INTRODUCTION — Restless legs syndrome (RLS) refers to symptoms of spontaneous, continuous leg movements associated with unpleasant paresthesias [1]. These sensations occur only at rest and are relieved by movement. Sleep disturbance and a frequent association with involuntary, jerking movements of the legs during sleep, known as periodic leg movements of sleep (PLMS), are common. Nocturnal leg cramps are a separate disorder and are discussed elsewhere. (See "Nocturnal leg cramps".)
EPIDEMIOLOGY — Mild symptoms of RLS occur in 5 to 15 percent of the population; prevalence figures vary widely depending upon the population surveyed and severity of symptoms required for inclusion [2-5].
In a population study of RLS that used standard diagnostic criteria, 15,391 subjects (≥18-years-old) from the United States and five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom) completed questionnaires and the following observations were made [6]:
A previous survey also found that the prevalence of restless legs (with symptoms experienced on five or more nights per month) increased with age, from 3 percent of participants ages 18 to 29, compared with 10 percent of those ages 30 to 79 and 19 percent of those ages 80 or older [7]. Increasing parity may be associated with an increased risk of RLS [8].
RLS also occurs in children. A large population-based internet survey study from the United Kingdom and United States found that the prevalence of definite RLS in children 8 to 17 years old was approximately 2 percent [9]. The presence of moderately severe or distressing RLS symptoms occurring two or more times a week was found in 0.5 percent of children ages 8 to 11 years and 1.0 percent of those 12 to 17 years old. A biologic parent with RLS symptoms was noted for >70 percent of children with RLS.
In a telephone survey of patients with RLS, 25 percent experienced their first symptoms between ages 11 and 20 [10]. Misdiagnoses such as "growing pains" and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder were common, and medical attention was often not sought until after age 40 when symptoms frequently begin to progress. In a retrospective study, 32 of 538 children and adolescent subjects (5.9 percent) presenting to a sleep disorders clinic had restless legs syndrome [11]. Low serum ferritin (<50 ng/mL [<50 mcg/L]) was found in 20 of 24 subjects (83 percent) who had ferritin levels.
A number of retrospective studies suggest that children and adults with RLS have a relatively high rate of comorbid psychiatric disorders, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and mood disorders [12-15]. However, the implications of these data are unclear, since psychotropic medications may induce symptoms similar to RLS or exacerbate pre-existing RLS.
PATHOGENESIS — In most cases RLS is a primary idiopathic disorder, but it also can be associated with a variety of underlying medical disorders.
Primary RLS — The cause of primary (or idiopathic) RLS is unknown. However, a family history consistent with dominant inheritance is present in more than 40 percent of patients with idiopathic RLS [16,17]. This observation, in combination with reports of several large kindreds with RLS, suggests a genetic basis for the disorder. A genetic component is further supported by the following observations:
Several neurophysiologic changes have been identified in patients with RLS, including reduced motor cortex inhibition, spinal flexor reflex hyperactivity, and brainstem reflex abnormalities, but these are nonspecific findings, the significance of which is currently undetermined [31].
It has been assumed that RLS is a peripheral disorder, but studies of brain dopamine metabolism raise the possibility of a central nervous system cause. One hypothesis holds that RLS arises from dysfunction of hypothalamic dopaminergic cells that are the source of spinal cord dopamine [32]. Data from functional imaging with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) are conflicting, having demonstrated reduced [33,34], increased [35], or unchanged [36] basal ganglia dopamine receptor binding and 18F-Dopa uptake in patients with RLS compared with control subjects. This is of particular interest since there is probably an increased incidence of RLS in Parkinson disease [37].
Brain iron metabolism may also play a role. (See 'Iron deficiency' below.)
Hypocretins are hypothalamic neuropeptide transmitters that participate in the normal control of the sleep wake cycle and are depleted in the pathophysiology of narcolepsy. (See "Diagnosis and neurobiology of narcolepsy", section on 'Genetic factors'.)
