UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2016 UpToDate®

Sick sinus syndrome: Epidemiology, etiology, and natural history

Author
Munther K Homoud, MD
Section Editor
Samuel Lévy, MD
Deputy Editor
Brian C Downey, MD, FACC

INTRODUCTION

The sinoatrial (SA) node is normally the dominant pacemaker in the human heart. Originally described in 1907 as a subepicardial structure located at the junction of the right atrium and superior vena cava, the SA node represents the integrated activity of pacemaker cells in a compact region of the right atrium that depolarize and produce action potentials almost synchronously [1-3]. While the location of the primary pacemaker may move among groups of cells within the region of the SA node, only about 1 percent of the cells in the SA node act as the leading pacemaker [4].

Sick sinus syndrome (SSS) is the term used to describe the inability of the SA node to generate a heart rate that meets the physiologic needs of an individual. The initial clues to the diagnosis of SSS are often derived from taking the history and obtaining a routine electrocardiogram (ECG), though the symptoms and ECG findings are frequently vague and nonspecific. The diagnostic evaluation should initially include a search for remediable causes of SA nodal depression such as drugs (eg, beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, digoxin) and metabolic diseases (eg, hypothyroidism). Treatment of SSS is directed at symptoms and typically involves the implantation of a permanent pacemaker.

The epidemiology, potential etiologies, and the natural history of SSS will be reviewed here. The clinical manifestations, approach to diagnosis, and the treatment of SSS are discussed in detail separately. (See "Sick sinus syndrome: Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and evaluation" and "Sick sinus syndrome: Treatment".)

NORMAL PHYSIOLOGY OF THE SA NODE

Cellular physiology — Pacemaking activity that originates from the sinoatrial (SA) node is incompletely understood. There are two predominant mechanisms that are thought to serve as the initiation of sinus activity:

The funny current (If)

                  

