Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point-of-care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors and editors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

Choose from the list below to learn more about subscriptions for a:


Subscribers log in here


Stress testing in patients with left bundle branch block or a paced ventricular rhythm

INTRODUCTION

Among patients who undergo stress testing to determine the diagnosis or prognosis of coronary artery disease, symptom-limited treadmill or bicycle exercise is the preferred form of stress for those who can attain an adequate level of exercise (defined as ≥85 of their predicted maximal heart rate) because it provides the most information concerning exercise capacity, patient symptoms, cardiovascular function, and the hemodynamic response during usual forms of activity [1,2]. The inability to perform an exercise test is in itself a negative prognostic factor in patients with coronary artery disease. (See "Selecting the optimal cardiac stress test" and "Stress testing to determine prognosis and management of patients with known or suspected coronary heart disease", section on 'Advantages of exercise stress'.)

While exercise electrocardiographic (ECG) testing is recommended for patients who are able to exercise, this technique requires the absence of baseline ECG abnormalities that could interfere with interpretation of the test (table 1). Two such abnormalities are complete left bundle branch block (LBBB) and a paced ventricular rhythm, which are also associated with a high rate of false positive or uninterpretable tests in patients undergoing exercise stress. The 2002 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines on exercise testing concluded that there is NO level of ST segment depression that confers diagnostic significance during exercise ECG testing in patients with LBBB [1,2]. (See "Exercise ECG testing: Performing the test and interpreting the ECG results".)

Options for stress testing in patients with LBBB or paced ventricular rhythm are discussed here. The role of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) in the evaluation of patients with LBBB is discussed separately. (See "Noninvasive coronary imaging with cardiac computed tomography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance", section on 'Other uses'.)

LEFT BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK

Exercise and pharmacologic stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (rMPI) and exercise and pharmacologic stress echocardiography have been evaluated in patients with LBBB. The goals of exercise testing in patients with LBBB include assessing for evidence of coronary heart disease (CHD); assessing the extent, severity, and location of CHD if present; and evidence of myocardial viability patients with LBBB and heart failure.

Exercise rMPI — Left bundle branch block can interfere with exercise rMPI. Among patients who undergo exercise rMPI, LBBB is associated with transient positive defects in the anteroseptal and septal regions in the absence of a lesion within the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) in approximately 10 to 20 percent of cases [3-7]. Thus, there is a high rate of false positive tests when exercise rMPI is performed in patients with LBBB.

             