Hypocretins increase arousal and interact with the dopamine system [38]. A small clinical study also found that increases in hypocretin levels in the cerebrospinal fluid were associated with an increased incidence of restless legs syndrome, particularly early onset disease [39].
Secondary RLS — RLS can occur secondary to a number of disorders including iron deficiency, uremia, diabetes mellitus, rheumatic disease, and venous insufficiency, among others.
Iron deficiency — Iron deficiency has been considered a possible cause of RLS since the original publications on this disorder [40]. Subsequently, the relationship between iron status and RLS has been examined in several studies [41-44]:
While these findings are not conclusive, they warrant the measurement of serum ferritin levels in patients with RLS and a trial of oral iron therapy when ferritin levels are low. (See "Causes and diagnosis of anemia due to iron deficiency" and "Treatment of anemia due to iron deficiency", section on 'Oral iron therapy'.)
Oral iron therapy may also be considered when ferritin levels are within normal range, as some patients without iron deficiency may still respond.
End-stage renal disease — RLS is common among dialysis patients, with a reported incidence of 6 to 60 percent [48-50]. (See "Uremic polyneuropathy".) Anemia may play a role in these circumstances, since low-dose erythropoietin therapy significantly reduced RLS in one report [51]. In addition, iron therapy among dialysis patients with functional, but not absolute, iron deficiency was beneficial in another study [52]. (See "Uremic polyneuropathy", section on 'Restless legs syndrome'.)
A third study, however, found that a low serum parathyroid hormone concentration, but not serum hemoglobin, was associated with the presence of RLS in 136 dialysis patients [53].
Diabetes mellitus — RLS can be a prominent feature of diabetic neuropathy [54,55], and type 2 diabetes may be an independent risk factor for RLS development [56]. RLS and other sensory symptoms of neuropathy often improve following successful pancreatic-kidney transplantation [57].
Multiple sclerosis — Mounting evidence suggests that RLS is associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) [58-60], but data are conflicting [61]. In the largest study, a prospective multicenter epidemiologic survey of 861 patients with MS and 649 control subjects, the prevalence of RLS was significantly higher in patients with MS than in controls (19 versus 4 percent, relative risk 5.4, 95% CI 3.56-8.26) [59].
Parkinson disease — Both RLS and Parkinson disease appear to involve disturbances in the dopaminergic neurotransmitter system, suggesting a common mechanism [62]. However, few studies have examined the relationship between these two disorders, and progress is hampered by a lack of understanding regarding the pathophysiology of RLS. In contrast to Parkinson disease, preliminary neuropathologic evidence suggests that the pathogenesis of RLS does not involve neuronal degeneration of nigrostriatal pathways [62].
Estimates of the prevalence of RLS among patients with Parkinson disease vary widely from 0 to 21 percent; some [37,63-65] but not all [66-68] studies have found that the prevalence of RLS is higher in patients with Parkinson disease than in the general population. Probably the best data come from a population-based study from Norway of 200 patients with early untreated Parkinson disease who were compared with 173 matched control subjects [68]. The frequency of RLS was nonsignificantly higher in patients with Parkinson disease compared with controls (12.5 versus 9.6 percent, relative risk [RR] 1.76, 95% CI 0.9-3.43). This finding suggests that the overlap of RLS with untreated Parkinson disease is most likely coincidental [69]. However, the issue is not settled. One series found that patients with both Parkinson disease and RLS were older at RLS onset, were less likely to have a family history of RLS, and had lower serum ferritin levels compared with patients with idiopathic RLS [37]. When both disorders were present, Parkinson disease preceded RLS in 68 percent of patients. There are also indications that long-term antiparkinson therapy may contribute to the apparent increased prevalence of RLS in patients with Parkinson disease [64]. One potential explanation is that wearing-off episodes related to levodopa therapy can be associated with symptoms that mimic RLS, such as unpleasant sensations and the urge to move the legs [70]. Another is that prolonged levodopa exposure can induce augmentation of RLS, characterized by increasingly severe symptoms, onset earlier in the day or spread to other body parts [71].