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Nov 2016. | This topic last updated: Wed May 04 00:00:00 GMT+00:00 2016.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2016 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Keith A, Flack M. The Form and Nature of the Muscular Connections between the Primary Divisions of the Vertebrate Heart. J Anat Physiol 1907; 41:172.
  2. Bleeker WK, Mackaay AJ, Masson-Pévet M, et al. Functional and morphological organization of the rabbit sinus node. Circ Res 1980; 46:11.
  3. Boyett MR, Honjo H, Kodama I. The sinoatrial node, a heterogeneous pacemaker structure. Cardiovasc Res 2000; 47:658.
  4. Boyett MR, Dobrzynski H, Lancaster MK, et al. Sophisticated architecture is required for the sinoatrial node to perform its normal pacemaker function. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003; 14:104.
  5. Lakatta EG, Maltsev VA, Vinogradova TM. A coupled SYSTEM of intracellular Ca2+ clocks and surface membrane voltage clocks controls the timekeeping mechanism of the heart's pacemaker. Circ Res 2010; 106:659.
  6. Veldkamp MW, Wilders R, Baartscheer A, et al. Contribution of sodium channel mutations to bradycardia and sinus node dysfunction in LQT3 families. Circ Res 2003; 92:976.
  7. Schuessler RB. Abnormal sinus node function in clinical arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003; 14:215.
  8. Josephson, ME. Sinus Node Function. In: Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: Techniques and Interpretations, 4th, Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2008. p.69-92.
  9. Pappano AJ, Mubagwa K. Actions of muscarinic agents and adenosine on the heart. In: The Heart and Cardiovascular System, Fozzard HA, et al (Eds), Raven Press, New York 1992. p.1765.
  10. Sanders P, Morton JB, Davidson NC, et al. Electrical remodeling of the atria in congestive heart failure: electrophysiological and electroanatomic mapping in humans. Circulation 2003; 108:1461.
  11. Morton JB, Sanders P, Vohra JK, et al. Effect of chronic right atrial stretch on atrial electrical remodeling in patients with an atrial septal defect. Circulation 2003; 107:1775.
  12. Yanni J, Tellez JO, Maczewski M, et al. Changes in ion channel gene expression underlying heart failure-induced sinoatrial node dysfunction. Circ Heart Fail 2011; 4:496.
  13. Sanders P, Kistler PM, Morton JB, et al. Remodeling of sinus node function in patients with congestive heart failure: reduction in sinus node reserve. Circulation 2004; 110:897.
  14. Hocini M, Sanders P, Deisenhofer I, et al. Reverse remodeling of sinus node function after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with prolonged sinus pauses. Circulation 2003; 108:1172.
  15. Sparks PB, Jayaprakash S, Vohra JK, Kalman JM. Electrical remodeling of the atria associated with paroxysmal and chronic atrial flutter. Circulation 2000; 102:1807.
  16. Daoud EG, Weiss R, Augostini RS, et al. Remodeling of sinus node function after catheter ablation of right atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2002; 13:20.
  17. Hadian D, Zipes DP, Olgin JE, Miller JM. Short-term rapid atrial pacing produces electrical remodeling of sinus node function in humans. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2002; 13:584.
  18. Sparks PB, Mond HG, Vohra JK, et al. Electrical remodeling of the atria following loss of atrioventricular synchrony: a long-term study in humans. Circulation 1999; 100:1894.
  19. Ferrer MI. The sick sinus syndrome in atrial disease. JAMA 1968; 206:645.
  20. Lown B. Electrical reversion of cardiac arrhythmias. Br Heart J 1967; 29:469.
  21. Dobrzynski H, Boyett MR, Anderson RH. New insights into pacemaker activity: promoting understanding of sick sinus syndrome. Circulation 2007; 115:1921.
  22. Jensen PN, Gronroos NN, Chen LY, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for sick sinus syndrome in the general population. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64:531.
  23. Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO, et al. Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:1854.
  24. Connolly SJ, Kerr CR, Gent M, et al. Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing Investigators. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:1385.
  25. Andersen HR, Thuesen L, Bagger JP, et al. Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet 1994; 344:1523.
  26. Kaplan BM, Langendorf R, Lev M, Pick A. Tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome (so-called "sick sinus syndrome"). Pathology, mechanisms and treatment. Am J Cardiol 1973; 31:497.
  27. Thery C, Gosselin B, Lekieffre J, Warembourg H. Pathology of sinoatrial node. Correlations with electrocardiographic findings in 111 patients. Am Heart J 1977; 93:735.
  28. HUDSON RE. The human pacemaker and its pathology. Br Heart J 1960; 22:153.
  29. Margolis JR, Strauss HC, Miller HC, et al. Digitalis and the sick sinus syndrome. Clinical and electrophysiologic documentation of severe toxic effect on sinus node function. Circulation 1975; 52:162.
  30. Strauss HC, Gilbert M, Svenson RH, et al. Electrophysiologic effects of propranolol on sinus node function in patients with sinus node dysfunction. Circulation 1976; 54:452.
  31. Breithardt G, Seipel L, Wiebringhaus E, Loogen F. Effects of verapamil on sinus node function in man. Eur J Cardiol 1978; 8:379.
  32. Vera Z, Awan NA, Mason DT. Assessment of oral quinidine effects on sinus node function in sick sinus syndrome patients. Am Heart J 1982; 103:80.
  33. LaBarre A, Strauss HC, Scheinman MM, et al. Electrophysiologic effects of disopyramide phosphate on sinus node function in patients with sinus node dysfunction. Circulation 1979; 59:226.
