Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Sources of hematopoietic stem cells

Robert S Negrin, MD
Section Editor
Nelson J Chao, MD
Deputy Editor
Alan G Rosmarin, MD


Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an important and potentially curative treatment option for a wide variety of malignant and nonmalignant diseases. The multipotent hematopoietic stem cells required for this procedure are usually obtained from the bone marrow or peripheral blood of a related or unrelated donor. Umbilical cord blood, the blood remaining in the umbilical cord and placenta following the birth of an infant, has emerged as an established alternative source of hematopoietic stem cells in allogeneic HCT.

This topic review will discuss the hematopoietic stem cell model of hematopoiesis followed by a discussion of the sources of hematopoietic cells suitable for transplantation. The selection of an appropriate HCT donor, the evaluation of a potential HCT donor, and the collection of umbilical cord blood are discussed separately. (See "Donor selection for hematopoietic cell transplantation" and "Evaluation of the hematopoietic cell transplantation donor" and "Collection and storage of umbilical cord blood for hematopoietic cell transplantation" and "Selection of an umbilical cord blood graft for hematopoietic cell transplantation".)

The term "hematopoietic cell transplantation" (HCT) will be used throughout this review as a general term to cover transplantation of progenitor/hematopoietic stem cells from any source (eg, bone marrow, peripheral blood, cord blood). Otherwise, the source of such cells will be specified (eg, autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation). (See 'Sources of hematopoietic stem cells' below.)


Discovery of HSCs — Hematopoiesis is sustained throughout the lifespan of an individual by a small number of multipotent hematopoietic stem cells that slowly cycle from a larger quiescent pool. Circulating blood cells are immediate descendants of maturing precursors that arise from a smaller pool of progenitors. The progenitors in turn arise from an even smaller pool of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC). HSCs are multipotent and have the capacity to differentiate into the cells of all blood lineages: erythrocytes, platelets, neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, monocytes, T and B lymphocytes, natural killer cells, and dendritic cells (figure 1).

The identification and role of HSCs in protecting animals from lethal irradiation emerged from studies that began in the 1950s in which it was observed that animals treated with irradiation could be protected by either lead shielding over the spleen or later infusion of splenocytes from a normal donor. With the development of in vitro and in vivo assay systems (eg, Till-McCulloch spleen-colony assay) it became clear that there were clonotypic precursor cells capable of giving rise to both erythroid and myeloid lineages of cells [1]. HSCs were defined functionally as populations of cells capable of rescuing lethally-irradiated animals, a definition that is accurate conceptually, although difficult to apply in different systems, especially in humans. Nevertheless, it became possible to define a population of cells capable of multilineage repopulation and rescuing animals from lethal irradiation. These hematopoietic stem cells could be re-isolated and used to rescue other lethally irradiated animals. (See "Overview of hematopoietic stem cells".)

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information on subscription options, click below on the option that best describes you:

Subscribers log in here

Literature review current through: Nov 2017. | This topic last updated: Feb 13, 2017.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2017 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Morrison SJ, Uchida N, Weissman IL. The biology of hematopoietic stem cells. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 1995; 11:35.
  2. Spangrude GJ, Heimfeld S, Weissman IL. Purification and characterization of mouse hematopoietic stem cells. Science 1988; 241:58.
  3. Baum CM, Weissman IL, Tsukamoto AS, et al. Isolation of a candidate human hematopoietic stem-cell population. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992; 89:2804.
  4. Craig W, Kay R, Cutler RL, Lansdorp PM. Expression of Thy-1 on human hematopoietic progenitor cells. J Exp Med 1993; 177:1331.
  5. Negrin RS, Atkinson K, Leemhuis T, et al. Transplantation of highly purified CD34+Thy-1+ hematopoietic stem cells in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2000; 6:262.
  6. Müller AM, Kohrt HE, Cha S, et al. Long-term outcome of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy and transplantation of purified autologous hematopoietic stem cells. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012; 18:125.
  7. Goodell MA, Rosenzweig M, Kim H, et al. Dye efflux studies suggest that hematopoietic stem cells expressing low or undetectable levels of CD34 antigen exist in multiple species. Nat Med 1997; 3:1337.
