What makes UpToDate so powerful?

  • over 10,000 topics
  • 22 specialties
  • 5,700 physician authors
  • evidence-based recommendations
See more sample topics
Find Print
0 Find synonyms

Find synonyms Find exact match

Sedation or induction agents for rapid sequence intubation in adults
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2016 UpToDate®
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2016 UpToDate, Inc.
Sedation or induction agents for rapid sequence intubation in adults

Disclosures: David Caro, MD Nothing to disclose. Ron M Walls, MD, FRCPC, FAAEM Other Financial Interest: Airway Management Education Center [Healthcare provider education and resources (Cook Melker Universal Cricothyrotomy kit, the Difficult Airway course)]. Jonathan Grayzel, MD, FAAEM Nothing to disclose.

Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these are addressed by vetting through a multi-level review process, and through requirements for references to be provided to support the content. Appropriately referenced content is required of all authors and must conform to UpToDate standards of evidence.

Conflict of interest policy

All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.
Literature review current through: Jan 2016. | This topic last updated: Apr 13, 2015.

INTRODUCTION — The first task of any clinician managing an acutely unstable patient is to secure the airway. In most circumstances, emergency clinicians use rapid sequence intubation (RSI) to accomplish this task. RSI incorporates a rapidly acting sedative (ie, induction) agent, in addition to a neuromuscular blocking (ie, paralytic) agent, to create optimal intubating conditions. Selection of the sedative agent and dose most appropriate for the clinical scenario is an important component of RSI.

The pharmacology and selection of induction agents for use in RSI will be reviewed here. The techniques and other medications used in the performance of RSI, as well as other aspects of airway management, are discussed separately. (See "Rapid sequence intubation in adults" and "Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in children" and "Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) for rapid sequence intubation in adults" and "Pretreatment agents for rapid sequence intubation in adults".)

RAPID SEQUENCE INTUBATION — Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) is the standard of care in emergency airway management for intubations not anticipated to be difficult [1-4]. RSI is the virtually simultaneous administration of a sedative and a neuromuscular blocking agent to render a patient rapidly unconscious and flaccid in order to facilitate emergent endotracheal intubation and to minimize the risk of aspiration. Multiple studies confirm the high-success rate of RSI using the combination of a sedative and a paralytic drug [2-4]. (See "Rapid sequence intubation in adults" and "Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) for rapid sequence intubation in adults" and "Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in children".)


Overview — Induction agents (sedatives) are integral to the performance of rapid sequence intubation (RSI) [5]. They provide amnesia, blunt sympathetic responses, and can improve intubating conditions.

When a paralytic agent is used for intubation without sedation, the patient may be fully aware of his or her environment, including pain, but unable to respond [6-9]. In addition to its inhumanity, this circumstance allows for potentially adverse physiologic responses to airway manipulation, including tachycardia, hypertension, and elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) [10]. Sedative use prevents or minimizes these effects. Furthermore, clinicians can sometimes select an induction agent that both facilitates RSI and ameliorates the patient's underlying condition. As examples, thiopental can be used in status epilepticus for its anticonvulsant properties and ketamine in severe asthma to reduce bronchospasm [11].

Use of sedatives may also improve the laryngoscopic view obtained during RSI [5,12,13]. During RSI, the clinician must perform laryngoscopy during the earliest phase of neuromuscular paralysis. Sedatives improve laryngoscopy in part by supplementing the yet incomplete relaxation provided by the paralytic. Even in the presence of a full neuromuscular blocking dose of a paralytic, the addition of a sedative improves intubating conditions during RSI [5].

Each of the major induction agents in common use is discussed below (table 1).


General use — Etomidate is an imidazole-derived, sedative-hypnotic agent that is frequently used for RSI. Etomidate acts directly on the gamma amino butyric acid (GABA) receptor complex, blocking neuroexcitation and producing anesthesia. Etomidate is given by intravenous push in a dose of 0.3 mg/kg, with a time to effect of 15 to 45 seconds and a duration of action of 3 to 12 minutes [14]. It is the most hemodynamically neutral of the sedative agents used for RSI, and does not stimulate histamine release [15-21].

Etomidate provides no analgesic effect, so it does not blunt the noxious stimulation of the upper airway during laryngoscopy and intubation. For patients in whom this is a concern (eg, patients with cardiovascular disease or elevated intracranial pressure), an opioid analgesic, such as fentanyl, is often given during the pretreatment phase of RSI [22].

The hemodynamic stability associated with etomidate makes it the drug of choice for the intubation of hypotensive patients, as well as an attractive option for patients with intracranial pathology, when hypotension must be avoided [15-19,21]. Etomidate causes a mild increase in airway resistance, but less so than thiopental, and may be used in patients with bronchospasm [23].

Concerns with etomidate include adrenal suppression (discussed below), myoclonus, and evidence of regional cerebral excitation (determined by electroencephalogram) after intubation [18,24,25]. Myoclonus has been misidentified as seizure activity, leading to incorrect recommendations that etomidate be avoided in patients with seizure disorders. Myoclonus during RSI is brief and minimal, because of the concomitant administration of a paralytic agent, and of no clinical significance. Etomidate decreases cerebral blood flow and cerebral metabolic oxygen demand, while preserving cerebral perfusion pressure [21]. Postintubation sedation with propofol or benzodiazepines helps to prevent neuroexcitation.

Adrenocortical suppression — The major controversy surrounding etomidate stems from the reversible adrenocortical suppression associated with its use [26-29]. Etomidate is a reversible inhibitor of 11-beta-hydroxylase, which converts 11-deoxycortisol to cortisol (figure 1). (See "Adrenal steroid biosynthesis".)

A single dose of etomidate causes a measurable decrease in the level of circulating cortisol that occurs in response to the administration of exogenous ACTH, although cortisol levels do not fall below the normal physiologic range. This effect does not persist beyond 12 to 24 hours [29].

