Systemic treatment for metastatic breast cancer: Combination chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Although metastatic breast cancer is unlikely to be cured, meaningful improvements in survival have been seen, coincident with the introduction of newer systemic therapies [1-3]. Median overall survival approaches two years, with a range from a few months to many years [4].

The selection of a therapeutic strategy depends upon both tumor biology and clinical factors, with the goal being a tailored approach. Although a subset of patients with oligometastatic disease may benefit from an intensified locoregional approach, most patients with metastatic breast cancer receive systemic medical therapy, consisting of chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and/or biologic therapies, and supportive care measures [5,6].

The efficacy and dosing of combination chemotherapy regimens are presented here. General principles of management of metastatic breast cancer, selection of chemotherapy regimen, and use of single agent chemotherapy, biologic therapies, endocrine therapy, surgical options, and supportive care are discussed separately.

INDICATIONS

Treatment principles for the use of chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer are outlined here.  

            

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article you must have access through your hospital or your group practice, log in to your personal subscription, or purchase a personal subscription. For more information, click below.
Literature review current through: Apr 2013. | This topic last updated: May 30, 2012.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2013 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Chia SK, Speers CH, D'yachkova Y, et al. The impact of new chemotherapeutic and hormone agents on survival in a population-based cohort of women with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer 2007; 110:973.
  2. Gennari A, Conte P, Rosso R, et al. Survival of metastatic breast carcinoma patients over a 20-year period: a retrospective analysis based on individual patient data from six consecutive studies. Cancer 2005; 104:1742.
  3. Dafni U, Grimani I, Xyrafas A, et al. Fifteen-year trends in metastatic breast cancer survival in Greece. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 119:621.
  4. Greenberg PA, Hortobagyi GN, Smith TL, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with complete remission following combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14:2197.
  5. Pagani O, Senkus E, Wood W, et al. International guidelines for management of metastatic breast cancer: can metastatic breast cancer be cured? J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102:456.
  6. Beslija S, Bonneterre J, Burstein HJ, et al. Third consensus on medical treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2009; 20:1771.
  7. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology are available online at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp (Accessed on July 28, 2010).
  8. Hortobagyi GN, Bodey GP, Buzdar AU, et al. Evaluation of high-dose versus standard FAC chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer in protected environment units: a prospective randomized study. J Clin Oncol 1987; 5:354.
  9. Falkson G, Tormey DC, Carey P, et al. Long-term survival of patients treated with combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 1991; 27:973.
  10. Coombes RC, Bliss JM, Wils J, et al. Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in premenopausal women with axillary node-positive operable breast cancer: results of a randomized trial. The International Collaborative Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14:35.
  11. Blomqvist C, Elomaa I, Rissanen P, et al. Influence of treatment schedule on toxicity and efficacy of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil in metastatic breast cancer: a randomized trial comparing weekly and every-4-week administration. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11:467.
  12. Joensuu H, Holli K, Heikkinen M, et al. Combination chemotherapy versus single-agent therapy as first- and second-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer: a prospective randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16:3720.
  13. A prospective randomized trial comparing epirubicin monochemotherapy to two fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, and epirubicin regimens differing in epirubicin dose in advanced breast cancer patients. The French Epirubicin Study Group. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9:305.
  14. Livi L, Meattini I, Cardillo Cde L, et al. Non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide or docetaxel as first-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective analysis. Tumori 2009; 95:422.
  15. Trudeau ME, Clemons MJ, Provencher L, et al. Phase II multicenter trial of anthracycline rechallenge with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for first-line therapy of metastatic breast cancer previously treated with adjuvant anthracyclines. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:5906.
  16. Biganzoli L, Cufer T, Bruning P, et al. Doxorubicin and paclitaxel versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10961 Multicenter Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20:3114.
  17. Langley RE, Carmichael J, Jones AL, et al. Phase III trial of epirubicin plus paclitaxel compared with epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute trial AB01. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:8322.
