Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2016 UpToDate®

Reducing adverse obstetrical outcomes through safety sciences

Christopher S Ennen, MD, CDR, MC, USN
Andrew J Satin, MD, FACOG
Section Editor
Charles J Lockwood, MD, MHCM
Deputy Editor
Kristen Eckler, MD, FACOG


Patient safety is about minimizing error and preventing harm. Reasons for errors include human fallibility, medical complexity, system deficiencies, and defensive barriers. In 1999, the Institute of Medicine estimated that medical errors account for up to 98,000 deaths each year in the United States [1].

Although there are more than 4 million hospitalizations related to childbirth in the United States each year, there is a paucity of data specifically addressing medical errors in obstetrics. Nevertheless, medical errors do not spare this population and it is likely that strategies to reduce these errors would benefit pregnant women and their children.

Strategies to reduce errors and subsequent adverse outcomes have focused on team and individual training; simulations and drills; development of protocols, guidelines and checklists; use of information technology; and education [1]. These activities and tools apply to inpatient and office settings [2]. Although most studies describe positive reactions among participants and improvements in knowledge, skills, and behavior, data on patient outcomes after clinician training programs are limited [3]. It appears, however, that further investment in healthcare delivery and patient safety science are needed to improve patient outcomes [4].  


Failures in teamwork and communication account for 70 percent of sentinel events in obstetrics [5]. Recognizing this, the Joint Commission, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), and the Institute of Medicine all acknowledge that teamwork/communication is a critical element of patient safety [1,5,6].

In a labor and delivery setting, the patient and her baby are not cared for solely by her obstetric providers, but also by nurses, anesthesia and pediatric providers, and support staff. Formal teamwork training is increasingly becoming a part of the orientation of new hospital staff members, with the goal of improving teamwork and communication [7,8]. There is some evidence (reviewed below) that formal training in these concepts will improve patient safety, team performance, and maternal-fetal outcomes.


Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Sep 2016. | This topic last updated: Aug 27, 2015.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2016 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Kohn, LT, Corrigan, JM, Donaldson, MS, Eds; Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
  2. Erickson TB, Kirkpatrick DH, DeFrancesco MS, Lawrence HC 3rd. Executive summary of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Presidential Task Force on Patient Safety in the Office Setting: reinvigorating safety in office-based gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115:147.
  3. van Lonkhuijzen L, Dijkman A, van Roosmalen J, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of training in emergency obstetric care in low-resource environments. BJOG 2010; 117:777.
  4. Pronovost PJ, Holzmueller CG, Ennen CS, Fox HE. Overview of progress in patient safety. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204:5.
  5. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. JCAHO sentinel event alert #30. 2004.
  6. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee Committee on Patient Safety and Quality Improvement. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 447: Patient safety in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114:1424.
  7. Birnbach DJ, Salas E. Can medical simulation and team training reduce errors in labor and delivery? Anesthesiol Clin 2008; 26:159.
  8. Hunt EA, Shilkofski NA, Stavroudis TA, Nelson KL. Simulation: translation to improved team performance. Anesthesiol Clin 2007; 25:301.
  9. Morey JC, Simon R, Jay GD, et al. Error reduction and performance improvement in the emergency department through formal teamwork training: evaluation results of the MedTeams project. Health Serv Res 2002; 37:1553.
  10. www.raes-hfg.com/reports/crm-now.htm (accessed July 27, 2009).
  11. Mann S, Pratt SD. Team approach to care in labor and delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2008; 51:666.
  12. Alonso, A, Baker, DP, Holtzman, A, et al. Reducing medical error in the Military Health System: How can team training help?. Human Resource Management Review 2006; 16:396.
  13. Nielsen PE, Goldman MB, Mann S, et al. Effects of teamwork training on adverse outcomes and process of care in labor and delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:48.
  14. Mann S, Pratt S, Gluck P, et al. Assessing quality obstetrical care: development of standardized measures. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2006; 32:497.
  15. Pratt SD, Mann S, Salisbury M, et al. John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety and Quality Awards. Impact of CRM-based training on obstetric outcomes and clinicians' patient safety attitudes. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2007; 33:720.
  16. Pettker CM, Thung SF, Norwitz ER, et al. Impact of a comprehensive patient safety strategy on obstetric adverse events. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200:492.e1.
  17. Phipps MG, Lindquist DG, McConaughey E, et al. Outcomes from a labor and delivery team training program with simulation component. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206:3.
  18. Haller G, Garnerin P, Morales MA, et al. Effect of crew resource management training in a multidisciplinary obstetrical setting. Int J Qual Health Care 2008; 20:254.
  19. Nielsen P, Mann S. Team function in obstetrics to reduce errors and improve outcomes. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2008; 35:81.
  20. Scholefield H. Safety in obstetric critical care. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 22:965.
  21. Read JS, Cannon MJ, Stanberry LR, Schuval S. Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of viral infections. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2008; 38:274.
  22. Guise JM, Segel S. Teamwork in obstetric critical care. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 22:937.
  23. McConaughey E. Crew resource management in healthcare: the evolution of teamwork training and MedTeams. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2008; 22:96.
  24. Morgan PJ, Pittini R, Regehr G, et al. Evaluating teamwork in a simulated obstetric environment. Anesthesiology 2007; 106:907.
  25. Guise JM, Deering SH, Kanki BG, et al. Validation of a tool to measure and promote clinical teamwork. Simul Healthc 2008; 3:217.
  26. Ellis D, Crofts JF, Hunt LP, et al. Hospital, simulation center, and teamwork training for eclampsia management: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111:723.
  27. Weller JM, Bloch M, Young S, et al. Evaluation of high fidelity patient simulator in assessment of performance of anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90:43.
  28. Crofts JF, Ellis D, Draycott TJ, et al. Change in knowledge of midwives and obstetricians following obstetric emergency training: a randomised controlled trial of local hospital, simulation centre and teamwork training. BJOG 2007; 114:1534.
  29. Daniels K, Lipman S, Harney K, et al. Use of simulation based team training for obstetric crises in resident education. Simul Healthc 2008; 3:154.
  30. Crofts JF, Fox R, Ellis D, et al. Observations from 450 shoulder dystocia simulations: lessons for skills training. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112:906.
