathleen M Moore, MD
Section Editors
Barbara Goff, MD
Don S Dizon, MD, FACP
Deputy Editor
Sadhna R Vora, MD

INTRODUCTION

Cancer is recognized as a disease of older adults, with over 50 percent of new cases being diagnosed after age 65, and over 70 percent of deaths from cancer occurring in this same age group [1,2]. Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common cancer in women worldwide and accounts for nearly 4 percent of all new cases of cancer in women [3]. It is also the eighth most common cause of cancer death in the world. The risk of ovarian cancer increased with age with only 10 to 15 percent of cases diagnosed before menopause [3]. With increasing age, there is an increased prevalence of comorbid conditions, polypharmacy, functional dependence, cognitive impairment, depression, frailty, poor nutrition, and limited social support [4]. Given these many potential limitations, it is not surprising that many older adult patients who present with advanced ovarian cancer receive less aggressive therapies than their younger counterparts and have poorer disease-specific outcomes. Because there are limited data on the approach to older women with gynecologic cancer in general, this topic will specifically discuss the care of the older woman with ovarian cancer.

Other topics related to the cancer care of this population are discussed separately. (See "Comprehensive geriatric assessment for patients with cancer" and "Treatment of metastatic breast cancer in older women" and "Drug prescribing for older adults" and "Hospital management of older adults" and "Systemic chemotherapy for cancer in elderly persons" and "Adjuvant therapy for resected colon cancer in elderly patients" and "Therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients and those with a poor performance status" and "Palliative care: Issues specific to geriatric patients".)

OVERVIEW OF THE APPROACH

Older patients should undergo a geriatric assessment (GA) at their initial presentation to determine whether or not they are appropriate candidates for cytoreductive surgery (CRS). (See 'Geriatric assessment' below.)

The results of the assessment can be used to determine the most appropriate treatment strategy:

Patients who are candidates for CRS should proceed with primary surgical therapy. (See 'Approach to surgery' below.)

                               