Akathisia, a subjective feeling of motor restlessness accompanied by inability to sit or stand still, is also common in Parkinson disease, with prevalence rates ranging from 26 to 45 percent [66,72] and the potential for overlap with RLS (see 'Diagnosis' below) [73]. Due to the similarity of symptoms, some patients with akathisia may be misidentified as having RLS, but the two can be distinguished. As an example, leg motor restlessness, defined as the urge to move the legs in subjects not fulfilling RLS criteria, was an outcome measure in the population-based case-control study cited above [68]. The frequency of leg motor restlessness was significantly higher in patients with Parkinson disease compared with controls (25 versus 8.7 percent, RR 2.84, 95% CI 1.43-5.61) [68]. However, the significance of this finding is uncertain, since wearing-off episodes or other effects of antiparkinson medications may contribute to motor restlessness in patients with Parkinson disease.
Pregnancy — Pregnancy appears to be a risk factor for the occurrence or worsening of RLS [74-77]. In a study of 626 pregnant women admitted to a single center, the diagnosis of RLS was determined by the four International RLS Study group criteria (see 'Diagnosis' below); the prevalence of RLS in this group of women was 10 percent before pregnancy and increased to 27 percent during pregnancy [77]. The highest rates were seen in the third trimester and dropped quickly after delivery. Older studies have reported lower rates of RLS during pregnancy [74-76], but none of them had used or strictly applied the four standard diagnostic criteria.
The cause of the increased frequency of RLS during pregnancy is unclear, but possible causes include iron deficiency, folate deficiency, and hormonal changes [77,78].
Treatment recommendations for RLS in pregnancy are summarized below (see 'Treatment in pregnancy' below).
Rheumatic disease — The relationship between RLS and rheumatic disease is unclear.
Venous insufficiency — Varicose veins have been associated with RLS and treatment of varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency may be helpful in some patients. As an example, one study found that 312 of 1397 patients seeking treatment for varicose veins had symptoms of RLS on a screening questionnaire and interview [84]. Sclerotherapy was performed in 113 of the patients with RLS; 98 percent reported initial relief of RLS. Symptom relief was maintained in 72 percent at two years of follow-up.
Treatment of chronic venous insufficiency with hydroxyethylrutoside also appears to be beneficial in patients with RLS but not as striking or dramatic as sclerotherapy. (See "Medical management of lower extremity chronic venous disease".) A meta-analysis of 15 trials that included a total of 1973 patients found that RLS improved in 36 percent of those treated with an average dose of 1000 mg/day for a minimum of four weeks compared with 26 percent of placebo controls [85].
Other miscellaneous conditions — Other disorders that have been reported to be associated with RLS include other peripheral neuropathies, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, vitamin deficiencies, lumbosacral radiculopathy, spinal stenosis, excess caffeine intake, administration of mianserin, hypoglycemia, hypothyroidism, and obesity [16,86-93].
CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS — Although the subjective symptoms of RLS are often difficult to describe, the clinical features are highly stereotyped. The hallmark of RLS is a marked discomfort in the legs that occurs only at rest and is immediately relieved by movement. The abnormal feelings are typically deep seated and localized below the knees. Distribution is usually bilateral, but some asymmetry may occur and the arms can be affected in more severe cases.
Terms that patients use to describe the symptoms include crawling, creeping, pulling, itching, drawing, or stretching, all localized to deep structures rather than the skin. Pain and tingling paresthesia of the type that occurs in painful peripheral neuropathy are usually absent, and there is no sensitivity to touching of the skin.
Symptoms typically worsen towards the end of the day and are maximal at night, when they appear within 15 to 30 minutes of reclining in bed. In severe cases symptoms may occur earlier in the day while the patient is seated, thereby interfering with attending meetings, sitting in a movie theater, and similar activities. In milder cases patients will fidget, move in bed, and kick or massage their legs for relief. Patients with more severe symptoms feel forced to get out of bed and pace the floor to relieve symptoms.