  8. Nakauchi H. Hematopoietic stem cells: are they CD34-positive or CD34-negative? Nat Med 1998; 4:1009.
  9. Lemoli RM, de Vivo A, Damiani D, et al. Autologous transplantation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-primed bone marrow is effective in supporting myeloablative chemotherapy in patients with hematologic malignancies and poor peripheral blood stem cell mobilization. Blood 2003; 102:1595.
  10. Seshadri T, Al-Farsi K, Stakiw J, et al. G-CSF-stimulated BM progenitor cells supplement suboptimal peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cell collections for auto transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2008; 42:733.
  11. Morton J, Hutchins C, Durrant S. Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-primed allogeneic bone marrow: significantly less graft-versus-host disease and comparable engraftment to G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells. Blood 2001; 98:3186.
  12. Ostronoff M, Ostronoff F, Souto Maior P, et al. Pilot study of allogeneic G-CSF-stimulated bone marrow transplantation: harvest, engraftment, and graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006; 12:729.
  13. Bahçeci E, Read EJ, Leitman S, et al. CD34+ cell dose predicts relapse and survival after T-cell-depleted HLA-identical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for haematological malignancies. Br J Haematol 2000; 108:408.
  14. Bittencourt H, Rocha V, Chevret S, et al. Association of CD34 cell dose with hematopoietic recovery, infections, and other outcomes after HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplantation. Blood 2002; 99:2726.
  15. Zubair AC, Zahrieh D, Daley H, et al. Engraftment of autologous and allogeneic marrow HPCs after myeloablative therapy. Transfusion 2004; 44:253.
  16. Waller EK, Logan BR, Harris WA, et al. Improved survival after transplantation of more donor plasmacytoid dendritic or naïve T cells from unrelated-donor marrow grafts: results from BMTCTN 0201. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:2365.
  17. McCredie KB, Hersh EM, Freireich EJ. Cells capable of colony formation in the peripheral blood of man. Science 1971; 171:293.
  18. Siena S, Bregni M, Brando B, et al. Circulation of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells in the peripheral blood of high-dose cyclophosphamide-treated patients: enhancement by intravenous recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Blood 1989; 74:1905.
  19. Socinski MA, Cannistra SA, Elias A, et al. Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor expands the circulating haemopoietic progenitor cell compartment in man. Lancet 1988; 1:1194.
  20. Sheridan WP, Begley CG, Juttner CA, et al. Effect of peripheral-blood progenitor cells mobilised by filgrastim (G-CSF) on platelet recovery after high-dose chemotherapy. Lancet 1992; 339:640.
  21. Fruehauf S, Schmitt K, Veldwijk MR, et al. Peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) counts during steady-state haemopoiesis enable the estimation of the yield of mobilized PBPC after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor supported cytotoxic chemotherapy: an update on 100 patients. Br J Haematol 1999; 105:786.
  22. Heuft HG, Dubiel M, Rick O, et al. Inverse relationship between patient peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts and collection efficiency for CD34+ cells in two automated leukapheresis systems. Transfusion 2001; 41:1008.
  23. Demirer T, Ilhan O, Ayli M, et al. Monitoring of peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts on the first day of apheresis is highly predictive for efficient CD34+ cell yield. Ther Apher 2002; 6:384.
  24. Visani G, Lemoli RM, Tosi P, et al. Fludarabine-containing regimens severely impair peripheral blood stem cells mobilization and collection in acute myeloid leukaemia patients. Br J Haematol 1999; 105:775.
  25. Moncada V, Bolan C, Yau YY, Leitman SF. Analysis of PBPC cell yields during large-volume leukapheresis of subjects with a poor mobilization response to filgrastim. Transfusion 2003; 43:495.
  26. Szwajcer D, Jennings-Coutts A, Giftakis A, Wall DA. Identification of the CD34 enumeration on the day before stem cell harvest that best predicts poor mobilization. Transfusion 2011; 51:587.
