Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2015 UpToDate®

Stress echocardiography: Indications, imaging techniques and safety

Nelson B Schiller, MD
Xiushui Ren, MD
Bryan Ristow, MD, FACC, FASE, FACP
Alexis Beatty, MD
Section Editor
Warren J Manning, MD
Deputy Editor
Brian C Downey, MD, FACC


Echocardiography enables dynamic evaluation of cardiac structure and function at rest and during stress provoked by exercise or a pharmacologic agent. Two-dimensional echocardiographic imaging performed during or immediately after stress is used primarily to detect the presence (or absence) and extent of ischemia secondary to obstructive coronary artery disease and to measure or estimate overall ventricular systolic function. In addition, Doppler echocardiographic imaging performed during or after exercise stress allows for evaluation of valvular function, pulmonary artery pressure, and left ventricular diastolic function.

The two major types of stress echocardiography are exercise (treadmill or bicycle) stress echocardiography and pharmacologic (predominantly dobutamine) stress echocardiography. The indications for stress echocardiography, along with the imaging technique and safety of the procedure, will be discussed here. Details of specific stress echocardiography protocols along with the advantages and disadvantages of stress echocardiography as compared to other stress modalities are also discussed separately. (See "Overview of stress echocardiography" and "Stress echocardiography in the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary heart disease", section on 'Stress test options' and "Selecting the optimal cardiac stress test".)


Stress testing is a common procedure with a variety of indications. Most commonly, however, stress testing is performed to estimate the likelihood of obstructive coronary artery (CAD) in patients who present with symptoms suggesting this diagnosis, or to estimate the ischemic burden and the prognosis in a patient with known CAD. The indications for stress testing are discussed in detail separately. (See "Stress testing for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary heart disease", section under construction and "Stress testing to determine prognosis and management of patients with known or suspected coronary heart disease".)

There are several specific indications for stress echocardiography as noted in the 2007 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) stress echocardiography guidelines [1]:


Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Oct 2015. | This topic last updated: Jan 23, 2013.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2015 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Pellikka PA, Nagueh SF, Elhendy AA, et al. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007; 20:1021.
  2. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, et al. 2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2008; 118:e523.
  3. American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American Heart Association, et al. ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57:1126.
  4. Ryan T, Feigenbaum H. Exercise echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69:82H.
  5. Ryan T, Segar DS, Sawada SG, et al. Detection of coronary artery disease with upright bicycle exercise echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1993; 6:186.
  6. Hecht HS, DeBord L, Sotomayor N, et al. Supine bicycle stress echocardiography: peak exercise imaging is superior to postexercise imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1993; 6:265.
  7. Hecht HS, DeBord L, Shaw R, et al. Digital supine bicycle stress echocardiography: a new technique for evaluating coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21:950.
  8. Hecht HS, DeBord L, Shaw R, et al. Supine bicycle stress echocardiography versus tomographic thallium-201 exercise imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1993; 6:177.
  9. Hecht HS, DeBord L, Shaw R, et al. Usefulness of supine bicycle stress echocardiography for detection of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71:293.
  10. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18:1440.
  11. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002; 105:539.
  12. Kamaran M, Teague SM, Finkelhor RS, et al. Prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients referred because of suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76:887.
  13. Elhendy A, Trocino G, Salustri A, et al. Low-dose dobutamine echocardiography and rest-redistribution thallium-201 tomography in the assessment of spontaneous recovery of left ventricular function after recent myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1996; 131:1088.
  14. La Canna G, Alfieri O, Giubbini R, et al. Echocardiography during infusion of dobutamine for identification of reversibly dysfunction in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23:617.
  15. Afridi I, Grayburn PA, Panza JA, et al. Myocardial viability during dobutamine echocardiography predicts survival in patients with coronary artery disease and severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32:921.
  16. Senior R, Kaul S, Lahiri A. Myocardial viability on echocardiography predicts long-term survival after revascularization in patients with ischemic congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33:1848.
  17. San Román JA, Vilacosta I, Rollán MJ, et al. Right ventricular asynergy during dobutamine-atropine echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30:430.
  18. O'Sullivan CA, Duncan A, Daly C, et al. Dobutamine stress-induced ischemic right ventricular dysfunction and its relation to cardiac output in patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease with angina-like symptoms. Am J Cardiol 2005; 96:622.
  19. Dolan MS, Riad K, El-Shafei A, et al. Effect of intravenous contrast for left ventricular opacification and border definition on sensitivity and specificity of dobutamine stress echocardiography compared with coronary angiography in technically difficult patients. Am Heart J 2001; 142:908.
  20. Vlassak I, Rubin DN, Odabashian JA, et al. Contrast and harmonic imaging improves accuracy and efficiency of novice readers for dobutamine stress echocardiography. Echocardiography 2002; 19:483.
  21. Rainbird AJ, Mulvagh SL, Oh JK, et al. Contrast dobutamine stress echocardiography: clinical practice assessment in 300 consecutive patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2001; 14:378.
  22. Thanigaraj S, Nease RF Jr, Schechtman KB, et al. Use of contrast for image enhancement during stress echocardiography is cost-effective and reduces additional diagnostic testing. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87:1430.
  23. Mulvagh SL, Rakowski H, Vannan MA, et al. American Society of Echocardiography Consensus Statement on the Clinical Applications of Ultrasonic Contrast Agents in Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008; 21:1179.
  24. Bernier M, Abdelmoneim SS, Moir S, et al. Pretest score for predicting microbubble contrast agent use in stress echocardiography: a method to increase efficiency in the echo laboratory. Cardiol Res Pract 2009; 2009:308486.
  25. Himelman RB, Stulbarg M, Kircher B, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of pulmonary artery pressure during exercise by saline-enhanced Doppler echocardiography in chronic pulmonary disease. Circulation 1989; 79:863.
  26. Rocchi G, Bertini M, Biffi M, et al. Exercise stress echocardiography is superior to rest echocardiography in predicting left ventricular reverse remodelling and functional improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J 2009; 30:89.
  27. Parsai C, Baltabaeva A, Anderson L, et al. Low-dose dobutamine stress echo to quantify the degree of remodelling after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J 2009; 30:950.
  28. Moonen M, O'Connor K, Magne J, et al. Stress echocardiography for selecting potential responders to cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Heart 2010; 96:1142.
  29. Tsutsui JM, Elhendy A, Xie F, et al. Safety of dobutamine stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45:1235.
  30. Leistad E, Ohmori K, Peterson TA, et al. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion during graded coronary artery stenoses by intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37:624.
  31. Jeetley P, Burden L, Greaves K, Senior R. Prognostic value of myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients presenting to hospital with acute chest pain and negative troponin. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99:1369.
  32. Sawada SG, Thomaides A. Three-dimensional stress echocardiography: the promise and limitations of volumetric imaging. Curr Opin Cardiol 2009; 24:426.
  33. Voigt JU, Exner B, Schmiedehausen K, et al. Strain-rate imaging during dobutamine stress echocardiography provides objective evidence of inducible ischemia. Circulation 2003; 107:2120.
  34. Hanekom L, Cho GY, Leano R, et al. Comparison of two-dimensional speckle and tissue Doppler strain measurement during dobutamine stress echocardiography: an angiographic correlation. Eur Heart J 2007; 28:1765.
  35. Abraham TP, Dimaano VL, Liang HY. Role of tissue Doppler and strain echocardiography in current clinical practice. Circulation 2007; 116:2597.
  36. Ishii K, Imai M, Suyama T, et al. Exercise-induced post-ischemic left ventricular delayed relaxation or diastolic stunning: is it a reliable marker in detecting coronary artery disease? J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53:698.
  37. Becker M, Lenzen A, Ocklenburg C, et al. Myocardial deformation imaging based on ultrasonic pixel tracking to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51:1473.
  38. Bansal M, Jeffriess L, Leano R, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability at dobutamine echocardiography by deformation analysis using tissue velocity and speckle-tracking. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3:121.
  39. Hoffmann R, Stempel K, Kühl H, et al. Integrated analysis of cardiac tissue structure and function for improved identification of reversible myocardial dysfunction. Coron Artery Dis 2009; 20:21.
  40. Varga A, Garcia MA, Picano E, International Stress Echo Complication Registry. Safety of stress echocardiography (from the International Stress Echo Complication Registry). Am J Cardiol 2006; 98:541.
  41. Mathias W Jr, Arruda A, Santos FC, et al. Safety of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography: A prospective experience of 4,033 consecutive studies. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999; 12:785.
  42. Sheldon SH, Askew JW 3rd, Klarich KW, et al. Occurrence of atrial fibrillation during dobutamine stress echocardiography: incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011; 24:86.
  43. Karabinos I, Kranidis A, Papadopoulos A, Katritsis D. Prevalence and potential mechanisms of sustained ventricular arrhythmias during dobutamine stress echocardiography: a literature review. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008; 21:1376.
  44. Pellikka PA, Oh JK, Bailey KR, et al. Dynamic intraventricular obstruction during dobutamine stress echocardiography. A new observation. Circulation 1992; 86:1429.
  45. Secknus MA, Niedermaier ON, Lauer MS, Marwick TH. Diagnostic and prognostic implications of left ventricular cavity obliteration response to dobutamine echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1998; 81:1318.
  46. Dawn B, Paliwal VS, Raza ST, et al. Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction provoked during dobutamine stress echocardiography predicts future chest pain, syncope, and near syncope. Am Heart J 2005; 149:908.
  47. Dolan MS, Gala SS, Dodla S, et al. Safety and efficacy of commercially available ultrasound contrast agents for rest and stress echocardiography a multicenter experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53:32.
  48. Abdelmoneim SS, Bernier M, Scott CG, et al. Safety of contrast agent use during stress echocardiography in patients with elevated right ventricular systolic pressure: a cohort study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3:240.
  49. Best PJ, Tajik AJ, Gibbons RJ, Pellikka PA. The safety of treadmill exercise stress testing in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129:628.
  50. Pellikka PA, Roger VL, Oh JK, et al. Safety of performing dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm > or = 4 cm in diameter. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77:413.