Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2016 UpToDate®

Surgical management of stress urinary incontinence in women: Bladder neck fascial sling procedures

Kimberly Kenton, MD, MS, FACOG, FACS
Section Editor
Linda Brubaker, MD, FACS, FACOG
Deputy Editor
Kristen Eckler, MD, FACOG


Surgical therapy for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) includes bladder neck slings, midurethral slings, and Burch urethropexy (table 1).

Although the midurethral sling is the most common procedure for treatment of SUI and the standard of care for most patients, rare patients may not be candidates or may request surgical techniques that do not use synthetic mesh [1,2]. This topic reviews bladder neck (also known as suburethral or pubovaginal) fascial sling procedures. In women undergoing surgical treatment, midurethral synthetic slings are generally preferred to bladder neck fascial slings or Burch urethropexy [3]. However, in women who decline or are not candidates for midurethral slings, bladder neck autologous fascial slings remain an effective treatment for SUI.

The evaluation, treatment and other surgical options for women with SUI are discussed elsewhere. (See "Treatment of urinary incontinence in women" and "Surgical management of stress urinary incontinence in women: Choosing a primary surgical procedure".).


Bladder neck slings are placed at the level of the proximal urethra or bladder neck. The anterior rectus fascia (ie, pubovaginal sling) and pubic bone are the most common superior attachments for bladder neck slings; however, the superior rectus fascia is preferred as most high-quality outcome data use the rectus fascia. In addition, bone anchors, used to attach the sling to the pubic bone, are associated with osteitis pubis and osteomyelitis [4] and offer no improvement in outcomes.

Sling materials include autografts (rectus fascia or fascia lata), allografts (fascia lata), xenografts (porcine dermis), and synthetic meshes (mersilene or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene). We use rectus fascia harvested from the patient (autologous) at the time of the sling surgery.


Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Sep 2016. | This topic last updated: Feb 17, 2015.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2016 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Oliphant SS, Wang L, Bunker CH, Lowder JL. Trends in stress urinary incontinence inpatient procedures in the United States, 1979-2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200:521.e1.
  2. Wu JM, Gandhi MP, Shah AD, et al. Trends in inpatient urinary incontinence surgery in the USA, 1998-2007. Int Urogynecol J 2011; 22:1437.
  3. Schimpf MO, Rahn DD, Wheeler TL, et al. Sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211:71.e1.
  4. FitzGerald MP, Gitelis S, Brubaker L. Pubic osteomyelitis and granuloma after bone anchor placement. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 1999; 10:346.
  5. DeLancey JO. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170:1713.
  6. AUGS and SUFU Position Statement on Mesh Midurethral Slings for SUI www.augs.org/p/cm/ld/fid=599.
  7. Nager CW, Brubaker L, Litman HJ, et al. A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery. N Engl J Med 2012; 366:1987.
  8. American Urogynecologic Society and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee opinion: evaluation of uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence in women before surgical treatment. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2014; 20:248.
  9. Committee on Practice Bulletins--Gynecology, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 84: Prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110:429.
  10. Solomon ER, Frick AC, Paraiso MF, Barber MD. Risk of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in urogynecologic surgical patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203:510.e1.
  11. Handa VL, Stone A. Erosion of a fascial sling into the urethra. Urology 1999; 54:923.
  12. Rehman H, Bezerra CC, Bruschini H, Cody JD. Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; :CD001754.
  13. Albo ME, Richter HE, Brubaker L, et al. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:2143.
  14. McGuire EJ, Lytton B. Pubovaginal sling procedure for stress incontinence. 1978. J Urol 2002; 167:1120.
  15. Webster TM, Gerridzen RG. Urethral erosion following autologous rectus fascial pubovaginal sling. Can J Urol 2003; 10:2068.
  16. Broussard AP, Reddy TG, Frilot CF 2nd, et al. Long-term follow-up of porcine dermis pubovaginal slings. Int Urogynecol J 2013; 24:583.
  17. Guerrero KL, Emery SJ, Wareham K, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing TVT, Pelvicol and autologous fascial slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. BJOG 2010; 117:1493.
  18. Wohlrab KJ, Erekson EA, Myers DL. Postoperative erosions of the Mersilene suburethral sling mesh for antiincontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009; 20:417.
  19. Barbalias G, Liatsikos E, Barbalias D. Use of slings made of indigenous and allogenic material (Goretex) in type III urinary incontinence and comparison between them. Eur Urol 1997; 31:394.
  20. Athanasopoulos A, Gyftopoulos K, McGuire EJ. Efficacy and preoperative prognostic factors of autologous fascia rectus sling for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Urology 2011; 78:1034.
  21. Kenton K, Richter H, Litman H, et al. Risk factors associated with urge incontinence after continence surgery. J Urol 2009; 182:2805.
  22. Richter HE, Burgio KL, Brubaker L, et al. Continence pessary compared with behavioral therapy or combined therapy for stress incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115:609.
  23. Norton PA, Nager CW, Chai TC, et al. Risk factors for incomplete bladder emptying after midurethral sling. Urology 2013; 82:1038.
  24. McAchran SE, Goldman HB. Contemporary length of stay and resource utilization when using a fast-track regimen for mid-urethral sling surgery. Urology 2009; 74:531.