UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2016 UpToDate®

Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scales

Authors
Robert J Singer, MD
Christopher S Ogilvy, MD
Guy Rordorf, MD
Section Editor
Jose Biller, MD, FACP, FAAN, FAHA
Deputy Editor
Janet L Wilterdink, MD

INTRODUCTION

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is often a devastating event. The appropriate therapy for SAH depends in part upon the severity of hemorrhage. Level of consciousness on admission, patient age, and the amount of blood on initial head computed tomography (CT) scan are the most important prognostic factors for SAH at presentation [1].

A number of grading systems are used in practice to standardize the clinical classification of patients with SAH based upon the initial neurologic examination and the appearance of blood on the initial head CT. This topic will provide an overview of the more commonly used clinical and radiologic grading scales for SAH. Treatment and other aspects of SAH are discussed separately. (See "Treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage" and "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage".)

INDIVIDUAL GRADING SCALES

An ideal SAH grading scale would provide the following capabilities [2-4]:

Guide management decisions that are influenced by the severity of SAH

Provide prognosis for clinicians, patients, and family members

       

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Nov 2016. | This topic last updated: Tue Jan 14 00:00:00 GMT+00:00 2014.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2016 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Hijdra A, van Gijn J, Nagelkerke NJ, et al. Prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia, rebleeding, and outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 1988; 19:1250.
  2. Ogilvy CS, Carter BS. A proposed comprehensive grading system to predict outcome for surgical management of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1998; 42:959.
  3. Takagi K, Tamura A, Nakagomi T, et al. How should a subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale be determined? A combinatorial approach based solely on the Glasgow Coma Scale. J Neurosurg 1999; 90:680.
  4. Rosen DS, Macdonald RL. Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scales: a systematic review. Neurocrit Care 2005; 2:110.
  5. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2:81.
  6. Gotoh O, Tamura A, Yasui N, et al. Glasgow Coma Scale in the prediction of outcome after early aneurysm surgery. Neurosurgery 1996; 39:19.
  7. Oshiro EM, Walter KA, Piantadosi S, et al. A new subarachnoid hemorrhage grading system based on the Glasgow Coma Scale: a comparison with the Hunt and Hess and World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Scales in a clinical series. Neurosurgery 1997; 41:140.
  8. Hunt WE, Hess RM. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1968; 28:14.
  9. van Gijn J, Bromberg JE, Lindsay KW, et al. Definition of initial grading, specific events, and overall outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A survey. Stroke 1994; 25:1623.
  10. Hunt WE, Kosnik EJ. Timing and perioperative care in intracranial aneurysm surgery. Clin Neurosurg 1974; 21:79.
  11. Aulmann C, Steudl WI, Feldmann U. [Validation of the prognostic accuracy of neurosurgical admission scales after rupture of cerebral aneurysms]. Zentralbl Neurochir 1998; 59:171.
  12. Hirai S, Ono J, Yamaura A. Clinical grading and outcome after early surgery in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1996; 39:441.
  13. Proust F, Hannequin D, Langlois O, et al. Causes of morbidity and mortality after ruptured aneurysm surgery in a series of 230 patients. The importance of control angiography. Stroke 1995; 26:1553.
  14. Lindsay KW, Teasdale GM, Knill-Jones RP. Observer variability in assessing the clinical features of subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 1983; 58:57.
  15. Degen LA, Dorhout Mees SM, Algra A, Rinkel GJ. Interobserver variability of grading scales for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 2011; 42:1546.
  16. Report of World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Committee on a Universal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Grading Scale. J Neurosurg 1988; 68:985.
  17. Rosen DS, Macdonald RL. Grading of subarachnoid hemorrhage: modification of the world World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies scale on the basis of data for a large series of patients. Neurosurgery 2004; 54:566.
  18. Lagares A, Gómez PA, Lobato RD, et al. Prognostic factors on hospital admission after spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2001; 143:665.
  19. Fisher CM, Kistler JP, Davis JM. Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery 1980; 6:1.
  20. Kistler JP, Crowell RM, Davis KR, et al. The relation of cerebral vasospasm to the extent and location of subarachnoid blood visualized by CT scan: a prospective study. Neurology 1983; 33:424.
  21. Claassen J, Bernardini GL, Kreiter K, et al. Effect of cisternal and ventricular blood on risk of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage: the Fisher scale revisited. Stroke 2001; 32:2012.