Some researchers have raised concerns regarding the safety of etomidate in the setting of adrenal insufficiency related to sepsis [27,28,30]. However, no well-designed, prospective trial has shown adverse effects from a single dose of etomidate used for intubation in patients with sepsis or septic shock. A 2013 systematic review identified only two trials that assessed mortality rates among patients randomly assigned to induction with etomidate or an alternative induction agent [31]. A multicenter randomized trial of critically ill patients requiring emergent intubation found no significant difference in organ failure score, 28 day mortality, or intubating conditions between patients given etomidate for induction and those given ketamine [32]. No serious, drug-related adverse events were reported for either medication. Although adrenal insufficiency occurred at a higher rate in the etomidate group (86 percent), it also developed in approximately 48 percent of patients receiving ketamine.

A systematic review of 20 studies in which etomidate was given in a bolus dose as part of induction for tracheal intubation found that etomidate does not have a significant effect upon mortality [33]. Declines in serum cortisol concentrations were more prevalent among etomidate recipients than those who did not receive etomidate in the large majority of studies, but did not persist beyond five hours. The authors note that no individual study included in the review was sufficiently powered to detect differences in mortality or resource utilization. A subsequent systematic review of 18 studies (including two randomized trials) involving 5552 patients with sepsis found that single-dose etomidate did not increase mortality, and that this conclusion was consistent across all study types and subgroup analyses [34]. Another systematic review limited to eight randomized trials of patients undergoing emergency tracheal intubation concluded that there is no strong evidence that a bolus dose of etomidate increases mortality in critically ill patients [35].

Observational and retrospective studies, and flawed reviews based upon such studies [36], have reported mixed results that do not justify recommendations to avoid using etomidate for induction in patients with sepsis.

A small observational study of children with meningococcal sepsis reported a correlation between the use of etomidate for RSI and low cortisol levels, which increased the risk of death [27]. This retrospective study did not randomize patients by intubating sedative agent, nor did it differentiate patients who were intubated from those (presumably less ill) who did not require intubation. The study had several other limitations, including the small number of nonsurvivors (n = 8) and the younger age and more severe disease among nonsurvivors.

A prospective observational study of 106 patients who met sepsis criteria and were intubated found no increase in mortality among those who received etomidate (n = 74) compared with those who received an alternative or no induction agent [37]. No differences were identified in the severity of illness or the demographic characteristics of the two groups.

An observational study using data from the CORTICUS trial reported increased mortality among patients with septic shock who received etomidate for intubation [38]. However, this study is limited and cannot demonstrate causality. According to the authors: "This study…was not designed or powered to test the outcomes prospectively. We do not know the patient's [sic] severity of illness at the time etomidate was used." Furthermore, a mortality difference did not appear until 10 days after etomidate was used and hydrocortisone made no difference in outcome, making it unlikely that etomidate accounts for the difference described.

A single-center, retrospective study of noncardiac surgery patients reported that induction with etomidate was associated with increased 30 day mortality when patients were compared to a propensity matched patient population induced with propofol [39]. Despite the authors’ methodological rigor, such studies cannot account for covariates that were unmeasured or remain unknown, most importantly in this case the reason why etomidate was selected for induction. In addition, given the known, relatively transient effect of etomidate on adrenocortical function, it remains unclear how etomidate could account for an increase in mortality 30 days after its use.

Several retrospective studies, published subsequently to the systematic review described above, of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock who received a single dose of etomidate as part of RSI have reported no increase in mortality, vasopressor use, or ICU length of stay [40,41].

Etomidate has the advantages of superior hemodynamic stability, when compared with most other sedative or induction agents and familiarity because of its widespread use for RSI. When intubating the critically ill patient with possible adrenal insufficiency, the clinician must weigh the theoretical risk of cortisol suppression against the hemodynamic instability that may be caused by alternative induction agents.

We recognize the critical importance of maintaining adequate blood pressure early in the treatment of sepsis and, pending more definitive studies, we believe that etomidate is an acceptable induction agent for patients with severe sepsis.

In contrast, etomidate should NOT be used as an infusion or in repeated bolus doses for maintenance of sedation after intubation. Thus, emergency clinicians should inform the physicians assuming care for the patient in the intensive care unit if etomidate has been used for induction. If ACTH stimulation testing is being considered, clinicians should be aware that the results may be affected by prior administration of etomidate. (See "Evaluation and management of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults".)

Some authors recommend the use of empiric glucocorticoids for the first 24 hours after a dose of etomidate in patients with sepsis, but this approach lacks support from outcome studies [27,42]. We suggest that patients with sepsis who receive etomidate for RSI also receive a single dose of glucocorticoid (eg, hydrocortisone 100 mg IV) only if they manifest hypotension that is refractory to treatment with aggressive fluid resuscitation and a vasopressor. This approach is consistent with that used for patients who do not receive etomidate. A discussion of the role of glucocorticoids in septic shock is discussed separately. (See "Corticosteroid therapy in septic shock".)

Benzodiazepines — Benzodiazepines cause sedation and amnesia through their effects on the gamma amino butyric acid (GABA) receptor complex. Midazolam is the most rapidly acting, making it the benzodiazepine of choice for rapid sequence intubation (RSI) [43,44]. The induction dose for midazolam is 0.1 to 0.3 mg/kg IV push, with a time to effect of approximately 30 to 60 seconds, and a duration of action of 15 to 30 minutes [43,44].

Like all benzodiazepines, midazolam does not provide analgesia but does possess anticonvulsant effects, making it an effective agent for RSI in patients with status epilepticus.

The routine induction dose of midazolam for RSI is 0.2 mg/kg. In this dose, midazolam causes moderate hypotension, with an average drop in mean arterial blood pressure in healthy patients of 10 to 25 percent [43,44]. This tendency to induce hypotension limits midazolam's usefulness in the setting of hypovolemia or shock. If midazolam must be used in such patients, we suggest a dose of 0.1 mg/kg, which will somewhat delay the speed of onset and decrease the depth of sedation achieved, but should not severely compromise intubating conditions. For patients in shock, we suggest etomidate or ketamine because of their superior hemodynamic profiles. (See 'Etomidate' above and 'Ketamine' below.)

