Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate®

Shoulder dystocia: Intrapartum diagnosis, management, and outcome

John F Rodis, MD
Section Editor
Charles J Lockwood, MD, MHCM
Deputy Editor
Vanessa A Barss, MD, FACOG


A vaginal delivery is complicated by shoulder dystocia when, after delivery of the fetal head, additional obstetric maneuvers beyond gentle traction are needed to enable delivery of the fetal shoulders. It occurs in 0.2 to 3 percent of all births and represents an obstetric emergency [1,2]. Few shoulder dystocias can be anticipated and prevented, as most occur in the absence of risk factors. Therefore, the obstetrician must be prepared to recognize a shoulder dystocia immediately and proceed through an orderly sequence of steps to affect delivery in a timely manner. The goal of management is to prevent fetal asphyxia and permanent Erb's palsy or death, while avoiding physical injury (eg, bone fractures, maternal trauma), but the latter are acceptable if needed to prevent permanent injury in the child.

Intrapartum diagnosis and management of shoulder dystocia will be reviewed here. Risk factors for shoulder dystocia and management of pregnancies at risk are discussed separately. (See "Shoulder dystocia: Risk factors and planning delivery of at risk pregnancies".)


The fetal biacromial diameter (the distance between the outermost parts of the fetal shoulders) normally enters the pelvis at an oblique angle with the posterior shoulder ahead of the anterior one, rotating to the anterior-posterior position at the pelvic outlet with external rotation of the fetal head. The anterior shoulder can then slide under the symphysis pubis for delivery (figure 1). If the fetal shoulders remain in an anterior-posterior position during descent or descend simultaneously rather than sequentially into the pelvic inlet, then the anterior shoulder can become impacted behind the symphysis pubis; the posterior shoulder may be obstructed by the sacral promontory. Anterior obstruction is more common than posterior obstruction. If descent of the fetal head continues while the anterior or posterior shoulder remains impacted, then stretching of the nerves in the brachial plexus may occur and may result in nerve injury.

Injuries diagnosed at birth may have resulted from prenatal insults, trauma related to labor and the impacted shoulder itself, or from the provider's attempt to deliver the infant. Acidemia may result from compression of the umbilical cord, from compression of the vessels in the fetal neck by a tight nuchal cord, or a combination of factors [3].


Shoulder dystocia is a subjective clinical diagnosis. It should be suspected when the fetal head retracts into the perineum (ie, turtle sign) after expulsion due to reverse traction from the shoulders being impacted at the pelvic inlet. The diagnosis is made when the routine practice of gentle, downward traction of the fetal head fails to accomplish delivery of the anterior shoulder.


Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Feb 2017. | This topic last updated: Tue Aug 02 00:00:00 GMT+00:00 2016.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2017 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology, The American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 40, November 2002. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100:1045.
  2. Hoffman MK, Bailit JL, Branch DW, et al. A comparison of obstetric maneuvers for the acute management of shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117:1272.
  3. Gherman RB, Chauhan S, Ouzounian JG, et al. Shoulder dystocia: the unpreventable obstetric emergency with empiric management guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195:657.
  4. Beall MH, Spong C, McKay J, Ross MG. Objective definition of shoulder dystocia: a prospective evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179:934.
  5. Spong CY, Beall M, Rodrigues D, Ross MG. An objective definition of shoulder dystocia: prolonged head-to-body delivery intervals and/or the use of ancillary obstetric maneuvers. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86:433.
  6. Allen RH, Rosenbaum TC, Ghidini A, et al. Correlating head-to-body delivery intervals with neonatal depression in vaginal births that result in permanent brachial plexus injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187:839.
  7. Leung TY, Stuart O, Sahota DS, et al. Head-to-body delivery interval and risk of fetal acidosis and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy in shoulder dystocia: a retrospective review. BJOG 2011; 118:474.
  8. Lerner H, Durlacher K, Smith S, Hamilton E. Relationship between head-to-body delivery interval in shoulder dystocia and neonatal depression. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118:318.
  9. Wood C, Ng KH, Hounslow D, Benning H. Time--an important variable in normal delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1973; 80:295.
  10. Spain JE, Frey HA, Tuuli MG, et al. Neonatal morbidity associated with shoulder dystocia maneuvers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212:353.e1.
  11. Benjamin K. Part 1. Injuries to the brachial plexus: mechanisms of injury and identification of risk factors. Adv Neonatal Care 2005; 5:181.
  12. Gross SJ, Shime J, Farine D. Shoulder dystocia: predictors and outcome. A five-year review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156:334.
  13. Phelan, JP Ouzounian, JG, Gherman, GB, et al. Shoulder dystocia and permanent Erb palsy: the role of fundal pressure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176:S138.
  14. Sagi-Dain L, Sagi S. The role of episiotomy in prevention and management of shoulder dystocia: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2015; 70:354.
  15. Crofts JF, Fox R, Ellis D, et al. Observations from 450 shoulder dystocia simulations: lessons for skills training. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112:906.
  16. Allen R, Sorab J, Gonik B. Risk factors for shoulder dystocia: an engineering study of clinician-applied forces. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77:352.
  17. Chauhan SP, Christian B, Gherman RB, et al. Shoulder dystocia without versus with brachial plexus injury: a case-control study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007; 20:313.
  18. Poggi SH, Spong CY, Allen RH. Prioritizing posterior arm delivery during severe shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101:1068.
  19. Gonik B, Stringer CA, Held B. An alternate maneuver for management of shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 145:882.
  20. Gherman RB, Tramont J, Muffley P, Goodwin TM. Analysis of McRoberts' maneuver by x-ray pelvimetry. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95:43.
  21. Buhimschi CS, Buhimschi IA, Malinow A, Weiner CP. Use of McRoberts' position during delivery and increase in pushing efficiency. Lancet 2001; 358:470.
  22. Gherman RB, Goodwin TM, Souter I, et al. The McRoberts' maneuver for the alleviation of shoulder dystocia: how successful is it? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176:656.
  23. Beall MH, Spong CY, Ross MG. A randomized controlled trial of prophylactic maneuvers to reduce head-to-body delivery time in patients at risk for shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102:31.
  24. Poggi SH, Allen RH, Patel CR, et al. Randomized trial of McRoberts versus lithotomy positioning to decrease the force that is applied to the fetus during delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191:874.
  25. Heath T, Gherman RB. Symphyseal separation, sacroiliac joint dislocation and transient lateral femoral cutaneous neuropathy associated with McRoberts' maneuver. A case report. J Reprod Med 1999; 44:902.
  26. SCHWARTZ BC, DIXON DM. Shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1958; 11:468.
  27. Leung TY, Stuart O, Suen SS, et al. Comparison of perinatal outcomes of shoulder dystocia alleviated by different type and sequence of manoeuvres: a retrospective review. BJOG 2011; 118:985.
  28. McFarland MB, Langer O, Piper JM, Berkus MD. Perinatal outcome and the type and number of maneuvers in shoulder dystocia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1996; 55:219.
  29. Gherman RB, Ouzounian JG, Goodwin TM. Obstetric maneuvers for shoulder dystocia and associated fetal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178:1126.
  30. Baskett TF, Allen AC. Perinatal implications of shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86:14.