  27. Humpe A, Riggert J, Meineke I, et al. A cell-kinetic model of CD34+ cell mobilization and harvest: development of a predictive algorithm for CD34+ cell yield in PBPC collections. Transfusion 2000; 40:1363.
  28. Anderlini P, Przepiorka D, Lauppe J, et al. Collection of peripheral blood stem cells from normal donors 60 years of age or older. Br J Haematol 1997; 97:485.
  29. Tricot G, Morris CL, Siegel E, et al. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in elderly (≥70 years) versus younger patients: A study of 984 multiple myeloma patients [abstract]. Proc ASCO 2002; 21:264a.
  30. de La Rubia J, Díaz MA, Verdeguer A, et al. Donor age-related differences in PBPC mobilization with rHuG-CSF. Transfusion 2001; 41:201.
  31. Cesaro S, Zanazzo AG, Frenos S, et al. A Phase II study on the safety and efficacy of a single dose of pegfilgrastim for mobilization and transplantation of autologous hematopoietic stem cells in pediatric oncohematology patients. Transfusion 2011; 51:2480.
  32. de Lavallade H, Ladaique P, Lemarié C, et al. Older age does not influence allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in a donor population of mostly white ethnic origin. Blood 2009; 113:1868.
  33. Lefrère F, Zohar S, Beaudier S, et al. Evaluation of an algorithm based on peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cell and CD34+ cell concentrations to optimize peripheral blood progenitor cell collection by apheresis. Transfusion 2007; 47:1851.
  34. Smith TJ, Bohlke K, Lyman GH, et al. Recommendations for the Use of WBC Growth Factors: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:3199.
  35. Tricot G, Jagannath S, Vesole D, et al. Peripheral blood stem cell transplants for multiple myeloma: identification of favorable variables for rapid engraftment in 225 patients. Blood 1995; 85:588.
  36. Chao NJ, Schriber JR, Grimes K, et al. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor "mobilized" peripheral blood progenitor cells accelerate granulocyte and platelet recovery after high-dose chemotherapy. Blood 1993; 81:2031.
  37. Bensinger WI, Longin K, Appelbaum F, et al. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) collected after recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor (rhG-CSF): an analysis of factors correlating with the tempo of engraftment after transplantation. Br J Haematol 1994; 87:825.
  38. de Fabritiis P, Iori AP, Mengarelli A, et al. CD34+ cell mobilization for allogeneic progenitor cell transplantation: efficacy of a short course of G-CSF. Transfusion 2001; 41:190.
  39. Fruehauf S, Seggewiss R. It's moving day: factors affecting peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and strategies for improvement [corrected]. Br J Haematol 2003; 122:360.
  40. Papayannopoulou T. Current mechanistic scenarios in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell mobilization. Blood 2004; 103:1580.
  41. Gertz MA. Current status of stem cell mobilization. Br J Haematol 2010; 150:647.
  42. Kröger N, Renges H, Krüger W, et al. A randomized comparison of once versus twice daily recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) for stem cell mobilization in healthy donors for allogeneic transplantation. Br J Haematol 2000; 111:761.
  43. Kroschinsky F, Hölig K, Poppe-Thiede K, et al. Single-dose pegfilgrastim for the mobilization of allogeneic CD34+ peripheral blood progenitor cells in healthy family and unrelated donors. Haematologica 2005; 90:1665.
  44. Isidori A, Tani M, Bonifazi F, et al. Phase II study of a single pegfilgrastim injection as an adjunct to chemotherapy to mobilize stem cells into the peripheral blood of pretreated lymphoma patients. Haematologica 2005; 90:225.
  45. Simona B, Cristina R, Luca N, et al. A single dose of Pegfilgrastim versus daily Filgrastim to evaluate the mobilization and the engraftment of autologous peripheral hematopoietic progenitors in malignant lymphoma patients candidate for high-dose chemotherapy. Transfus Apher Sci 2010; 43:321.
  46. Koenigsmann M, Jentsch-Ullrich K, Mohren M, et al. The role of diagnosis in patients failing peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization. Transfusion 2004; 44:777.
  47. Weaver CH, Birch R, Greco FA, et al. Mobilization and harvesting of peripheral blood stem cells: randomized evaluations of different doses of filgrastim. Br J Haematol 1998; 100:338.
