Medline ® Abstract for Reference 6
of 'Radiation therapy techniques for newly diagnosed, non-metastatic breast cancer'
Can simulation measurements be used to predict the irradiated lung volume in the tangential fields in patients treated for breast cancer?
Bornstein BA, Cheng CW, Rhodes LM, Rashid H, Stomper PC, Siddon RL, Harris JR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1990;18(1):181.
A simple method of estimating the amount of lung irradiated in patients with breast cancer would be of use in minimizing lung complications. To determine whether simple measurements taken at the time of simulation can be used to predict the lung volume in the radiation field, we performed CT scans as part of treatment planning in 40 cases undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer. Parameters measured from simulator films included: (a) the perpendicular distance from the posterior tangential field edge to the posterior part of the anterior chest wall at the center of the field (CLD); (b) the maximum perpendicular distance from the posterior tangential field edge to the posterior part of the anterior chest wall (MLD); and (c) the length of lung (L) as measured at the posterior tangential field edge on the simulator film. CT scans of the chest were performed with the patient in the treatment position with 1 cm slice intervals, covering lung apex to base. The ipsilateral total lung area and the lung area included within the treatment port were calculated for each CT scan slice, multiplied by the slice thickness, and then integrated over all CT scan slices to give the volumes. The best predictor of the percent of ipsilateral lung volume treated by the tangential fields was the CLD. Employing linear regression analysis, a coefficient of determination r2 = 0.799 was calculated between CLD and percent treated ipsilateral lung volume on CT scan. In comparison, the coefficients for the other parameters were r2 = 0.784 for the MLD, r2 = 0.071 for L, and r2 = 0.690 for CLD x L. A CLD of 1.5 cm predicted that about 6% of the ipsilateral lung would be included in the tangential field, a CLD of 2.5 cm about 16%, and a CLD of 3.5 cm about 26% of the ipsilateral lung, with a mean 90% prediction interval of +/- 7.1% of ipsilateral lung volume. We conclude that the CLD measured at the time of simulation provides a reasonable estimate of the percent of the ipsilateral lung treated by the tangential fields. This information may be of value in evaluating the likelihood of pulmonary complications from such treatment and in minimizing toxicity.
Department of Radiation Therapy, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.