  34. Kim HG, Friedman HS. Procainamide-induced sinus node dysfunction in patients with chronic renal failure. Chest 1979; 76:699.
  35. Weintraub M, Hes JP, Rotmensch HH, et al. Extreme sinus bradycardia associated with lithium therapy. Isr J Med Sci 1983; 19:353.
  36. Thormann J, Neuss H, Schlepper M, Mitrovic V. Effects of clonidine on sinus node function in man. Chest 1981; 80:201.
  37. Lennerz C, Jilek C, Semmler V, et al. Sinus arrest from mad honey disease. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157:755.
  38. Yabek SM, Jarmakani JM. Sinus node dysfunction in children, adolescents, and young adults. Pediatrics 1978; 61:593.
  39. Hayes CJ, Gersony WM. Arrhythmias after the Mustard operation for transposition of the great arteries: a long-term study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 7:133.
  40. Beder SD, Gillette PC, Garson A Jr, et al. Symptomatic sick sinus syndrome in children and adolescents as the only manifestation of cardiac abnormality or associated with unoperated congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 1983; 51:1133.
  41. Greenwood RD, Rosenthal A, Sloss LJ, et al. Sick sinus syndrome after surgery for congenital heart disease. Circulation 1975; 52:208.
  42. Benson DW, Wang DW, Dyment M, et al. Congenital sick sinus syndrome caused by recessive mutations in the cardiac sodium channel gene (SCN5A). J Clin Invest 2003; 112:1019.
  43. Caralis DG, Varghese PJ. Familial sinoatrial node dysfunction. Increased vagal tone a possible aetiology. Br Heart J 1976; 38:951.
  44. Bharati S, Surawicz B, Vidaillet HJ Jr, Lev M. Familial congenital sinus rhythm anomalies: clinical and pathological correlations. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1992; 15:1720.
  45. Makiyama T, Akao M, Tsuji K, et al. High risk for bradyarrhythmic complications in patients with Brugada syndrome caused by SCN5A gene mutations. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:2100.
  46. Schulze-Bahr E, Neu A, Friederich P, et al. Pacemaker channel dysfunction in a patient with sinus node disease. J Clin Invest 2003; 111:1537.
  47. Ueda K, Nakamura K, Hayashi T, et al. Functional characterization of a trafficking-defective HCN4 mutation, D553N, associated with cardiac arrhythmia. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:27194.
  48. Milanesi R, Baruscotti M, Gnecchi-Ruscone T, DiFrancesco D. Familial sinus bradycardia associated with a mutation in the cardiac pacemaker channel. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:151.
  49. Nof E, Luria D, Brass D, et al. Point mutation in the HCN4 cardiac ion channel pore affecting synthesis, trafficking, and functional expression is associated with familial asymptomatic sinus bradycardia. Circulation 2007; 116:463.
  50. James TN. The sinus node. Am J Cardiol 1977; 40:965.
  51. James TN, Birk RE. Pathology of the cardiac conduction system in polyarteritis nodosa. Arch Intern Med 1966; 117:561.
  52. JAMES TN, RUPE CE, MONTO RW. PATHOLOGY OF THE CARDIAC CONDUCTION SYSTEM IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS. Ann Intern Med 1965; 63:402.
  53. Hatle L, Bathen J, Rokseth R. Sinoatrial disease in acute myocardial infarction. Long-term prognosis. Br Heart J 1976; 38:410.
  54. Rokseth R, Hatle L. Sinus arrest in acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J 1971; 33:639.
  55. Simonsen E, Nielsen BL, Nielsen JS. Sinus node dysfunction in acute myocardial infarction. Acta Med Scand 1980; 208:463.
  56. Alboni P, Baggioni GF, Scarfò S, et al. Role of sinus node artery disease in sick sinus syndrome in inferior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1991; 67:1180.
  57. Puljiz I, Beus A, Kuzman I, Seiwerth S. Electrocardiographic changes and myocarditis in trichinellosis: a retrospective study of 154 patients. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2005; 99:403.
  58. Assimakopoulos SF, Michalopoulou S, Papakonstantinou C, et al. A case of severe sinus bradycardia complicating anicteric leptospirosis. Am J Med Sci 2007; 333:381.
  59. Cunha BA, Thermidor M, Mohan S, et al. Fever of unknown origin: subacute thyroiditis versus typhoid fever. Heart Lung 2005; 34:147.
  60. Cunha BA. The diagnostic significance of relative bradycardia in infectious disease. Clin Microbiol Infect 2000; 6:633.
  61. Lien WP, Lee YS, Chang FZ, et al. The sick sinus syndrome: natural history of dysfunction of the sinoatrial node. Chest 1977; 72:628.
  62. Ferrer MI. The etiology and natural history of sinus node disorders. Arch Intern Med 1982; 142:371.
  63. Simonsen E, Nielsen JS, Nielsen BL. Sinus node dysfunction in 128 patients. A retrospective study with follow-up. Acta Med Scand 1980; 208:343.
  64. Brandt J, Anderson H, Fåhraeus T, Schüller H. Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20:633.
  65. Menozzi C, Brignole M, Alboni P, et al. The natural course of untreated sick sinus syndrome and identification of the variables predictive of unfavorable outcome. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82:1205.
  66. Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE, et al. Arterial thromboembolism in patients with sick sinus syndrome: prediction from pacing mode, atrial fibrillation, and echocardiographic findings. Heart 1999; 81:412.
  67. Alonso A, Jensen PN, Lopez FL, et al. Association of sick sinus syndrome with incident cardiovascular disease and mortality: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study and Cardiovascular Health Study. PLoS One 2014; 9:e109662.