Midazolam is frequently underdosed (common dose 0.05 mg/kg) when used for emergency department RSI [45]. Midazolam is often used for procedural sedation in much smaller doses than are required for RSI, which may contribute to underdosing [44].

Midazolam can be used as an infusion for long-term sedation. Doses of 0.05 to 0.4 mg/kg per hour IV have been shown to be safe and effective in critically ill neonates and children [46,47], including neonates undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [48]. Dosing in intubated adults should be titrated to an endpoint of adequate sedation, preferably using a sedation scale.

Lorazepam and diazepam are benzodiazepines used frequently for long-term sedation following intubation, but are not recommended for RSI. Both require propylene glycol as a diluent, and there are reports of propylene glycol toxicity associated with long-term infusions [49]. (See "Sedative-analgesic medications in critically ill adults: Properties, dosage regimens, and adverse effects", section on 'Benzodiazepines'.)

Barbiturates — The ultrashort-acting barbiturates interact with the barbiturate component of the GABA receptor complex, causing profound amnesia and sedation. Thiopental sodium is the barbiturate most commonly used for rapid sequence intubation (RSI). The induction dose is 3 to 5 mg/kg IV, with a time to effect of less than 30 seconds, and a duration of action of 5 to 10 minutes [50]. Methohexital is another barbiturate used for induction; its induction dose is 1 to 3 mg/kg IV, with a time to effect of less than 30 seconds, and a duration of action of approximately 5 to 10 minutes. Barbiturates do not provide analgesia.

Thiopental suppresses neuronal activity, making it a useful induction agent in hemodynamically stable patients with conditions that can elevate intracranial pressure (ICP), including seizures, intracranial bleeding, or trauma.

Thiopental is a venodilator with negative cardiac inotropic effects, and can induce profound hypotension in the doses used for induction of anesthesia. Clinicians must exercise great care when using it in hemodynamically unstable patients or patients prone to hypotension, such as the elderly. For emergency department RSI, we recommend a dose of 3 mg/kg. A reduced dose of 2 or 1 mg/kg is recommended in the setting of hemodynamic compromise [51]. Reductions in ICP associated with thiopental may be caused in part by a decrease in mean arterial pressure, which decreases cerebral perfusion.

Thiopental causes histamine release and can induce or exacerbate bronchospasm [52]. We recommend that thiopental not be used in patients with reactive airway disease.

Thiopental and methohexital suppress white blood cell recruitment, activation, and activity, both in vitro [53,54] and in vivo [55-57]. This effect has been attributed to a number of causes, including suppression of nuclear transcription factor [58], an increase in apoptosis [53], and a decrease in phagocytosis [54]. These immunosuppressive effects make barbiturates poor induction agents in the setting of sepsis, and we do not recommend their use.


General use — Ketamine is a dissociative anesthetic agent, structurally similar to phencyclidine (PCP). It is unique among sedative agents in that it provides analgesia along with its amnestic and sedative effects. Ketamine is given intravenously in doses of 1 to 2 mg/kg, with a time to effect of 45 to 60 seconds, and a duration of action of 10 to 20 minutes.

Ketamine acts at many receptors causing a range of effects. It is thought to stimulate the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor at the GABA receptor complex, causing neuroinhibition and anesthesia. It excites opioid receptors within the insular cortex, putamen, and thalamus, producing analgesia [59,60]. It stimulates catecholamine receptors and release of catecholamines leading to increases in heart rate, contractility, mean arterial pressure, and cerebral blood flow [59,61-63]. Ketamine decreases the production of vascular nitric oxide, diminishing its vasodilatory effect [64], and inhibits nicotinic acetylcholine receptors [65].

Ketamine preserves respiratory drive and has both a quick onset of action and analgesic properties. This makes it a good choice for "awake" intubation attempts, when laryngoscopy is performed on a patient who is moderately sedated and topically anesthetized but not paralyzed due to concerns about a difficult airway (see 'Conditions precluding use of a paralytic' below). Ketamine causes sympathetic stimulation, and is the most hemodynamically stable of all of the available sedative induction agents, making it an attractive choice for hypotensive patients requiring rapid sequence intubation (RSI) [61,62]. Ketamine has also been used successfully and safely in an infant population undergoing bronchoscopy [66].

Theoretically, ketamine causes bronchodilation by stimulating the release of catecholamines. Limited evidence from animal studies suggests the drug may also have direct bronchodilatory effects. Although definitive evidence is lacking, many clinicians use ketamine as an induction agent in severe asthmatics needing RSI. Use of ketamine infusions in subanesthetic doses during asthma exacerbations provides no additional benefit compared with standard therapy [63]. Case reports suggest larger doses may be needed [11].

Ketamine appears to have beneficial effects on stunned myocardium in vitro [62]. When used prior to myocardial oxygen deprivation, ketamine resulted in better recovery after reperfusion. Contractility may also improve with ketamine use [61]. Clinicians must weigh ketamine's potential cardiovascular benefits against its potential to induce cardiac ischemia in patients with significant coronary disease.

The reemergence phenomenon, in which patients experience disturbing dreams as they emerge from ketamine-induced anesthesia, limits use of the drug for procedural sedation or elective anesthesia in adult patients. Reemergence phenomena are of less concern when ketamine is used for RSI, after which the patient is generally sedated with benzodiazepines for a substantial period. One study found that while dreams occurred frequently following sedative doses of ketamine, they were generally pleasant, and the frequency of reemergence phenomena and delirium was markedly reduced by concomitant use of a benzodiazepine [67].