  31. Maslovitz S, Barkai G, Lessing JB, et al. Recurrent obstetric management mistakes identified by simulation. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:1295.
  32. Johannsson H, Ayida G, Sadler C. Faking it? Simulation in the training of obstetricians and gynaecologists. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2005; 17:557.
  33. Macedonia CR, Gherman RB, Satin AJ. Simulation laboratories for training in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102:388.
  34. Argani CH, Eichelberger M, Deering S, Satin AJ. The case for simulation as part of a comprehensive patient safety program. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206:451.
  35. Merién AE, van de Ven J, Mol BW, et al. Multidisciplinary team training in a simulation setting for acute obstetric emergencies: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115:1021.
  36. Thompson S, Neal S, Clark V. Clinical risk management in obstetrics: eclampsia drills. BMJ 2004; 328:269.
  37. Daniels K, Parness AJ. Development and use of mechanical devices for simulation of seizure and hemorrhage in obstetrical team training. Simul Healthc 2008; 3:42.
  38. Gurewitsch ED. Optimizing shoulder dystocia management to prevent birth injury. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 50:592.
  39. Deering S, Poggi S, Macedonia C, et al. Improving resident competency in the management of shoulder dystocia with simulation training. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103:1224.
  40. Goffman D, Heo H, Pardanani S, et al. Improving shoulder dystocia management among resident and attending physicians using simulations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199:294.e1.
  41. Goffman D, Heo H, Chazotte C, et al. Using simulation training to improve shoulder dystocia documentation. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112:1284.
  42. Crofts JF, Bartlett C, Ellis D, et al. Training for shoulder dystocia: a trial of simulation using low-fidelity and high-fidelity mannequins. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108:1477.
  43. Draycott TJ, Crofts JF, Ash JP, et al. Improving neonatal outcome through practical shoulder dystocia training. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112:14.
  44. Inglis SR, Feier N, Chetiyaar JB, et al. Effects of shoulder dystocia training on the incidence of brachial plexus injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204:322.e1.
  45. Grobman WA, Miller D, Burke C, et al. Outcomes associated with introduction of a shoulder dystocia protocol. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205:513.
  46. Walsh JM, Kandamany N, Ni Shuibhne N, et al. Neonatal brachial plexus injury: comparison of incidence and antecedents between 2 decades. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204:324.e1.
  47. Powell J, Gilo N, Foote M, et al. Vacuum and forceps training in residency: experience and self-reported competency. J Perinatol 2007; 27:343.
  48. Maulik D. Adequate training for operative vaginal delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004; 16:145.
  49. Bailey PE. The disappearing art of instrumental delivery: time to reverse the trend. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005; 91:89.
  50. Shaffer BL, Caughey AB. Forceps delivery: potential benefits and a call for continued training. J Perinatol 2007; 27:327.
  51. Dupuis O, Moreau R, Silveira R, et al. A new obstetric forceps for the training of junior doctors: a comparison of the spatial dispersion of forceps blade trajectories between junior and senior obstetricians. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194:1524.
  52. Dupuis O, Moreau R, Pham MT, Redarce T. Assessment of forceps blade orientations during their placement using an instrumented childbirth simulator. BJOG 2009; 116:327.
  53. Moreau R, Jardin A, Pham MT, et al. A new kind of training for obstetric residents: simulator training. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006; 1:4416.
  54. Leslie KK, Dipasquale-Lehnerz P, Smith M. Obstetric forceps training using visual feedback and the isometric strength testing unit. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105:377.
  55. Moreau R, Pham MT, Brun X, et al. Assessment of forceps use in obstetrics during a simulated childbirth. Int J Med Robot 2008; 4:373.
  56. Cheong YC, Abdullahi H, Lashen H, Fairlie FM. Can formal education and training improve the outcome of instrumental delivery? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 113:139.
  57. Deering SH, Chinn M, Hodor J, et al. Use of a postpartum hemorrhage simulator for instruction and evaluation of residents. J Grad Med Educ 2009; 1:260.
  58. Birch L, Jones N, Doyle PM, et al. Obstetric skills drills: evaluation of teaching methods. Nurse Educ Today 2007; 27:915.
  59. Andreatta P, Gans-Larty F, Debpuur D, et al. Evaluation of simulation-based training on the ability of birth attendants to correctly perform bimanual compression as obstetric first aid. Int J Nurs Stud 2011; 48:1275.
  60. Dijkman A, Huisman CM, Smit M, et al. Cardiac arrest in pregnancy: increasing use of perimortem caesarean section due to emergency skills training? BJOG 2010; 117:282.