Periodic limb movements of sleep — Periodic limb movements of sleep (PLMS) are sudden jerking leg movements that commonly accompany RLS. These are repetitive, highly stereotyped movements that typically involve extension of the big toe with partial flexion of the ankle, knee, and sometimes the hip. The patient is usually unaware of these movements. The prevalence of PLMS increases with age, and PLMS are identified in the vast majority of patients with RLS during sleep laboratory evaluations.
Treatment is not necessary if PLMS occur without sleep complaints.
In some patients, however, the periodic limb movements may cause partial or total arousal from sleep and provide an additional cause of insomnia and excessive daytime drowsiness. In such cases, periodic limb movement disorder (PLMD) of sleep is the term used to characterize the association of PLMS and hypersomnolence. A case-control polysomnography study found that 45 patients with RLS had significantly higher indices of sleep fragmentation and of PLMS than 45 matched controls [94].
Although data are limited, treatment of symptomatic PLMD is approached using the same drugs and regimens as are used to treat RLS, particularly when PLMD is accompanied by RLS [95,96]. Benzodiazepines, pramipexole, and ropinirole are often used to treat PLMD in the absence of RLS. (See 'Treatment' below and 'Benzodiazepines' below.)
Formal diagnostic criteria for PLMD require polysomnography as follows [97]:
DIAGNOSIS — The diagnosis of RLS is often delayed or missed, especially when the symptoms are relatively mild or non-specific. The diagnosis of primary RLS rests on typical symptoms in the presence of a normal neurologic examination. Patients with secondary forms of RLS due to peripheral neuropathy may have related sensory and reflex abnormalities.
The International Restless Legs Study Group proposed the following four features as essential criteria for the diagnosis of RLS [98]:
Supportive criteria for the diagnosis of RLS include the following [98]:
Polysomnography in a sleep laboratory is not necessary for the diagnosis, but it may be helpful, especially when RLS is resistant to treatment [99]. (See 'Periodic limb movements of sleep' above.)
The differential diagnosis begins with separating primary from secondary RLS. Iron deficiency and renal failure are particularly important to exclude; a normal hemoglobin does not rule out iron deficiency if the serum ferritin is low. Peripheral neuropathy, lumbosacral radiculopathy, and ordinary leg cramps, all of which are typically more painful conditions, should also be considered. (See "Nocturnal leg cramps".)
RLS should be differentiated from akathisia, a common side effect of the phenothiazine antipsychotic drugs and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants. Akathisia (from the Greek "not to sit") is a more constant and generalized feeling of motor restlessness unassociated with subjective discomfort localizing to the legs. In contrast to akathisia, RLS has a circadian rhythm (worse at night when the patient is sitting or in bed) and is commonly accompanied by paresthesias and myoclonic jerks during the waking state [100]. The syndrome of "painful legs and moving toes" is a rare disorder of unknown cause characterized by more prominent involuntary toe movements and leg pain [101].
TREATMENT — A number of treatments for RLS have been studied in primarily small, randomized, controlled trials. Placebo controlled studies are particularly important since RLS is normally characterized by fluctuations and remissions.
Iron replacement therapy is suggested for all patients with RLS. Nonpharmacologic measures such as mental alerting activities, avoidance of aggravating factors, and stretching exercises for the posterior leg muscles (picture 1) may be helpful for some patients with RLS [102].
Pharmacotherapy for idiopathic RLS with benzodiazepines, dopaminergic drugs, or, in resistant cases, opioids have been successful in many patients [103]. Dopaminergic drugs such as levodopa (L-dopa) and dopamine agonists appear to be more effective than benzodiazepines in patients with RLS, although there are no direct comparison studies. (See 'Levodopa' below and 'Pramipexole and ropinirole' below.)