Elevated intracranial pressure — Controversy persists regarding the use of ketamine in patients with a head injury due to concerns about elevating intracranial pressure (ICP). Opponents emphasize that ketamine can cause a rise in ICP through sympathetic stimulation, potentially exacerbating the condition of such patients [68,69]. However, when ketamine is used with a GABA agonist, this rise in ICP may not occur [70,71]. Furthermore, by increasing cerebral perfusion, ketamine may benefit patients with a neurologic injury [59,70].

On balance, evidence suggesting ketamine elevates ICP is weak, and evidence that harm might ensue is weaker. We believe ketamine is an appropriate induction agent for RSI in patients with suspected ICP elevation and normal blood pressure or hypotension. In patients with hypertension and suspected ICP elevation, ketamine should be avoided because of its tendency to further elevate blood pressure.

The best available evidence comes from a systematic review of 10 trials involving 953 critically ill patients, all managed with intubation and mechanical ventilation, which concluded that the use of intravenous ketamine did not adversely affect patient outcomes, including mortality and neurologic outcome [72]. Although most trials included in the review had methodological limitations, two randomized, double-blinded controlled trials comparing the effects of prolonged ketamine and sufentanil infusions found no difference in the mean daily intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure of patients, all of whom had sustained traumatic brain injury.

Other studies suggest ketamine does not interfere with cerebral metabolism; it does not increase cerebral oxygen consumption and does not reduce regional glucose metabolism [59,73,74]. Ketamine can also offset any decrease in mean arterial pressure caused by fentanyl, a drug commonly used as part of RSI in patients with a head injury [75].

Propofol — Propofol is a highly lipid-soluble, alkylphenol derivative that acts at the GABA receptor causing sedation and amnesia. Sedation occurs through direct suppression of brain activity, while amnesia appears to result from interference with long-term memory creation [76,77]. Induction doses of 1.5 to 3 mg/kg IV can be used, with a time to effect of approximately 15 to 45 seconds, and a duration of action of 5 to 10 minutes. Propofol does not provide analgesia. In addition to its use for RSI, propofol is used for long-term sedation in critically ill patients, which is discussed separately. (See "Sedative-analgesic medications in critically ill adults: Properties, dosage regimens, and adverse effects", section on 'Propofol'.)

The pharmacokinetic properties of propofol do not appear to differ among races or between genders [78,79], but children appear to have a slightly longer time to peak serum concentration [80].

Propofol reduces airway resistance and can be a useful induction agent for patients with bronchospasm undergoing RSI [23,81,82]. Its neuroinhibitory effects make propofol a good induction agent for patients with intracranial pathology, provided they are hemodynamically stable. Propofol suppresses sympathetic activity, causing myocardial depression and peripheral vasodilation [83-86]. A decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) caused by propofol can reduce cerebral perfusion pressure, thereby exacerbating a neurologic injury [87]. The usual decrease in MAP is approximately 10 mmHg [88].

Propofol does not prolong the QT interval, unlike some other anesthetic agents [89,90]. Serum triglycerides and serum lipase rise during propofol infusions [91]. Although the manufacturer lists egg or soybean allergies as contraindications to the use of propofol, significant allergic reactions to the newer preparation of the drug appear to be rare. (See "Perioperative anaphylaxis: Clinical manifestations, etiology, and diagnosis", section on 'Hypnotic induction agents'.)

CHOICE OF INDUCTION AGENT — Different clinical scenarios lend themselves to the use of certain induction agents when rapid sequence intubation (RSI) is needed.

Head injury or stroke — In the patient with potentially elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) from head injury or stroke or other conditions, adequate cerebral perfusion pressure must be maintained to prevent secondary brain injury. This means avoiding elevations in ICP and maintaining adequate mean arterial pressure [51]. For these reasons, we suggest etomidate or ketamine be used for induction of these patients [20]. (See 'Etomidate' above and 'Ketamine' above.)

If the patient is hypertensive at the time of induction, etomidate is preferable, as it will not further elevate the blood pressure. In normotensive or hypotensive patients, either agent can be used. In the severely hypotensive patient, ketamine is preferable. Ketamine's analgesic effects minimize the adverse sympathetic stimulation of laryngoscopy, while etomidate lacks such effect.

We suggest pretreatment with a low dose of fentanyl (3 mcg/kg given three minutes before the induction agent) for patients with suspected elevated ICP, particularly if etomidate is to be used for sedation, to mitigate catecholamine release caused by laryngoscopy. If the patient is hypotensive, however, fentanyl should be avoided.

Midazolam, barbiturates, and propofol have been used in head-injured patients, but the risk of hypotension-induced brain injury must be considered [5,20,56,87,92-94]. If these agents are used, the dose should be reduced to minimize the risk of hypotension.

Status epilepticus — We suggest midazolam or thiopental be used for the rapid sequence intubation (RSI) of patients in status epilepticus. Reduced doses should be used in the unusual circumstance of seizure with hypotension.

Propofol is acceptable. Etomidate can cause myoclonus, and has a slightly higher rate of EEG-documented seizure activity compared with thiopental [28], but may be used for RSI in status epilepticus when the patient manifests hemodynamic compromise. We suggest ketamine not be used because of its stimulant effects.

Reactive airway disease — For hemodynamically stable patients with severe bronchospasm requiring intubation, we suggest ketamine or propofol be used for induction, because of their bronchodilatory properties [23,63]. Etomidate and midazolam are acceptable alternatives. In hypotensive patients, we prefer ketamine or etomidate. None of these agents causes histamine release, unlike thiopental, which is not recommended for this reason.

Cardiovascular disease — We suggest etomidate for induction of the patient with significant cardiovascular disease requiring RSI [17,18,20,95]. The hemodynamic stability it provides and the absence of induced hypertension make it preferable to other sedatives. Patients with coronary artery disease or suspected aortic dissection should receive fentanyl (3 mcg/kg) as a pretreatment agent to mitigate the catecholamine release associated with laryngoscopy and intubation. (See 'Etomidate' above.)

Shock — We suggest ketamine or etomidate for induction of the patient in shock requiring RSI. (See 'Etomidate' above and 'Ketamine' above.)