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Nov 2016. | This topic last updated: Wed Jan 27 00:00:00 GMT 2016.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2016 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Yancik R, Ries LA. Cancer in older persons: an international issue in an aging world. Semin Oncol 2004; 31:128.
  2. Yancik R. Population aging and cancer: a cross-national concern. Cancer J 2005; 11:437.
  3. World Cancer Research Fund / American Institute for Cancer Research. Continuous Update Project Report. Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Ovarian Cancer 2014. http://www.dietandcancerreport.org/cup/cup_resources.php (Accessed on October 07, 2014).
  4. Chow WB, Rosenthal RA, Merkow RP, et al. Optimal preoperative assessment of the geriatric surgical patient: a best practices guideline from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg 2012; 215:453.
  5. Hurria A, Togawa K, Mohile SG, et al. Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:3457.
  6. Kanesvaran R, Li H, Koo KN, Poon D. Analysis of prognostic factors of comprehensive geriatric assessment and development of a clinical scoring system in elderly Asian patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:3620.
  7. Satariano WA, Ragland DR. The effect of comorbidity on 3-year survival of women with primary breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120:104.
  8. PACE participants, Audisio RA, Pope D, et al. Shall we operate? Preoperative assessment in elderly cancer patients (PACE) can help. A SIOG surgical task force prospective study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2008; 65:156.
  9. Pope D, Ramesh H, Gennari R, et al. Pre-operative assessment of cancer in the elderly (PACE): a comprehensive assessment of underlying characteristics of elderly cancer patients prior to elective surgery. Surg Oncol 2006; 15:189.
  10. Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ, et al. Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210:901.
  11. Robinson TN, Eiseman B, Wallace JI, et al. Redefining geriatric preoperative assessment using frailty, disability and co-morbidity. Ann Surg 2009; 250:449.
  12. Bandeen-Roche K, Xue QL, Ferrucci L, et al. Phenotype of frailty: characterization in the women's health and aging studies. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2006; 61:262.
  13. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001; 56:M146.
  14. Robinson TN, Wallace JI, Wu DS, et al. Accumulated frailty characteristics predict postoperative discharge institutionalization in the geriatric patient. J Am Coll Surg 2011; 213:37.
  15. Saliba D, Elliott M, Rubenstein LZ, et al. The Vulnerable Elders Survey: a tool for identifying vulnerable older people in the community. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49:1691.
  16. Falandry C, Weber B, Savoye AM, et al. Development of a geriatric vulnerability score in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with first-line carboplatin: a GINECO prospective trial. Ann Oncol 2013; 24:2808.
  17. Korc-Grodzicki B, Downey RJ, Shahrokni A, et al. Surgical considerations in older adults with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:2647.
  18. Kristjansson SR, Nesbakken A, Jordhøy MS, et al. Comprehensive geriatric assessment can predict complications in elderly patients after elective surgery for colorectal cancer: a prospective observational cohort study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2010; 76:208.
  19. Thrall MM, Goff BA, Symons RG, et al. Thirty-day mortality after primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer in the elderly. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118:537.
  20. Khuri SF, Henderson WG, DePalma RG, et al. Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications. Ann Surg 2005; 242:326.
  21. Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Neugut AI, et al. Effect of radical cytoreductive surgery on omission and delay of chemotherapy for advanced-stage ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120:871.
  22. Wright JD, Lewin SN, Deutsch I, et al. Defining the limits of radical cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 123:467.
  23. Aletti GD, Dowdy SC, Podratz KC, Cliby WA. Relationship among surgical complexity, short-term morbidity, and overall survival in primary surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197:676.e1.
  24. Hershman D, Jacobson JS, McBride R, et al. Effectiveness of platinum-based chemotherapy among elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 94:540.
  25. Lin JJ, Egorova N, Franco R, et al. Ovarian Cancer Treatment and Survival Trends Among Women Older Than 65 Years of Age in the United States, 1995-2008. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127:81.
  26. Maas HA, Kruitwagen RF, Lemmens VE, et al. The influence of age and co-morbidity on treatment and prognosis of ovarian cancer: a population-based study. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 97:104.
  27. Freyer G, Geay JF, Touzet S, et al. Comprehensive geriatric assessment predicts tolerance to chemotherapy and survival in elderly patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: a GINECO study. Ann Oncol 2005; 16:1795.
  28. Trédan O, Geay JF, Touzet S, et al. Carboplatin/cyclophosphamide or carboplatin/paclitaxel in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer? Analysis of two consecutive trials from the Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens. Ann Oncol 2007; 18:256.
  29. Pignata S, Breda E, Scambia G, et al. A phase II study of weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line treatment of elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer. A Multicentre Italian Trial in Ovarian cancer (MITO-5) study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2008; 66:229.
  30. Pignata S, Scambia G, Katsaros D, et al. Carboplatin plus paclitaxel once a week versus every 3 weeks in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (MITO-7): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15:396.
  31. Fader AN, von Gruenigen V, Gibbons H, et al. Improved tolerance of primary chemotherapy with reduced-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel in elderly ovarian cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 109:33.
  32. Tew WP, Java J, Chi D, et al. Treatment outcomes for older women with advanced ovarian cancer: Results from a phase III clinical trial (GOG182). J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:15s, (suppl; abstr 5030).
  33. Pignata S, Monfardini S. Single agents should be administered in preference to combination chemotherapy for the treatment of patients over 70 years of age with advanced ovarian carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36:817.
  34. International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm Group. Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus standard chemotherapy with either single-agent carboplatin or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in women with ovarian cancer: the ICON3 randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 360:505.
  35. Tewari KS, Java JJ, Gatcliffe TA, et al. Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia as a biomarker of survival in advanced ovarian carcinoma: an exploratory study of the gynecologic oncology group. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 133:439.
  36. Armstrong DK, Bundy B, Wenzel L, et al. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:34.
  37. Lichtman SM, Hollis D, Miller AA, et al. Prospective evaluation of the relationship of patient age and paclitaxel clinical pharmacology: Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 9762). J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:1846.
  38. Wright JD, Ananth CV, Tsui J, et al. Comparative effectiveness of upfront treatment strategies in elderly women with ovarian cancer. Cancer 2014; 120:1246.
  39. Aletti GD, Dowdy SC, Podratz KC, Cliby WA. Analysis of factors impacting operability in stage IV ovarian cancer: rationale use of a triage system. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 105:84.
  40. Gridelli C, Langer C, Maione P, et al. Lung cancer in the elderly. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:1898.
  41. Wildiers H, Kunkler I, Biganzoli L, et al. Management of breast cancer in elderly individuals: recommendations of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology. Lancet Oncol 2007; 8:1101.
  42. Gordon AN, Tonda M, Sun S, et al. Long-term survival advantage for women treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin compared with topotecan in a phase 3 randomized study of recurrent and refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 95:1.
  43. Morris RT. Weekly topotecan in the management of ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 90:S34.