Expert panel recommendations — An algorithm for the management of RLS devised by an expert panel was published in 2004 and highlights three particular types of RLS (intermittent, daily, and refractory) [102]. Recommendations for these three types are excerpted here.
Intermittent RLS — Intermittent RLS is defined as RLS that is troublesome enough when present to require treatment but that is not sufficiently frequent to require regular daily medication use [102]. Treatment options include:
Daily RLS — Daily RLS is defined as RLS that is frequent and troublesome enough to require daily treatment [102]. Treatment options include:
Refractory RLS — Refractory RLS is defined as daily RLS treated with a dopamine agonist but with a poor response [102]. The response is considered poor if there is an inadequate initial response despite adequate doses of medication or if the response becomes inadequate with time despite increasing doses. Augmentation (the onset of symptoms earlier in the day or extension of symptoms to arms or trunk) that is not controllable with additional earlier doses of the drug also qualifies RLS as refractory, as does intolerable adverse effects.
Referral to a specialist for RLS management should be considered for these patients [102]. Four different pharmacologic treatment approaches are recommended:
Nonpharmacologic therapy — Nonpharmacologic therapy is recommended by the expert panel for patients with intermittent or daily RLS [102]. The therapy involves the following components:
Online information and support is available for patients with RLS through The Restless Legs Syndrome Foundation.
Iron replacement — A trial of oral iron therapy is suggested for all patients with RLS, particularly premenopausal women, as some patients without evidence of iron deficiency may still respond favorably. Iron replacement is indicated if the serum ferritin level is lower than 45 to 50 ng/mL (45 to 50 mcg/L).
The suggested regimen is ferrous sulfate (325 mg three times a day) in combination with vitamin C (100 to 200 mg) with each dose of ferrous sulfate to enhance absorption. (See "Treatment of anemia due to iron deficiency", section on 'Oral iron therapy'.)
Ferritin levels should be checked after three to four months of therapy and then every three to six months until the serum ferritin level is >50 ng/mL (>50 mcg/L) and iron saturation is greater than 20 percent.
Avoidance of aggravating drugs — Caffeine, nicotine, and alcohol may aggravate RLS symptoms. A trial of abstinence is reasonable in many patients.
Antidepressants, neuroleptic agents, dopamine-blocking antiemetics such as metoclopramide, or sedating antihistamines (including those found in nonprescription medications) may contribute to RLS symptoms. However, discontinuation may not be possible without causing patient harm. If antidepressants are necessary, the symptoms of secondary RLS can usually be treated in the same way as primary RLS. Bupropion is an alternative antidepressant that may be less likely to induce or worsen RLS [104].
Short daily hemodialysis for patients in renal failure — In a prospective cohort study (FREEDOM study) that included 94 patients with disturbed sleep and/or restless leg syndrome, short daily hemodialysis resulted in a sustained improvement in restless legs symptoms as assessed by the International Restless Leg Syndrome Study Group rating scale [105]. However the percentage of patients prescribed medication for restless leg syndrome did not decrease. (See "Short daily hemodialysis", section on 'Quality of life'.)
Dopamine agonists — Dopamine agonists belong to a class of drugs that directly stimulate dopamine receptors and have a longer half-life (four to six hours) than levodopa (90 minutes). They are generally superior to levodopa for the treatment of daily RLS. In a 2011 meta-analysis of 38 trials evaluating dopamine agonists for the treatment of RLS that included cabergoline, lisuride, pergolide, pramipexole, ropinirole, rotigotine, and sumanirole, all except sumanirole were superior to placebo [106]. In two trials, cabergoline and pramipexole were superior to levodopa for improvement in disease severity as measured by the International Restless Leg Syndrome Study Group rating scale (IRLS).
Pramipexole and ropinirole — The non-ergot dopamine agonists, pramipexole and ropinirole, are less likely to cause side effects than other dopamine agonists. These agents are considered to be the drugs of choice in most patients with daily RLS [102]. They may also be helpful in patients with intermittent RLS.