  48. Bensinger W, Appelbaum F, Rowley S, et al. Factors that influence collection and engraftment of autologous peripheral-blood stem cells. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13:2547.
  49. Copelan EA, Ceselski SK, Ezzone SA, et al. Mobilization of peripheral-blood progenitor cells with high-dose etoposide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with breast cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and Hodgkin's disease. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15:759.
  50. Koç ON, Gerson SL, Cooper BW, et al. Randomized cross-over trial of progenitor-cell mobilization: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus G-CSF. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18:1824.
  51. Narayanasami U, Kanteti R, Morelli J, et al. Randomized trial of filgrastim versus chemotherapy and filgrastim mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells for rescue in autologous transplantation. Blood 2001; 98:2059.
  52. Ameen RM, Alshemmari SH, Alqallaf D. Factors associated with successful mobilization of progenitor hematopoietic stem cells among patients with lymphoid malignancies. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma 2008; 8:106.
  53. Schwella N, Braun A, Ahrens N, et al. Leukapheresis after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: a novel approach to harvest a second autograft. Transfusion 2003; 43:259.
  54. Krishnan A, Bhatia S, Slovak ML, et al. Predictors of therapy-related leukemia and myelodysplasia following autologous transplantation for lymphoma: an assessment of risk factors. Blood 2000; 95:1588.
  55. Hicks ML, Lonial S, Langston A, et al. Optimizing the timing of chemotherapy for mobilizing autologous blood hematopoietic progenitor cells. Transfusion 2007; 47:629.
  56. Bruns I, Steidl U, Kronenwett R, et al. A single dose of 6 or 12 mg of pegfilgrastim for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization results in similar yields of CD34+ progenitors in patients with multiple myeloma. Transfusion 2006; 46:180.
  57. Kroschinsky F, Hölig K, Platzbecker U, et al. Efficacy of single-dose pegfilgrastim after chemotherapy for the mobilization of autologous peripheral blood stem cells in patients with malignant lymphoma or multiple myeloma. Transfusion 2006; 46:1417.
  58. Weaver CH, Schulman KA, Wilson-Relyea B, et al. Randomized trial of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim after myelosuppressive chemotherapy for the harvesting of peripheral-blood stem cells. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18:43.
  59. Weaver CH, Schulman KA, Buckner CD. Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: a randomized comparison of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001; 27 Suppl 2:S23.
  60. To LB, Levesque JP, Herbert KE. How I treat patients who mobilize hematopoietic stem cells poorly. Blood 2011; 118:4530.
  61. Popat U, Saliba R, Thandi R, et al. Impairment of filgrastim-induced stem cell mobilization after prior lenalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009; 15:718.
  62. Glaspy JA, Shpall EJ, LeMaistre CF, et al. Peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization using stem cell factor in combination with filgrastim in breast cancer patients. Blood 1997; 90:2939.
  63. Moskowitz CH, Stiff P, Gordon MS, et al. Recombinant methionyl human stem cell factor and filgrastim for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization and transplantation in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients--results of a phase I/II trial. Blood 1997; 89:3136.
  64. Weaver A, Ryder D, Crowther D, et al. Increased numbers of long-term culture-initiating cells in the apheresis product of patients randomized to receive increasing doses of stem cell factor administered in combination with chemotherapy and a standard dose of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Blood 1996; 88:3323.
  65. Begley CG, Basser R, Mansfield R, et al. Enhanced levels and enhanced clonogenic capacity of blood progenitor cells following administration of stem cell factor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to humans. Blood 1997; 90:3378.
  66. Pelus LM, Fukuda S. Chemokine-mobilized adult stem cells; defining a better hematopoietic graft. Leukemia 2008; 22:466.
  67. Ramirez P, Rettig MP, Uy GL, et al. BIO5192, a small molecule inhibitor of VLA-4, mobilizes hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood 2009; 114:1340.
  68. Vose JM, Ho AD, Coiffier B, et al. Advances in mobilization for the optimization of autologous stem cell transplantation. Leuk Lymphoma 2009; 50:1412.
