Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point-of-care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors and editors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

Choose from the list below to learn more about subscriptions for a:


Subscribers log in here


Surgical instruments for gynecologic surgery

INTRODUCTION

It has been said that "a good carpenter knows his tools." Similarly, skilled surgeons must know the applications and limitations of the instruments they regularly use. Novice surgeons usually select instruments according to the advice and habits of their surgical mentors. Personal experience modifies, and often limits, the selection of instruments eventually used by the advanced surgeon. The economic forces at work to standardize operative costs may further limit the choice of instrumentation.

Surgical instruments are, in many ways, simply extensions of the human hand. There is inevitably a "feel" for different instruments designed to accomplish the same purpose. This topic review is an effort to familiarize the reader with basic instrumentation for gynecologic surgery and advantages of individual instruments. The author has put forth some of his preferences for instrumentation based upon his experience, but is cognizant that satisfactory alternatives exist.

Surgical instruments used for laparotomy are discussed here. Instruments for laparoscopic surgery are discussed separately. (See "Instruments and devices used in laparoscopic surgery".)

CUTTING INSTRUMENTS

The exposure and conduct of a surgical procedure depends upon use of cutting instruments that are properly chosen to accomplish a specific task.

Scalpel — The traditional surgical scalpel, available in a variety of sizes and shapes, is adequate for most gynecologic procedures. Disposable blades can be firmly attached to the scalpel handle using a needle holder.

                     

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Jun 2014. | This topic last updated: Oct 9, 2013.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Malt, RA. The Practice of Surgery. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1993.
  2. Hasselgren PO, Hagberg E, Malmer H, et al. One instead of two knives for surgical incision. Does it increase the risk of postoperative wound infection? Arch Surg 1984; 119:917.
  3. Chen NC, Towler MA, Moody FP, et al. Mechanical performance of surgical needle holders. J Emerg Med 1991; 9 Suppl 1:5.
  4. Stamp CV, McGregor W, Rodeheaver GT, et al. Surgical needle holder damage to sutures. Am Surg 1988; 54:300.
  5. Towler MA, Chen NC, Moody FP, et al. Biomechanics of a new atraumatic surgical needle holder. J Emerg Med 1991; 9:477.
  6. Corson, SL, Sedlacek, TV, Hoffman, JJ. Greenhill's Surgical Gynecology. 5th Ed. Year Book Medical, Chicago, 1986.
  7. Abidin MR, Thacker JG, Lombardi SA, et al. Needle holder damage to surgical needles. Am Surg 1989; 55:681.
  8. Edlich RF, Towler MA, Rodeheaver GT, et al. Scientific basis for selecting surgical needles and needle holders for wound closure. Clin Plast Surg 1990; 17:583.
  9. Nichols, DH. Instruments and sutures. p. 120. In Nichols DH (ed): Gynecologic and Obstetric Surgery. Mosby-Yearbook, St. Louis, 1993.
  10. Bernstein G. Needle holders--an instrument especially for the left-handed surgeon. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1988; 14:505.
  11. Bennett NT, Howard RJ. Quantity of blood inoculated in a needlestick injury from suture needles. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 178:107.
  12. Masterson BJ, Sullivan TG, Townsend PR. Development of a noncrushing vascular clamp for pelvic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978; 132:113.
  13. Masterson, BJ. Selecting instruments for gynecologic surgery. Contemp Ob/Gyn 1978; 12:31.
  14. Applegate WV. Abdominal cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome. Surgery 1972; 71:118.
  15. Gershenson, DM, DeCherney, AH, Curry, SL. Operative Gynecology. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1993.
  16. Hunt, RB. Atlas of Female Infertility Surgery. 2nd Ed. Mosby-Year Book, St. Louis, 1992.
  17. Smith, MF, Stehn, JL. Basic Surgical Instrumentation. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1993.
  18. Sharp TR. Sacrospinous suspension made easy. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82:873.
  19. Barnhill, DR, Park, RC. Latest on stapling. Contemp Ob/Gyn 1994; 39:19.
  20. Beresford JM. Automatic stapling techniques in abdominal hysterectomy. Surg Clin North Am 1984; 64:609.
  21. Stovall TG, Summitt RL Jr, Lipscomb GH, Ling FW. Vaginal cuff closure at abdominal hysterectomy: comparing sutures with absorbable staples. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78:415.
  22. Villeneuve MG, Khalifé S, Marcoux S, Blanchet P. Surgical staples in cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163:1641.
  23. Hill AD, Menzies-Gow N, Darzi A. Methods of controlling presacral bleeding. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 178:183.
  24. Wilcox LS, Koonin LM, Pokras R, et al. Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988-1990. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83:549.