  31. Menticoglou SM. A modified technique to deliver the posterior arm in severe shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108:755.
  32. Schramm M. Impacted shoulders--a personal experience. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 23:28.
  33. HOLMAN MS. A new manoeuvre for delivery of an impacted shoulder, based on a mechanical analysis. S Afr Med J 1963; 37:247.
  34. Cluver CA, Hofmeyr GJ. Posterior axilla sling traction for shoulder dystocia: case review and a new method of shoulder rotation with the sling. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212:784.e1.
  36. Gurewitsch ED, Kim EJ, Yang JH, et al. Comparing McRoberts' and Rubin's maneuvers for initial management of shoulder dystocia: an objective evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192:153.
  37. Woods, C. A principle of physics as applicable to shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1943; 145:882.
  38. Bruner JP, Drummond SB, Meenan AL, Gaskin IM. All-fours maneuver for reducing shoulder dystocia during labor. J Reprod Med 1998; 43:439.
  39. Sandberg EC. The Zavanelli maneuver: a potentially revolutionary method for the resolution of shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152:479.
  40. Sandberg EC. The Zavanelli maneuver: 12 years of recorded experience. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93:312.
  41. O'Leary JA, Cuva A. Abdominal rescue after failed cephalic replacement. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80:514.
  42. O'Shaughnessy MJ. Hysterotomy facilitation of the vaginal delivery of the posterior arm in a case of severe shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92:693.
  43. Ersdal HL, Verkuyl DA, Björklund K, Bergström S. Symphysiotomy in Zimbabwe; postoperative outcome, width of the symphysis joint, and knowledge, attitudes and practice among doctors and midwives. PLoS One 2008; 3:e3317.
  44. Chalidis B, Fahel LA, Glanville T, et al. Management and reconstruction of pelvic instability after emergency symphysiotomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2007; 98:264.
  45. Hofmeyr GJ, Shweni PM. Symphysiotomy for feto-pelvic disproportion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 10:CD005299.
  46. Wilson A, Truchanowicz EG, Elmoghazy D, et al. Symphysiotomy for obstructed labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2016; 123:1453.
  47. Hsu TY, Hung FC, Lu YJ, et al. Neonatal clavicular fracture: clinical analysis of incidence, predisposing factors, diagnosis, and outcome. Am J Perinatol 2002; 19:17.
  48. Benjamin K. Part 2. Distinguishing physical characteristics and management of brachial plexus injuries. Adv Neonatal Care 2005; 5:240.
  49. Gherman RB, Ouzounian JG, Goodwin TM. Brachial plexus palsy: an in utero injury? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180:1303.
  50. Foad SL, Mehlman CT, Ying J. The epidemiology of neonatal brachial plexus palsy in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90:1258.
  51. Chauhan SP, Rose CH, Gherman RB, et al. Brachial plexus injury: a 23-year experience from a tertiary center. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192:1795.
  52. Paradiso G, Grañana N, Maza E. Prenatal brachial plexus paralysis. Neurology 1997; 49:261.
  53. Dunn DW, Engle WA. Brachial plexus palsy: intrauterine onset. Pediatr Neurol 1985; 1:367.
  54. Torki M, Barton L, Miller DA, Ouzounian JG. Severe brachial plexus palsy in women without shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120:539.
  55. Gonik B, Walker A, Grimm M. Mathematic modeling of forces associated with shoulder dystocia: a comparison of endogenous and exogenous sources. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182:689.
  56. Jennett RJ, Tarby TJ, Krauss RL. Erb's palsy contrasted with Klumpke's and total palsy: different mechanisms are involved. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186:1216.
  57. Turnpenny PD, Nimmo A. Fractured clavicle of the newborn in a population with a high prevalence of grand-multiparity: analysis of 78 consecutive cases. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100:338.
  58. Poggi SH, Stallings SP, Ghidini A, et al. Intrapartum risk factors for permanent brachial plexus injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189:725.
  59. Jeffery AR, Ellis FJ, Repka MX, Buncic JR. Pediatric Horner syndrome. J AAPOS 1998; 2:159.
  60. Huang YG, Chen L, Gu YD, Yu GR. Histopathological basis of Horner's syndrome in obstetric brachial plexus palsy differs from that in adult brachial plexus injury. Muscle Nerve 2008; 37:632.
  61. Al-Qattan MM, Clarke HM, Curtis CG. The prognostic value of concurrent Horner's syndrome in total obstetric brachial plexus injury. J Hand Surg Br 2000; 25:166.
  62. Hashimoto T, Mitomo M, Hirabuki N, et al. Nerve root avulsion of birth palsy: comparison of myelography with CT myelography and somatosensory evoked potential. Radiology 1991; 178:841.
  63. Medina LS, Yaylali I, Zurakowski D, et al. Diagnostic performance of MRI and MR myelography in infants with a brachial plexus birth injury. Pediatr Radiol 2006; 36:1295.
  64. Trojaborg W. Clinical, electrophysiological, and myelographic studies of 9 patients with cervical spinal root avulsions: discrepancies between EMG and X-ray findings. Muscle Nerve 1994; 17:913.
  65. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. www.jcaho.org/. (Accessed on March 10, 2005).
  66. Sentilhes L, Sénat MV, Boulogne AI, et al. Shoulder dystocia: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 203:156.