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Jun 2014. | This topic last updated: Nov 15, 2012.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). Circulation 2002; 106:1883.
  2. Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Beasley JW, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for Exercise Testing. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Exercise Testing). J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30:260.
  3. Jazmati B, Sadaniantz A, Emaus SP, Heller GV. Exercise thallium-201 imaging in complete left bundle branch block and the prevalence of septal perfusion defects. Am J Cardiol 1991; 67:46.
  4. Hirzel HO, Senn M, Nuesch K, et al. Thallium-201 scintigraphy in complete left bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53:764.
  5. Vaduganathan P, He ZX, Raghavan C, et al. Detection of left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis in patients with left bundle branch block: exercise, adenosine or dobutamine imaging? J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28:543.
  6. O'Keefe JH Jr, Bateman TM, Barnhart CS. Adenosine thallium-201 is superior to exercise thallium-201 for detecting coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21:1332.
  7. Delonca J, Camenzind E, Meier B, Righetti A. Limits of thallium-201 exercise scintigraphy to detect coronary disease in patients with complete and permanent bundle branch block: a review of 134 cases. Am Heart J 1992; 123:1201.
  8. Matzer L, Kiat H, Friedman JD, et al. A new approach to the assessment of tomographic thallium-201 scintigraphy in patients with left bundle branch block. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17:1309.
  9. Mairesse GH, Marwick TH, Arnese M, et al. Improved identification of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block by use of dobutamine stress echocardiography and comparison with myocardial perfusion tomography. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76:321.
  10. Skalidis EI, Kochiadakis GE, Koukouraki SI, et al. Phasic coronary flow pattern and flow reserve in patients with left bundle branch block and normal coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33:1338.
  11. Patel R, Bushnell DL, Wagner R, Stumbris R. Frequency of false-positive septal defects on adenosine/201T1 images in patients with left bundle branch block. Nucl Med Commun 1995; 16:137.
  12. O'Keefe JH Jr, Bateman TM, Silvestri R, Barnhart C. Safety and diagnostic accuracy of adenosine thallium-201 scintigraphy in patients unable to exercise and those with left bundle branch block. Am Heart J 1992; 124:614.
  13. Wagdy HM, Hodge D, Christian TF, et al. Prognostic value of vasodilator myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left bundle-branch block. Circulation 1998; 97:1563.
  14. Nallamothu N, Bagheri B, Acio ER, et al. Prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography imaging in patients with left ventricular bundle branch block. J Nucl Cardiol 1997; 4:487.
  15. Nigam A, Humen DP. Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging with exercise and/or dipyridamole hyperemia in patients with preexisting left bundle branch block. J Nucl Med 1998; 39:579.
  16. Geleijnse ML, Vigna C, Kasprzak JD, et al. Usefulness and limitations of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block. A multicentre study. Eur Heart J 2000; 21:1666.
  17. Tandoğan I, Yetkin E, Yanik A, et al. Comparison of thallium-201 exercise SPECT and dobutamine stress echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2001; 17:339.
  18. Cortigiani L, Picano E, Vigna C, et al. Prognostic value of pharmacologic stress echocardiography in patients with left bundle branch block. Am J Med 2001; 110:361.
  19. Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery): developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery. Circulation 2007; 116:e418.
  20. Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina www.acc.org/qualityandscience/clinical/statements.htm (Accessed on August 24, 2006).
  21. Fraker TD Jr, Fihn SD, 2002 Chronic Stable Angina Writing Committee, et al. 2007 chronic angina focused update of the ACC/AHA 2002 guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Writing Group to develop the focused update of the 2002 guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50:2264.
  22. Peteiro J, Monserrat L, Martinez D, Castro-Beiras A. Accuracy of exercise echocardiography to detect coronary artery disease in left bundle branch block unassociated with either acute or healed myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85:890.
  23. Lakkis NM, He ZX, Verani MS. Diagnosis of coronary artery disease by exercise thallium-201 tomography in patients with a right ventricular pacemaker. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29:1221.
  24. Tse HF, Lau CP. Long-term effect of right ventricular pacing on myocardial perfusion and function. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29:744.
  25. Ciaroni S, Bloch A, Albrecht L, Vanautryve B. Diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with permanent cardiac pacemaker by dobutamine stress echocardiography or exercise thallium-201 myocardial tomography. Echocardiography 2000; 17:675.
  26. Skalidis EI, Kochiadakis GE, Koukouraki SI, et al. Myocardial perfusion in patients with permanent ventricular pacing and normal coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37:124.
  27. Xiao HB, Brecker SJ, Gibson DG. Differing effects of right ventricular pacing and left bundle branch block on left ventricular function. Br Heart J 1993; 69:166.
  28. Vassallo JA, Cassidy DM, Miller JM, et al. Left ventricular endocardial activation during right ventricular pacing: effect of underlying heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 7:1228.
  29. Vassallo JA, Cassidy DM, Marchlinski FE, et al. Endocardial activation of left bundle branch block. Circulation 1984; 69:914.
  30. Prinzen FW, Hunter WC, Wyman BT, McVeigh ER. Mapping of regional myocardial strain and work during ventricular pacing: experimental study using magnetic resonance imaging tagging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33:1735.
  31. Lapeyre AC 3rd, Poornima IG, Miller TD, et al. Prognostic value of exercise stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with permanent pacemakers. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94:811.
  32. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42:1318.
  33. Ritchie JL, Bateman TM, Bonow RO, et al. Guidelines for clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging. Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Committee on Radionuclide Imaging), developed in collaboration with the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25:521.
  34. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Bateman TM, et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Radionuclide Imaging). (2003). http://www.acc.org/clinical/guidelines/radio/rni_fulltext.pdf (Accessed on November 16, 2012).