Adverse effects with pramipexole and ropinirole are usually mild, transient, and limited to nausea, lightheadedness, and fatigue; these usually resolve within 10 to 14 days. Less frequent side effects include nasal stuffiness, constipation, insomnia, and leg edema; these are reversible if the medication is stopped. Sudden, unexpected sleep attacks, as described in patients with Parkinson disease on higher doses of pramipexole, do not appear to occur in patients on low-dose pramipexole (mean of 0.37 mg/day) for RLS [111].
As first reported in patients with Parkinson disease, dopamine agonist therapy in patients with RLS may be associated with an increased risk of impulse control disorders such as pathologic gambling, compulsive eating and shopping, and inappropriate hypersexuality [112]. (See "Pharmacologic treatment of Parkinson disease", section on 'Impulse control disorders'.)
The onset of action for dopamine agonists is typically 90 to 120 minutes after intake. Therefore, these medications should be started two hours before RLS symptoms start [102]. The recommended starting doses are [102]:
Augmentation is less common with these drugs than with levodopa, but it has been reported in up to one-third of patients taking pramipexole for two years [113,114]. The risk of augmentation with ropinirole is unknown [102]. In one study, augmentation was significantly more common in patients with a family history of restless legs syndrome and in those who had no evidence of neuropathy on electromyography or nerve conduction studies [115].
Unlike levodopa, additional doses of a dopamine agonist earlier in the day can often reduce the risk and intensity of augmentation [102]. The development of augmentation with one dopamine agonist does not necessarily predict augmentation with a different agonist [113]. In addition, ropinirole and pramipexole can be substituted for one another. However, therapy should be changed to a different class of medications if augmentation develops with a second dopamine agonist [102].
Other dopamine agonists — Other dopamine agonists are also effective in RLS but are used infrequently.
Levodopa — The efficacy of levodopa (levodopa) for restless legs syndrome has been demonstrated in small randomized trials and a meta-analysis [123]. The following trials illustrate the range of findings:
Tachyphylaxis (a decreasing response with continual treatment) to levodopa has been reported [127], but in one long-term study lasting two years, 26 of 30 patients initially responding to levodopa maintained a good response [128].
Three different problems may occur with patients on levodopa therapy:
An expert advisory panel on RLS recommends levodopa only for intermittent RLS [102]. The risk of augmentation may be decreased with intermittent use of dopaminergic drugs, although this has not been well studied. The expert panel recommends discontinuation of the drug if augmentation occurs [102]. Controlled release levodopa (CR) combined with standard levodopa may help sleep quality during the second half of the night for patients who experience recurrence [131].
For best absorption, levodopa should not be taken with high protein foods. Suggested agents include:
Benzodiazepines — Benzodiazepines are useful in mild cases of RLS, particularly in younger patients [132,133]. Diazepam has been used in RLS for many years, although there have been no controlled trials. In a small randomized, double-blind, crossover trial, treatment with clonazepam, 1.0 mg daily, was superior to placebo in six patients with RLS [134]. In an open trial, 14 of 15 patients with RLS due to uremia responded to clonazepam, 1 to 2 mg daily [135].
An RLS expert panel algorithm recommends benzodiazepines or benzodiazepine agonists for intermittent RLS, especially if the patient has another cause of poor sleep in addition to RLS [102]. Short-acting agents can be helpful for sleep onset insomnia caused by RLS; these agents include:
For RLS that awakens the patient later in the night, the expert panel recommends intermediate acting agents such as temazepam 15 to 30 mg [102].
Although most trials have been performed with clonazepam, its long duration of action may result in more adverse effects, such as nocturnal unsteadiness and drowsiness or cognitive impairment in the morning [102]. However, at least one study has shown a low rate of adverse effects from clonazepam in elderly patients [132].
Long-term maintenance treatment with benzodiazepines is limited by tolerance in many patients, but abuse appears to be low in this disorder.