  18. Jassem J, Pieńkowski T, Płuzańska A, et al. Doxorubicin and paclitaxel versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as first-line therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer: final results of a randomized phase III multicenter trial. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19:1707.
  19. Nabholtz JM, Falkson C, Campos D, et al. Docetaxel and doxorubicin compared with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: results of a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21:968.
  20. Bontenbal M, Creemers GJ, Braun HJ, et al. Phase II to III study comparing doxorubicin and docetaxel with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: results of a Dutch Community Setting Trial for the Clinical Trial Group of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:7081.
  21. Bria E, Giannarelli D, Felici A, et al. Taxanes with anthracyclines as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast carcinoma. Cancer 2005; 103:672.
  22. Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Burzykowski T, Buyse M, et al. Taxanes alone or in combination with anthracyclines as first-line therapy of patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:1980.
  23. Gianni L, Munzone E, Capri G, et al. Paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion in combination with bolus doxorubicin in women with untreated metastatic breast cancer: high antitumor efficacy and cardiac effects in a dose-finding and sequence-finding study. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13:2688.
  24. Giordano SH, Booser DJ, Murray JL, et al. A detailed evaluation of cardiac toxicity: a phase II study of doxorubicin and one- or three-hour-infusion paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2002; 8:3360.
  25. Valero V, Hortobagyi GN. Are anthracycline-taxane regimens the new standard of care in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer? J Clin Oncol 2003; 21:959.
  26. Gamucci T, D'Ottavio AM, Magnolfi E, et al. Weekly epirubicin plus docetaxel as first-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2007; 97:1040.
  27. Aihara T, Takatsuka Y, Itoh K, et al. Phase II study of concurrent administration of doxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Oncology 2003; 64:124.
  28. Sledge GW, Neuberg D, Bernardo P, et al. Phase III trial of doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and the combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel as front-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: an intergroup trial (E1193). J Clin Oncol 2003; 21:588.
  29. Alba E, Martín M, Ramos M, et al. Multicenter randomized trial comparing sequential with concomitant administration of doxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM-9903) phase III study. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:2587.
  30. O'Shaughnessy J, Miles D, Vukelja S, et al. Superior survival with capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: phase III trial results. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20:2812.
  31. Albain KS, Nag SM, Calderillo-Ruiz G, et al. Gemcitabine plus Paclitaxel versus Paclitaxel monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer and prior anthracycline treatment. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:3950.
  32. Chan S, Romieu G, Huober J, et al. Phase III study of gemcitabine plus docetaxel compared with capecitabine plus docetaxel for anthracycline-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:1753.
  33. Fountzilas G, Dafni U, Dimopoulos MA, et al. A randomized phase III study comparing three anthracycline-free taxane-based regimens, as first line chemotherapy, in metastatic breast cancer: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009; 115:87.
  34. Gradishar WJ, Meza LA, Amin B, et al. Capecitabine plus paclitaxel as front-line combination therapy for metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter phase II study. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:2321.
  35. Lueck H, Minckwitz GV, Du Bois A, et al. Epirubicin/paclitaxel (EP) vs. capecitabine/paclitaxel (XP) in first-line metastatic breast cancer: a prospective, randomized multicentre phase III study of the AGO breast cancer study group (abstract #517). J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:7s.
  36. Soto C, Torrecillas L, Reyes S, et al. Capecitabine (X) and taxanes in patients with anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: sequential vs. combined therapy results from a MOSG randomized phase III trial (abstract). J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:20s.
  37. Blum JL, Dees EC, Chacko A, et al. Phase II trial of capecitabine and weekly paclitaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:4384.
  38. Blum JL, Dees EC, Vukelja SJ, et al. Phase II trial of capecitabine and weekly paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with every-3-week taxane therapy. Clin Breast Cancer 2007; 7:465.
  39. Bernhard J, Zahrieh D, Castiglione-Gertsch M, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy followed by goserelin compared with either modality alone: the impact on amenorrhea, hot flashes, and quality of life in premenopausal patients--the International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VIII. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:263.
  40. O'Shaughnessy J, Nag et al. Gemcitabine plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel as first-line treatment for anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: interim results of a global phase III study (abstract). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003; 22:7a.
  41. Tomova A, Brodowicz V, Tzekova V, et al. Concomitant docetaxel plus gemcitabine versus sequential docetaxel followed by gemcitabine. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:15S (abstr #1106).