Ketamine causes a sympathetic surge that may augment endogenous catecholamines but may also elevate intracranial pressure. Etomidate has been scrutinized because of its transient suppression of endogenous cortisol. More research is required in this area before a firm recommendation can be made. These issues are discussed in detail above. (See 'Elevated intracranial pressure' above and 'Adrenocortical suppression' above.)

CONDITIONS PRECLUDING USE OF A PARALYTIC — Conditions may exist that preclude the use of a paralytic for intubation (ie, precludes rapid sequence intubation [RSI]). The clinician may then decide to use an appropriate sedative or combination of sedatives and topical anesthesia to facilitate laryngoscopy and assess the airway, while allowing the patient to maintain his respiratory drive. This approach, referred to as a "sedated look" or "awake look," is used when the clinician suspects the airway will be difficult to intubate, and allows the practitioner to verify that laryngeal structures are visible, before committing to paralysis.

The sedated look approach is distinct from the older practice of "intubation with sedation alone" or "non-paralytic RSI," in which the patient receives a full induction dose of a sedative agent, but no neuromuscular blocking agent. The older practice is to be avoided, as it creates a vulnerable, compromised patient in whom intubating conditions are far from ideal [96,97]. In general, if the clinician anticipates a difficult intubation which may preclude successful RSI, an "awake look" or "sedated look" is advised. If the clinician does not anticipate a difficult airway, RSI with a full induction dose of a sedative agent, accompanied by a full dose of a paralytic agent, is advised.

Multiple medications have been studied, primarily in the operating room, to determine which agents are appropriate for "sedated looks" [1,98-105]. In general, the use of topical anesthesia (eg, nebulized 4 percent lidocaine) along with moderate sedation allows for a look into the airway, while enabling the patient to maintain respiratory drive and protective airway reflexes.

Ketamine is gaining popularity in this circumstance because it allows the patient to maintain respiratory drive while providing analgesia, amnesia, and sedation [60,66,70,99]. Ketamine's analgesic properties allow it to be used as the sole agent in the bloody traumatized airway, when topical anesthesia is unlikely to work effectively. More research is needed to determine which sedatives are best for "sedated looks" in the emergent setting.

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS — Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) is the standard of care in emergency airway management for intubations not anticipated to be difficult. RSI involves combining a sedative and a paralytic agent to render a patient rapidly unconscious and flaccid in order to facilitate emergent tracheal intubation and to minimize the risk of aspiration. (See "Rapid sequence intubation in adults" and "Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in children".)

Different clinical scenarios lend themselves to the use of certain sedatives when RSI is needed (table 1). We suggest the following induction agents be used in the specific clinical circumstances described below (Grade 2C):

In the patient with a head injury or potentially elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), adequate cerebral perfusion pressure must be maintained to prevent secondary brain injury. We suggest etomidate for induction of these patients. For hypotensive patients, etomidate or ketamine may be used. Ketamine should be avoided in patients with hypertension or if elevated ICP is caused by spontaneous cerebral hemorrhage. (See 'Head injury or stroke' above and 'Etomidate' above and 'Ketamine' above.)

For the rapid sequence intubation (RSI) of patients in status epilepticus, we suggest midazolam or thiopental be used for induction. Reduced doses should be used in the unusual circumstance of seizure with hypotension. Etomidate may be used when the patient manifests hemodynamic compromise. We suggest ketamine NOT be used because of its stimulant effects. (See 'Status epilepticus' above.)

For the hemodynamically stable patient with severe bronchospasm requiring intubation, we suggest induction with ketamine or propofol. Etomidate or midazolam is an acceptable alternative. In hemodynamically unstable patients with severe bronchospasm, we suggest ketamine or etomidate. We suggest that thiopental NOT be used in these patients because it provokes histamine release and can induce or exacerbate bronchospasm. (See 'Reactive airway disease' above.)

For induction of the patient with cardiovascular compromise requiring RSI, we suggest etomidate because of the hemodynamic stability it provides. (See 'Cardiovascular disease' above and 'Etomidate' above.)

For induction of the patient in shock requiring RSI, we suggest ketamine or etomidate. If etomidate is used in a patient with sepsis and hypotension refractory to treatment with fluid resuscitation and a vasopressor, we suggest that a single dose of glucocorticoid (eg, hydrocortisone 100 mg IV) be given. (See 'Shock' above and 'Etomidate' above and 'Ketamine' above.)

For induction of most patients with conditions precluding the use of paralytics in whom an "awake look" is necessary for intubation, we suggest ketamine. Ketamine may not be appropriate when these patients have cardiovascular disease or hypertension. (See 'Conditions precluding use of a paralytic' above and 'Ketamine' above.)

Use of UpToDate is subject to the Subscription and License Agreement.


