Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2016 UpToDate®

Standard biliary sphincterotomy technique: The cutting edge

Priya Jamidar, MD, FACG, FASGE
Section Editor
Douglas A Howell, MD, FASGE, FACG
Deputy Editor
Anne C Travis, MD, MSc, FACG, AGAF


Approximately 150,000 patients undergo endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy every year in the United States. Biliary sphincterotomy refers to the cutting of the biliary sphincter and is typically carried out during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The principal indications for sphincterotomy include removal of common bile duct stones, treatment of papillary stenosis, and facilitation of endotherapy (ie, stent placement, tissue sampling, and stricture dilation).

Sphincterotomy is a technically complex procedure that is performed under visual and fluoroscopic guidance. Deep cannulation of the bile duct is followed by electrocautery to incise the sphincter of Oddi. This topic review will focus on the technique of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. Its clinical applications and complications are discussed separately. (See "Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Indications, patient preparation, and complications".)


Sphincterotomes (also known as papillotomes) are available with a number of different configurations, which can be broadly categorized as pull, push, and needle-knife. Several modifications are available within each category that are designed for specific clinical settings or anatomic variations. This topic review will focus on the most commonly used sphincterotome (the Erlangen or pull-type version), which consists of a wire-loop partially enclosed in a Teflon catheter. The wire exits the catheter about 3 cm before its distal end and reenters the catheter about 3 mm from its tip. The portion of the catheter distal to the reentry point is referred to as the "nose." When the wire is tightened, the tip of the catheter is bowed so that the exposed wire is brought away from the catheter. There are also sphincterotomes available that can rotate (Autotome Rx, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) and may facilitate better sphincterotome and cutting wire orientation.

Nose length — Pull-type sphincterotomes are available with long and short noses. Compared with the long-nosed devices, the short-nosed devices are more responsive to bowing, provide more control during sphincterotomy, and often do not require deep cannulation before the cutting wire exits the endoscope. However, they are more likely to become inadvertently dislodged from the bile duct. With the widespread (nearly universal) use of multilumen sphincterotomes and over the wire sphincterotomies, the long-nose devices are now rarely used.

Diathermy wire — Another variable distinguishing sphincterotomes is the length of the exposed wire, which ranges from 15 to 40 mm. Devices with longer wires follow the natural curve of the endoscope and elevator, and are more likely to enter the papilla in the correct orientation. However, the longer length of wire may not always be an advantage since the ideal transfer of energy occurs when a short segment of cutting wire is applied to sphincter tissue. The most commonly used cutting wires are 25 and 30 mm long. To limit contact of the cutting wire with the endoscope channel, one sphincterotome has insulation covering the proximal one-half (CleverCut, Olympus).


Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Sep 2016. | This topic last updated: Jul 9, 2014.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2016 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Johlin FC, Tucker RD, Ferguson S. The effect of guidewires during electrosurgical sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1992; 38:536.
  2. O'Brien JW, Chen SL, Connolly R, Libby ED. Current induction in a fiberglass guidewire compared to conventional wires during simulated papillotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 45:493.
  3. Sherman S, Uzer MF, Lehman GA. Wire-guided sphincterotomy. Am J Gastroenterol 1994; 89:2125.
  4. Elta GH, Barnett JL, Wille RT, et al. Pure cut electrocautery current for sphincterotomy causes less post-procedure pancreatitis than blended current. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 47:149.
  5. Haag R, Cuschieri A. Recent advances in high-frequency electrosurgery: development of automated systems. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1993; 38:354.
  6. Grund KE, Farin G. New principles and application of high frequency surgery, including argon plasma coagulation. In: Annual of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 10th ed, Rapid Science Publishers, 1997.
  7. Kohler A, Maier M, Benz C, et al. A new HF current generator with automatically controlled system (Endocut mode) for endoscopic sphincterotomy--preliminary experience. Endoscopy 1998; 30:351.
  8. Norton ID, Petersen BT, Bosco J, et al. A randomized trial of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy using pure-cut versus combined cut and coagulation waveforms. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 3:1029.
  9. Perini RF, Sadurski R, Cotton PB, et al. Post-sphincterotomy bleeding after the introduction of microprocessor-controlled electrosurgery: does the new technology make the difference? Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61:53.
  10. Verma D, Kapadia A, Adler DG. Pure versus mixed electrosurgical current for endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: a meta-analysis of adverse outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66:283.
  11. Forbes A, Cotton PB. ERCP and sphincterotomy after Billroth II gastrectomy. Gut 1984; 25:971.
  12. Al-Kawas FH, Geller AJ. A new approach to sphincterotomy in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 43:253.
  13. Vaira D, Dowsett JF, Hatfield AR, et al. Is duodenal diverticulum a risk factor for sphincterotomy? Gut 1989; 30:939.