  69. Lyman SD, Jacobsen SE. c-kit ligand and Flt3 ligand: stem/progenitor cell factors with overlapping yet distinct activities. Blood 1998; 91:1101.
  70. Sudo Y, Shimazaki C, Ashihara E, et al. Synergistic effect of FLT-3 ligand on the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-induced mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells and progenitor cells into blood in mice. Blood 1997; 89:3186.
  71. Molineux G, McCrea C, Yan XQ, et al. Flt-3 ligand synergizes with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to increase neutrophil numbers and to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells with long-term repopulating potential. Blood 1997; 89:3998.
  72. Carlo-Stella C, Di Nicola M, Milani R, et al. Use of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) plus recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) for the mobilization and collection of CD34+ cells in poor mobilizers. Blood 2004; 103:3287.
  73. Devine SM, Flomenberg N, Vesole DH, et al. Rapid mobilization of CD34+ cells following administration of the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 to patients with multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:1095.
  74. Calandra G, McCarty J, McGuirk J, et al. AMD3100 plus G-CSF can successfully mobilize CD34+ cells from non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease and multiple myeloma patients previously failing mobilization with chemotherapy and/or cytokine treatment: compassionate use data. Bone Marrow Transplant 2008; 41:331.
  75. Flomenberg N, Devine SM, Dipersio JF, et al. The use of AMD3100 plus G-CSF for autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization is superior to G-CSF alone. Blood 2005; 106:1867.
  76. DiPersio JF, Stadtmauer EA, Nademanee A, et al. Plerixafor and G-CSF versus placebo and G-CSF to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 2009; 113:5720.
  77. DiPersio JF, Micallef IN, Stiff PJ, et al. Phase III prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor compared with placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for autologous stem-cell mobilization and transplantation for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:4767.
  78. Devine SM, Vij R, Rettig M, et al. Rapid mobilization of functional donor hematopoietic cells without G-CSF using AMD3100, an antagonist of the CXCR4/SDF-1 interaction. Blood 2008; 112:990.
  79. Giralt S, Stadtmauer EA, Harousseau JL, et al. International myeloma working group (IMWG) consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current status of stem cell collection and high-dose therapy for multiple myeloma and the role of plerixafor (AMD 3100). Leukemia 2009; 23:1904.
  80. Tricot G, Cottler-Fox MH, Calandra G. Safety and efficacy assessment of plerixafor in patients with multiple myeloma proven or predicted to be poor mobilizers, including assessment of tumor cell mobilization. Bone Marrow Transplant 2010; 45:63.
  81. Worel N, Rosskopf K, Neumeister P, et al. Plerixafor and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma previously failing mobilization with G-CSF with or without chemotherapy for autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization: the Austrian experience on a named patient program. Transfusion 2011; 51:968.
  82. Vishnu P, Roy V, Paulsen A, Zubair AC. Efficacy and cost-benefit analysis of risk-adaptive use of plerixafor for autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization. Transfusion 2012; 52:55.
  83. Bilgin YM, Visser O, Beckers EA, et al. Evaluation of Dutch guideline for just-in-time addition of plerixafor to stem cell mobilization in patients who fail with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor. Transfusion 2015; 55:1021.
  84. Van Hennik PB, Breems DA, Kusadasi N, et al. Stroma-supported progenitor production as a prognostic tool for graft failure following autologous stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol 2000; 111:674.
  85. Jansen EM, Hanks SG, Terry C, et al. Prediction of engraftment after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: CD34, colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage, or both? Transfusion 2007; 47:817.
  86. Dzik W, Sniecinski I, Fischer J. Toward standardization of CD34+ cell enumeration: an international study. Biomedial Excellence for Safer Transfusion Working Party. Transfusion 1999; 39:856.
  87. Negrin RS, Kusnierz-Glaz CR, Still BJ, et al. Transplantation of enriched and purged peripheral blood progenitor cells from a single apheresis product in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Blood 1995; 85:3334.
  88. Ketterer N, Salles G, Raba M, et al. High CD34(+) cell counts decrease hematologic toxicity of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation. Blood 1998; 91:3148.