  61. Fisher N, Eisen LA, Bayya JV, et al. Improved performance of maternal-fetal medicine staff after maternal cardiac arrest simulation-based training. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205:239.e1.
  62. Pittini R, Oepkes D, Macrury K, et al. Teaching invasive perinatal procedures: assessment of a high fidelity simulator-based curriculum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19:478.
  63. Deering S, Brown J, Hodor J, Satin AJ. Simulation training and resident performance of singleton vaginal breech delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:86.
  64. Draycott T, Sibanda T, Owen L, et al. Does training in obstetric emergencies improve neonatal outcome? BJOG 2006; 113:177.
  65. Crofts JF, Bartlett C, Ellis D, et al. Management of shoulder dystocia: skill retention 6 and 12 months after training. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110:1069.
  66. Clark SL, Simpson KR, Knox GE, Garite TJ. Oxytocin: new perspectives on an old drug. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200:35.e1.
  67. Hayes EJ, Weinstein L. Improving patient safety and uniformity of care by a standardized regimen for the use of oxytocin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198:622.e1.
  68. Miller LA. Oxytocin, excessive uterine activity, and patient safety: time for a collaborative approach. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2009; 23:52.
  69. Simpson KR, Knox GE. Oxytocin as a high-alert medication: implications for perinatal patient safety. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2009; 34:8.
  70. Clark S, Belfort M, Saade G, et al. Implementation of a conservative checklist-based protocol for oxytocin administration: maternal and newborn outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197:480.e1.
  71. Clark SL, Belfort MA, Byrum SL, et al. Improved outcomes, fewer cesarean deliveries, and reduced litigation: results of a new paradigm in patient safety. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199:105.e1.
  72. Clark SL, Meyers JA, Frye DK, Perlin JA. Patient safety in obstetrics--the Hospital Corporation of America experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204:283.
  73. Donovan EF, Lannon C, Bailit J, et al. A statewide initiative to reduce inappropriate scheduled births at 36(0/7)-38(6/7) weeks' gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202:243.e1.
  74. Hirsch E, Haney EI, Gordon TE, Silver RK. Reducing high-order perineal laceration during operative vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198:668.e1.
  75. Skupski DW, Lowenwirt IP, Weinbaum FI, et al. Improving hospital systems for the care of women with major obstetric hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:977.
  76. Rizvi F, Mackey R, Barrett T, et al. Successful reduction of massive postpartum haemorrhage by use of guidelines and staff education. BJOG 2004; 111:495.
  77. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144:742.
  78. Unit-Based Safety Program Improves Safety Culture, Reduces Medication Errors and Length of Stay http://www.innovations.ahrq.gov/content.aspx?id=1769 (Accessed on January 20, 2011).
  79. Pronovost PJ, Berenholtz SM, Goeschel C, et al. Improving patient safety in intensive care units in Michigan. J Crit Care 2008; 23:207.
  80. Pronovost P, Weast B, Rosenstein B. Implementing and validating a Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program. J Patient Safety 2005; 1:33.
  81. Timmel J, Kent PS, Holzmueller CG, et al. Impact of the Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP) on safety culture in a surgical inpatient unit. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2010; 36:252.
  82. Committee on Optimizing Graduate Medical Trainee (Resident) Hours and Work Schedules to Improve Patient Safety. Resident duty hours: enhancing sleep, supervision, and safety. National Academies Press, Washington, DC 2008.
  83. Kelly A, Marks F, Westhoff C, Rosen M. The effect of the New York State restrictions on resident work hours. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78:468.
  84. Bailit JL, Weisberger A, Knotek J. Resident job satisfaction and quality of life before and after work hour reform. J Reprod Med 2005; 50:649.
  85. Espey E, Ogburn T, Puscheck E. Impact of duty hour limitations on resident and student education in obstetrics and gynecology. J Reprod Med 2007; 52:345.
  86. Bailit JL, Blanchard MH. The effect of house staff working hours on the quality of obstetric and gynecologic care. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103:613.
  87. Hutter MM, Kellogg KC, Ferguson CM, et al. The impact of the 80-hour resident workweek on surgical residents and attending surgeons. Ann Surg 2006; 243:864.
  88. de Virgilio C, Yaghoubian A, Lewis RJ, et al. The 80-hour resident workweek does not adversely affect patient outcomes or resident education. Curr Surg 2006; 63:435.
  89. Salim A, Teixeira PG, Chan L, et al. Impact of the 80-hour workweek on patient care at a level I trauma center. Arch Surg 2007; 142:708.
  90. Philibert I, Nasca T, Brigham T, Shapiro J. Duty-hour limits and patient care and resident outcomes: can high-quality studies offer insight into complex relationships? Annu Rev Med 2013; 64:467.