  1. Li J, Murphy-Lavoie H, Bugas C, et al. Complications of emergency intubation with and without paralysis. Am J Emerg Med 1999; 17:141.
  2. Sagarin MJ, Chiang V, Sakles JC, et al. Rapid sequence intubation for pediatric emergency airway management. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002; 18:417.
  3. Sakles JC, Laurin EG, Rantapaa AA, Panacek EA. Airway management in the emergency department: a one-year study of 610 tracheal intubations. Ann Emerg Med 1998; 31:325.
  4. Tayal VS, Riggs RW, Marx JA, et al. Rapid-sequence intubation at an emergency medicine residency: success rate and adverse events during a two-year period. Acad Emerg Med 1999; 6:31.
  5. Sivilotti ML, Filbin MR, Murray HE, et al. Does the sedative agent facilitate emergency rapid sequence intubation? Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10:612.
  6. Ballard N, Robley L, Barrett D, et al. Patients' recollections of therapeutic paralysis in the intensive care unit. Am J Crit Care 2006; 15:86.
  7. Playfor SD, Thomas DA, Choonara I I. Recall following paediatric intensive care. Paediatr Anaesth 2000; 10:703.
  8. Topulos GP, Lansing RW, Banzett RB. The experience of complete neuromuscular blockade in awake humans. J Clin Anesth 1993; 5:369.
  9. Wagner BK, Zavotsky KE, Sweeney JB, et al. Patient recall of therapeutic paralysis in a surgical critical care unit. Pharmacotherapy 1998; 18:358.
  10. Sivilotti ML, Ducharme J. Randomized, double-blind study on sedatives and hemodynamics during rapid-sequence intubation in the emergency department: The SHRED Study. Ann Emerg Med 1998; 31:313.
  11. Denmark TK, Crane HA, Brown L. Ketamine to avoid mechanical ventilation in severe pediatric asthma. J Emerg Med 2006; 30:163.
  12. El-Orbany MI, Wafai Y, Joseph NJ, Salem MR. Does the choice of intravenous induction drug affect intubation conditions after a fast-onset neuromuscular blocker? J Clin Anesth 2003; 15:9.
  13. Skinner HJ, Biswas A, Mahajan RP. Evaluation of intubating conditions with rocuronium and either propofol or etomidate for rapid sequence induction. Anaesthesia 1998; 53:702.
  14. Bergen JM, Smith DC. A review of etomidate for rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 1997; 15:221.
  15. Benson M, Junger A, Fuchs C, et al. Use of an anesthesia information management system (AIMS) to evaluate the physiologic effects of hypnotic agents used to induce anesthesia. J Clin Monit Comput 2000; 16:183.
  16. Fuchs-Buder T, Sparr HJ, Ziegenfuss T. Thiopental or etomidate for rapid sequence induction with rocuronium. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80:504.
  17. Guldner G, Schultz J, Sexton P, et al. Etomidate for rapid-sequence intubation in young children: hemodynamic effects and adverse events. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10:134.
  18. Jellish WS, Riche H, Salord F, et al. Etomidate and thiopental-based anesthetic induction: comparisons between different titrated levels of electrophysiologic cortical depression and response to laryngoscopy. J Clin Anesth 1997; 9:36.
  19. Sokolove PE, Price DD, Okada P. The safety of etomidate for emergency rapid sequence intubation of pediatric patients. Pediatr Emerg Care 2000; 16:18.
  20. Zed PJ, Abu-Laban RB, Harrison DW. Intubating conditions and hemodynamic effects of etomidate for rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department: an observational cohort study. Acad Emerg Med 2006; 13:378.
  21. Oglesby AJ. Should etomidate be the induction agent of choice for rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department? Emerg Med J 2004; 21:655.
  22. Schneider, RE, Caro, DA. Pretreatment agents. In: Manual of Emergency Airway Management, Walls, RM (Eds), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2004. p.185.
  23. Eames WO, Rooke GA, Wu RS, Bishop MJ. Comparison of the effects of etomidate, propofol, and thiopental on respiratory resistance after tracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1996; 84:1307.
  24. Kox WJ, von Heymann C, Heinze J, et al. Electroencephalographic mapping during routine clinical practice: cortical arousal during tracheal intubation? Anesth Analg 2006; 102:825.
  25. Reddy RV, Moorthy SS, Dierdorf SF, et al. Excitatory effects and electroencephalographic correlation of etomidate, thiopental, methohexital, and propofol. Anesth Analg 1993; 77:1008.
  26. Cohan P, Wang C, McArthur DL, et al. Acute secondary adrenal insufficiency after traumatic brain injury: a prospective study. Crit Care Med 2005; 33:2358.
  27. den Brinker M, Joosten KF, Liem O, et al. Adrenal insufficiency in meningococcal sepsis: bioavailable cortisol levels and impact of interleukin-6 levels and intubation with etomidate on adrenal function and mortality. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005; 90:5110.
  28. Jackson WL Jr. Should we use etomidate as an induction agent for endotracheal intubation in patients with septic shock?: a critical appraisal. Chest 2005; 127:1031.
  29. Schenarts CL, Burton JH, Riker RR. Adrenocortical dysfunction following etomidate induction in emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med 2001; 8:1.
  30. Malerba G, Romano-Girard F, Cravoisy A, et al. Risk factors of relative adrenocortical deficiency in intensive care patients needing mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31:388.
  31. Hunter BR, Kirschner J. In patients with severe sepsis, does a single dose of etomidate to facilitate intubation increase mortality? Ann Emerg Med 2013; 61:571.
  32. Jabre P, Combes X, Lapostolle F, et al. Etomidate versus ketamine for rapid sequence intubation in acutely ill patients: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009; 374:293.
  33. Hohl CM, Kelly-Smith CH, Yeung TC, et al. The effect of a bolus dose of etomidate on cortisol levels, mortality, and health services utilization: a systematic review. Ann Emerg Med 2010; 56:105.
  34. Gu WJ, Wang F, Tang L, Liu JC. Single-dose etomidate does not increase mortality in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Chest 2015; 147:335.
  35. Bruder EA, Ball IM, Ridi S, et al. Single induction dose of etomidate versus other induction agents for endotracheal intubation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 1:CD010225.
  36. Chan CM, Mitchell AL, Shorr AF. Etomidate is associated with mortality and adrenal insufficiency in sepsis: a meta-analysis*. Crit Care Med 2012; 40:2945.