  89. Weaver CH, Hazelton B, Birch R, et al. An analysis of engraftment kinetics as a function of the CD34 content of peripheral blood progenitor cell collections in 692 patients after the administration of myeloablative chemotherapy. Blood 1995; 86:3961.
  90. Siena S, Schiavo R, Pedrazzoli P, Carlo-Stella C. Therapeutic relevance of CD34 cell dose in blood cell transplantation for cancer therapy. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18:1360.
  91. Zaucha JM, Gooley T, Bensinger WI, et al. CD34 cell dose in granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood mononuclear cell grafts affects engraftment kinetics and development of extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease after human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling transplantation. Blood 2001; 98:3221.
  92. Singh AK, Savani BN, Albert PS, Barrett AJ. Efficacy of CD34+ stem cell dose in patients undergoing allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation after total body irradiation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2007; 13:339.
  93. Robin M, Kernèis S, Porcher R, et al. Influence of bone marrow nucleated red blood cell dose on outcome after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol 2008; 140:725.
  94. Pulsipher MA, Chitphakdithai P, Logan BR, et al. Donor, recipient, and transplant characteristics as risk factors after unrelated donor PBSC transplantation: beneficial effects of higher CD34+ cell dose. Blood 2009; 114:2606.
  95. Yoon DH, Sohn BS, Jang G, et al. Higher infused CD34+ hematopoietic stem cell dose correlates with earlier lymphocyte recovery and better clinical outcome after autologous stem cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Transfusion 2009; 49:1890.
  96. Urbano-Ispizua A, Carreras E, Marín P, et al. Allogeneic transplantation of CD34(+) selected cells from peripheral blood from human leukocyte antigen-identical siblings: detrimental effect of a high number of donor CD34(+) cells? Blood 2001; 98:2352.
  97. Nakamura R, Bahceci E, Read EJ, et al. Transplant dose of CD34(+) and CD3(+) cells predicts outcome in patients with haematological malignancies undergoing T cell-depleted peripheral blood stem cell transplants with delayed donor lymphocyte add-back. Br J Haematol 2001; 115:95.
  98. Urbano-Ispizua A, Rozman C, Pimentel P, et al. Risk factors for acute graft-versus-host disease in patients undergoing transplantation with CD34+ selected blood cells from HLA-identical siblings. Blood 2002; 100:724.
  99. Mehta J, Mehta J, Frankfurt O, et al. Optimizing the CD34 + cell dose for reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Leuk Lymphoma 2009; 50:1434.
  100. Cao TM, Wong RM, Sheehan K, et al. CD34, CD4, and CD8 cell doses do not influence engraftment, graft-versus-host disease, or survival following myeloablative human leukocyte antigen-identical peripheral blood allografting for hematologic malignancies. Exp Hematol 2005; 33:279.
  101. Ringdén O, Barrett AJ, Zhang MJ, et al. Decreased treatment failure in recipients of HLA-identical bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplants with high CD34 cell doses. Br J Haematol 2003; 121:874.
  102. Duggan PR, Guo D, Luider J, et al. Predictive factors for long-term engraftment of autologous blood stem cells. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 26:1299.
  103. Sumikuma T, Shimazaki C, Inaba T, et al. CD34+/CD90+ cells infused best predict late haematopoietic reconstitution following autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol 2002; 117:238.
  104. Kozuka T, Ikeda K, Teshima T, et al. Predictive value of circulating immature cell counts in peripheral blood for timing of peripheral blood progenitor cell collection after G-CSF plus chemotherapy-induced mobilization. Transfusion 2002; 42:1514.
  105. Perez-Simon JA, Diez-Campelo M, Martino R, et al. Impact of CD34+ cell dose on the outcome of patients undergoing reduced-intensity-conditioning allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Blood 2003; 102:1108.
  106. Dominietto A, Lamparelli T, Raiola AM, et al. Transplant-related mortality and long-term graft function are significantly influenced by cell dose in patients undergoing allogeneic marrow transplantation. Blood 2002; 100:3930.
