Smarter Decisions,
Better Care
UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point of care decisions.
For more information, click below.
Subscribers log in here
Related articles
Related Searches
| AuthorsThomas G Stovall, MDWilliam J Mann, Jr, MD | Section EditorsTommaso Falcone, MD, FRCSC, FACOGMimi Zieman, MD | Deputy EditorSandy J Falk, MD |
Topic Outline
INTRODUCTION
Surgical sterilization is a safe, highly effective, permanent, and convenient form of contraception. Numerous methods for achieving permanent sterilization have been described, and subsequently modified to improve success rates, simplify surgical technique and reduce postoperative pain and length of hospital stay. Laparoscopic techniques are preferred for most patients, as they are effective, and are usually performed on an outpatient basis, and result in rapid patient recovery. In 1995, almost 30 percent of contraceptive users in the United States used tubal sterilization [1].
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
Tubal sterilization is an elective and essentially permanent procedure. There are virtually no absolute contraindications, although a patient's gynecologic disease may require sterilization by hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy.
Informed consent — A woman's decision to undergo sterilization must be voluntary and not coerced by her family, partner, or health care providers. Complete, nonbiased information about the procedure and alternatives to surgery helps to reduce post-sterilization regret. Failure of one method of contraception is not an indication for permanent sterilization. The woman's husband is not required to give consent before performing the procedure (in the United States); however, ideally both partners should have an understanding of the procedure as well as the benefits, alternatives, and potential risks. This discussion includes [2]:
Subscribers log in here