  37. Tekwani KL, Watts HF, Rzechula KH, et al. A prospective observational study of the effect of etomidate on septic patient mortality and length of stay. Acad Emerg Med 2009; 16:11.
  38. Cuthbertson BH, Sprung CL, Annane D, et al. The effects of etomidate on adrenal responsiveness and mortality in patients with septic shock. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35:1868.
  39. Komatsu R, You J, Mascha EJ, et al. Anesthetic induction with etomidate, rather than propofol, is associated with increased 30-day mortality and cardiovascular morbidity after noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2013; 117:1329.
  40. Dmello D, Taylor S, O'Brien J, Matuschak GM. Outcomes of etomidate in severe sepsis and septic shock. Chest 2010; 138:1327.
  41. McPhee LC, Badawi O, Fraser GL, et al. Single-dose etomidate is not associated with increased mortality in ICU patients with sepsis: analysis of a large electronic ICU database. Crit Care Med 2013; 41:774.
  42. Payen JF, Dupuis C, Trouve-Buisson T, et al. Corticosteroid after etomidate in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med 2012; 40:29.
  43. Blumer JL. Clinical pharmacology of midazolam in infants and children. Clin Pharmacokinet 1998; 35:37.
  44. Nordt SP, Clark RF. Midazolam: a review of therapeutic uses and toxicity. J Emerg Med 1997; 15:357.
  45. Sagarin MJ, Barton ED, Sakles JC, et al. Underdosing of midazolam in emergency endotracheal intubation. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10:329.
  46. de Wildt SN, de Hoog M, Vinks AA, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and metabolism of midazolam in pediatric intensive care patients. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:1952.
  47. Tobias JD, Berkenbosch JW. Sedation during mechanical ventilation in infants and children: dexmedetomidine versus midazolam. South Med J 2004; 97:451.
  48. Mulla H, McCormack P, Lawson G, et al. Pharmacokinetics of midazolam in neonates undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Anesthesiology 2003; 99:275.
  49. Wilson KC, Reardon C, Theodore AC, Farber HW. Propylene glycol toxicity: a severe iatrogenic illness in ICU patients receiving IV benzodiazepines: a case series and prospective, observational pilot study. Chest 2005; 128:1674.
  50. Russo H, Bressolle F. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of thiopental. Clin Pharmacokinet 1998; 35:95.
  51. Reich DL, Hossain S, Krol M, et al. Predictors of hypotension after induction of general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2005; 101:622.
  52. Hirota K, Ohtomo N, Hashimoto Y, et al. Effects of thiopental on airway calibre in dogs: direct visualization method using a superfine fibreoptic bronchoscope. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81:203.
  53. Keel M, Mica L, Stover J, et al. Thiopental-induced apoptosis in lymphocytes is independent of CD95 activation. Anesthesiology 2005; 103:576.
  54. Ploppa A, Kiefer RT, Nohé B, et al. Dose-dependent influence of barbiturates but not of propofol on human leukocyte phagocytosis of viable Staphylococcus aureus. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:478.
  55. Sato M, Tanaka S, Suzuki K, et al. Complications associated with barbiturate therapy. Resuscitation 1989; 17:233.
  56. Schalén W, Messeter K, Nordström CH. Complications and side effects during thiopentone therapy in patients with severe head injuries. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1992; 36:369.
  57. Stover JF, Stocker R. Barbiturate coma may promote reversible bone marrow suppression in patients with severe isolated traumatic brain injury. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 54:529.
  58. Loop T, Humar M, Pischke S, et al. Thiopental inhibits tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced activation of nuclear factor kappaB through suppression of kappaB kinase activity. Anesthesiology 2003; 99:360.
  59. Långsjö JW, Kaisti KK, Aalto S, et al. Effects of subanesthetic doses of ketamine on regional cerebral blood flow, oxygen consumption, and blood volume in humans. Anesthesiology 2003; 99:614.
  60. Rogers R, Wise RG, Painter DJ, et al. An investigation to dissociate the analgesic and anesthetic properties of ketamine using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Anesthesiology 2004; 100:292.
  61. Hanouz JL, Persehaye E, Zhu L, et al. The inotropic and lusitropic effects of ketamine in isolated human atrial myocardium: the effect of adrenoceptor blockade. Anesth Analg 2004; 99:1689.
  62. Hanouz JL, Zhu L, Persehaye E, et al. Ketamine preconditions isolated human right atrial myocardium: roles of adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channels and adrenoceptors. Anesthesiology 2005; 102:1190.
  63. Allen JY, Macias CG. The efficacy of ketamine in pediatric emergency department patients who present with acute severe asthma. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 46:43.
  64. Chen RM, Chen TL, Lin YL, et al. Ketamine reduces nitric oxide biosynthesis in human umbilical vein endothelial cells by down-regulating endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression and intracellular calcium levels. Crit Care Med 2005; 33:1044.
  65. Ho KK, Flood P. Single amino acid residue in the extracellular portion of transmembrane segment 2 in the nicotinic alpha7 acetylcholine receptor modulates sensitivity to ketamine. Anesthesiology 2004; 100:657.
  66. Berkenbosch JW, Graff GR, Stark JM. Safety and efficacy of ketamine sedation for infant flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Chest 2004; 125:1132.
  67. Grace RF. The effect of variable-dose diazepam on dreaming and emergence phenomena in 400 cases of ketamine-fentanyl anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2003; 58:904.
  68. Wyte SR, Shapiro HM, Turner P, Harris AB. Ketamine-induced intracranial hypertension. Anesthesiology 1972; 36:174.
  69. Gardner AE, Dannemiller FJ, Dean D. Intracranial cerebrospinal fluid pressure in man during ketamine anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1972; 51:741.
  70. Himmelseher S, Durieux ME. Revising a dogma: ketamine for patients with neurological injury? Anesth Analg 2005; 101:524.