  107. Léonard BM, Hétu F, Busque L, et al. Lymphoma cell burden in progenitor cell grafts measured by competitive polymerase chain reaction: less than one log difference between bone marrow and peripheral blood sources. Blood 1998; 91:331.
  108. Pilarski LM, Hipperson G, Seeberger K, et al. Myeloma progenitors in the blood of patients with aggressive or minimal disease: engraftment and self-renewal of primary human myeloma in the bone marrow of NOD SCID mice. Blood 2000; 95:1056.
  109. Ottinger HD, Beelen DW, Scheulen B, et al. Improved immune reconstitution after allotransplantation of peripheral blood stem cells instead of bone marrow. Blood 1996; 88:2775.
  110. Vellenga E, van Agthoven M, Croockewit AJ, et al. Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed lymphoma results in accelerated haematopoietic reconstitution, improved quality of life and cost reduction compared with bone marrow transplantation: the Hovon 22 study. Br J Haematol 2001; 114:319.
  111. Vose JM, Sharp G, Chan WC, et al. Autologous transplantation for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a randomized trial evaluating graft source and minimal residual disease. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20:2344.
  112. Tjønnfjord GE, Steen R, Evensen SA, et al. Characterization of CD34+ peripheral blood cells from healthy adults mobilized by recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Blood 1994; 84:2795.
  113. Anderlini P, Körbling M, Dale D, et al. Allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation: considerations for donors. Blood 1997; 90:903.
  114. Holtick U, Albrecht M, Chemnitz JM, et al. Bone marrow versus peripheral blood allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for haematological malignancies in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; :CD010189.
  115. Gorin NC, Labopin M, Rocha V, et al. Marrow versus peripheral blood for geno-identical allogeneic stem cell transplantation in acute myelocytic leukemia: influence of dose and stem cell source shows better outcome with rich marrow. Blood 2003; 102:3043.
  116. Eapen M, Logan BR, Horowitz MM, et al. Bone marrow or peripheral blood for reduced-intensity conditioning unrelated donor transplantation. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:364.
  117. Schmitz N, Beksac M, Hasenclever D, et al. Transplantation of mobilized peripheral blood cells to HLA-identical siblings with standard-risk leukemia. Blood 2002; 100:761.
  118. Couban S, Simpson DR, Barnett MJ, et al. A randomized multicenter comparison of bone marrow and peripheral blood in recipients of matched sibling allogeneic transplants for myeloid malignancies. Blood 2002; 100:1525.
  119. Anasetti C, Logan BR, Lee SJ, et al. Peripheral-blood stem cells versus bone marrow from unrelated donors. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:1487.
  120. Eapen M, Horowitz MM, Klein JP, et al. Higher mortality after allogeneic peripheral-blood transplantation compared with bone marrow in children and adolescents: the Histocompatibility and Alternate Stem Cell Source Working Committee of the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:4872.
  121. Schrezenmeier H, Passweg JR, Marsh JC, et al. Worse outcome and more chronic GVHD with peripheral blood progenitor cells than bone marrow in HLA-matched sibling donor transplants for young patients with severe acquired aplastic anemia. Blood 2007; 110:1397.
  122. Storek J, Dawson MA, Storer B, et al. Immune reconstitution after allogeneic marrow transplantation compared with blood stem cell transplantation. Blood 2001; 97:3380.
  123. Lapierre V, Oubouzar N, Aupérin A, et al. Influence of the hematopoietic stem cell source on early immunohematologic reconstitution after allogeneic transplantation. Blood 2001; 97:2580.
  124. Stem Cell Trialists' Collaborative Group. Allogeneic peripheral blood stem-cell compared with bone marrow transplantation in the management of hematologic malignancies: an individual patient data meta-analysis of nine randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:5074.
  125. Schmitz N, Eapen M, Horowitz MM, et al. Long-term outcome of patients given transplants of mobilized blood or bone marrow: A report from the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry and the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Blood 2006; 108:4288.
  126. Friedrichs B, Tichelli A, Bacigalupo A, et al. Long-term outcome and late effects in patients transplanted with mobilised blood or bone marrow: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11:331.
  127. Storek J, Gooley T, Siadak M, et al. Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation may be associated with a high risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood 1997; 90:4705.