Gabapentin — Gabapentin and the extended release formulation of gabapentin enacarbil are alternative choices for patients with daily RLS [102,136,137]. Gabapentin, mean dose 733 mg/day, was effective in a four-week open-label study of nine patients with idiopathic RLS [138], and at a much higher mean dose (1,855 mg) in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 22 patients [139]. Among dialysis patients, gabapentin (200 to 300 mg three times weekly after hemodialysis) was effective in a 12-week, double-blind crossover study [140].
Although the trial data above suggest that mean doses of 1800 mg a day are needed, many patients appear to benefit from a lower dose. The expert panel suggests beginning treatment with 100 to 300 mg per dose because of the tendency of the drug to cause somnolence and gait unsteadiness [102].
Gabapentin may be particularly useful in patients whose symptoms are less intense and in patients in whom RLS is perceived as painful. It may also be useful when RLS occurs in the setting of a painful peripheral neuropathy or an unrelated chronic pain syndrome. Gabapentin may also be considered in the treatment of RLS in association with neurodegenerative disorders, such as PD or dementia.
Opioids — A variety of opioids, including codeine and methadone, have been reported to be helpful for RLS in uncontrolled trials [141]. In a double-blind, four week crossover study of 11 patients, oxycodone at a mean dose 15.9 mg/day, was superior to placebo with regard to number of sleep arousals, PLMS frequency, and sleep efficiency [142]. One long-term retrospective study of 113 patients treated with opioids has shown persistent benefit, but a small number of patients developed sleep apnea [143].
Similar to benzodiazepines, opioid abuse potential is low in patients with RLS. Nevertheless, we typically restrict use to patients with more severe symptoms who fail to respond to benzodiazepines or dopaminergic drugs.
The expert RLS panel recommends more liberal use of low potency opioids or opioid agonists for intermittent RLS and as an alternative for daily RLS [102]. These drugs are usually taken before bed and include:
For patients with refractory RLS, the same panel recommends change to a high potency opioid or tramadol as one of four different management approaches (see 'Refractory RLS' above) [102]. High potency opioids may be effective in the management of RLS, and escalation of doses and dependence are uncommon in the absence of a history of substance abuse. High potency opioids may be used one to three times a day depending on timing of symptoms; agents include [102]:
Other drugs — Pregabalin (starting dose 150 mg/daily, mean dose 337 mg/daily) was superior to placebo for improving symptoms of RLS in a 12-week randomized controlled trial of 58 patients [144]. Other drugs that may be useful in RLS but have been reported in only a small number of mainly open studies include carbamazepine (mean dose 236 mg/day) [145], clonidine (0.05 mg/day) [146], propranolol (40 to 120 mg/day) [147], and amantadine (up to 300 mg/day) [148].
INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, “The Basics” and “Beyond the Basics.” The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.
Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on “patient info” and the keyword(s) of interest.)
RECOMMENDATIONS — Recommendations for RLS treatment by the expert panel are listed above (see 'Expert panel recommendations' above). We recommend the following sequence of pharmacologic therapy in patients with RLS:
Combination therapy is often useful, and periodic changes in choice of medication to deal with tolerance are frequently necessary. In some patients, additional doses of medication may be necessary during the day to manage diurnal symptoms.
Cost of medications — The treatment plan should include consideration of prescription costs. Typical monthly costs will be highest for cabergoline; intermediate for pramipexole, ropinirole, and gabapentin; lower for levodopa/carbidopa; and lowest for carbamazepine.
Treatment in pregnancy — The treatment of RLS in pregnant women is complicated by the fact that nearly all of the drugs used for RLS are considered pregnancy risk factor C or D (table 1). The one major exception is pergolide, which has other serious side effects (see 'Other dopamine agonists' above). The following options are therefore suggested:
Most drugs for RLS are not recommended or are not rated by the American Academy of Pediatrics for use during breast feeding. Codeine is considered compatible with breast feeding but should be used with caution.
All topics are updated as new information becomes available. Our peer review process typically takes one to six weeks depending on the issue.