  71. Albanèse J, Arnaud S, Rey M, et al. Ketamine decreases intracranial pressure and electroencephalographic activity in traumatic brain injury patients during propofol sedation. Anesthesiology 1997; 87:1328.
  72. Cohen L, Athaide V, Wickham ME, et al. The effect of ketamine on intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressure and health outcomes: a systematic review. Ann Emerg Med 2015; 65:43.
  73. Långsjö JW, Salmi E, Kaisti KK, et al. Effects of subanesthetic ketamine on regional cerebral glucose metabolism in humans. Anesthesiology 2004; 100:1065.
  74. Hudetz JA, Pagel PS. Neuroprotection by ketamine: a review of the experimental and clinical evidence. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 24:131.
  75. Bourgoin A, Albanèse J, Léone M, et al. Effects of sufentanil or ketamine administered in target-controlled infusion on the cerebral hemodynamics of severely brain-injured patients. Crit Care Med 2005; 33:1109.
  76. Veselis RA, Reinsel RA, Feshchenko VA, Johnson R Jr. Information loss over time defines the memory defect of propofol: a comparative response with thiopental and dexmedetomidine. Anesthesiology 2004; 101:831.
  77. Veselis RA, Feshchenko VA, Reinsel RA, et al. Propofol and thiopental do not interfere with regional cerebral blood flow response at sedative concentrations. Anesthesiology 2005; 102:26.
  78. Kodaka M, Johansen JW, Sebel PS. The influence of gender on loss of consciousness with sevoflurane or propofol. Anesth Analg 2005; 101:377.
  79. Shangguan WN, Lian Q, Aarons L, et al. Pharmacokinetics of a single bolus of propofol in chinese children of different ages. Anesthesiology 2006; 104:27.
  80. Muñoz HR, Cortínez LI, Ibacache ME, Altermatt FR. Estimation of the plasma effect site equilibration rate constant (ke0) of propofol in children using the time to peak effect: comparison with adults. Anesthesiology 2004; 101:1269.
  81. Conti G, Ferretti A, Tellan G, et al. Propofol induces bronchodilation in a patient mechanically ventilated for status asthmaticus. Intensive Care Med 1993; 19:305.
  82. Pizov R, Brown RH, Weiss YS, et al. Wheezing during induction of general anesthesia in patients with and without asthma. A randomized, blinded trial. Anesthesiology 1995; 82:1111.
  83. Bein B, Renner J, Caliebe D, et al. Sevoflurane but not propofol preserves myocardial function during minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesth Analg 2005; 100:610.
  84. Ebert TJ. Sympathetic and hemodynamic effects of moderate and deep sedation with propofol in humans. Anesthesiology 2005; 103:20.
  85. Masuda T, Tomiyama Y, Kitahata H, et al. Propofol inhibits volume-sensitive chloride channels in human coronary artery smooth muscle cells. Anesth Analg 2003; 97:657.
  86. Win NN, Fukayama H, Kohase H, Umino M. The different effects of intravenous propofol and midazolam sedation on hemodynamic and heart rate variability. Anesth Analg 2005; 101:97.
  87. Steiner LA, Johnston AJ, Chatfield DA, et al. The effects of large-dose propofol on cerebrovascular pressure autoregulation in head-injured patients. Anesth Analg 2003; 97:572.
  88. Aitkenhead AR, Pepperman ML, Willatts SM, et al. Comparison of propofol and midazolam for sedation in critically ill patients. Lancet 1989; 2:704.
  89. Whyte SD, Booker PD, Buckley DG. The effects of propofol and sevoflurane on the QT interval and transmural dispersion of repolarization in children. Anesth Analg 2005; 100:71.
  90. Paventi S, Santevecchi A, Ranieri R. Effects of sevoflurane versus propofol on QT interval. Minerva Anestesiol 2001; 67:637.
  91. Gottschling S, Meyer S, Krenn T, et al. Effects of short-term propofol administration on pancreatic enzymes and triglyceride levels in children. Anaesthesia 2005; 60:660.
  92. Marvez-Valls E, Houry D, Ernst AA, et al. Protocol for rapid sequence intubation in pediatric patients -- a four-year study. Med Sci Monit 2002; 8:CR229.
  93. Sonday CJ, Axelband J, Jacoby J, et al. Thiopental vs. etomidate for rapid sequence intubation in aeromedicine. Prehosp Disaster Med 2005; 20:324.
  94. Choi YF, Wong TW, Lau CC. Midazolam is more likely to cause hypotension than etomidate in emergency department rapid sequence intubation. Emerg Med J 2004; 21:700.
  95. Sarkar M, Laussen PC, Zurakowski D, et al. Hemodynamic responses to etomidate on induction of anesthesia in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg 2005; 101:645.
  96. Kirkegaard-Nielsen H, Caldwell JE, Berry PD. Rapid tracheal intubation with rocuronium: a probability approach to determining dose. Anesthesiology 1999; 91:131.
  97. Naguib M, Samarkandi A, Riad W, Alharby SW. Optimal dose of succinylcholine revisited. Anesthesiology 2003; 99:1045.
  98. Durmus M, Ender G, Kadir BA, et al. Remifentanil with thiopental for tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants. Anesth Analg 2003; 96:1336.
  99. Bahk JH, Sung J, Jang IJ. A comparison of ketamine and lidocaine spray with propofol for the insertion of laryngeal mask airway in children: a double-blinded randomized trial. Anesth Analg 2002; 95:1586.
  100. Bair AE, Filbin MR, Kulkarni RG, Walls RM. The failed intubation attempt in the emergency department: analysis of prevalence, rescue techniques, and personnel. J Emerg Med 2002; 23:131.
  101. Bozeman WP, Young S. Etomidate as a sole agent for endotracheal intubation in the prehospital air medical setting. Air Med J 2002; 21:32.
  102. De Fátima De Assunção Braga A, Da Silva Braga FS, Potério GM, et al. The effect of different doses of propofol on tracheal intubating conditions without muscle relaxant in children. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 18:384.
  103. Erhan E, Ugur G, Alper I, et al. Tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants: remifentanil or alfentanil in combination with propofol. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003; 20:37.
  104. Liou CM, Hung WT, Chen CC, et al. Improving the success rate of laryngeal mask airway insertion during etomidate induction by using fentanyl or succinylcholine. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 2004; 42:209.
  105. Taha S, Siddik-Sayyid S, Alameddine M, et al. Propofol is superior to thiopental for intubation without muscle relaxants. Can J Anaesth 2005; 52:249.
Topic 271 Version 21.0

All topics are updated as new information becomes available. Our peer review process typically takes one to six weeks depending on the issue.