  128. Remberger M, Beelen DW, Fauser A, et al. Increased risk of extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation using unrelated donors. Blood 2005; 105:548.
  129. Dey BR, Shaffer J, Yee AJ, et al. Comparison of outcomes after transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells versus bone marrow following an identical nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen. Bone Marrow Transplant 2007; 40:19.
  130. Bensinger WI, Martin PJ, Storer B, et al. Transplantation of bone marrow as compared with peripheral-blood cells from HLA-identical relatives in patients with hematologic cancers. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:175.
  131. Brunet S, Urbano-Ispizua A, Ojeda E, et al. Favourable effect of the combination of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease on the outcome of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for advanced haematological malignancies. Br J Haematol 2001; 114:544.
  132. Bornhäuser M, Platzbecker U, Theuser C, et al. CD34+-enriched peripheral blood progenitor cells from unrelated donors for allografting of adult patients: high risk of graft failure, infection and relapse despite donor lymphocyte add-back. Br J Haematol 2002; 118:1095.
  133. Panse JP, Heimfeld S, Guthrie KA, et al. Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell graft composition affects early T-cell chimaerism and later clinical outcomes after non-myeloablative conditioning. Br J Haematol 2005; 128:659.
  134. Cao TM, Shizuru JA, Wong RM, et al. Engraftment and survival following reduced-intensity allogeneic peripheral blood hematopoietic cell transplantation is affected by CD8+ T-cell dose. Blood 2005; 105:2300.
  135. Larghero J, Rocha V, Porcher R, et al. Association of bone marrow natural killer cell dose with neutrophil recovery and chronic graft-versus-host disease after HLA identical sibling bone marrow transplants. Br J Haematol 2007; 138:101.
  136. Devine SM, Carter S, Soiffer RJ, et al. Low risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease and relapse associated with T cell-depleted peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia in first remission: results of the blood and marrow transplant clinical trials network protocol 0303. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011; 17:1343.
  137. Jakubowski AA, Small TN, Young JW, et al. T cell depleted stem-cell transplantation for adults with hematologic malignancies: sustained engraftment of HLA-matched related donor grafts without the use of antithymocyte globulin. Blood 2007; 110:4552.
  138. Berz D, McCormack EM, Winer ES, et al. Cryopreservation of hematopoietic stem cells. Am J Hematol 2007; 82:463.
  139. Tavassoli M, Hardy CL. Molecular basis of homing of intravenously transplanted stem cells to the marrow. Blood 1990; 76:1059.
  140. Peled A, Petit I, Kollet O, et al. Dependence of human stem cell engraftment and repopulation of NOD/SCID mice on CXCR4. Science 1999; 283:845.
  141. Simmons PJ, Masinovsky B, Longenecker BM, et al. Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expressed by bone marrow stromal cells mediates the binding of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood 1992; 80:388.
  142. Siczkowski M, Clarke D, Gordon MY. Binding of primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells to marrow stromal cells involves heparan sulfate. Blood 1992; 80:912.
  143. Papayannopoulou T, Priestley GV, Nakamoto B, et al. Molecular pathways in bone marrow homing: dominant role of alpha(4)beta(1) over beta(2)-integrins and selectins. Blood 2001; 98:2403.
  144. Calmels B, Lemarié C, Esterni B, et al. Occurrence and severity of adverse events after autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell infusion are related to the amount of granulocytes in the apheresis product. Transfusion 2007; 47:1268.
  145. Milone G, Pinto V, Mercurio S, et al. Adverse events after infusions of cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cells depend on non-mononuclear cell in infused suspention and on patient age (abstract). Blood 2006; 108:402b.
  146. Shpall EJ, LeMaistre CF, Holland K, et al. A prospective randomized trial of buffy coat versus CD34-selected autologous bone marrow support in high-risk breast cancer patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy. Blood 1997; 90:4313.
  147. Sniecinski IJ, Oien L, Petz LD, Blume KG. Immunohematologic consequences of major ABO-mismatched bone marrow transplantation. Transplantation 1988; 45:530.