  42. Vahdat LT. Clinical studies with epothilones for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Semin Oncol 2008; 35:S22.
  43. Thomas ES, Gomez HL, Li RK, et al. Ixabepilone plus capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer progressing after anthracycline and taxane treatment. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:5210.
  44. European Medicines Agency (EMEA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommendation for refusal of marketing authorization for ixabepilone, available online at http://www.esmo.org/no_cache/view-news.html?tx_ttnews[tt_news]=480&tx_ttnews[backPid]=585&cHash=9385b0342b .
  45. Perez EA, Patel T, Moreno-Aspitia A. Efficacy of ixabepilone in ER/PR/HER2-negative (triple-negative) breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 121:261.
  46. Hainsworth JD. Mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin (NFL) in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: randomized comparison to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) and attempts to improve efficacy by adding paclitaxel. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 1997; 6:4.
  47. Ackland SP, Anton A, Breitbach GP, et al. Dose-intensive epirubicin-based chemotherapy is superior to an intensive intravenous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil regimen in metastatic breast cancer: a randomized multinational study. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19:943.
  48. Nagourney RA, Link JS, Blitzer JB, et al. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin repeating doublet therapy in previously treated, relapsed breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18:2245.
  49. Seo JH, Oh SC, Choi CW, et al. Phase II study of a gemcitabine and cisplatin combination regimen in taxane resistant metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2007; 59:269.
  50. Burch PA, Mailliard JA, Hillman DW, et al. Phase II study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group Trial. Am J Clin Oncol 2005; 28:195.
  51. Martín M, Ruiz A, Muñoz M, et al. Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine versus vinorelbine monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes: final results of the phase III Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM) trial. Lancet Oncol 2007; 8:219.
  52. Pallis AG, Boukovinas I, Ardavanis A, et al. A multicenter randomized phase III trial of vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet versus capecitabine monotherapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated women with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2012; 23:1164.
  53. Zielinski C, Beslija S, Mrsic-Krmpotic Z, et al. Gemcitabine, epirubicin, and paclitaxel versus fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: a Central European Cooperative Oncology Group International, multicenter, prospective, randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:1401.
  54. Spielmann M, Llombart A, Zelek L, et al. Docetaxel-cisplatin combination (DC) chemotherapy in patients with anthracycline-resistant advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol 1999; 10:1457.
  55. Fountzilas G, Kalofonos HP, Dafni U, et al. Paclitaxel and epirubicin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer: a phase III study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. Ann Oncol 2004; 15:1517.
  56. Donadio M, Ardine M, Berruti A, et al. Weekly cisplatin plus capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer patients heavily pretreated with both anthracycline and taxanes. Oncology 2005; 69:408.
  57. Icli F, Akbulut H, Uner A, et al. Cisplatin plus oral etoposide (EoP) combination is more effective than paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines: a randomised phase III trial of Turkish Oncology Group. Br J Cancer 2005; 92:639.
  58. Vassilomanolakis M, Koumakis G, Demiri M, et al. Vinorelbine and cisplatin for metastatic breast cancer: a salvage regimen in patients progressing after docetaxel and anthracycline treatment. Cancer Invest 2003; 21:497.
  59. Norris B, Pritchard KI, James K, et al. Phase III comparative study of vinorelbine combined with doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone in disseminated metastatic/recurrent breast cancer: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study MA8. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18:2385.
  60. Ejlertsen B, Mouridsen HT, Langkjer ST, et al. Phase III study of intravenous vinorelbine in combination with epirubicin versus epirubicin alone in patients with advanced breast cancer: a Scandinavian Breast Group Trial (SBG9403). J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:2313.
  61. Carrick S, Ghersi D, Wilcken N, Simes J. Platinum containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; :CD003374.
  62. Isakoff SJ. Triple-negative breast cancer: role of specific chemotherapy agents. Cancer J 2010; 16:53.
  63. Staudacher L, Cottu PH, Diéras V, et al. Platinum-based chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: the Institut Curie experience. Ann Oncol 2011; 22:848.
  64. Koshy N, Quispe D, Shi R, et al. Cisplatin-gemcitabine therapy in metastatic breast cancer: Improved outcome in triple negative breast cancer patients compared to non-triple negative patients. Breast 2010; 19:246.
  65. Rhiem K, Wappenschmidt B, Bosse K, et al. Platinum sensitivity in a BRCA1 mutation carrier with advanced breast cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2009; 21:448.
  66. Berry DA, Ueno NT, Johnson MM, et al. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in metastatic breast cancer: overview of six randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:3224.